Here come the pedos...Boy scouts lifts ban on gay leaders

CrashBangWallop said:
Guys, being gay does not make someone a paedo.

True, sexual abuse is just 1000% more common among gays.

That is why you don't have male leaders supervising female scouts. Some girls become sexually mature at ages 13-15 and get very frisky. When you are on weekends alone with a bunch of 14-15 year olds who want to experiment with their sexuality, then putting a male leader in charge of them is just bad judgement. And it's not anti-male to say this, it is just common sense.

Given that we know the stats of gays and a lot of their fantasies include young boys, then it's not advisable to allow such a thing.

That remains true even if 80% gays would never do anything. Oh - I might add that almost 50% of homosexuals were sexually abused during childhood which in itself does not bode well to put them in boy scout leadership positions.
 

Col. Tigh

Woodpecker
This isn't complicated. Gay men who want to fuck boys will insinuate themselves into opportunities where they can accomplish that goal. Preferably under cover of supposed righteousness.

That is a statement of fact. It does not imply all gays want to fuck boys, but those who do, will rejoice at this new opportunity.
 

heavy

Hummingbird
Gold Member
This is a huge sign that our society is quickly unraveling.

Why? I wondered for a moment if this and other organizations caving to political correctness pressure might allow business and entrepreneurial opportunities at more local levels. The problem is, if you're a man and want to work with little kids, nowadays you're suspect. And God forbid you don't have kids yourself.

In fact, society is at a point where if you wanted to run a camp or organization like Boy Scouts, you'd pretty much have to market the "we don't allow gays to be leaders" message so customers know this. And at that point you're being forced to either accept gays as leaders, or be 'against gays', which we all know are two very opposite ends of a broad spectrum.

The implication, the understood rule of no gay leaders is fine. It should be fine. But to them, it's not fine. No, they have to infiltrate and blow that out of the water, so the only option you have is to explicitly say 'no gay leaders'. That's the real problem. You're forced to say 'we hate gays' even though you don't really hate gays, you just don't want them leading your little kids.

And that's the point. It's not enough to allow marriage. It's not enough that they have 'equal rights'. They (the liberal agenda, feminist agenda, homosexual agenda) need you to completely bow down to their agenda. In their mind the Boy Scouts saying they don't want gay leaders is like saying they hate gays, which isn't true at all. They simply don't want homosexuals - you know, men who are sexually attracted to and who butt-fuck other men, you know, men who are *way* more likely to have been sexually abused at an early age and who are *way* more likely to sexually abuse children - as leaders. Seems reasonable.

But to the liberal agenda, the homosexual PC feminist public-school public-union high-tax high-spend domestic-handout keep-people-unemployed keep-people-on-welfare big-government social-media agenda, the goal is to *MAKE* you fall in line. It's not to allow freedom. It's not open-minded. It's close-minded.

My only hope, and it's hope hanging by a thin fishing line at this point, is that the American public is beginning to truly see how close-minded that agenda is.

My suspicion is that it's too late. Even those who see how awful and freedom threatening the agenda is simply find it too difficult to go against the tidal wave of social media, mainstream media, and political pressure to care. I haven't even heard Trump go against the homosexual agenda.

Edit: This shit started long ago. I had discussions 15 years ago claiming welfare was bad. "But what about the single mother's who's baby-daddy left...thank god they had help, right? Obviously you have no heart." Meanwhile I'm paying 30% in taxes and donating to local charities to help the poor. But that didn't matter. It didn't matter to this stupid brain-fart moron chic (funny thing, she's one of the smartest people I know). None of that mattered. I'm obviously a cold-hearted evil conservative. Right, the guy who's forced to pay tens of thousands of dollars to raise bastards is evil but the chic who makes that guy pay all that money is a saint. So fucking stupid. I'm done.
 

Mekorig

Pelican
Gold Member
It is weird that the Boy Scouts of America, beign part of the World Organization of the Scout Movement would allow that. In the rest of the world is not even tought of allowing gays to be leaders.
 

speakeasy

Peacock
Gold Member
bacan said:
Where is the research that shows rates of pedophilia according to sexual orientation? Let's have an informed discussion. The idea of some gay guy molesting a child with the end goal of "multiplying the numbers of gays" is absurd ..

However, the analogy by rionomad makes sense. People might self select into an opportunity to be alone and in an authority position with a group of young people of the gender that they are attracted to.

That's why so many boys have been molested by closeted gay priests.
 

Suits

 
Banned
heavy said:
Edit: This shit started long ago. I had discussions 15 years ago claiming welfare was bad. "But what about the single mother's who's baby-daddy left...thank god they had help, right? Obviously you have no heart." Meanwhile I'm paying 30% in taxes and donating to local charities to help the poor. But that didn't matter. It didn't matter to this stupid brain-fart moron chic (funny thing, she's one of the smartest people I know). None of that mattered. I'm obviously a cold-hearted evil conservative. Right, the guy who's forced to pay tens of thousands of dollars to raise bastards is evil but the chic who makes that guy pay all that money is a saint. So fucking stupid. I'm done.

Welfare isn't bad. There's nothing wrong with a society voting to create a safety net so that people who run into tough times can bounce back.

What's a big mistake is having a welfare system like the current one in the US. It amounts to nothing more than a wealth transfer from men to women.

