Globalists agree: the majority of the world population supports Globalism

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
If the machine made good coffee quickly it would be hard to pass up, even at a comparative price.

These days I've had to get into the habit of sipping my soy mochachinolatte before I leave the store so I can decide whether I want to keep it or ask for a refund. The minimum wage peasantry isn't what it used to be.

I suppose in France they still have higher standards for such things.
 

ilostabet

Pelican
Orthodox Inquirer
Hey, it's the great promise of capitalism. Your car can double as a taxi, your apartment can double as a hotel and you can yourself double as whatever professional service you need. That is if you own something to begin with.

Aren't we lucky for having thrown away the 'servitude' of feudalism...
 

Avoy

 
Banned
Leonard D Neubache said:
If the machine made good coffee quickly it would be hard to pass up, even at a comparative price.

These days I've had to get into the habit of sipping my soy mochachinolatte before I leave the store so I can decide whether I want to keep it or ask for a refund. The minimum wage peasantry isn't what it used to be.

I suppose in France they still have higher standards for such things.

Funny. Automation does lend itself to greater consistency. I'm curious to try one of these $6 Robo Burgers (also in San Francisco).


Listen and you'll catch the creator using Globlists talking points about automation (mentioned the NYT article). 5% work time to be creative / read a book - hahaha



I think this will catch on. In the condo tower where I live, food delivery services seem to be pretty popular. Who actually prepares the food doesn't really matter. In the future, folks will get trained to assist, program, maintain, and repair bots.
 

Oberrheiner

 
Banned
Leonard D Neubache said:
I suppose in France they still have higher standards for such things.

In my experience it's only really in italy where you can drop by anywhere and get a great coffee (and it will almost always be cheap too).

Anywhere else (france included) and you have to know where to go.
Acceptable is easy to find here, great takes some searching.
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
The real trouble here is the rotating workforce. I'd like to imagine people are moving ahead with their lives and getting better jobs but based on the service quality I'd say they're all being fired and re-hired somewhere else in a never ending merry-go-round of shit-tier employment.

So you can go back to the place where you got great coffee last week but now there's a different chick serving and you're back to square one.

There must be something about running businesses that escapes me. I keep thinking "why don't you guys pay a bit above minimum wage and get good employees that will stay longer than a month, provide good service, stop you having to train new bozos and keep your customers happy" but if it were that simple surely some of these businesses would be doing it already.
 

Oberrheiner

 
Banned
Well it would hurt the bottom line - you're not here to sell good coffee but to make money after all :tard:
See attali and his one-legged trousers joke :)
https://www.gilad.co.uk/writings/the-jewish-notion-of-capitalism-jacques-attali.html

It's the financialization of the whole world basically.
Although I must admit that most people can't make the difference between a real coffee and some poisonous black piss, but an honest man would not just use that as an excuse to serve them the latter.

I don't know what to say .. it seems there are no more honest men left, we are all merchants now :(
 

ilostabet

Pelican
Orthodox Inquirer
Leonard D Neubache said:
The real trouble here is the rotating workforce. I'd like to imagine people are moving ahead with their lives and getting better jobs but based on the service quality I'd say they're all being fired and re-hired somewhere else in a never ending merry-go-round of shit-tier employment.

So you can go back to the place where you got great coffee last week but now there's a different chick serving and you're back to square one.

There must be something about running businesses that escapes me. I keep thinking "why don't you guys pay a bit above minimum wage and get good employees that will stay longer than a month, provide good service, stop you having to train new bozos and keep your customers happy" but if it were that simple surely some of these businesses would be doing it already.

