Germany has gone insane

Don Quixote

Ostrich
Orthodox Inquirer
What will happen in Germany? I think these measures will continue and the government response to the insanity will not be to correct the situation, but to just continue to ramp up up surveillance measures and law enforcement powers.
 

Stadtaffe

Kingfisher
Orthodox
Gold Member
I was driving along and picked up a German radio station „Wir haben heute im Studio einen Virenexperte...“ and listened for another few minutes before I had to switch off. The host asked the 'expert' "Do you think the public can be now trusted to protect themselves from the virus?" the latter basically said no, it's more dangerous than we realise, we are still studying new strains!

Was just hilarious in late 2022 that some countries are keeping the story alive and well, nurturing and feeding it, I wonder if someone in Stuttgart is hiding under their kitchen table with a mask on.
 

Stadtaffe

Kingfisher
Orthodox
Gold Member
Nothing that out of the ordinary but a pair of schoolgirls were stabbed recently in Germany, one of which died -
..by a refugee from Africa
Twice I was within days or hours in the same place of an attack of one kind or another in Germany. More recently I was in the same place as a knifing but thankfully missed it by a few hours. It's still not a dangerous place and does not have school shootings like in the USA but it does have this with the knives or vehicles from time to time. Not sure how much it bothers the average German when they read about this kind of thing.
 

paternos

Pelican
Catholic

Germany now officially in recession. It's king of sad to see. Destroying nuclear, destoying industry, destroying farmers, import more migrants.


I wonder if we will ever see a revolt, the psy-op was very effective, the puppet government in Germany is going for full destruction. It's getting BDSM like vibes now, a collective masochistic experience with a sadistic master.

Then seeing the guy screaming in the video above "Nazis raus" "Nazi's out", my goodness. The people really need God. Really need a little of truth.

When I think about Germany, or the decline, I feel like this song:


It's a civilization crumbling in front of your eyes and having 0 means to change a thing.
 
Last edited:

Pete345

Kingfisher
Orthodox
9e4530460b29cdae.png
 

paternos

Pelican
Catholic
Had to check if it's real:

And fourth, Martin Schulz, the president of the European Parliament, is a close friend of mine. On most issues connected to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict we disagree. He is closer to the Israeli mainstream, and his positions resemble those of Labor Party chairman Isaac Herzog. He once told me, during a frank and stern conversation, “For me, the new Germany exists only in order to ensure the existence of the State of Israel and the Jewish people.” He’s a brilliant intellectual and a thoughtful politician, and we don’t need to worry – he won’t give up his existential friendship so easily. And certainly not because of Bennett or his colleague Orit Strock, the party whip.
It's in away funny how these Jews speak on the German President of the European Parliament, like a toy.

Quite a prominent guy, so probably more or less trustworthy. (not just an anonymous blogger that says he said this)

Anyhow not surprising, but still.

Once upon a time, there were different leaders:

Bismarck_pickelhaube.jpgKaiser_Wilhelm_II_of_Germany_-_1902(cropped).jpg
Von Bismarck & Wilhelm II
 

Caduceus

Ostrich
Had to check if it's real:


It's in away funny how these Jews speak on the German President of the European Parliament, like a toy.

Quite a prominent guy, so probably more or less trustworthy. (not just an anonymous blogger that says he said this)

Anyhow not surprising, but still.

Once upon a time, there were different leaders:

View attachment 58384View attachment 58385
Von Bismarck & Wilhelm II


Bismarck is fine, but King Wilhelm II is one of the biggest reasons why Germany is in the mess it is in today.
If World War 1 hadn't been unleashed by him in the year 1914, the entire world would be a much better place today.

Almost all Kings are anointed in churches, temples or other holy places and rule by the grace of God.
When a King (and all his descendants) lose power forever and are unable to reclaim it, I see it as God's will.

Any monarchy that has ruled a country for hundreds (or even thousands of years) and suddenly loses all power and legitimacy forever must have committed great offence to God through their actions and the actions of the court they commanded.
See here:

 
Last edited:

paternos

Pelican
Catholic
Bismarck is fine, but King Wilhelm II is one of the biggest reasons why Germany is in the mess it is in today.
If World War 1 hadn't been unleashed by him in the year 1914, the entire world would be a much better place today.

Almost all Kings are anointed in churches, temples or other holy places and rule by the grace of God.
When a King (and all his descendants) lose power forever and are unable to reclaim it, I see it as God's will.

Any monarchy that has ruled a country for hundreds (or even thousands of years) and suddenly loses all power and legitimacy forever must have committed great offence to God through their actions and the actions of the court they commanded.
See here:

ww1 in my opinion was the result of France, Britain and Russia desiring to break the rising power of the German Reich. It's not that Wilhelm 2 was "the" agressor. He didn't unleash ww1.

I don't agree with your conclusion that he must have offended God. That would have to be the same for tsar Nicolas. Job in the Bible got strong challenges. and many died martyrs death.

Wordly pleasure or success or life is not correlated to the kingdom of heaven.
 

Caduceus

Ostrich
ww1 in my opinion was the result of France, Britain and Russia desiring to break the rising power of the German Reich. It's not that Wilhelm 2 was "the" agressor. He didn't unleash ww1.

Kaiser Wilhelm II planned a major war against the other European powers for years before 1914.
There's ample documentary evidence for this in the imperial German archives.
Here's one major example in December 1912 where Wilhelm II was openly planning it with his cabinet and military leaders:



Also, one of the motivations for a major war were the German federal elections of January 1912 in which for the first time in history the socialists got the most seats in the Reichstag. Germany was on the brink of total socialist rule, and a huge distraction was needed to create an emergency (martial law) status quo, in which all future elections were suspended. In fact, there were no more elections after 1912 until after the war in 1919.

 
Last edited:

paternos

Pelican
Catholic
Kaiser Wilhelm II planned a major war against the other European powers for years before 1914.
There's ample documentary evidence for this in the imperial German archives.
Here's one major example in December 1912 where Wilhelm II was openly planning it with his cabinet and military leaders:



Also, one of the motivations for a major war were the German federal elections of January 1912 in which for the first time in history the socialists got the most seats in the Reichstag. Germany was on the brink of total socialist rule, and a huge distraction was needed to create an emergency (martial law) status quo, in which all future elections were suspended. In fact, there were no more elections after 1912 until after the war in 1919.

Yes exactly we saw the spirit of socialism rising. Essentially the French revolution, the color revolutions of Europe. The end of the monarchies, the end of the church as a power house.

To.the ideal of godless secular society. What you describe is in my opinion allied propaganda. It's the same story that's used for Hitler. If we don't act now evil Hitler will take over all of Europe. That's his idea.

We read in our history books always "Schlieffen plan" which was the "plan of Germany to take over the world"... Think it over 1 plan in the full war.. What is that?

That's a casu Belli propaganda case. Thats what they said over Putin. Putin wants to take over Europe... It's most likely not true. While there will be a plan for sure to do this today.

In the end the socialist international cooperation. UK, France, Russia took over.

The years leading up to the war we saw a rise of weaponisation in Europe. Germany was the rising power.

Look into the "triple entente" in 1907 when Russia signed the deal with France and Uk to become the "allied powers". Against the Central powers.

Especially Russia came out badly in the Russian Revolution in 1917. Getting your empire destroyed by socialists while fighting with the socialists in France against Germany.
End of 19th century for many countries in Europe saw a revival of the church. Ww1 marked the end. And the move to secular godless society.

Breaking up the old structures of rule which we saw in Germany and Russia.

It will never be possible to pinpoint 100%

But the attack was on a deeper level as well as you describe. The" liberation from God" also moved internally in Germany.

After 1918 they secured it with women voting rights in Germany. (The main tool to secure socialist rule)

The old Germany was fighting the enemy inside (comparable to the NGOs today spreading their filth all across the globe pushing color revolutions) and the militarized enemy outside.

It was a culmination of people turning away from God seduced by liberalism and getting seduced by the promises of socialism. Free health, security, let the evil rich bastards pay.

Thats 3ssentially the rule of Europe the last 100 years. Liberalism and Socialism/communism.
 
Last edited:

BarrontheTigercat

Kingfisher
Other Christian
Yes exactly we saw the spirit of socialism rising. Essentially the French revolution, the color revolutions of Europe. The end of the monarchies, the end of the church as a power house.

To.the ideal of godless secular society....

In the end the socialist international cooperation. UK, France, Russia took over.

The years leading up to the war we saw a rise of weaponisation in Europe. Germany was the rising power.

