Illegal immigrant gets California law license

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aliblahba

 
Banned
Wayout said:
You will! And you are not going to be the first one. There was many stories like that. In all seriousness - if you never been fingerprinted by the feds - they have no way of knowing who you are. Just keep silent ( that's your right anyway) but give them false clue like Argentinian money in your pocket. You will spend about 2-4 weeks in a detention center where you can meet some Hispanic women and make connections,then they will deport you.After your free vacation you can come back and sue the government for deporting a US citizen without any evidence and make some money again. You welcome!

Don't got no Argentino money All I got is some Dominican pesos left and stupid Presidente tshirt. Hey Fisto! Looks like I'll be back in Santo Domingo in about 5 weeks. :banana:

I'm gonna follow him and the evil driver around all day offering to wash the windshield and shine their shoes.
 

DjembaDjemba

Pelican
Suits said:
DjembaDjemba said:
Immigrating to Argentina is actually very easy. You just need to land, register, and you can automatically apply for citizenship.

Incorrect.

The current laws governing citizenship (Ley 346, Ley 23.059, and Decreto 3.213/84) set forth very simple requirements:
*be 18 years old or older;
*have been living in Argentina for 2 years; and
*apply for citizenship before a federal judge.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentine_nationality_law

Still far easier than anything in pretty much any developed (or even developing) country.

If you're European (not sure about American) you can arrive without a visa. Working/living there 2 years isn't too bad of a requirement.

You have 90 days visa free stay, apply for work, get work, then apply for PR. 2 years later you're can apply for citizenship.
 

Aliblahba

 
Banned
Moma said:
Aliblahba said:
The new border proposal. Easy, just shift a little north.


Everything in between the black lines is the new U.S.


Hey, you cut off nearly all of Florida!!

Well duh, its not like anyone south of I-10 speaks English anymore, anyways.




Fun fact- All the 17 down voters on that Youtube video have Greek last names.
 
el mechanico said:
Hey, Ali B nice job on your map you left out Montreal

I noticed that too. I think (hope) he circled Ottawa assuming it was Montreal.

I think Miami is the most "foreign" city in the US. It's at a level where not knowing Spanish will negatively affect your job prospects.
 

Quintus Curtius

Crow
Gold Member
From reading the posts on this thread, I thought some of you guys might really like the British movie "Code 46", which came out in 2003. One of the best science fiction movies I've seen in terms of predicting what the future global society will look like.

Here's the plot summary:

Code 46 is a love story set in a Brave New World-type near-future where cities are heavily controlled and only accessible through checkpoints. People cannot travel unless they have "papeles" (papers in Spanish; words and sentences in many languages, especially Spanish, French and Chinese are mixed with English in this new world), a special travel permit issued by the totalitarian government, the "Sphinx". Outside these cities, the desert has taken over and shanty towns are jammed with non-citizens - people without IDs forced to live primitive lives. William is a family man who works as a government investigator. When he is sent to Shanghai to solve a case of fake IDs, he meets a woman named Maria. Although he realizes she is behind the forgeries, he cannot help but fall completely in love with her. He hides her crime and they have a wild, passionate affair that can only last as long as his visa: 24 hours.

Very creative, intelligent, and timely film. Some interesting things noted in the movie:

1. How viruses will become used by us at will to solve problems, including mindreading (the "empathy" virus)
2. How abuse of biotechnology will lead to unforseen consequences.
3. The development of a highly stratified world order based on the caste of wealth and privilege.
4. The gradual loss of intimacy and love.

Worth checking out....
 

The Lizard of Oz

Crow
Gold Member
People are still missing the simplest points.

Hispanic immigrants make great Americans.

Look at the hispanic dudes on this forum -- they're some of the coolest guys of anyone here. And they're some of the most American dudes anywhere. The Latino population is injecting new energies into our culture which are healthy and life-giving.

The culture could use some fresh blood, fresh energies. The Latinos might be just what the doctor ordered.

And no one on the thread mentioned Latina pussy? Is this still a game forum or what?

Latina pussy is fucking unbelievable.

But the only thing better is Latina/white blends. That is the finest pussy in the world, bar none.

So I think it's all good. If we were having an influx of America-hating Muslims like the Europeans do, I'd be as up in arms about it as everyone. And their pussy is nothing to brag about either, not to mention they keep it locked up.

But hispanics? I say bring 'em on and in one or two generations they'll make America a stronger and better country.
 

