So recently I've been exposed to the terrain theory of medicine. It contradicts the germ theory which states that all infections come from an invading bacteria or virus. Terrain theory states that our body is an ecosystem to all sorts of bacteria and viruses. Sickness is caused when that ecosystem loses balance (due to environmental or lifestyle problems) and allows microorganisms that coexist with us peacefully to now cause infection.
Terrain theory was promoted by Antoine Bechamp, a peer of Louis Pasteur. The latter attempted to use false allegations to silence him, reminding me of the relationship between Nikola Tesla and Thomas Edison. Pasteur was the promoter of germ theory because corporations liked the idea of simply giving chemicals or medicines ($$$) to cure people. Since the early 20th century, the entirety of medicine has been dominated by germ theory, which a lot of people are intuitively doubting in light of coronavirus.
www.westonaprice.org
oawhealth.com
A video introduction:
Terrain theory was promoted by Antoine Bechamp, a peer of Louis Pasteur. The latter attempted to use false allegations to silence him, reminding me of the relationship between Nikola Tesla and Thomas Edison. Pasteur was the promoter of germ theory because corporations liked the idea of simply giving chemicals or medicines ($$$) to cure people. Since the early 20th century, the entirety of medicine has been dominated by germ theory, which a lot of people are intuitively doubting in light of coronavirus.
Whereas most Americans probably have heard of Louis Pasteur (1822–1895), it is doubtful that many are familiar with the name and work of Antoine Béchamp (1816–1908). The two nineteenth-century researchers were scientific contemporaries, compatriots and fellow members of the French Academy of Science, but key differences in their views on biology and disease pathology led to a prolonged rivalry both within and outside of the Academy.1
Béchamp was the more brilliant thinker, but Pasteur had political connections, including Emperor Napoleon III. Reportedly not above “plagiarising and distorting Béchamp’s research,”2 Pasteur achieved fame and fortune largely because his views “were in tune with the science and the politics of his day.”1 Meanwhile, mainstream medical historians relegated Béchamp’s ideas—not as attractive to conventional thinkers—to the intellectual dustbin.3
Pasteur’s promotion of germ theory (a flawed notion that he did not so much “discover” as repackage) has remained “dear to pharmaceutical company executives’ hearts” up to the present day,4 having laid the groundwork for “synthetic drugs, chemotherapy, radiation, surgical removal of body parts and vaccines” to become the “medicine of choice.”5 The unshakeable belief that there is one microbe for every illness is so ingrained as the “controlling medical idea for the Western world” that competing ideas about disease causation still have difficulty gaining traction.6
Over a century after the two Frenchmen’s demise, why bother to revisit their place in history? The answer is that the scientific (and industry) bias in favor of Pasteur’s model has not served the public’s health—to the contrary. Two decades into the twenty-first century, dismal national and international health statistics utterly belie the hype about medical advances.7 In the U.S., for example, over half of all children have one or more chronic conditions,8 as does a comparable proportion of millennials9 and up to 62 percent of Medicaid-population adults.10 Most health care dollars spent in the U.S. (86 percent) are for patients with at least one chronic condition.10 Similar trends are on the rise around the world.11
For those who are able to steel themselves against medical propaganda, it is abundantly clear that the Pasteurian paradigm has failed to deliver. With Americans in such a shocking state of ill health,12 we cannot afford to let the profit-driven pharmaceutical perspective continue to dominate. As one writer more bluntly puts it, “The sooner we get over the legacy of Pasteur’s fake science and get back to reality the better.”13

Germ Theory Versus Terrain: The Wrong Side Won the Day - The Weston A. Price Foundation
An analysis of Louis Pasteur versus Antoine Béchamp's theories.

Béchamp’s research revealed that the inner condition of a person’s cellular terrain determined whether disease would manifest or spread in the body. He proved through rigorous scientific method that disease was not due to germs attacking the body from the outside as Louis Pasteur later convinced the world. What you eat, breathe, drink, and bathe in are the primary factors that determine your body’s inner condition.
Instead of incorporating Béchamp’s discoveries to bring about a health revolution in the world and save countless lives, greedy, power hungry industrialists decided to ostracize his work and put their dollars behind Louis Pasteur’s "Germ Theory of Disease" because it was a way for them to build a colossal pharmaceutical/medical empire for profit. No pharmaceutical company in the world today cares one iota about curing disease. They want to control disease and focus on symptom suppression so they can make huge profits by getting you to become a lifelong user until you die from their poison. That’s why they go to war against disease with all their "anti" this and "anti" that medications instead of addressing the inner condition of a patient and re-establishing homeostasis in the body.

Honoring Antoine Bechamp: The Gentle Giant Of Science & Medicine - OAWHealth
April 15, 1908 one of the greatest scientists who ever lived passed away at the ripe age of 91. You may be thinking to yourself, Who cares or Why is this important. It matters because he was the foremost pioneer of science, medicine, nutrition and genetics all at once and his discoveries could...

Last edited: