Jews publicly agitating for the destruction of Russia

Pilgrim of the East

 
Banned
Protestant
Basically "the current war" is the work of Nuland, Blinken and most Ashkenazis who are currently running US foreign policy, along with others from their community shaping public opinion in the MSM, think tanks and popular culture harbor a very deep, ancestral hatred against Christian Russia. People like Julia Yoffe, or that "Cathy Young" character above.

Gonzalo Lira in the video above goes into the family history of Victoria Nuland, and shows how her hatred of Christian Russia is the driving force behind her political career. There is a deep-seated drive to avenge their grandparents being "persecuted" by Russia, and generally speaking a hatred of all Christian Slavs.
Victoria Nuland didn't start the war, Putin did. He was planning it (as evidenced by the article released in an accident in advance by RIA Novosti ) but he miscalculated (also as evidenced by the content of the said article)

People like you try to paint Putin as a Lenin/Stalin-like figure who yearns for the old USSR are misrepresenting this essential nuance.
Putin doesn't need my help painting him yearning for the old USSR - why did he have playing a remake of Burce Springteen's song, Made in the USSR when he appeared in public last time otherwise? He also said that "the demise of the Soviet Union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century"
 

Enigma

Hummingbird
Orthodox Inquirer
Gold Member
Get2Choppa, and other Justinian defenders, I strongly and respectfully disagree with you. I believe you are mistaken.
I agree that Justinian was demon possessed. His own top historian wrote the condemnation against Justinian, why would he do that if not for Truth's sake?

Not the derail the thread, but just because he's officially a saint means nothing, he strong-armed the church and made them do terrible things. I've looked into the matter over months, pouring over mountains of evidence, and my best conclusion was that Justinian was one of the worst emperors Byzantium ever had, and most destructive.

No one should be above criticism, we are all judged equally in the eyes of God, all true saints called themselves sinners.

Why did their contemporaries ignore Procopius' writings and canonize Justinian? Maybe they knew better?

Another emperor-saint, Nikephoros II Phokas, was assassinated by his own wife and nephew, who was also his top general. That he was betrayed by people close to him doesn't mean he's not a saint. The entire history of Byzantium is filled with this kind of scheming and no emperor, saintly or not, was above it.

The Jewish religious leaders condemned Jesus and the Roman authorities crucified Him. I guess that was truth too, huh? Just a completely silly argument on your part.

"just because he's officially a saint means nothing"

So, the Church -- and thus the canonization process -- aren't guided by the Holy Spirit? St. Justinian's sanctity isn't doubted and hasn't been for over a thousand years.

You or some "secret history" -- which, again, was known to their contemporaries -- don't get to rewrite history and the longstanding tradition of the Church because you did "months" of research.

Justinian started a golden age, almost completely restored Rome's historical borders, built dozens of churches (including the Hagia Sophia), presided over the Fifth Ecumenical Council, and even penned theological works that are still cited to this day. Those are basic facts that almost everyone agrees on. To say he was the worst Byzantine emperor or possessed by demons is laughable even by secular standards.

Even if one didn't think that he was a saint, that statement is just so absurd that it proves how unserious your claims are as a whole. Just the objective, factual accomplishments of Justinian's reign put him way beyond some of the completely incompetent or crazy emperors.

What were the "horrible things" he did? Fought wars and punished heretics? So did many other saints, including St. Constantine, Equal to the Apostles.
 

Stoyan

 
Banned
Orthodox
I agree that Justinian was demon possessed. His own top historian wrote the condemnation against Justinian, why would he do that if not for Truth's sake?

I think that history is written by the victors, never for truth's sake. It's the Game of Thrones, whoever wins, gets to write history. No doubt there was anti-Justinian party in the Byzantine Empire who sought to write against him after his death.
 

Easy_C

Peacock
are you saying, that I should watch 2 hour long video by a Hispanic guy to find out about the Jews calling for the destruction of Russia?

Why don't you post original sources instead?
He doesn't call out "The jews" as a whole.