Veloce

Crow
Gold Member
worldwidetraveler said:
Which western county has a quicker path to citizenship? 7 years sounds normal if you compare other countries.

Making something easier so others don't cheat the system is a somewhat dubious thought process.

Maybe as a matter of principal. You could say the same thing about drug policy.

Government policy only goes so far. The will of the individual human is greater than any government entity.

You can imprison half your population; people are still going to smoke weed. And what's happened in recent years? More and more legislation de-criminalizing marijuana.

In regards to immigration, there should be less attention placed on illegal immigrants and more attention placed on employers. There's got to be a better way to sponsor an employee for citizenship or an extended work visa as the current process is too costly and bureaucratic.

I'll give you my personal anecdote:

Dishwashers are hard to find. It's insane. Even Mexicans are over it. It's rare that I get a Mexican dishwasher that speaks fluent English. If they can speak English, they've got a better job somewhere else. So I only get guys from dusty little northern towns in Sonora or Chihuahua that speak zero to little English. If and when these guys leave, I've got a job opening. I know with 100% of my heart that job will be filled by another non-English speaking Mexican, Central American, or Filipino.

Sometimes they're legal; most of the time they're not. There seems to be this rhetoric that all illegal immigrants come here and take cash-under-the-table jobs. I'm sure that's true in some fields, but not here. These guys can go to MacArthur Park and there are a few guys there that sling fake I.D.s and social security cards for 50 bucks. So they get their cards, show up to the hotel, "Estoy buscando un trabajo", and I get them started. I fill out an I-9 and W-4 so they're in the system just like a regular employee. We deduct income tax which goes straight to Uncle Sam, the only thing that gets iffy is their Social Security tax since they're using an alias, but the money goes in regardless.

So these guys are illegal, but they're paying into the system. They're taking a job no-one else will. They're making sure our rich folks in the restaurant get nice clean plates to eat off of. For the most part they live a quiet existence, don't drink, and live with 5 of their cousins and send half the money back home. In some cases they move the family up here, some of them have kids, and bingo it's a new round of American citizens living the dream.

What exactly is the problem with this scenario? Before you answer with "They're sending money outside of the U.S." keep in mind there are no white kids that apply to dishwashing positions. I've seen like 2 in 13 years, and these guys were one foot out of jail. Even if the job paid $15 an hour I promise you I would not be getting white dishwashers. I've put job postings on recruitement registries with agencies that get people off the streets. They'd rather live on the streets than wash dishes.

This is the scale we're working with. These are not retail jobs where you stand around in slacks and sneakers. This is old fashioned manual labor. The jobs are so shitty that you can barely find legal immigrants to take them, you have to go with illegal. It takes some hardworking grunt from the deserts of northern Mexico, a gang infested town in Central America, some skin-and-bones kid fresh off the boat from Haiti, or a guy living in a 3rd world cinder block in the Philippines to want to work as a dishwasher.

America has always been a nation of immigrants. It's the very basis of our economy. Instead of having a closed door policy, it would be wiser to regulate it in a sustainable fashion.
 

worldwidetraveler

Hummingbird
Gold Member
thedude3737 said:
Maybe as a matter of principal. You could say the same thing about drug policy.

Government policy only goes so far. The will of the individual human is greater than any government entity.

You can imprison half your population; people are still going to smoke weed. And what's happened in recent years? More and more legislation de-criminalizing marijuana.

I don't see that it was made easier because it wasn't controllable (which is wasn't just like prohibition), I see it as people rallying to get laws changed like it should have been. They used the system in place as it was designed.

In regards to immigration, there should be less attention placed on illegal immigrants and more attention placed on employers. There's got to be a better way to sponsor an employee for citizenship or an extended work visa as the current process is too costly and bureaucratic.

Yeah, I don't understand how these businesses don't worry too much about getting busted. It sounds like the repercussions are pretty low.

...edited to keep post smaller

This is the scale we're working with. These are not retail jobs where you stand around in slacks and sneakers. This is old fashioned manual labor. The jobs are so shitty that you can barely find legal immigrants to take them, you have to go with illegal. It takes some hardworking grunt from the deserts of northern Mexico, a gang infested town in Central America, some skin-and-bones kid fresh off the boat from Haiti, or a guy living in a 3rd world cinder block in the Philippines to want to work as a dishwasher.

That is really the only reason the illegal problem hasn't been fixed.