Look into the "triple entente" in 1907 when Russia signed the deal with France and Uk to become the "allied powers". Against the Central powers.

Especially Russia came out badly in the Russian Revolution in 1917.

Breaking up the old structures of rule which we saw in Germany and Russia.

It will never be possible to pinpoint 100%

Thats 3ssentially the rule of Europe the last 100 years. Liberalism and Socialism/communism.
After what you said about the video summary of "Under the Sign of the Scorpion" in the WWI thread, namely that it blamed freemasons and illuminati without going to the crux of the issue - you may be interested to know that the author Jura Lina identifies freemasonry as under the dominion of the Jews and an extension of their power structure.
He traces the Jewish Revolutionary power structure as being active in Vienna as the Illuminati in the 1700s as well as being the driving force behind the French Revolution through the influence of Jewish Secret Societies there.

He identifies the greed that motivated them but that ultimately there was an overarching racial and religious messianism to their conquest of Russia, the Ukraine and Byelorussia that began in 1917.

"Every castle in Russia was plundered, like the funds of larger businesses, which were all confiscated at a later stage anyway. The Bolsheviks tortured people to get at their jewels. They began ruling with starvation as a weapon, just like the Cosa Nostra mafia in Sicily began ruling by exploiting the drought.
All kinds of goods were sent to Berlin.
In 1918 alone, 841 wagons of timber, 1218 railway carriages of meat, two million pounds of flax, etc., were sent.
The "revolutionary" Jews were only interested in themselves. Gleb Boky continued using Uritsky's old trick of demanding large amounts from hostages, the money finding its way into his own pocket.
The GPU discovered in 1932 that Ganetsky had 60 million Swiss francs in a bank account in Geneva. (Igor Bunich, "The Party's Gold", St. Petersburg, 1992, p. 42.)
In October 1918, Jewish bankers in Berlin received 47 cases of gold from Russia, containing 3125 kilos of gold, 191 bars.
All of this had been plundered from the Russian people, gold that later became infamous as "the Jewish gold".
50 000 German marks and 300 000 Tsar-roubles were also handed over.
In the autumn of 1917, the Jewish banker Mendelssohn in Berlin received 50 676 kilos of stolen Russian gold, 113 636 roubles (which was equivalent to 48 819 kilos of gold). Mendelssohn's signature in the Communist party archives is witness to the fact that he received these riches: a serious case of receiving stolen goods.
(Viktor Kuznetsov, "The Secret of the October Coup", St. Petersburg, 2001, p. 51.)" (page 278 Under the Sign of the Scorpion.)

He continues:
"The Communists burned millions of valuable books and rare manuscripts. 95 per cent of the cultural heritage sites were destroyed.
As late as l970, a Soviet functionary said openly to the director Yuri Lyubimov: "We need neither Bulgakov nor Dostoevsky..." (Edasi, 2nd of August l988,p. 6.)
Undesirable books have also been burned in Israel.
On the 23rd of March 1980 hundreds of copies of the New Testament were publicly and ceremonially burnt in Jerusalem under the auspices of Yad Le'akhim, a Jewish religious organisation subsidised by the Israeli Ministry of Religions. (Israel Shahak, "Jewish History, Jewish Religion", London, 1994, p. 21.)
The Bolsheviks actually did everything they could to leave the remaining Russians in the "ethnic sewer" Marx spoke of.
They wanted to crush the people's spirit and morals through total poverty and force them into crime and alcoholism.
So doing, they wanted to make the workers less dangerous. They certainly succeeded. Everybody was afraid of the Communists.
The Jacobins had also struck terror into their subjects to make them easier to rule.
2500 years ago the Chinese philosopher Sun Tzu (490 B.C.) wrote his "The Art of War ", where he described the most effective tactics against an enemy country in a way which is just as relevant today: "Everything which is valuable in the enemy's country must be knocked town and destroyed... Co-operate with the worst and vilest of creatures. Provoke fights and conflicts between the citizens... Degrade the traditions of the enemy and wipe out his history. Infiltrate society with spies."
International Communism used a technique similar to this against the Russian society. They began to eliminate traditions by re-naming 1200 Russian cities and towns and changing millions of street names.
During the new generation, the Communists began to use the most efficient socialist means to arrest the spiritual and psychological development of society - the paths of study were closed for the talented and were only made available to the unintelligent."

(Page 279, Under the Sign of the Scorpion.)

