Instagram testing "tipping" feature. Bigger than Onlyfans
- Thread starter SlickyBoy
- Start date
Unfortunately, zoomer males are incredibly socially retarded and anxious. Not entirely without reason, either, but it's still a shame that such a great number of them have simply decided to go with it, have all their intimacy mediated through corporations and codified into a transaction.
I'll say what I always say. You have an Internet filled with free images of nude women, hot women, women in movies, women talking dirty on podcasts, and so on.
If that's your thing, why in the world would you choose to pay for that? There's also vintage niche stuff. You could spend years going through PDFs of old Playboys.
Beyond all that, I find it degrading as a man that I'd be "tipping" a woman for just putting out a picture. What does that signify?
Well, like it or not, this will unintentionally signify that all women are sex object/pseudo-prostitutes. All it takes is a small percentage of a group to do something for that whole group to be tainted with the stereotype. Just as the Italian gangsters and Irish drunks.
We've never had a society before (as far as I know), where it's been widespread that men are supposed to "tip" women for merely existing. People are dreaming if they don't think this will permanently alter the male/female dynamic, esp. among younger people.
If that's your thing, why in the world would you choose to pay for that? There's also vintage niche stuff. You could spend years going through PDFs of old Playboys.
Beyond all that, I find it degrading as a man that I'd be "tipping" a woman for just putting out a picture. What does that signify?
Well, like it or not, this will unintentionally signify that all women are sex object/pseudo-prostitutes. All it takes is a small percentage of a group to do something for that whole group to be tainted with the stereotype. Just as the Italian gangsters and Irish drunks.
We've never had a society before (as far as I know), where it's been widespread that men are supposed to "tip" women for merely existing. People are dreaming if they don't think this will permanently alter the male/female dynamic, esp. among younger people.
Future relationship articles will read like "how much should you tip her only fans account on your first date?"
Its also going to lead to some insane dynamics. Like if some girl gets feelings for some guy that pays her money on only fans (not in this era, but if its ubiquitous, who knows). She somehow thinks they are dating, the guy is like "uh...I was clearly just paying you" she, as an act of revenge reports him to the local police for soliciting prostitution...of which she gets no charges because "sex work is feminism" etc.
SlickyBoy
Hummingbird
That's pre-tax. It'll soon be tIme for another thot audit.
Meanwhile in sane world, men with wives get to see their wife's breasts for free, physically be with their wife for free, and even... gasp! Have sex for free!
Pathetic, the lot of them. Simps. Grow a pair. And the OnlyFans girls: whores. They are w-h-o-r-e-s. Prostitutes. Someone has to say it.
Men who have been married to women for any length of time know that nothing is 'for free'.
Stop letting women rule over you.Men who have been married to women for any length of time know that nothing is 'for free'.
I've been divorced for 10 years and live alone, never been more free in my life even with the scam Covid-19 'pademic'. Stop jumping to conclusions or you may brake an ankle.
So you were ruled over by a woman. Where am I wrong?
ScannerLIV
Woodpecker
Those guys are not paying for sexual content but their perceived artificial intimacy with the girls on the screen. Nothing more.
Sure they can grow "pairs of balls" but realize that given all advantages and privileges western women have, men have largely become obsolete as long as theft of their resources are transferred to women via taxes, equity quotas, divorces, gender preferred scholarships are maintained.
Moreover most of these guys have zero chances anyway because of their looks, poor social skills, or simply being "blue-pilled"
Reality of the modern sexual market is jaw-dropping brutal in its totality. All the more savage considering our current technical modern civilization.
Remember this: by 2040, if not earlier, half of women (and by extension more than half of men) will be single.
And we know which gender is pushing this trend.
Sure they can grow "pairs of balls" but realize that given all advantages and privileges western women have, men have largely become obsolete as long as theft of their resources are transferred to women via taxes, equity quotas, divorces, gender preferred scholarships are maintained.
Moreover most of these guys have zero chances anyway because of their looks, poor social skills, or simply being "blue-pilled"
Reality of the modern sexual market is jaw-dropping brutal in its totality. All the more savage considering our current technical modern civilization.
Remember this: by 2040, if not earlier, half of women (and by extension more than half of men) will be single.
And we know which gender is pushing this trend.
There was always something "off" about the glitzy social media apps where one has to upload specially filtered photos and videos.
Facebook was bad, Instagram multiplied that by a factor of 10 and made things lot worse.
Clearly, all these social media companies want to solely cater to the female gender and want to curry favour with them.
Guys shouldn't be giving their attention to these types of women.
Attention is the currency in girl-world. Do not give it to them.
There are better things to do than watch some body parts flashed by some loose women with questionable morals and character (if they had morals and character, they wouldn't be on such platforms in the first place).
Facebook was bad, Instagram multiplied that by a factor of 10 and made things lot worse.
Clearly, all these social media companies want to solely cater to the female gender and want to curry favour with them.
Guys shouldn't be giving their attention to these types of women.
Attention is the currency in girl-world. Do not give it to them.
There are better things to do than watch some body parts flashed by some loose women with questionable morals and character (if they had morals and character, they wouldn't be on such platforms in the first place).
I think what he’s trying to say is that marriage is a give and take. Being a leader is work, even in a relationship. Just as being a platoon leader isn’t all salutes and offices; being a husband isn’t all hot meals and sex on demand. I could be wrong, but I think that’s where he was going.
Marriage is consent.1 Cor. 7:4-5 said:
Sigh...yes, yes it is. What I’m trying to say is that being the leader of your marriage carries obligations as well. Leadership is hard. It’s work.
Okay, so I see what this is devolving into. This is devolving into a false equivocation between the "work" of being a husband and the "work" that simps have to put into to get the money in order to pay their OnlyFans queens for attention. My point about a husband getting it for free is that in a biblically framed marriage, he does not have to do anything special to see her naked or touch her. Yes, he still has to work as a husband to provide her with her needs on an ongoing basis, but seeing his wife naked is as simple as just waking up in the morning. Whereas an OnlyFans simp has to put in a lot of time and money just to get even a drip of attention from his OF queen, and then some more for just 5 minutes of being physically within 25 feet of her.
That's what I mean about getting it for free. I am fully aware that if you translate everything into pure economic terms, I'm not really getting it for free because societal costs, cost of responsibility, no such thing as a free lunch, yadda yadda. But in the end, a husband has something an OnlyFans simp will never have: constant and ongoing access to his wife's body. Unless the wife's frigid, in which case you do not have a biblically framed marriage on your hands.
Also, Ralph's first post in response to me was an obvious reference to (((modern culture's))) tendency to joke about the frigidity of wives and the weakness and betatude of husbands as a good thing. It's one of those things that hark back to the Boomer days when married men would get together and then "jokingly" whine about how their wives don't let them touch them anymore. Ergo, women ruling over them. Ergo my comment about stop letting women rule over him.
So that's some fun with rhetoric.
And I am speaking from experience. I do not have to "work for it" like Boomer men loved to claim they had to. Because my wife does not rule over me. Yes, I realize I have a rare marriage.
I think we agree and simply had a misunderstanding. I’m always open to the fact that I may be wrong!