I can at least speak of the Portuguese situation, which I assume resembles the rest of Western Europe. There's very few incentives to do that, and still wouldn't improve the quality employees that much, because taxes are so high that even if you raise salaries you'll pay a lot more taxes but the net salary of the employee would still be very low, so it's not much of an incentive; plus automation can easily replace these people anyway. I've started to see coffee shops and stores where you don't give your money to the cashier (it doesn't even makes sense to call them this anymore), you put your money in a machine that gives you the exact change. The person is there to get the food, coffee, whatever, from the kitchen or counter to you. You can get decent coffee (expresso) in Portugal pretty much anywhere, but a lot of them are now based on single-served Nespresso machines, so the waiter doesn't really matter. Even if an employer wants to give higher end service, he either has to raise prices to cover the higher costs, which is risky, or the external pressures of competitors implementing cheaper measures will drive him to do the same - or go out of business. Besides, these types of jobs are now obviously 'transition' jobs. No one thinks, or can realistically expect, anymore to work in something forever - much less service jobs. I still remember the neighborhood convenience store being operated by the same old guy that had been there since who knows when, probably hired when he was 14 or something. This doesn't exist anymore, because you can't support a family on that salary, and besides, these kinds of small businesses (even coffee shops) are being driven out by larger chains that are the same anywhere and have a competitive advantage because of their numerous locations, optimized processes, legal and fiscal teams, etc. The trend exists in all industries: uniformization and consolidation.
 

Avoy

 
Banned
These are 10 professional jobs that are threatened by advances big data and machine learning, according to Forbes.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernar...essional-jobs-are-under-threat-from-big-data/

1. Healthcare
Some aspects of a doctor’s job can now be done by computers. For example, surgeons already use automated robotic systems to aid with less invasive procedures. IBM ’s Watson proved it can diagnose lung cancer from analyzing MRI scans much more reliably than real people. In addition, the UCSF Medical Center recently launched an automated, robotics-controlled pharmacy at two UCSF hospitals that automatically dispense prescriptions based on barcodes scanned by nurses. In fact, Johnson & Johnson has an FDA-approved device that can deliver low levels of anesthesia automatically — no anesthesiologist required.

2. Insurance
Much of what insurance brokers and insurance underwriters do today can be done by computers using big data and machine learning. Formulas have been used for decades to determine how much insurance a person is qualified for and at what rate, but new tools will automate the decision-making process even more.

3. Architects
Programs already exist to help individuals design their own homes, making architectural skill and even design and color choices more automated. For now, most people are using the software mostly as a visualization tool, or to replace architects for very small projects. But as the sophistication of the programs improves, so will the need for human architects and designers diminish.

4. Journalists
Much of what journalists do can now be automated using machine learning tools such as narrative science that creates natural language news stories from analyzing data. In fact, if you’ve read a financial earnings report in the past year or two, you’ve probably read an article or press release generated by a machine. The first places these programs will be used is in financial and sports reporting, which rely heavily on data and numbers, but other fields are not far behind. Services are already appearing that “scrape” content from news sites and “rewrite” it to avoid outright plagiarism but include the same content for websites.

5. Financial industry
Algorithms can now analyze financial data and prepare accounts (as well as do tax returns) — without the need for accountants. Bank tellers have already been partially replaced by ATMs, but soon even higher level bankers, including loan officers, could be easily replaced by automated systems. Even governments are now using big data and machine learning to check tax returns and identify potential fraud in tax matters. We know that computers are already being used to make stock trades faster than humans ever could and they’re even used to predict how the market will react and make recommendations whether you should buy or sell.

6. Teachers
The job of teachers will definitely change with the digitization. Studies have already shown that algorithms used to customize leaning to individual pupils based on their progress and understanding can be more effective than a human teacher. While this may be a boon to school districts desperate to find qualified individuals to teach, it may also eventually reduce the role of classroom teacher to that of proctor or babysitter — or eliminate it altogether.

7. Human Resources
Human resources, headhunting and hiring is already being affected by data mining as algorithms take on the job of sorting through resumes to find the perfect candidates. Other jobs of human resources, including collecting and filing paperwork, advising employees about benefits, etc., can easily be automated.

8. Marketing and Advertising
Marketing is all about that most human of skills, persuasion and manipulation. But even that is being successfully outsourced to computers. Persado, a natural language software firm, has put its computers to the task of writing compelling email subject lines for large retail organizations that can as much as double open rates. Companies are also experimenting with automated ad buying: instead of having people choose which magazines to place ads in and on which pages, the computers take care of it, using billions of data points for reference.

