How does a white person in North America prove that they aren't racist? (serious)

Status
Not open for further replies.

GameTheory

 
Banned
soup said:
[...]
Joking aside- it is kind of funny to see Chris Rock sipping from a growler 20 years before they've became a hipster item.

not exactly a growler per se, but it took me an entire afternoon to kill a half-gallon of 8-bomb (on the left)

64oz40oz.jpg
 

Walderschmidt

 
Banned
LeBeau said:
Point taken.

See that's the thing, this wasn't intended to be a battle about anything.

...

Will keep this in mind for the future.

I know you weren't trying to start a battle. I suppose I should have clarified.

Generally, discussions about race on the internet turn into battles whether you want them to or not. So, in my opinion, it's better not to talk about it unless you've got thick skin and really know your shit.

You can't always predict how race conversations online will go - but if you'd be right most of the time if you guessed 'South'.

That was my point.

~Wald
 

Burdflu

Pigeon
I think all that needs to be said has been said. Sounds like disregarding those that would stand you to trial on charges of "racism" is the way to go.


 

Anon-A-Moose

Kingfisher
LoveBug said:
Why would you want to? I say what I want, usually from a pro-white male perspective as that's what I happen to be. Say whats on your mind and don't live life with your tail tucked between your legs.
 

Ziltoid

Pelican
LowerCaseG said:
Roosh, maybe we can start a RACE subsection of the forum so most of us can ignore it.
Did anyone make you open this thread and read it?
When you saw the title, what did you THINK it was going to be about?
If you want to ignore racial topics, then ignore them. Not hard.
 

Giovonny

Crow
Gold Member
White people don't have to prove anything to anybody.

As a descendant of the great Prussian Empire, I want to say that this thread is :bash: :vomit:
 

numanist

 
Banned
Honestly, who cares if some dick-brain calls you a "racist". The word was invented by mass-murdering Red Army general Leon Trotsky, and it was used to browbeat the Eastern European populations for not accepting for Soviet occupation. Those same Eastern Europeans were killed in the worst genocide known to mankind, the Holodomor - some 7 million Ukrainian Christians lost their lives to starvation. If you want to read more about this obfuscated history, I suggest you read Alexander Solzenitzyn's literature.
 

Therapsid

Pelican
numanist said:
Honestly, who cares if some dick-brain calls you a "racist". The word was invented by mass-murdering Red Army general Leon Trotsky, and it was used to browbeat the Eastern European populations for not accepting for Soviet occupation. Those same Eastern Europeans were killed in the worst genocide known to mankind, the Holodomor - some 7 million Ukrainian Christians lost their lives to starvation. If you want to read more about this obfuscated history, I suggest you read Alexander Solzenitzyn's literature.

It's interesting, it does seem as if Trotsky's use of the word in the History of the Russian Revolution (1930) is one of the first major uses of the term.

Here's the quote:

"Slavophilism, the messianism of backwardness, has based its philosophy upon the assumption that the Russian people and their church are democratic through and through, whereas official Russia is a German bureaucracy imposed upon them by Peter the Great. Marx remarked upon this theme: “In the same way the Teutonic jackasses blamed the despotism of Frederick the Second upon the French, as though backward slaves were not always in need of civilised slaves to train them.” This brief comment completely finishes off not only the old philosophy of the Slavophiles, but also the latest revelations of the “Racists.”

Link

So, he used the word to condemn Russians and slavic peoples for believing in their superiority as a people. Yet he has no qualms about implying that they're actually *inferior* when he calls slavophilism the "messianism of backwardness"!

But it seems that the word was used before Trotsky by some French writers. And from digging around it appears that the words racist and racism really only became common currency later in the 30's after the Nazis came to power.
 
Not to turn this into a conversation about history but Hitler is a considered a universal monster by everyone due to the holocaust. Yet, how come men like Stalin, Trotsky, Lenin etc... Get off the hook, despite being responsible for killing even more people?
 
A War You Cannot Win said:
Not to turn this into a conversation about history but Hitler is a considered a universal monster by everyone due to the holocaust. Yet, how come men like Stalin, Trotsky, Lenin etc... Get off the hook, despite being responsible for killing even more people?

Simple, Marxists have control over the education system.
Leftard moonbats would argue that Hitler's killings were deliberate, while Stalin was not.

Even if that were true, then it still means that Marxism dangerous, Nazis would be considered murderers, While Communism is like a fire that burns down buildings.
 

tairos

 
Banned
It's more that "racism" (which Hitler, somehow, committed by killing millions of other white people) is now the greatest sin imaginable. So, racism + killing >>>>>>>> killing. In fact, racism alone >>>>>>> killing. In all seriousness, the average SWPL leftoid will muster incomparably greater righteous outrage at the utterance of a racial slur than he ever has for a common murder, or even for all the atrocities committed by left-of-center figures in the 20th century. It really is that ridiculous. And cynical. Nazism is useful as a weapon with which to bludgeon the historical people of this country; Communism is not. So, we hear about the former, not the latter.
 
Quintus Flaminius said:
A War You Cannot Win said:
Not to turn this into a conversation about history but Hitler is a considered a universal monster by everyone due to the holocaust. Yet, how come men like Stalin, Trotsky, Lenin etc... Get off the hook, despite being responsible for killing even more people?

Simple, Marxists have control over the education system.
Leftard moonbats would argue that Hitler's killings were deliberate, while Stalin was not.

Even if that were true, then it still means that Marxism dangerous, Nazis would be considered murderers, While Communism is like a fire that burns down buildings.


Small wonder public education is spectacularly failing children in the US then.
 

clever alias

 
Banned
stalin and mao and kim killed their own people. were relatively okay with that. its when you go kill another counteys people we get mad
 

Sombro

Ostrich
Agnostic
How does a white person in North America prove that they aren't racist?

Trying to prove a negative? Seriously, folks.

At the risk of sounding passive/aggressive, the burden is on the other guy to prove I'm racist.
Unless you assume I'm racist by default.
Which, ipso facto, would be racist.

RECURSION RECURSION RECURSION

285.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top