Here you can see the deaths reported in Sweden 2015 to 2019 (grey lines), in 2020 (red line) and in 2021 (purple line) and what would have been normal for 2020 based on previous years (black line). As in all other countries, as you can see, it shows a massive spike for 2020.
Your graphs are different, I believe, because you select certain parametres only on the Swedish website, like only selecting certain ages.
Sweden is not the only country in the world that logs births and deaths, virtually all countries do. There can always be issues with methodology, however, the overall data is so clear there is really no room for misunderstanding. I do not need to separate the ages, I am merely looking at overall excess death figures. And yes, you get similar data for Mexico and Malaysia. Whatever the differences the overall picture is crystal clear however.
View attachment 34197
On this page we provide an overview of excess mortality along with charts to explore the data. You can learn in more depth about different measures of excess mortality, their strengths and limitations, and their comparability across countries in our work with John Muellbauer and Janine Aron.
ourworldindata.org
As others have commented, we should be having this discussion in another thread, but before that I will answer your last comment.
First off if you answer, please read your counterpart's comment. Otherwise you would have known from just looking at the figures that I selected
all available age groups,. Second of all, I didn't deny there was an "excess mortality". As you would see in the figures I posted, the excess mortality was concentrated in the oldest age groups, deaths per thousand among the youngest groups even went down in 2020. The excess mortality is even comparable to 2002 or 2010, this is especially true for the younger age groups. Did Sweden close in those years when youngsters were "dying like flies"?
What I deny is that there was ever a justification for lockdowns, the new normal or the concoctions and the numbers so far bear this out. Therefore the motivations behind this hysteria are far darker than many of us imagine.
Third, Many numbers in the third world are not reliable, are not published and when they are, they are outdated one or more years. In many cases the raw data is there but there is a never ending work of purging and correcting the records a work most politicians down here are not inclined to support, unless it is done with borrowed money or technical cooperations. In many of these countries, the data is there but is spread in many independent reports, faulty databases, different organizations with different processing methodolgies etc. Hence my question about how they got these data, when it's not published even in the official records in the countries of origin. I guess they got "special" access to this data, who knows, but that in itself thwarts any attempt at double checking.
By the way, the excess mortality can only be attributed to the "pandemic" either by
excess deaths directly caused by the disease or by externalities attributed to the "pandemic" (overloading of the hospitalization services, supply chain collapse, civil disorder, wars etc.). So far no evidence of either has surfaced. As others have said, the excess mortality in most places has been due to a mix of killer protocols (refusal to provide prevention care, ventilators when not needed), denial of medical services altogether in many cases, lockdown and impoverishment (try lockdowns in Peru, or certain countries in Africa, even in Australia where general mortality increased by 5% even though the cases and deaths attributed to covid are barely 1500 out of 25 million people), etc. One can almost say they tried to "simulate" the impacts of a real pandemic, but I digress.
In regards to the graph, the real question would be the methodology behind the calculation. But there are basic flaws very conspicuous even at first sight: the comparison timeframe is really short (5 years) and there is not breakdown by ages or causes of death..., those "mistakes" say a lot about the creators' biases and what they try to "prove".
Well, I made my point, good luck.
