Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MorganAlpha" data-source="post: 1522991" data-attributes="member: 22776">If it&#039;s your reality, your frame, that you will only pay out money if she signs the contract, and if she wants to be with you, then she would probably sign. After all she doesn&#039;t lose anything, she just has to repay what she is given.Obviously when you have children and are married, then that changes things. I am just concerned with the money that men spend leading up to marriage, in the various courtships with various candidates. I am not concerned with curtailing her right to leave, like you said, if she wants to leave she will leave. It&#039;s not about that. It&#039;s more about men being reimbursed for what they spent, if the woman is the one to unilaterally end the relationship.I would not presume that contract would counter a woman&#039;s loss of love, however, if you have a contract where she is obliged to repay the money you spent, and it is enforceable in court, would that not be preferable from the man&#039;s point of view, to be reimbursed the money he paid? After all a woman gets paid for all services she provided in marriage.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MorganAlpha, post: 1522991, member: 22776"] If it's your reality, your frame, that you will only pay out money if she signs the contract, and if she wants to be with you, then she would probably sign. After all she doesn't lose anything, she just has to repay what she is given. Obviously when you have children and are married, then that changes things. I am just concerned with the money that men spend leading up to marriage, in the various courtships with various candidates. I am not concerned with curtailing her right to leave, like you said, if she wants to leave she will leave. It's not about that. It's more about men being reimbursed for what they spent, if the woman is the one to unilaterally end the relationship. I would not presume that contract would counter a woman's loss of love, however, if you have a contract where she is obliged to repay the money you spent, and it is enforceable in court, would that not be preferable from the man's point of view, to be reimbursed the money he paid? After all a woman gets paid for all services she provided in marriage. [/QUOTE]

Verification