As regards the bolded above, "In the end the socialist international cooperation. UK, France, Russia took over." Lina gives a tantalising detail in the following paragraph to be found on page 280 of the aforementioned book "Under the Sign of the Scorpion".

"The international financial elite decided as early as 1814, at the Vienna Congress, that Russia must be destroyed as a revenge on the Russian Tsar, who was against the plans to create the >>European Social Community<<<.

The Bolshevik executors believed they had justice on their side, since (in their interpretation) the God of the Jews had given them the right to exterminate all undesirable races
(Deuteronomy 7:22-25).
Their God had also given them the right to enslave other peaceful races (Deuteronomy 20:10-11). Karl Radek proclaimed that it was a bourgeois prejudice to act as if work led to freedom.
The sensible Jewish author A. B. Jehoshua confirmed: "For me, the catastrophe in Judaism is the idea of being the chosen people..." (Dagens Nyheter, 3rd January 1988.)
But does not Zionism build its entire ideology on the myth about "God's chosen people"? It is a racist ideology, even though the UN no longer considers it as such." (Page 280)"

Jura Lina was clear, as well as the likes of Solzhenitsyn and the historian Anthony Sutton, that the Russian Revolution wasn't Russian at all, nor Ukrainian, nor Slavic, nor Christian.
It was part of a Jewish conquest of Europe.

How many times in the 1800s did fevered Zionist intellectuals write both openly and confidentially to one another speaking of "the coming European Wars" and "the Planned Wars in Europe"? Its a rhetorical question. So many times.
It was their messianic plan just as racial replacement of the European peoples is their current messianic plan.

Hiram Maxim the jew recalls being admonished in Vienna in 1882 to quit his "chemistry and electricity" and to "invent something that will enable these Europeans (goyim) to slit each others throats with greater facility!"

His Maxim Machine Gun had the odd design specification that it would fire the number - 666 - rounds, per minute..
 
Last edited:

paternos

Pelican
Catholic
After what you said about the video summary of "Under the Sign of the Scorpion" in the WWI thread, namely that it blamed freemasons and illuminati without going to the crux of the issue - you may be interested to know that the author Jura Lina identifies freemasonry as under the dominion of the Jews and an extension of their power structure.
He traces the Jewish Revolutionary power structure as being active in Vienna as the Illuminati in the 1700s as well as being the driving force behind the French Revolution through the influence of Jewish Secret Societies there.

He identifies the greed that motivated them but that ultimately there was an overarching racial and religious messianism to their conquest of Russia, the Ukraine and Byelorussia that began in 1917.

"Every castle in Russia was plundered, like the funds of larger businesses, which were all confiscated at a later stage anyway. The Bolsheviks tortured people to get at their jewels. They began ruling with starvation as a weapon, just like the Cosa Nostra mafia in Sicily began ruling by exploiting the drought.
All kinds of goods were sent to Berlin.
In 1918 alone, 841 wagons of timber, 1218 railway carriages of meat, two million pounds of flax, etc., were sent.
The "revolutionary" Jews were only interested in themselves. Gleb Boky continued using Uritsky's old trick of demanding large amounts from hostages, the money finding its way into his own pocket.
The GPU discovered in 1932 that Ganetsky had 60 million Swiss francs in a bank account in Geneva. (Igor Bunich, "The Party's Gold", St. Petersburg, 1992, p. 42.)
In October 1918, Jewish bankers in Berlin received 47 cases of gold from Russia, containing 3125 kilos of gold, 191 bars.
All of this had been plundered from the Russian people, gold that later became infamous as "the Jewish gold".
50 000 German marks and 300 000 Tsar-roubles were also handed over.
In the autumn of 1917, the Jewish banker Mendelssohn in Berlin received 50 676 kilos of stolen Russian gold, 113 636 roubles (which was equivalent to 48 819 kilos of gold). Mendelssohn's signature in the Communist party archives is witness to the fact that he received these riches: a serious case of receiving stolen goods.
(Viktor Kuznetsov, "The Secret of the October Coup", St. Petersburg, 2001, p. 51.)" (page 278 Under the Sign of the Scorpion.)