Like I said earlier, these are mainly jobs most people won't take at the wage asked. Most people don't want to pay more for services or products so in that way they have already said they were for illegal immigration. If the pay if good enough, you will find Americans who will do the job. Look at what people put up with in the oil fields. There is always a price. Those higher prices will be passed on to consumers and they won't like that so we get illegals in to keep costs down.

Exporting dollars back home will matter if there is a large enough amount not being recirculated within our economy. I do know that one of Philippines major imports is foreign money from all of the overseas workers.

It is a major contributor to that economy.

I don't think it is a big deal here, though, or at least I haven't read anything to give me any indication it was a problem.


Instead of having a closed door policy, it would be wiser to regulate it in a sustainable fashion.

We do have it regulated. It isn't like we don't have legal immigrants that go through the process.

Allowing illegals to have driver licenses and to get student loans is bypassing those regulations.

Access to programs paid by tax payers is bypassing those regulations.

Allowing them to work is bypassing those regulations.

By opening the door more, I suspect you will still have a worker shortage for low wage jobs. Who in their right mind would work a low paying job while they could be making roughly 36k in welfare benefits? I don't think we can afford more people on welfare.
 
thedude3737 said:
I'll give you my personal anecdote:

Dishwashers are hard to find. It's insane. Even Mexicans are over it. It's rare that I get a Mexican dishwasher that speaks fluent English. If they can speak English, they've got a better job somewhere else. So I only get guys from dusty little northern towns in Sonora or Chihuahua that speak zero to little English. If and when these guys leave, I've got a job opening. I know with 100% of my heart that job will be filled by another non-English speaking Mexican, Central American, or Filipino.


I have a similar anecdote. I once had an interesting experience one summer while out of school to run a cafe owned by a Turkish guy on Capitol Hill. I was on my bike hitting up various bars in DC looking for bartending work at night. I walked into this wellness store and cafe and the Turkish lady who was working there took a liking to me and made me a ridiculous offer. She said she was going to Istanbul in a few days to meet her son, which is where her and her husband send him to live with her parents every summer. He was in grade school and instead of staying home in the summer they figured he would have a better experience living in Istanbul and learning their culture firsthand. She said she hadn't been able to find someone to run the store for the month and a half she'll be gone and that I seemed like a trustworthy guy so she wanted me to meet her husband. They had just opened a Mediterranean resto (their second business) in another part of DC and he was spending most of his time there to get it up and running. So she asked for my number and I agreed to return to meet her husband. We met and he felt comfortable enough to let me handle the responsibility. Never been in a situation like that with total strangers.

So I ran the store for a good part of the summer. The guy would come in every now and then to check the books and make sure I wasn't stealing money and, of course, everything checked out so he really was grateful to me. I was in a LTR at that time so I would just chill at the store, arrange orders and deliveries, and speak to customers and have my girl come hang out sometimes. The customers were the best part because I was right near the Capitol. I met a bunch of politicians (Jesse Jackson Jr.), lobbyists, and lawyers. The business a few doors down was run by a Harvard-trained lawyer who managed political campaigns, including one for Arnold Schwarznegger. Anytime him or his employees came through to get lunch, we never charged them because that guy helped out with a loan once that helped the business during hard times.

I managed one employee, who was a Mexican lady that cooked all the meals and opened/closed the store. The business made healthy smoothies, salads, and sandwiches for customers. I can't even tell you how important that lady was to the business. She was an incredibly hard worker. Didn't speak good English but it was cool since I spoke Spanish well enough to communicate with her. I'm mostly sure she was paid under the table, as was I. Not 100% sure about her because the owner kept certain financial info concealed from me. Don't see how the business could have afforded paying someone legally to do the job due to taxes, while maintaining the same level of service and productivity. I think you'd have to hire TWO Americans at higher wages to get the same productivity. Not even maybe. I know I wouldn't have done her job at her pay under the table. Not even two of MEs could match her relentless work ethic. Not sure what her status was but I would guess it was illegal.

It was an eye-opening experience though.
 

Veloce

Crow
Gold Member
worldwidetraveler said:
Allowing illegals to have driver licenses and to get student loans is bypassing those regulations.

Access to programs paid by tax payers is bypassing those regulations.

Allowing them to work is bypassing those regulations.

By opening the door more, I suspect you will still have a worker shortage for low wage jobs. Who in their right mind would work a low paying job while they could be making roughly 36k in welfare benefits? I don't think we can afford more people on welfare.

