Google internal memo on gender gap triggers everyone

[John Michael Kane]

The article is publicly supported by many people internally.
Begs the question, how many privately support/agreee/subscribe.

— Sarah Adams (@sadams007) August 5, 2017

This Sarah Adams is apparently - "proudly bipolar".

Oh rly...?

Also, I just noted a "reee" in her writing of "agreee".

Can you imagine that people actually have different opinions, and more importantly, they haven't been fired for them...YET! It is 2017 people, muh feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeelz!

 

[Steve McQueen]

Promote that man, tells it like it is

 

[Jetset]

Promote that man, tells it like it is

We could go so far as to say that he's a real straight shooter.

 

[Aurini]

Relevant portion of his article:

[2] Of course, I may be biased and only see evidence that supports my viewpoint. In terms of political biases, I consider myself a classical liberal and strongly value individualism and reason. I’d be very happy to discuss any of the document further and provide more citations.

A twitter exchange I had over it last night:







As things stand, his "Classical Liberal" moderate position would drive him to denounce us as a bunch of sexist/racist/homophobic/troglodytes; he's fighting our common enemy, but so long as he clings to unworkable beliefs in "equality" he's an erstwhile ally at best. He repeatedly celebrates diversity in his post, while lamenting that the Left is going "Too Far." It's like nerds who complain about the new Doctor Who being a woman: they say they're not opposed to the sex change, they just don't like how it's being done (since being sexist is evil, of course).

Oh really? Care to explain how it SHOULD have been done?

Leftism is founded upon tenets which are demonstrably false; thus it finds itself in opposition to objective reality - it finds itself in rebellion to God. It's a tyrannical movement, which demands that all others must share it's delusions, so that those delusions can made true, and it will crush any and all who oppose it.

This man's about to get bent over; the question is, will he break, and proclaim his love of Big Brother? Or will he finally admit that the whole belief system is a lie, and join us over here in the Truth movement? Until he abandons his own Leftist lies, he cannot be trusted not to betray those who support him.

Just a reminder - it's the troglodytes who get laid:

 

[Disco_Volante]

Women and the left only recognize differences in the sexes when it suits them. Working construction, oil rigs, etc... yea men are different we don't care.

But if it's a 'glamorous' job at a tech company, all of a sudden they demand we ignore the mental differences. I don't think 'tech' jobs became in vogue until at least the late 90s anyways. Only dry nerds really got into programming in the early days, but media made it seem cool now the women demand places and their totalitarian masters are happy to use it to attack men further.

If programming became uncool again, they would stop giving a shit about the different abilities just like garbage collectors are all men.

 

[Bacchus]

Writing 'biological factors keep women and minorities out of tech' at Google in 2017 is like writing 'the Eucharist is just bread' in the Catholic Church during the middle ages.

 

[El Chinito loco]

It's a bold move but not very smart i'm afraid. He's going to get shitcanned with all the hysteria and triggering going on and google will replace him with 10 indian code monkeys.

 

[TooFineAPoint]

While it's true from a macro level that he did a stupid thing assuming that he could have a good faith convo about this issue openly, imagine what it is like from his point of view.

He's likely someone who any of us would consider borderline soy in manner and dispositions. He probably also happens to be really damn good at what he does, and to be a true believer in his company (and I don't blame him, Google is excellent in many respects, no matter what they do politically). And at the end of they day, he probably really gives a shit about pursuing an objective view of reality (given the nature of his job).

What does he see around him? Diversity hires coming in and diluting his life's work. Diluting the work of his beloved company! He thinks "oh these people are nice and everything, I wish them the best. But they don't belong here. They will end up unhappy because they are not up to snuff, and we will be unhappy having to carry them on our backs. I'm back in highschool again, doing the entire group project because the dumb girl and the hot girl and the jock are too busy and/or uninterested and/or incapable of contributing. I just need to make people aware, and once they realize what is happening, we can sort this out."