He continues:
"The Communists burned millions of valuable books and rare manuscripts. 95 per cent of the cultural heritage sites were destroyed.
As late as l970, a Soviet functionary said openly to the director Yuri Lyubimov: "We need neither Bulgakov nor Dostoevsky..." (Edasi, 2nd of August l988,p. 6.)
Undesirable books have also been burned in Israel.
On the 23rd of March 1980 hundreds of copies of the New Testament were publicly and ceremonially burnt in Jerusalem under the auspices of Yad Le'akhim, a Jewish religious organisation subsidised by the Israeli Ministry of Religions. (Israel Shahak, "Jewish History, Jewish Religion", London, 1994, p. 21.)
The Bolsheviks actually did everything they could to leave the remaining Russians in the "ethnic sewer" Marx spoke of.
They wanted to crush the people's spirit and morals through total poverty and force them into crime and alcoholism.
So doing, they wanted to make the workers less dangerous. They certainly succeeded. Everybody was afraid of the Communists.
The Jacobins had also struck terror into their subjects to make them easier to rule.
2500 years ago the Chinese philosopher Sun Tzu (490 B.C.) wrote his "The Art of War ", where he described the most effective tactics against an enemy country in a way which is just as relevant today: "Everything which is valuable in the enemy's country must be knocked town and destroyed... Co-operate with the worst and vilest of creatures. Provoke fights and conflicts between the citizens... Degrade the traditions of the enemy and wipe out his history. Infiltrate society with spies."
International Communism used a technique similar to this against the Russian society. They began to eliminate traditions by re-naming 1200 Russian cities and towns and changing millions of street names.
During the new generation, the Communists began to use the most efficient socialist means to arrest the spiritual and psychological development of society - the paths of study were closed for the talented and were only made available to the unintelligent."

(Page 279, Under the Sign of the Scorpion.)

As regards the bolded above, "In the end the socialist international cooperation. UK, France, Russia took over." Lina gives a tantalising detail in the following paragraph to be found on page 280 of the aforementioned book "Under the Sign of the Scorpion".

"The international financial elite decided as early as 1814, at the Vienna Congress, that Russia must be destroyed as a revenge on the Russian Tsar, who was against the plans to create the >>European Social Community<<<.

The Bolshevik executors believed they had justice on their side, since (in their interpretation) the God of the Jews had given them the right to exterminate all undesirable races
(Deuteronomy 7:22-25).
Their God had also given them the right to enslave other peaceful races (Deuteronomy 20:10-11). Karl Radek proclaimed that it was a bourgeois prejudice to act as if work led to freedom.
The sensible Jewish author A. B. Jehoshua confirmed: "For me, the catastrophe in Judaism is the idea of being the chosen people..." (Dagens Nyheter, 3rd January 1988.)
But does not Zionism build its entire ideology on the myth about "God's chosen people"? It is a racist ideology, even though the UN no longer considers it as such." (Page 280)"

Jura Lina was clear, as well as the likes of Solzhenitsyn and the historian Anthony Sutton, that the Russian Revolution wasn't Russian at all, nor Ukrainian, nor Slavic, nor Christian.
It was part of a Jewish conquest of Europe.

How many times in the 1800s did fevered Zionist intellectuals write both openly and confidentially to one another speaking of "the coming European Wars" and "the Planned Wars in Europe"? Its a rhetorical question. So many times.
It was their messianic plan just as racial replacement of the European peoples is their current messianic plan.

Hiram Maxim the jew recalls being admonished in Vienna in 1882 to quit his "chemistry and electricity" and to "invent something that will enable these Europeans (goyim) to slit each others throats with greater facility!"

His Maxim Machine Gun had the odd design specification that it would fire the number - 666 - rounds, per minute..
I'll take a better look at juro lina and read this book. Sounds really interesting. What you write here seems directionally right.

I don't know about all the individual facts. But that Jews are the international power brokers and financial rulers since 1800 ia obvious to me.

The breaking of strong independent jew-critical (Chrisyian) countries has been their goal. This democratic liberal socialist society is the perfect soil for the Jew.

That why they hated Hitler because he spoke what it was; Jewish internationalism. The problems of liberalism and Socialism/communism.

Ww1 was just the first act of WW2. Same players. Same goal.

Somehow it's a huge shame that Germany and Russia never were able to become allies before WW1.

That would have been very interesting.

I'd love to do more research into that. Why that didn't happen? Because they could have made great partners.

It also shows why the Jews needed to blow.up this piprline between Germany and Russia
 
Top