Fully in agreement with you here.

I disagree that raising wages will attract non-illegals. However for the sake of argument, lets consider that scenario.

I can't speak for other industries, but the profits in many food production operations is quite thin. To make a long story short, if you raised the wages of dishwashers to $15 per hour, we simply wouldn't be able to afford them. We'd have to pass off the increased expense directly to the consumer through higher menu prices and check averages. The $32 entree becomes a $40 entree.

I operate my department on a firm percentage based budget. I know that 10% of my gross food sales goes to hourly labor. An increase of even 1% of my labor budget is significant and would reduce already slim profits to next to nothing. That money has to come from somewhere.

This just opens up the discussion on inflation vs. wages which at this point puts this thread over the edge. Let's just land this plane.
 

speakeasy

Peacock
Gold Member
thedude3737 said:
worldwidetraveler said:
Allowing illegals to have driver licenses and to get student loans is bypassing those regulations.

Access to programs paid by tax payers is bypassing those regulations.

Allowing them to work is bypassing those regulations.

By opening the door more, I suspect you will still have a worker shortage for low wage jobs. Who in their right mind would work a low paying job while they could be making roughly 36k in welfare benefits? I don't think we can afford more people on welfare.

Fully in agreement with you here.

I disagree that raising wages will attract non-illegals. However for the sake of argument, lets consider that scenario.

I can't speak for other industries, but the profits in many food production operations is quite thin. To make a long story short, if you raised the wages of dishwashers to $15 per hour, we simply wouldn't be able to afford them. We'd have to pass off the increased expense directly to the consumer through higher menu prices and check averages. The $32 entree becomes a $40 entree.

I operate my department on a firm percentage based budget. I know that 10% of my gross food sales goes to hourly labor. An increase of even 1% of my labor budget is significant and would reduce already slim profits to next to nothing. That money has to come from somewhere.

This just opens up the discussion on inflation vs. wages which at this point puts this thread over the edge. Let's just land this plane.

http://laist.com/2013/12/30/why_in-n-out_fast_food_workers_didn.php

Can someone explain to me how Inn-n-out can pay its workers $10.50/hr + benefits(for both FT and PT employees) and it's managers up to $120,000 a year while selling meals that cost $7 on average? Why does their business model of relative high wages work out for them? Especially in an industry where wages are usually the bare minimum. As an aside, Inn-N-Out is the ONLY fast food chain in California where I see whites and blacks working. Every other place is 100% Latino. Just an observation.

Edit -- Even though Inn N Out has the most generous compensation package in America for fast food workers, by the standards of other Western countries it still falls way behind. A McDonald's worker in Australia of course has the advantage of universal health care and their wages start at $15/hr. From what I hear you can actually live a middle class life in Scandinavia if you flip burgers. Yet in America we just can't seem to ever get wages up and everyone just sort of accepts it as an axiom of life that the rich are going to get richer and the poor poorer and there's nothing you can do about it.
 

Lemmo

 
Banned
MikeCF said:
Hencredible Casanova said:
Also, why has no one cited data when making claims about the economic and social impact of illegal immigrants? I'm just supposed to take your word?

The studies have been done. I don't link to them because it won't change your mind. Your political views are very conventional/PC.

Here's one of many, though:

http://cis.org/High-Cost-of-Cheap-Labor

Economists have done a poor job predicting/getting most anything right.

I don't value the consensus of economists.

Anyhow, you don't need to be an economist to see what has happened to California.

Previously livable neighborhoods and entire cities have gone to shit thanks to the influx of unskilled labor.

And there is no consensus. Anyone arguing that "immigration is good cause smart man tolds me so" obviously hasn't bothered to do any research. Plenty of studies about costs to social services, crime, retardation of technological progress, etc. And of course there is the little thing called common sense, which would suggest allowing the least educated people in the world to enter the country by the millions might be a bad thing for economic and non-economic reasons. As you point out, Americans have made their judgment of these immigrants by refusing to live, work or go to school with them to the extent they have the means to avoid them.
 

worldwidetraveler

Hummingbird
Gold Member
thedude3737 said:
worldwidetraveler said:
Allowing illegals to have driver licenses and to get student loans is bypassing those regulations.

Access to programs paid by tax payers is bypassing those regulations.

Allowing them to work is bypassing those regulations.

By opening the door more, I suspect you will still have a worker shortage for low wage jobs. Who in their right mind would work a low paying job while they could be making roughly 36k in welfare benefits? I don't think we can afford more people on welfare.

