Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
Is Civilization much Older than we're led to Beleive?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Teedub" data-source="post: 959370" data-attributes="member: 4257"><p>Shout out to Thought Gypsy and others in this thread. I've since got my hands on a lot of material and I'm a firm believer that the original Sphinx (possibly a lion rather than a human face - due to the constellation Leo, I think is the theory) is WAY older than what we're told by mainstream archaeology. There's so much data out there now about a possible comet collision that would have massively affected earth around the period these theories say had huge floods etc. </p><p></p><p>Great thread. Also props to Joe Rogan for giving these guys like Graham Hancock, John Anthony West etc a platform.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Teedub, post: 959370, member: 4257"] Shout out to Thought Gypsy and others in this thread. I've since got my hands on a lot of material and I'm a firm believer that the original Sphinx (possibly a lion rather than a human face - due to the constellation Leo, I think is the theory) is WAY older than what we're told by mainstream archaeology. There's so much data out there now about a possible comet collision that would have massively affected earth around the period these theories say had huge floods etc. Great thread. Also props to Joe Rogan for giving these guys like Graham Hancock, John Anthony West etc a platform. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
Is Civilization much Older than we're led to Beleive?
Top
