I call out feminist Laci Green (she wants to censor Youtube)
- Thread starter Roosh
- Start date
UroboricForms
Woodpecker
Priceless!
Roosh killed it.
Dusty said:Roosh said:
otd:
Damn Roosh went in.
hshit:
alexdagr81
Woodpecker
LOL @ the people accusing Roosh of using Ad Homs when that's pretty much the SJW MO, especially since her history is totally relevant as to whether she should be leading witch hunts on morality.
One of the best takedowns of Laci Green is by Rachel Edwards and comes courtesy of the Honey Badger Brigade site. Edwards seems steeped in Green's odd SJW culture (which has a "WTF" factor for a lot of guys) and really nails what makes her a danger.
Her main point:
"She goes on paid lecture tours. This is her job. She makes money distributing feminist propaganda about sex to teens....(But) Like many sexologists, Laci Green has no medical degree to speak of. She also lacks a degree in psychology. She has little practical experience, and her resume cites her as being an expert in feminist theory. Yet, they’re tossing her money to give people information that could be gained from a Google search."
Edwards' piece got me thinking that tyranny is no longer coming to us in the form of a police state that will jail us for minor crimes. It's here in the form of "attractive" and "sexy" women who seduce loser-males into having their rights taken away.
I'm convinced of this after viewing some of the Laci Green material Edwards links to at the end of her article. Watch them at your own peril, especially the one where she redefines consent. Almost comes off like she's been planted by the Justice Department as a way to make the expanded definition of rape seem hip, cool, and sexy.
Her main point:
"She goes on paid lecture tours. This is her job. She makes money distributing feminist propaganda about sex to teens....(But) Like many sexologists, Laci Green has no medical degree to speak of. She also lacks a degree in psychology. She has little practical experience, and her resume cites her as being an expert in feminist theory. Yet, they’re tossing her money to give people information that could be gained from a Google search."
Edwards' piece got me thinking that tyranny is no longer coming to us in the form of a police state that will jail us for minor crimes. It's here in the form of "attractive" and "sexy" women who seduce loser-males into having their rights taken away.
I'm convinced of this after viewing some of the Laci Green material Edwards links to at the end of her article. Watch them at your own peril, especially the one where she redefines consent. Almost comes off like she's been planted by the Justice Department as a way to make the expanded definition of rape seem hip, cool, and sexy.
Quintus Curtius said:
Quintus: I wrote about SJW being the return of The Cult Of Victorian Sensibility - fuelled by the Hysteria borne of female privilege - a few months back. You might find it interesting.
Victorian Sensibility
Unfortunately, I wasn't a good enough writer to get my point across but it was one of those 'Aha!' moments where I was thinking "I have never been so sure of anything as I am of this right now." You are right. All we are dealing with is the hysteria borne of privilege. Everything comes from this.
More in this thread:
The Rise Of Plain Jane Heroines in Victorian Literature
AnonymousBosch said:
Anonymous Bosch I have a question why haven't you submitted any articles to ROK, your always dropping great knowledge?