9. Lawyers and Paralegals
In the discovery phase of a lawsuit, lawyers and paralegals can be required to sift through thousands, even tens of thousands of documents depending on the case. Now, sophisticated databases can use big data techniques including syntactic analysis and keyword recognition to accomplish the same tasks in much less time. In fact, it’s likely that a Watson-style machine learning system could be legally “trained” to review precedent and case history and even draft legal briefs — which has traditionally been the job of lower level law firm associates. But don’t think it’s only the lowly junior associates whose jobs are at risk: lawyers are well paid now to predict the outcome of major cases, but a statistical model created by researchers at Michigan State University and South Texas College of Law was able to predict the outcome of almost 71 percent of U.S. Supreme Court cases. That ability to predict outcomes is possibly the most valuable (and lucrative) service lawyers provide, and it was easily matched by a computer.

10. Law Enforcement
Predictive policing is a hot-button topic. Many critics say that predictive policing is an infringement of civil liberties, but it’s not all as “Minority Report” as many people believe. In 2003, the same sorts of algorithms retailers like Wal-Mart use to predict demand for products was used to predict demand for police presence in New York City on New Year’s Eve, and the results were striking: 47 percent fewer random gunfire incidents, and a $15,000 savings in personnel costs during the 8-hour period. Better risk prediction could decrease the number of officers needed at any given time and for any given department.
 

Avoy

 
Banned
I didn't see this coming. Are we too critical of the World Economic Forum? The founder is open to right-leaning ideas and individuals. A movement at the forum dubbed Alt-Globalization.

440px-Klaus_Schwab_WEF_2008_%2802%29.jpg


https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/economy/2019/01/rise-right-wing-globalists

Over the past two years, the founder of the World Economic Forum has extended his hand to the right-wing advocates of alternative globalisation. The 80-year-old engineer and economist Klaus Schwab last year defended Trump and this year warmly introduced Bolsonaro for his Davos debut. Schwab has absorbed the talking points of right-wing critics into his own lexicon. He dropped a statement into a 2018 interview with the Wall Street Journal that echoed the Leave campaign, arguing that “people want to have control back. And they want not to be dictated to by Brussels in everything that they are doing.” Some have accused Schwab of faking populism. Yet there’s reason to believe he’s for real.

The cynical view: the WEF now has token populists in attendance to show how diverse they are in an auditorium full of lefties.
 

Avoy

 
Banned
If the Democratic Socialists of America have their way, "guaranteed income" is included in their Green New Deal resolution for all those unable or unwilling to work within the next 10 years. Curious what they consider a family-sustainable wage? Renting a room in San Francisco costs about $30K a year and earning a combined income of $100K year is considered "low income" for a family in the Bay Area.

HUD says a family of four in San Francisco or San Mateo County with an income of $105,350 is considered “low income.”

For Alameda and Contra Costa County, $80,400 is considered low income.

More here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_New_Deal

tec541g6x7f21.png
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
"Adequate" is an opinion and while most lower class citizens of first world nations expect they'll be getting an improvement what will actually be the case is that virtually everyone except the elites ends up in second world North Korea style concrete box apartments where it's just barely warm enough to survive in winter and just barely cool enough not to go insane in summer.

When even a socialist uses a word as ugly as "adequate" you know you're fucked.
 

Avoy

 
Banned
Trump the Globalist?

People are talking about Trump's comments at the SOTU regarding his support for increasing legal immigration to the "largest numbers ever" -- opposite to the reductions he said he would do before getting elected.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...ore-wage-crushing-legal-immigration-we-agree/

Here's Trump expanding on that...

“We need people in our country because our unemployment numbers are so low and we have massive numbers of companies coming back into our country,” Trump reportedly told the media this week.

“I need people coming in because we need people to run the factories and plants and companies that are moving back in,” Trump said. “We need people.”

Basically, forget higher wages for all Americans... we need to be competitive in the Global market is what he's saying. It's a win-win for corporations and shareholders. Has anything changed lately with workers being asked to work less than 35 hours week so they're not considered full-time and be eligible for benefits?

Breitbart reports:

Every one percent increase in the immigrant composition of an American workers’ occupation reduces their weekly wages by about 0.5 percent, researcher Steven Camarotta concludes. This means the average native-born American worker today has their wage reduced by perhaps 8.5 percent because of current legal immigration levels.

