How Old Is The Earth?
- Thread starter Roosh
- Start date
I don't believe that number either. Shithole governments report ridiculous numbers to get more "development aid". And China makes itself look undefeatable.
Maybe the Earth Population topic deserves a thread at some point as a way of investigating it further and gathering some resources. Too many hardcore globalist arguments depend on this 7B+ over-population narrative, which has the effect of nihilism and loathing amongst Westerners, for us to just accept such a number at face value. Here is a scholarly article with some formula's in it which we might be able to use, along with an agreed upon set of assumptions, to better come up with a number. Several researchers have proposed an ideal earth population around 1.5B, which is what we very well might be at or below currently (but this number would encourage Western Christians to have more babies and we don't want that narrative!)
Babel and World Demography: Biblical Demography
Babel and World Demography: Biblical Demography
The 1 Duke
Sparrow
I am paraphrasing so "A day is like a thousand years and a thousand like a day"
The Bible is quite clear on time being different for God.
Only my opinion.... We are missing the point by debating the minutiae.
Get ready for His return, not many years left.
By Christ's own words when asked when He would return. The generation that sees the creation of Israel in modern times, plus the age of a generation ( life span)
equals the approx time for his return.
I used the 1948 life exp. today for my calc.
May 14th 1948 + 78 (life exp.) = 2026-2033 approx or sooner as we cannot know the day or time, but as Christians we are commanded to be watching for and would be able to discern that IT (Rapture) is close.
Everything I see today is screaming that we are heading for a one world monetary/ religious system, this is not congruent with Christian beliefs/doctrine.
I am a NOBODY but this has been a deep belief since I was a child.
May God bless you and yours and hope to see you on the other side.
Last edited:
The 1 Duke
Sparrow
To me He/God/Christ created it end of discussion. It is called Faith.
Maybe there is something there but, man, sv3rige belongs in the asylum. Everything he promotes is dangerous and he is a clear psycho with narcistic delusions.
If something conflicts with God's word, our first instinct should be to distrust the something, not God. Imagine we get to Heaven and ask God, how did you do it? Like, I told you in Genesis, not my fault you didn't believe me.
Amazon Prime "Noah's Ark" serves has some good insights on our origins. It's a four part series, the first two are great and the second two are mostly Seventh Day Adventist nonsense.
Full disclosure, I have no idea who that guy is so you may totally be right, but I couldn't find the article yet from like 3 years ago that made a number of solid arguments, so this was kind of just a taster as the guy seems to have covered at least 1 or 2 of the "Population Myth" concepts, such as "at a scale of 1 million much less 1 billion, the human mind does not really have the idea to conceptualize this number well- the number just means 'A Lot'. So anything over a couple thousand people, people start thinking they're over-crowded" ... We see this with other numerical-psychological phenomena such as the amount of debt the country has, the supposed amount of distance between planets in the solar system, the amount of cells in the human body, or even many statistical ratios which people have issues conceptualizing naturally. Thus, it leaves them open to believe anything from an "approved source", such as Bill Nye the Science Guy.
I need to find better, more legit sources on the topic for sure. If I'm successful maybe start a thread.
The 1 Duke
Sparrow
The body is just a shell, temporary home, temple for the soul. No?
Please, enlighten me.
And tell me how every other celestial body, including multiple we see with our own eyes from Earth, and see from space with satellites, trips, etc are round.
No.
Planets look pretty “spherical” through my own telescope. And planetary rings look like “rings” and not “lines over a disc.” I’ve watched the moon rotate. It’s an orb.
The amount of text needed to explain this is insurmountable.
I will provide reason for the most obvious ones which I already alluded to.
He never provides the viewer with logical and reasonable counter arguments. He instead provides red herring arguments.
For instance, how the only reason the shadow experiment would be wrong is if if someone falsified the length of the shadow in Syene.
How the only reason the lengths of the shadows could be different is because there is a curve of the surface, which he then proceeds to program the viewer to understand with his ridiculous visual experiment.