And the claims he makes here are very easily fact-checked.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 911

Pointy Elbows

Kingfisher
Orthodox
Victoria Nuland didn't start the war, Putin did. He was planning it (as evidenced by the article released in an accident in advance by RIA Novosti ) but he miscalculated (also as evidenced by the content of the said article)


Putin doesn't need my help painting him yearning for the old USSR - why did he have playing a remake of Burce Springteen's song, Made in the USSR when he appeared in public last time otherwise? He also said that "the demise of the Soviet Union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century"
Looks like Pilgrim of the East is gone now. Though I disagree with him, he represents a common thought process I have heard from family and friends. I'd' rather Pilgrim be around - to give a counter-argument that some of us hear often.

Yes, Pilgrim, Putin did start the war. For that he will get his day at judgement. Perhaps he is the "peacemaker," that is to be blessed. Perhaps not, and he is a malicious villain. God will judge him.

Yes, Pilgrim, Putin planned this war. It was a deliberate act, one with forethought and extensive planning (with evident shortfalls). Time will tell how bad that planning was. Perhaps it was a massive blunder, as he has defied laws of maneuver warfare, attacking a near 300k force with his 200k. Any military planner will advise against this. Perhaps it was a master stroke, built upon a plan to isolate and defeat smaller subsets of the enemy piecemeal. Scott Ritter's "big arrow war" video is a good explanation of this.

Time will also tell: was it a logical response to a worsening situation, or premature and unjustified. As news (yes, maybe propaganda?) comes out that Ukraine was massing forces in preparation for a March master-assault across the Donbass, I am actually becoming more sympathetic to Putin, not less. Likewise, Zelensky is dropping his mask and he is clearly now a Russian hater. I don't trust Zelensky - not one bit. I think it is fully in his character to talk about peace as he is massing forces for an attack on an ethnic minority in his country. Especially a minority that he hates, his masters hate, and his benefactors hate. As a Czech, would you not feel some responsibility to protect ethnic Czechs in nearby countries? If you had the means to protect them from an assault and believed in the justness of your cause, would you stand by silently as a neighbor country assaulted your "kin and kind?" This is not an insult, but a legitimate question. I'm not asking if you would initiate contact with a 30M man Wehrmacht, I'm asking if you would go to war with an equal or smaller power to protect your own kind. If not, would you lose any sleep at the thought of leaving your cousins to fend for themselves, when you had the chance to help? Would you not be willing to "get your hands dirty" in the process?

As an American, I can say that such thought process - ethnic loyalty - is bred and trained out of our (white) population. I still have it, and many here do, but I find commonly that (white) Americans have zero ethnic loyalty, nor even racial benevolence. We are more loyal to a dubious "democracy" than we are to our own kind. That is not to mean any harm to others, but it is strange the extent to which ethnic Europeans will demonstrate no consideration for their own kind. Putin is "bucking" this way of thinking, and it is an absolute shock to many westerners.

Finally: Yes, Pilgrim, I believe Putin seeks a return to a greater Russ. Perhaps it is an evil like the USSR, killing millions in sake of a godless empire. I doubt it, but If so, damn him. Maybe it is a return of a patriarchate Tsar-like era. Perhaps he plays "Boss' Bruce Springsteen for Russians, because it sounds cool and reminds them of glory days - you know, the days before your adversaries entered your country and plundered nearly all your industry while your population lost a decade of life expectancy. Have your politicians never played somewhat off-message music just to amp up a crowd?

So what does this all have to do with "Jews agitating for Russia's destruction?" Well, it pivots largely on Zelensky. Do you trust this man, with all his nefarious contacts and benefactors? Would you trust him and his circle of advisors to run your country? Do you really see Zelensky as a "Jewish man looking out for the little guy," or is he "out to stick it to the Russians" while your country gets wrecked? Do you think Zelensky has any true loyalty to his gentile ethnic-Ukrainian Ukrainians? Would you bet your life on it, seeing how he has hung his regular Army out to dry? Clearly he has no loyalty to his ethnic-Russian Ukrainian citizens. If and once the Russians are vanquished, will he turn on his ethnic-Ukrainian citizenry, or just use them as pawns in his "Greater Israel?"

To the thread title: How is jewish animosity to Russia working out for Ukraine?
 