He most likely limited his view to that range. And in nearly any normal position that might have been enough. A less tainted culture or company would have had a few alpha leaders present who could have backed his cause and made it more palatable to normies and fence sitters.

But where he is now, he'll end up like Ned Stark in Game Of Thrones.

 

[El Chinito loco]

But if it's a 'glamorous' job at a tech company, all of a sudden they demand we ignore the mental differences. I don't think 'tech' jobs became in vogue until at least the late 90s anyways. Only dry nerds really got into programming in the early days, but media made it seem cool now the women demand places and their totalitarian masters are happy to use it to attack men further.

Media has been pushing this women in tech narrative hard for the past 20 years at least. I can name countless shitty movies and tv shows where it's always some model who is a "hacker" or tech genius. I seem to recall this nonsense cropping up a lot sometime around the old dot com boom and hollywood has gone full retard with it in the past 5 years.

The number of times i've encountered a woman who is really knowledgeable about tech (or any other technical field) in real life: Zero.

A skilled woman in tech is about as fictional as superheroes who can fly and shoot lasers from their eyes. I'm sure there's maybe .000001% women who are actually into coding but most likely they have ham hock legs with cottage cheese thighs and big giant floppy veiny breasts along with a female 'stache.

 

[CynicalContrarian]

I think I can pinpoint the moment of Google's decline...

 

[Suits]

Writing 'biological factors keep women and minorities out of tech' at Google in 2017 is like writing 'the Eucharist is just bread' in the Catholic Church during the middle ages in 2017.

Fixed that for you.

 

[philosophical_recovery]

Mister Metokur, of shitlording gamergate fame, has a takedown here:



The timing is interesting with the proximity to Jordan Peterson's sudden non-platforming.

 

[kosko]

[Draft post removed by moderator.]

 

[Thomas Jackson]

The piece is fairly moderate/measured and the responses are absurd. He definitely should have done this anonymously.

 

[Disco_Volante]

The sugar-coated, sweet cupcake buzzwords the left gets you to bite into, once bitten, quickly turn into ugly totalitarian mandatory policies that shut down reason or thought.

Poor saps like this find out the hard way it was never about compassion, equality, science, or any of that. They want complete control and submission of your life, they were never interested in improvement or science or problem solving.

 

[frenchcorporation]

As far as the UK, the smart black people I know, go into more "tradtional" smart people roles, like law, medicine, mech/electrical/chem engineering etc.

Which is due to most of us being 1st/2nd generation immigrants, & these career paths being more straightforward and stable. Our parents push us into a few fields, hence why there arent many black people in tech, proportional to our numbers in the UK.

Shit, when I was a kid my mother told me to stop messing around with computers, otherwise I'd "never get a good job"

Also, I woudnt even want to work somewhere where I was hired preferentially just because I was black. I'd be taken less seriously by my colleagues, consciously or unconciously, & my fragile male ego couldnt handle that.

 

[brob]

Definitely more stupidity than bravery going on there. Career suicide. Needs to read 48 Laws of Power and update his resume ASAP.

 

[JohnKreese]

This is like the beginning of Jerry Maguire

This guy next week:

 

[DarkTriad]

It's not enough to simply fire this sexist man, every single person who liked this memo should be fired too and even those who just received it should be reprimanded for their reckless exosure to bigoted thoughts. All the IT equipment that was used to disseminate hate speech should be formatted into oblivion too.

In fact, we best go ahead and dissolve entire Google right now. Who's with me?

It was a clear thoughtcrime, and bookburning, isn't nearly as effective in internet age. To quote Aliens "It's the only way to be sure.".

 

[balybary]

Google can guess if you are a man or a woman based on your online activities. Google compiles a lot of data to create a profile of every people who used one of the Google websites, this profiling includes their political orientation.

With all the data of your profile, Google decides which informations are displayed when you make a search on Google, Youtube or other activities you are doing online.

Google will show different informations depending on the gender of the user. But hey, the official speech of Google is that all gender are equal.

Maybe in the future the next Edward Snowden will enlighten us about Google's dirty secrets.