"Islam is right about women" signs posted in Boston cause mass confusion

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
Days of Broken Arrows said:
From the video: "Is it free speech or hate speech?"

The fact that this question is being asked without irony shows how off-course our country has gotten. People don't seem to understand that anything can qualify as hate speech. Once you've recognized hate speech as a concept, you're on your way to getting rid of free speech.

That said, I don't think most of the people in this video understood the irony in that sign. I just think they thought "Sign bad!" like they think "Red hat bad!" We're giving them too much credit to assume they thought this through. Most Americans don't seem capable of complex thought anymore -- something exemplified by how dumbed-down popular entertainment had gotten.

A sizable percentage of the population these days are so timid and automaton that an A4 piece of paper with any message whatsoever on it duct taped to any public surface is enough to trigger their "call the authorities" response.

Ironically if you spent a few grand and made movie-poster sized messages with stylish font and colorful backgrounds that look like they were produced by a company then nobody would even look at them twice.

The immediate trigger for many drones coming across this message is that they can instantly tell it was put there by someone without the social authority to express themselves publicly. Either the authority of the state or the authority of wealth.
 

questor70

 
Banned
SJWs tend to see the world more in terms of power dynamics than actual good and evil.

Any group that has a power advantage over another group is deemed an oppressor even if the group being oppressed harbors despicable attitudes and commits evil acts. You see this most dramatically with the Palestinians and Israelis like that idiot woman who went over there and got herself run over by a tractor. There are even extreme liberals who literally make apologies for violence. These people are no better than fascists on the other extreme who make apologies for genocide.

The sympathy is extended in almost knee-jerk fashion to underdogs regardless of how these groups lead their lives. And in the name of avoiding prejudice, these groups are given way too much benefit of the doubt. Since many ethnic groups in the past were unfairly maligned, they naively assume every group is equally virtuous and benign to society. That's just how it is. It's a very simplistic view of the world.
 

Foolsgo1d

Peacock
scorpion said:
I've written before about how leftists and Muslims both view each other as useful idiots. It's not like liberals don't understand that what Islam teaches conflicts with their values. They just choose to ignore it because Islam is a useful weapon against their most hated enemy - the white, Christian male. Leftists believe that Muslims will drop their religious values over time and convert to the religion of globohomo. Muslims (at least the ones liberals talk to) are happy to play along with the leftist fantasy of multicultural tolerance for the time being. They know their day is coming and the demographics on their side, especially in Europe.

Like Starship Troopers, "its a question of numbers, they have more." :laugh:
 

Days of Broken Arrows

Crow
Gold Member
Leonard D Neubache said:
Days of Broken Arrows said:
From the video: "Is it free speech or hate speech?"

The fact that this question is being asked without irony shows how off-course our country has gotten. People don't seem to understand that anything can qualify as hate speech. Once you've recognized hate speech as a concept, you're on your way to getting rid of free speech.

That said, I don't think most of the people in this video understood the irony in that sign. I just think they thought "Sign bad!" like they think "Red hat bad!" We're giving them too much credit to assume they thought this through. Most Americans don't seem capable of complex thought anymore -- something exemplified by how dumbed-down popular entertainment had gotten.

A sizable percentage of the population these days are so timid and automaton that an A4 piece of paper with any message whatsoever on it duct taped to any public surface is enough to trigger their "call the authorities" response.

Ironically if you spent a few grand and made movie-poster sized messages with stylish font and colorful backgrounds that look like they were produced by a company then nobody would even look at them twice.

The immediate trigger for many drones coming across this message is that they can instantly tell it was put there by someone without the social authority to express themselves publicly. Either the authority of the state or the authority of wealth.

Have you ever heard No Trend's "Teen Love" -- an indie punk cult classic from 1983? Your comment reminds me of some of the lyrics:

"They could act "really mad", "happy" or even "sad"
According to the current pre-fabricated social circumstances
They had copied all aspects of their behavior
From what they'd observed in society
At the school dance, they were careful to exhibit
Only behavior which had been approved by their peer group...