Likewise, every one percent increase in the immigrant composition of low-skilled U.S. occupations reduces wages by about 0.8 percent. Should 15 percent of low-skilled jobs be held by foreign-born workers, it would reduce the wages of native-born American workers by perhaps 12 percent.
 

Once Was Not

Kingfisher
Avoy said:
Trump the Globalist?

People are talking about Trump's comments at the SOTU regarding his support for increasing legal immigration to the "largest numbers ever" -- opposite to the reductions he said he would do before getting elected.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...ore-wage-crushing-legal-immigration-we-agree/

Here's Trump expanding on that...

“We need people in our country because our unemployment numbers are so low and we have massive numbers of companies coming back into our country,” Trump reportedly told the media this week.

“I need people coming in because we need people to run the factories and plants and companies that are moving back in,” Trump said. “We need people.”

giphy.gif


Sweet Christ tell me he didn't actually say this? Combined with the feminist bullshit and ww2 crap I think we might have totally lost him. It's only been barely over 2 years. But hey at least we're fighting antisemitism and white nationalism right guys?

I wonder what other goodies I missed in this SOTU.

Nationalist my ass.
 

Avoy

 
Banned
It just occurred to me... Democrat's talk of "reparations" to Blacks is really just a Universal Basic Income (UBI) program wrapped in a Social Justice cloth. No matter what they call it its intention is "to break the cycle of poverty."

https://abc7chicago.com/5127392/

UBI will also be pitched to working-class Americans once automation and AI knock people's wages and job opportunities further down. UBI is currently being tested in countries like Brazil and Italy. It's an interesting space to watch.

Supposedly, a "robot tax" -- not unlike the "carbon tax" -- is going to help pay for these welfare programs.

 

Avoy

 
Banned
nomadbrah said:
Trump just reads stuff handed to him by President Kushner.

Could be. Also, Ramzpaul has a theory. Ivanka is Trump's Madonna figure. He loves no one more in the world. His positions can easily change or evolve based on her and her husband's influence. Hence, Trump's backing of Israel, Women's Empowerment, etc.

 

Avoy

 
Banned
5c628b37dda4c8425b8b456b.jpg


Never mind your concerns about AI's impact on jobs and society... Trump believes it is of "paramount importance" to America's national security and is backing big-tech in their endeavors 100%.

https://www.rt.com/usa/451241-trump-order-ai-dominance/

A new executive order signed by Trump on Monday warns the US government against falling behind its strategic competitors in the race for AI supremacy. The order says that “continued American leadership” in the high-tech sector is of “paramount importance to maintaining the economic and national security” of the US and it is the Trump administration policy to “sustain and enhance” it.

The freshly-signed document outlines five principles to guide the US federal agencies as they embark on implementing the ambitious plan. One is to “train current and future generations of American workers with the skills to develop and apply AI technologies” as well as to nurture public trust in AI.

Pro-women empowerment, pro-migration, pro-AI... so what other Globalist initiatives is he currently or going to be backing soon?

Meanwhile, Hungry just came up with a brilliant way to increase child birth rates without have to import outsiders.

2j81stu3ozf21.jpg


I think it's fair to say at this point that the US will continue to morph into whatever it wants to become for competitive advantage on the world stage under the guise of the economy and national security. As you know... being #1 is of "paramount importance." USA! USA! USA!
 

ilostabet

Pelican
Orthodox Inquirer
Trump was always a corporate nationalist, as in, the nation is only as good as the corporation it serves.

National interests are corporate interests and corporations only care about the collective.

European descendents are simply not profitable at the moment. They consume too much and produce too little. The independents that actually produce value for a comunnity are a statistic nuisance. And regardless, the only community the corporation cares about is a global one, the more unified and homogenized the better, as it's easier maintain. So those will be exploited until they are wiped out. The rest will either be part of the elite or mix into the unifed, anything but human, race.

But do not worry, every country is on the same train, or will be eventually, with or without nationalists.
 

Avoy

 
Banned
People are waking up and not buying the propaganda. Will YouTube censor and come to the rescue? The dislikes are strong with this one. I'm refraining from watching it -- just quickly scrubbed through.

"Awareness is growing that climate impacts and hits women and girls the hardest...."

TED Talk: How empowering women and girls can help stop global warming

 
Top