Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="No-Designation Man" data-source="post: 1348360" data-attributes="member: 18523">The &quot;double standard&quot; commonly presented by Alt Right, was what my other post was referring to.&nbsp; If God can wipe her slate clean, but we can't, then have we not have declared God's view on the matter to be incorrect? Never may that happen!Regarding illicit sexual activity:A woman (or man) with a 100+ partner count, versus a partner count of only 1 - there is no difference between them. God's salvation, or judgment, depends solely on the (lack of) true repentance of each individual and the subsequent abandonment of the former course of life. (1 Corinthians 6:9-11)&quot;Should I take into account a woman's sexual history?&quot; should be rephrased as&quot;How to tell if anyone's claim to have genuinely repented is sincere.&quot;God holds neither men, nor women, to any different &quot;double standard&quot; criteria&nbsp; for sin. If we accept what any man (or woman) suggests otherwise, then we have declared the Sovereign of the Universe to be a liar. Now our /own/ repentance is insincere, and we know what happens to such people.That's how serious this matter is, Gentlemen. We must be careful.I would not imply that you have to wife up anyone you personally don't want to. What I disagree with, scripturally, is the Alt Right's angle that a woman's sexual history means she should automatically be forever condemned by all men, regardless of what she does /now/, but men can (continue to) be whatever they want.I'll simply conclude with this:One divine directive must be applied equally to all. If a woman's past is to predestinate her future, then the scriptures demand that her (male) accusers must be held to the same standard.Luke 6:37-38, 40</blockquote>

[QUOTE="No-Designation Man, post: 1348360, member: 18523"] The "double standard" commonly presented by Alt Right, was what my other post was referring to. If God can wipe her slate clean, but we can't, then have we not have declared God's view on the matter to be incorrect? Never may that happen! Regarding illicit sexual activity: A woman (or man) with a 100+ partner count, versus a partner count of only 1 - there is no difference between them. God's salvation, or judgment, depends solely on the (lack of) true repentance of each individual and the subsequent abandonment of the former course of life. (1 Corinthians 6:9-11) "Should I take into account a woman's sexual history?" should be rephrased as "How to tell if anyone's claim to have genuinely repented is sincere." God holds neither men, nor women, to any different "double standard" criteria for sin. If we accept what any man (or woman) suggests otherwise, then we have declared the Sovereign of the Universe to be a liar. Now our /own/ repentance is insincere, and we know what happens to such people. That's how serious this matter is, Gentlemen. We must be careful. I would not imply that you have to wife up anyone you personally don't want to. What I disagree with, scripturally, is the Alt Right's angle that a woman's sexual history means she should automatically be forever condemned by all men, regardless of what she does /now/, but men can (continue to) be whatever they want. I'll simply conclude with this: One divine directive must be applied equally to all. If a woman's past is to predestinate her future, then the scriptures demand that her (male) accusers must be held to the same standard. Luke 6:37-38, 40 [/QUOTE]

Verification