If you are going to have a safety net, it needs to be one that motivates people to get back on their feet, not one that motivates people to become lazy single moms.

The welfare system in the US has always been a tax on men, nothing more.
 

Phoenix

 
Banned
Suits said:
Welfare isn't bad. There's nothing wrong with a society voting to create a safety net so that people who run into tough times can bounce back.

...

If you are going to have a safety net, it needs to be one that motivates people to get back on their feet, not one that motivates people to become lazy single moms.

Charity is that system though. Charity is a 'market of sympathy'. Under a charity system, people plead their case, dole bludgers starve, and people who have suffered terrible misfortune get relief.

Welfare doesn't work because its goal isn't to provide welfare, it is to purchase votes. If it was correctly called "loot marketing", you could say its working perfectly.
 

ordinaryleastsquared

Robin
Gold Member
Col. Tigh said:
This isn't complicated. Gay men who want to fuck boys will insinuate themselves into opportunities where they can accomplish that goal. Preferably under cover of supposed righteousness.

That is a statement of fact. It does not imply all gays want to fuck boys, but those who do, will rejoice at this new opportunity.

Probably more of an issue for closeted gays then those publicly out. Openly gay guys that do go into the boy scouts will certainly receive more scruitiniy and are probably not the types looking to expoit children... thats a different matter all together. For instance:

Jerry Sandusky was married with children.
 

SlickyBoy

Hummingbird
Well, Elton John must finally be psyched.

elton-john-boy-scouts-11.jpg
 

SlickyBoy

Hummingbird
speakeasy said:
bacan said:
Where is the research that shows rates of pedophilia according to sexual orientation? Let's have an informed discussion. The idea of some gay guy molesting a child with the end goal of "multiplying the numbers of gays" is absurd ..

However, the analogy by rionomad makes sense. People might self select into an opportunity to be alone and in an authority position with a group of young people of the gender that they are attracted to.

That's why so many boys have been molested by closeted gay priests.

The Catholic Church molestation scandal was never about a religion, it was (and still is) a problem with homosexuals infesting an organization to access young boys. As time went on, a gay mafia evolved to protect each other, should they be found out.
 

zaqan

Robin
What could possibly go wrong?

"Hey boys, who wants to go explore that cave deep in the woods??" *handwave* "Well, fabulous! Lets go!"

I was reading comments on Facebook and one rainbow-festooned bimbo proudly proclaimed that she would now allow her son to join. How can anyone be that deranged? It is like a great mental disorder has taken over the West, one of those zombie virus apocalypses that everyone is reading these days.

I remember when I quit the Scouts rather than be forced into a uniform. Perhaps that was a sign of my future.
 

Benoit

Pelican
Gold Member
zaqan said:
"Hey boys, who wants to go explore that cave deep in the woods??" *handwave* "Well, fabulous! Lets go!"

I'm going to take this opportunity to rework the classic priest joke:

Scout leader: "Let's go into that dark cave!"
Young boy: "But I'm scared!"
Scout leader: "You're scared? There's two of us going in. I'm the one who's got to come out of it alone!"
 

Bushido

Ostrich
Gold Member
There have always been closet homos in the Scouts. I was in the Cubs and later Scouts - there was one leader that you instinctually knew to avoid. Even at that age, it was obvious where his interests lay.

Likewise, I remember a badminton coach who was almost definitely a paedo. He'd be coming onto 12 year-old girls right in front of us. Unfortunately there are people who choose these roles with other motivations in mind.

The difference nowadays is that this shit is almost being encouraged. "Let's install gay leaders to take care of our kids!!!" Common sense is being eroded in the name of supposed equality. A male feminist I know told me with a straight face that he would have no issues hiring a gay babysitter for his sons.

Gay rights over children's safety. What a world we live in.
 

Days of Broken Arrows

Crow
Gold Member
This policy is THE perfect example of a society so blinded by political correctness it can't think straight anymore.

No one would ever put a straight man in charge of troupes of prepubescent girls and allow him to sleep and shower with them. Yet Boy Scout troupes are essentially doing the same thing by letting gay men sleep and shower with prepubescent boys.

Let be more direct, in case we have SJW outsiders on here reading this. It takes them longer to understand things.

Just as I would not want my 12-year-old daughter changing in and out of underwear or getting her period in front of male scout troupe leaders, I would not want my son changing in and out of his underwear and getting wet dreams with gay male scout around.

Anyone who doesn't understand this logic is being willfully ignorant when it comes to sexuality in general -- and not just gay sexuality.

The fact that this was never brought up in the media or in the Boy Scouts is cause for major alarm. If they can't see something this obvious, what else are they ignorant about? And would you want people like that responsible for your child?
 

questor70

 
Banned
Hypno said:
Boy Scouts requiring condoms at its World Jamboree.

This organization used to be for children.

http://www.wnd.com/2018/05/condoms-required-at-scouts-24th-world-jamboree/

"That would include the 24th World Scout Jamboree, scheduled July 21-Aug. 1, 2019, in West Virginia."

How appropriate. Squeal like a pig territory.

This is what happens to a male safe-space after it's invaded. The original demographics of the group disappears and is replaced with those who felt excluded all this time.

So pretty soon the Boy Scouts will be associated solely with women and gays because no straight boys would want to be caught dead there, creating this vicious cycle.
 
Top