Fully in agreement with you here.

I disagree that raising wages will attract non-illegals. However for the sake of argument, lets consider that scenario.

Sure it would. I bet there would be plenty of people that would take that job for 10, 20 or 30 bucks an hour. There is always a price.

I can't speak for other industries, but the profits in many food production operations is quite thin. To make a long story short, if you raised the wages of dishwashers to $15 per hour, we simply wouldn't be able to afford them. We'd have to pass off the increased expense directly to the consumer through higher menu prices and check averages. The $32 entree becomes a $40 entree.

Exactly, and that is what I said in a couple of posts. That increase will be passed on to consumers and those consumers won't like that. Even the consumers that think illegal immigration is bad.

Same as the debate over Walmart. People think those workers don't get paid enough. Those same people would cry because of paying higher prices to subsidize higher wages.

You can't have both, there needs to be a middle ground.

Illegal immigration plays an important part in our economy. It helps keep prices down. The problem is when you offer them a path to citizenship they will have the same welfare benefits that everyone else has.

That means they have options other than working for really low wages as a dishwasher.

I remember watching a documentary on supermarkets. It sounds a lot like the restaurant industry based on razor thin margins. They try to make it up on volume which would be difficult in your biz.
 

Veloce

Crow
Gold Member
speakeasy said:
thedude3737 said:
worldwidetraveler said:
Allowing illegals to have driver licenses and to get student loans is bypassing those regulations.

Access to programs paid by tax payers is bypassing those regulations.

Allowing them to work is bypassing those regulations.

By opening the door more, I suspect you will still have a worker shortage for low wage jobs. Who in their right mind would work a low paying job while they could be making roughly 36k in welfare benefits? I don't think we can afford more people on welfare.

Fully in agreement with you here.

I disagree that raising wages will attract non-illegals. However for the sake of argument, lets consider that scenario.

I can't speak for other industries, but the profits in many food production operations is quite thin. To make a long story short, if you raised the wages of dishwashers to $15 per hour, we simply wouldn't be able to afford them. We'd have to pass off the increased expense directly to the consumer through higher menu prices and check averages. The $32 entree becomes a $40 entree.

I operate my department on a firm percentage based budget. I know that 10% of my gross food sales goes to hourly labor. An increase of even 1% of my labor budget is significant and would reduce already slim profits to next to nothing. That money has to come from somewhere.

This just opens up the discussion on inflation vs. wages which at this point puts this thread over the edge. Let's just land this plane.

http://laist.com/2013/12/30/why_in-n-out_fast_food_workers_didn.php

Can someone explain to me how Inn-n-out can pay its workers $10.50/hr + benefits(for both FT and PT employees) and it's managers up to $120,000 a year while selling meals that cost $7 on average? Why does their business model of relative high wages work out for them? Especially in an industry where wages are usually the minimum. As an aside, Inn-N-Out is the ONLY fast food chain in California where I see whites and blacks working. Every other place is 100% Latino. Just an observation.

$10.50 for cooks isn't very much. I start cooks at $11 and go up to $13.

In 'n' Out is the ideal food operation. It's a limited menu so there's zero waste. They're constantly busy. It's a good product that people like. They've likely established several contracts with their vendors that locks in prices for years to come, keeping their cost-of-goods low. It's a formula that works extremely well, and Chipotle is on a similar model.

McDonald's pales in comparison because of the gigantic menu. The "Big-boys" of fast food have a GIGANTIC amount of waste, it's pretty horrible actually.

When all you have is burgers, fries, and shakes on the menu, there's zero waste. That's quite a rare feat for a fast-food business to acheive. Every other company has to offset their waste with either higher prices, or cutting costs elsewhere, like wages.
 

worldwidetraveler

Hummingbird
Gold Member
speakeasy said:
http://laist.com/2013/12/30/why_in-n-out_fast_food_workers_didn.php

Can someone explain to me how Inn-n-out can pay its workers $10.50/hr + benefits(for both FT and PT employees) and it's managers up to $120,000 a year while selling meals that cost $7 on average? Why does their business model of relative high wages work out for them? Especially in an industry where wages are usually the minimum. As an aside, Inn-N-Out is the ONLY fast food chain in California where I see whites and blacks working. Every other place is 100% Latino. Just an observation.

