German man aquitted of raping 15 year old girl--saying no not enough

[SierraNovember]

I kinda read through most of these comments You guys are entitled to your opinion. If the guy didn't violate German law then fine. The law is the law. But I'm not sure how in the shit not fighting back enough is a concept that exists. The concept disgusts me. If the chick says no ... its just fucking no. Not a big deal, not worth the hassle. It is what it is. And what was the chick suppose to do, risk getting the shit beat of her. Or fight back until she got killed or choked out. Come the fuck on. Man on Man rape is mad serious business. We can all say what the shit we WOULD do in that situation, but regardless of how far we went, Im damn sure we would not want our fight-back ability to be involved in whether or not the guy gets a conviction. Or lets talk about fucking kiddie rape. Well actually, no, I just ate. Again, if the dude didn't violate German law then fine, but I'm not a fan of "she should have fought if it was really rape" shit.

 

[Deluge]

If we start denying that rape exists, we become just as bad as the feminists that deny that false rape exists.

 

[xsplat]

Of course rape exists. But if we say that it exists every time a woman says no and the sex then continues, or if we say that every time a woman says no but has sex anyway then the sex is not consensual, then we are lying and putting innocent men in jail. And we are cock-blocking the natural process of seduction.

 

[Deluge]

Of course rape exists. But if we say that it exists every time a woman says no then and sex continues then the sex is not consensual, then we are lying and putting innocent men in jail. And we are cock-blocking the natural process of seduction.

The dealbreaker here is that she eventually said yes to you. Like in your first post in the thread, she eventually gave permission for "just the tip" and didn't say no again after that.

 

[xsplat]

Of course rape exists. But if we say that it exists every time a woman says no then and sex continues then the sex is not consensual, then we are lying and putting innocent men in jail. And we are cock-blocking the natural process of seduction.

The dealbreaker here is that she eventually said yes to you. Like in your first post in the thread, she eventually gave permission for "just the tip" and didn't say no again after that.

You understand me exactly.

Saying no during the INITIAL stage of sex is not the same as saying no during sex.

Saying no and then continuing on to sex is not a clear boundary to define rape. It's not any sort of boundary at all.

Women say no during sexual escalation all the time. It's just part of the process - it's not some horrible traumatic boundary that can never be crossed without a need for the police to get involved. It's just normal people normal sex.

 

[Samseau]

Of course rape exists. But if we say that it exists every time a woman says no then and sex continues then the sex is not consensual, then we are lying and putting innocent men in jail. And we are cock-blocking the natural process of seduction.

The dealbreaker here is that she eventually said yes to you. Like in your first post in the thread, she eventually gave permission for "just the tip" and didn't say no again after that.

I've had girls tell me no right up until I've put my dick inside of them.


The only thing that matters during the build up to sex is body-language. Everything else is bullshit.