Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Elipe" data-source="post: 1502236" data-attributes="member: 17998">Okay, so I see what this is devolving into. This is devolving into a false equivocation between the &quot;work&quot; of being a husband and the &quot;work&quot; that simps have to put into to get the money in order to pay their OnlyFans queens for attention. My point about a husband getting it for free is that in a biblically framed marriage, he does not have to do anything special to see her naked or touch her. Yes, he still has to work as a husband to provide her with her needs on an ongoing basis, but seeing his wife naked is as simple as just waking up in the morning. Whereas an OnlyFans simp has to put in a lot of time and money just to get even a drip of attention from his OF queen, and then some more for just 5 minutes of being physically within 25 feet of her.That's what I mean about getting it for free. I am fully aware that if you translate everything into pure economic terms, I'm not really getting it for free because societal costs, cost of responsibility, no such thing as a free lunch, yadda yadda. But in the end, a husband has something an OnlyFans simp will never have: constant and ongoing access to his wife's body. Unless the wife's frigid, in which case you do not have a biblically framed marriage on your hands.Also, Ralph's first post in response to me was an obvious reference to (((modern culture's))) tendency to joke about the frigidity of wives and the weakness and betatude of husbands as a good thing. It's one of those things that hark back to the Boomer days when married men would get together and then &quot;jokingly&quot; whine about how their wives don't let them touch them anymore. Ergo, women ruling over them. Ergo my comment about stop letting women rule over him.So that's some fun with rhetoric.And I am speaking from experience. I do not have to &quot;work for it&quot; like Boomer men loved to claim they had to. Because my wife does not rule over me. Yes, I realize I have a rare marriage.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Elipe, post: 1502236, member: 17998"] Okay, so I see what this is devolving into. This is devolving into a false equivocation between the "work" of being a husband and the "work" that simps have to put into to get the money in order to pay their OnlyFans queens for attention. My point about a husband getting it for free is that in a biblically framed marriage, he does not have to do anything special to see her naked or touch her. Yes, he still has to work as a husband to provide her with her needs on an ongoing basis, but seeing his wife naked is as simple as just waking up in the morning. Whereas an OnlyFans simp has to put in a lot of time and money just to get even a drip of attention from his OF queen, and then some more for just 5 minutes of being physically within 25 feet of her. That's what I mean about getting it for free. I am fully aware that if you translate everything into pure economic terms, I'm not really getting it for free because societal costs, cost of responsibility, no such thing as a free lunch, yadda yadda. But in the end, a husband has something an OnlyFans simp will never have: constant and ongoing access to his wife's body. Unless the wife's frigid, in which case you do not have a biblically framed marriage on your hands. Also, Ralph's first post in response to me was an obvious reference to (((modern culture's))) tendency to joke about the frigidity of wives and the weakness and betatude of husbands as a good thing. It's one of those things that hark back to the Boomer days when married men would get together and then "jokingly" whine about how their wives don't let them touch them anymore. Ergo, women ruling over them. Ergo my comment about stop letting women rule over him. So that's some fun with rhetoric. And I am speaking from experience. I do not have to "work for it" like Boomer men loved to claim they had to. Because my wife does not rule over me. Yes, I realize I have a rare marriage. [/QUOTE]

Verification