Edit -- Even though Inn N Out has the most generation compensation package in America for fast food workers, by the standards of other Western countries it still falls way behind. A McDonald's worker in Australia of course has the advantage of universal health care and their wages start at $15/hr. From what I hear you can actually live a middle class life in Scandinavia if you flip burgers. Yet in America we just can't seem to ever get wages up and everyone just sort of accepts it as an axiom of life that the rich are going to get richer and the poor poorer and there's nothing you can do about it.


I would say part of the reason is because it is privately owned.
 

speakeasy

Peacock
Gold Member
worldwidetraveler said:
Exactly, and that is what I said in a couple of posts. That increase will be passed on to consumers and those consumers won't like that. Even the consumers that think illegal immigration is bad.

Same as the debate over Walmart. People think those workers don't get paid enough. Those same people would cry because of paying higher prices to subsidize higher wages.

You can't have both, there needs to be a middle ground.

Illegal immigration plays an important part in our economy. It helps keep prices down. The problem is when you offer them a path to citizenship they will have the same welfare benefits that everyone else.

That means they have options other than working for really low wages as a dishwasher.

I remember watching a documentary on supermarkets. It sounds a lot like the restaurant industry based on razor thin margins. They try to make it up on volume which would be difficult in your biz.

That's the rationale always thrown out when the Democrats try to raise the minimum wage. If we listened to this, the minimum wage would still be $2. Yet people still continue to shop there, so if prices are being raised, they are not being raised enough to deter consumers. There's no way you can tell me that Walmart, being one of the largest and wealthiest global corporations in the world cannot afford to pay a bit more. They aren't some marginal mom and pop business selling used books.
 
speakeasy said:
http://laist.com/2013/12/30/why_in-n-out_fast_food_workers_didn.php

Can someone explain to me how Inn-n-out can pay its workers $10.50/hr + benefits(for both FT and PT employees) and it's managers up to $120,000 a year while selling meals that cost $7 on average? Why does their business model of relative high wages work out for them? Especially in an industry where wages are usually the minimum. As an aside, Inn-N-Out is the ONLY fast food chain in California where I see whites and blacks working. Every other place is 100% Latino. Just an observation.

Edit -- Even though Inn N Out has the most generation compensation package in America for fast food workers, by the standards of other Western countries it still falls way behind. A McDonald's worker in Australia of course has the advantage of universal health care and their wages start at $15/hr. From what I hear you can actually live a middle class life in Scandinavia if you flip burgers. Yet in America we just can't seem to ever get wages up and everyone just sort of accepts it as an axiom of life that the rich are going to get richer and the poor poorer and there's nothing you can do about it.


Yeah. I've met young world-traveling waitresses from Scandinavia.

Australia is a rich country for its size. It only has 20 million people (about the same population as NY state) yet is a continent and country the same size as the US in land area (and with immense natural resources). It's also geographically isolated and cheap labor isn't widely available. Those cited hourly rates are gross, not net, and they pay lot more income tax than Americans.

As for your question about In N Out, I can only say In N Out is a private company with a limited presence (just a few western states I believe). Would it be able to keep the pay levels high if it expanded across the globe like Mickey D's? Mickey D's constantly invests profits into expanded growth, similar to Starbucks.
 

worldwidetraveler

Hummingbird
Gold Member
speakeasy said:
worldwidetraveler said:
Exactly, and that is what I said in a couple of posts. That increase will be passed on to consumers and those consumers won't like that. Even the consumers that think illegal immigration is bad.

Same as the debate over Walmart. People think those workers don't get paid enough. Those same people would cry because of paying higher prices to subsidize higher wages.

You can't have both, there needs to be a middle ground.

Illegal immigration plays an important part in our economy. It helps keep prices down. The problem is when you offer them a path to citizenship they will have the same welfare benefits that everyone else.

That means they have options other than working for really low wages as a dishwasher.

I remember watching a documentary on supermarkets. It sounds a lot like the restaurant industry based on razor thin margins. They try to make it up on volume which would be difficult in your biz.

That's the rationale always thrown out when the Democrats try to raise the minimum wage. If we listened to this, the minimum wage would still be $2. Yet people still continue to shop there, so if prices are being raised, they are not being raised enough to deter consumers. There's no way you can tell me that Walmart, being one of the largest and wealthiest global corporations in the world cannot afford to pay a bit more. They aren't some marginal mom and pop business selling used books.

Why should Walmart pay more?

If people don't want to work for what they pay, they will have to raise their wages to meet demand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top