As a viewer, you are never provided with what the people of the earth understood before the entire disinformation campaign of (G)lobe and (G)ravity science was forced upon us as children. You are provided with information designed to reinforce what you have already been told in school.
That if the sun goes around the earth, at a much closer distance, it could just as easily explain the different lengths of shadows as does his billion trillion million miles away sun. However, this would run counter to his own agenda. It might confuse the viewer, because then two equally plausible scenarios would be presented and the viewer would be forced to come to their own conclusion.
If you want to put your trust in the Government, Not A Space Agency, et al. (because everything you ever see regarding "Space" is their work and your money) my attempts to enlighten you will fall as flat as trying to convince a mask-wearing normie not to take an unsafe vaccine.
I do not hold the answers to the world.
But here is your typical gravity super condensed cloud of burning dust:
and for the lulz:
Hold on (and you didn't answer my questions, btw) let's get at least one thing straight here: it doesn't matter what we think about this topic. I just see no reason to doubt what I actually can, at least in part, verify from my own position here on the earth. Celestial bodies are round, they rotate (better explanation than some made up stuff you won't tell me even), and there are many examples of them.
Unless it's pure entertainment for you, the standard explanations actually make sense in every way, and don't waste our time. Believing in spherical bodies that most humans have reported and studied throughout time, made calendars on, fly around the world on, put satellites in orbit, etc seems highly likely, not just plausible. It has absolutely nothing to do with anything approaching most BS these days, which is clown world stuff that this is not. This is an odd hill to complain on, or die on, from a conspiracy angle ... it's really weird to me because unlike bullshit like climate change which has a real agenda, you can't actually verify it yourself at least in some ways, by walking outside.
Unless it's pure entertainment for you, the standard explanations actually make sense in every way, and don't waste our time. Believing in spherical bodies that most humans have reported and studied throughout time, made calendars on, fly around the world on, put satellites in orbit, etc seems highly likely, not just plausible. It has absolutely nothing to do with anything approaching most BS these days, which is clown world stuff that this is not. This is an odd hill to complain on, or die on, from a conspiracy angle ... it's really weird to me because unlike bullshit like climate change which has a real agenda, you can't actually verify it yourself at least in some ways, by walking outside.
How do Flat Earthers explain why the Sun is not visible at night. The changing length of days and the changing of seasons. There are so many logic holes in the theory that one would have to be a gullible true believer to not realize that. It is a psyop designed to make anyone that questions Evolution, Global Warming etc. to look like fools by comparing them to Flat Earthers.
My father tells me that, "nowhere in the bible does it say that God created Woman. It says that A Rib was taken from Adam, then woman was created."
Then, my father says...
"Satan. Satan created woman."
Then, my father says...
"Satan. Satan created woman."
Bro, NOWHERE does it say in the Bible that the Earth is 10.000 years old. This nonsense was INTERPRETED by people after they counted the generations listed. Don't start drifting into total kookoo-land territory.
The generations listed in the scriptures are not a count from the creation of the planet, they are a count from when THIS WORLD was created, which means this world we live in now after the destruction of the last world about 9600 BC, which is also the time Platon gives when he talks about the destruction of Atlantis by Comet/Asteroid impact or a huge Meteor shower that hit the planet.
These Texts all talk about the same thing - the destruction of the last world as we know it, and the 'rebirth' of the new world after the destrucion. Revelation chapter in the Bible is FULL of descriptions of various cosmic attacks - stuff hitting the land, hitting the sea, asteroid showers, etc...
Please dont become a total nutjob by subscribing to the dumb evangelical interpretation of when the earth was created. It is false and stupid.
@Roosh
Love your work bro. If you wanna learn more about this topic I can give a ton of good material you can read or watch...
Randall Carlson talks about it in this video...
Last edited:
This seems pretty hard to reconcile with logic in general, but more specifically with Genesis 5, and then Christ's exegesis/reference in Matthew:
"He answered, 'Have you not read that he who made them from the beginning made them male and female'"
Just so you know.