Coja Petrus Uscan

Crow
Orthodox Inquirer
Gold Member
Looks like Pilgrim of the East is gone now. Though I disagree with him, he represents a common thought process I have heard from family and friends. I'd' rather Pilgrim be around - to give a counter-argument that some of us hear often.

I don't think it was his position on this topic. He probably racked up lots of points due to numerous posts against the rules. Namely rule 1 - don't use mocking or condescending language, on top of use of profanity.
 

Ember

Hummingbird
Other Christian
Gold Member
Looks like Pilgrim of the East is gone now. Though I disagree with him, he represents a common thought process I have heard from family and friends. I'd' rather Pilgrim be around - to give a counter-argument that some of us hear often.
I don't know about that, in principle yes, but the difference with family and friends is that they tend to argue in good faith, and not be disingenuous. With people like Pilgrim, no answer will ever be good enough, and they will endlessly argue with everyone.
 

Samseau

Eagle
Orthodox
Gold Member
Why did their contemporaries ignore Procopius' writings and canonize Justinian? Maybe they knew better?

Because they did not want to die, or be put in jail, or have their tongues cut out?

Another emperor-saint, Nikephoros II Phokas, was assassinated by his own wife and nephew, who was also his top general. That he was betrayed by people close to him doesn't mean he's not a saint. The entire history of Byzantium is filled with this kind of scheming and no emperor, saintly or not, was above it.

I haven't looked into that particular emperor so I cannot comment.

The Jewish religious leaders condemned Jesus and the Roman authorities crucified Him. I guess that was truth too, huh? Just a completely silly argument on your part.

In fact, Jesus was very much kept alive by the Procopius' of his time, and the Bible was considered the Secret History of Christ for nearly 100 years after the death of Christ. The Bible was burned wherever it was found until God judged the Jews and had most of them exterminated, so that earliest Bibles can only be traced back to 77 AD - several years after the destruction of Jerusalem.

"just because he's officially a saint means nothing"

So, the Church -- and thus the canonization process -- aren't guided by the Holy Spirit? St. Justinian's sanctity isn't doubted and hasn't been for over a thousand years.

Not when clergy are threatened to be killed, imprisoned, or defrocked by the Emperor. You really don't understand how much power Justinian amassed, do you? It's no different than the puppet Bishops installed by the soviets.

You or some "secret history" -- which, again, was known to their contemporaries -- don't get to rewrite history and the longstanding tradition of the Church because you did "months" of research.

Was not known to their contemporaries. It was hidden by those wishing to preserve the truth, and was not rediscovered until the Catholics sacked Constantinople and stole the library there. It was brought back amidst a treasure haul of books to the Vatican, and was only discovered by a librarian monk in the 15th or 16th century. It was quite literally Secret history.

Justinian started a golden age, almost completely restored Rome's historical borders, built dozens of churches (including the Hagia Sophia), presided over the Fifth Ecumenical Council, and even penned theological works that are still cited to this day. Those are basic facts that almost everyone agrees on. To say he was the worst Byzantine emperor or possessed by demons is laughable even by secular standards.

False - he pushed his empire to the break of exhaustion, and used dictorial powers to force men into war nonstop to satisfy Justinian's mad lusts, and destroyed a massive generation of Greeks as well as the last of the Latins (of which Justinian was one). That is why, after Justinian's death, the collapse of the Byzantine territory was massive and occurred within one generation. It can only be inferred that the generation to follow Justinian's was smaller and weaker than his. He killed the golden goose.

Even if one didn't think that he was a saint, that statement is just so absurd that it proves how unserious your claims are as a whole. Just the objective, factual accomplishments of Justinian's reign put him way beyond some of the completely incompetent or crazy emperors.

What were the "horrible things" he did? Fought wars and punished heretics? So did many other saints, including St. Constantine, Equal to the Apostles.

"Ye shall know them by their fruits"

Constantine - built a massive Christian empire that set cultural Christianity for the next 1000 years.

Justinian - completely tyrannized his population to steal wealth and murder his population in endless pointless wars, building projects (the Hagia Sophia belongs to Muslims now because it was an affront to God), and utterly failed to create a self-sustaining culture which is why nothing he did survived.