They were killed in an auto wreck while driving to and fro
After drinking two beers, he was pretending to be "drunk."
While the local popular radio station
Played the newest pre-designated, youth-oriented "top-forty hits..."


 

Going strong

Crow
Orthodox Inquirer
Gold Member
Samseau said:
Syberpunk said:
Islam is right about homosexuality.

Should be next.

Exactly. This looks like a 4Chan pysop similar to "It's okay to be White."

Put the left's coalition of discontents against each other. They all have extremely conflicting beliefs, making them confront each other is great.

This "Islam is right about women" pits women against Islam.

Muslims think, "These feminists are disgusting," and Women think, "I have rights Islam can't touch!!"

It keeps them from touching each other's causes.

Reminds me of Clooney VS Islam:

https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-72807.html

Update on this, by the way: https://www.wgbh.org/news/internati...-death-by-stoning-law-for-gay-sex-sultan-says

Stoning of Gays is suspended (though the law still exists and can be re-implemented at any time), but anyway "whipping women convicted of having lesbian sex" remains a law in full force, in sunny Islamic Brunei. :banana:

Well, looks like I'll relocate to Brunei once my holidays in Boston are over.
 

Teedub

Crow
Gold Member
The stupidity of the interviewees is quite difficult to watch. They're 'outraged'... by something, but they aren't really sure what. Some of them have cognitive dissonance, sure, but some are just morons. This would be the same in the UK by the way, I'm not dissing the States.
 

catoblepa

Woodpecker
They try to rationalize their dilemma claiming that Islam is not that bad to women and we must not generalize quoting a page of the Quran where Mohammed says to be respectful to women while overlooking all the other excerpts where he recommends 8 lashes or so as a punishment to disobedient wives and all other amenities.
 

Newguy101

Sparrow
This was a 4chan thread on /pol/ not long ago.
The board is pretty bipolar.
Hates islam but wants similar for culture for whites.
Hates coal burning but has yellow fever or will race mix with any girl given the chance.
Call own girls roasties and racemixers then loyal and chaste in another.
This incel epidemic is likely just undiagnosed mental illness. Sorta like tumblr.
But gotta say 4chan and tumblr are like brother and sister. Both nuts but far end on opposite spectrum.
 

Easy_C

Peacock
The main difference is that 4chan is the guerillas and that Tumblr is now over to Twitter, which means they're more akin to the occupiers.

4channers demonstrate far more craftiness and ingenuity out of simple necessity. They only way they can make a scratch is if they do something that's calculated to cause outrage....

and they take the bait. every....damn....time....
 
I find the meme one of the most NPC-busting actions out there:



[attachment=42448]

The most hilarious aspect about this is how the women reacted to it all with some even bringing the paper to the cops.

But alas - I am not with Ahmet on a lot of things, but there are matters we can agree upon:

am-a-muslim-and-a-feminist-ahmed-get-the-stones-25881573.png
 

Attachments

  • 1568921263146.jpg
    1568921263146.jpg
    59.6 KB · Views: 1,975

Days of Broken Arrows

Crow
Gold Member
catoblepa said:
They try to rationalize their dilemma claiming that Islam is not that bad to women and we must not generalize quoting a page of the Quran where Mohammed says to be respectful to women while overlooking all the other excerpts where he recommends 8 lashes or so as a punishment to disobedient wives and all other amenities.

In other words, "Believe what we tell you, not what's right in front of your face." They're like the used car salesmen of politics.
 
Best also this woman at 0330 in the BlackPigeon wideo who makes it also about Jews! Oy vey - this is so anti-semitic. The Muslim woman in a Niqab espoused more freedom of speech on that subject.
 

mehdreamer

Sparrow
Jokes aside...as an ex muslim, the only redeeming quality I see in Islam is its views on women and gender dynamics..