Byzantium immediately started to dissolve after his death, and never recovered until Basil the great. This is not a coincidence. He consumed too much of his population with insane taxes and wars, leaving nothing for the common folk to prosper with. He was one of the worst tyrants I've ever read about, and it only makes sense from reading about the Secret History God preserved of this awful man.
 

BarrontheTigercat

Kingfisher
Other Christian
This Chew is really pushing for escalation.



View attachment 39097

This lady really is the gift that keeps on giving.

Equal parts narcissistic and sociopathic.

As has been said, jews don't want to be outed as they will never repent.

She gives a fascinating insight into just how above the silly goyim she is and how expert. She is in the realm of Albright and Nuland.

She narrates events like a condescending psychiatrist revealing just how fearful and traumatised ickle wickle little Vladimir Putin is as a consequence of every event that transpires.

Its incredibly revealing .. just not in the way that she thinks it is.



^Face constantly working, plays with her hair, jewellery a lot, extremely vain. Talking in made up children stories. Explaining how Russia Hacked the DNC!! They subverted the US elections etc.
The last 60 seconds of the video are interesting to say the least. Just how bloodthirsty ARE these jewish talking heads who pretend to be world experts?



This is from 2017 and is quite the interview. Apparently Victoria Nuland was at the Maidan handing out donuts because "She loves democracy".
Very interesting that our Julia was wandering around the Maidan with security and that she was hanging out in the same building that both the opposition and CNN were headquartered in.
"The KGB don't believe that any protest is organic." Hmmm..
Apparently there was a demonstration in Russia's 'capital' by an angry public and for a long time afterward people were languishing in jail as a result of defying their regime.
Who knew that such a thing could happen?

These people have no shame. Sheer psychopathy.

This "Putin files" propaganda series offers me nothing but Jewish talking heads, Masha Gessen, Anthony Blinken etc.

But the best thing is the comments. The delusion is real.
 

Enigma

Hummingbird
Orthodox Inquirer
Gold Member
In fact, Jesus was very much kept alive by the Procopius' of his time, and the Bible was considered the Secret History of Christ for nearly 100 years after the death of Christ. The Bible was burned wherever it was found until God judged the Jews and had most of them exterminated, so that earliest Bibles can only be traced back to 77 AD - several years after the destruction of Jerusalem.

It's not even clear that the Gospels were written before 77 AD. The notes in the Orthodox Study Bible place them sometime between 60 AD to 100 AD, with John coming in 96 AD. The "Bible" didn't even exist until long after 77 AD.

Was not known to their contemporaries. It was hidden by those wishing to preserve the truth, and was not rediscovered until the Catholics sacked Constantinople and stole the library there. It was brought back amidst a treasure haul of books to the Vatican, and was only discovered by a librarian monk in the 15th or 16th century. It was quite literally Secret history.

Did you get this from a Dan Brown novel?

The “Secret History” is mentioned in the 10th century Byzantine encyclopedia, the Suda. Meaning it was already known about and wasn’t being hidden. It was simply treated as a joke, as it is.

Procopius's now famous Anecdota also known as Secret History (Greek: Ἀπόκρυφη Ἱστορία, Apókryphe Historía; Latin: Historia Arcana) was discovered centuries later at the Vatican Library in Rome and published in Lyon by Niccolò Alamanni in 1623. Its existence was already known from the Suda, which referred to it as Procopius's "unpublished works" containing "comedy" and "invective" of Justinian, Theodora, Belisarius and Antonina.


Here’s a well-known Byzantine account of the sack of Constantinople, which was (according to you) when the “secret history” was finally discovered:

Finding that the corpse of Emperor Justinian
had not decomposed through the long centuries, they looked upon the
spectacle as a miracle, but this in no way prevented them from keeping
their hands off the tomb's valuables: In other words, the Western nations
spared neither the living nor the dead, but beginning with God and his
servants, they displayed complete indifference and irreverence to all.

- Niketas Choniates, O City of Byzantium

So, in the 10th century, the Byzantines considered Procopius’ Anekdota a joke. And in 1204, the Byzantines were testifying that Justinian’s remains were incorrupt, meaning he was a saint.