Hijab/headscarf was originally designed to cover women’s body but it's actually a way to keep their hypergamous nature in check.

Men are visual creatures. Half-naked females walking down the street have an edge over men. Just read the comment section of any Insta Thot.

Cover them up and they will become random, indistinguishable and interchangeable. Just one among many.
 

Muffuguh

Pigeon
The more radical branches of Islam kick it up a notch and cut off part or all of the clitoris to try to control female sexuality. In the UK laws have been passed against this, although almost no one has been convicted. The media routinely brings up Female Genital Mutilation, as it's called, to show how barbaric they are and how advanced we are. No word on cutting off part of male infants' penises, but that's another thread.

Imagine my surprise when a Somali girl met on tinder showed off her partially cut clitoris and joked that "it's a good thing my dad did it, otherwise I'd be even more of a slut"

I come into contact with quite a few in this demographic and they generally look down on white culture but sure as hell aren't going back to strict Islam either.

I don't agree with the methodology but on some level I understand why people would react violently at Western degenerate culture infiltrating their societies.
 

mehdreamer

Sparrow
Muffuguh said:
The more radical branches of Islam kick it up a notch and cut off part or all of the clitoris to try to control female sexuality. In the UK laws have been passed against this, although almost no one has been convicted. The media routinely brings up Female Genital Mutilation, as it's called, to show how barbaric they are and how advanced we are. No word on cutting off part of male infants' penises, but that's another thread.

Imagine my surprise when a Somali girl met on tinder showed off her partially cut clitoris and joked that "it's a good thing my dad did it, otherwise I'd be even more of a slut"

I come into contact with quite a few in this demographic and they generally look down on white culture but sure as hell aren't going back to strict Islam either.

I don't agree with the methodology but on some level I understand why people would react violently at Western degenerate culture infiltrating their societies.
I agree. I still consider FGM as barbaric by today's standards...but I can see the end goal of it and what they were trying to achieve back then..

The idea behind it is sexual restraint for females. In a desert environment where resources are scarce, tribes cannot afford to have their females slut around and get pregnant.

It is also linked to virginity as it help increase female's marriageability. A marriage, means new alliances for the tribe, etc.

It predates Islam...but since it was part of the social order, Islam had no objections to its practice and it became part of it, although there are debates among "scholars".
 
Way to go to justify barbarism in order to keep women in check. There is no need to go back to the Muslim califate. That's like shooting yourself into both feet in order to lose weight.

The West had a far superior system up until roughly the 1930s and in some countries beyond that. You had wives - honorable women - and you had sluts/hookers. Honorable women did not go with a man on their own, never went alone with him anywhere and married early.

Obviously modern systems would need adaptations, but it can be done if sane healthy models were promoted. This can be done without throwing a towel over them relentlessly and wiping out their clitoris which contributes to different behavior, weight gain and even a form of eternal frustration in many.

As most things imagined by Islam - it's just retarded.
Keep the family strong - marry in the family with your cousins and uncles. - You end up with a literally dumber weaker population vs to what it could be.
Keep the old traditions strong - burn and destroy all infidel knowledge, the Quran is the only book you know. You end up with knowledge barely being done and the entire Muslim world publishing as many books as one mid-sized European country - nevermind patent generation and other achievements.
Have polygamy and female restraint which necessities eternal warfar and constant supply of slaves - since you cannto have that becasu the West has become too strong = rampant homosexuality in countries like Saudi Arabia where many bottom class men fuck powerbottoms and consider themselves not gay. (and they may not be - they are just victims in a prison system called Islam)

In reality the wide majority of Western girls even in the 1950s or for Eastern European countries up to the 1970s wasn't as degenerate as advertised. The cultural marxism and aggressive promotion of degeneration, slut-pushing vs slut-shaming - all began with the 70s, but accelerated in the 80s and 90s - resulting in the 00s Tinder-super-power-mode. It runs counter the inherent female instincts. It takes one war and one shitlord totalitarian ruler to promote sane values again.
 
Top