But according to you, that was only because they were… afraid of Justinian, who had been dead for 500+ years? That’s dozens of emperors and multiple dynasties later.

And then the hidden codex, suppressed by the mean Christians, was discovered in its super secret hiding place that no one found for over half a millennia, and the “truth” was revealed. Not only are you factually wrong, you’re repeating something that so clearly follows the basic pattern of every other stupid gnostic fairy tale of all time.

Meanwhile, after centuries of modern Byzantine scholarship throughout Greece, Russia, and the rest of the world, who all had access to and read the “secret history”, Justinian is still considered a saint.

For instance, there’s an entire book on Justinian published by the Institute of Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, written by a Greek Orthodox priest who did his doctoral research on the topic.

https://www.ibmgs.org/lives.html

Did he not have access to the "secret history"?

Your comparison to the Soviets only proves my point. The rest of the Church broke communion with Moscow during that period. Even much of the Russian church did, which explains both the Russian Church Abroad and the Catacomb Church.

Everything the Moscow Church did during that period was heavily scrutinized – and still is, to this day.

And if we look at an easy parallel, the canonization of Tsar Nicholas II and the Royal Family right after the fall of the USSR, this was debated for years because of how widespread Bolshevik lies were. He was “weak” and “cruel” and a “tyrant” and “impious”. Weird how well that lines up with the exact same claims you’re making about Justinian, and have been made about pretty much every other Christian ruler at one time or another.

As more resources were made available and the evidence was examined, the Royal Family’s canonization was made official and accepted by the entire Church.

The idea that everyone has ad hoc accepted Justinian as a saint for 1500+ years because he supposedly suppressed the Church during his 40-year rule is ahistorical and completely out of line with an Orthodox view of history and sanctity. Sainthood isn’t even officially recognized until long after a person’s death.

These same faulty assumptions fill all of your other supposed critiques. A Christian emperor isn’t required to let people burn down the whole city and overthrow him. He is justified in using violence, as Justinian did during the Nika revolt. The Byzantines weren’t libertarians or anarchists.

Even if you want to claim he went too far… okay? So did many other royal and military saints. And Justinian had 30+ more years of successful rule after that.

"Ye shall know them by their fruits"

Constantine - built a massive Christian empire that set cultural Christianity for the next 1000 years.

Justinian - completely tyrannized his population to steal wealth and murder his population in endless pointless wars, building projects (the Hagia Sophia belongs to Muslims now because it was an affront to God), and utterly failed to create a self-sustaining culture which is why nothing he did survived.

Byzantium immediately started to dissolve after his death, and never recovered until Basil the great. This is not a coincidence. He consumed too much of his population with insane taxes and wars, leaving nothing for the common folk to prosper with. He was one of the worst tyrants I've ever read about, and it only makes sense from reading about the Secret History God preserved of this awful man.

1. Being a saint doesn’t require you live up to the accomplishments of Constantine.

2. Being a saint doesn’t require worldly achievements at all. There are numerous royal saints who are recognized specifically because their kingdom fell and they were martyred, for instance, like St. Edmund.

3. I just provided many examples of the “fruits” of Justinian’s reign, including the Fifth Ecumenical Council, the Hagia Sophia, and his own theological writings. I even forgot to mention the Code of Justinian, which is and has been a major source of legal knowledge for the entire Christian world ever since.

You simply hand wave the “fruits” you don’t like, which makes the comparison pointless.

Your argument about the Hagia Sophia is just completely nonsensical. The Hagia Sophia is in Constantinople, which is also in Muslim hands. Constantinople was founded and named after Constantine. So, he’s clearly not a saint, right, if something he built was conquered by Muslims?

Was Solomon’s temple also unholy because it was destroyed? How about all of the Christian sites throughout the Middle East and Anatolia, which aren’t controlled – and haven’t been for even longer than the Hagia Sophia?

Jerusalem, Antioch, and countless other locations were all affronts to God, obviously. And Kiev too, while we're at it.

Why do these things actually happen, according to the Bible? As punishment for bad deeds by God’s people. That’s why He allows monuments to be destroyed, cities to be sacked, nations to be overthrown, and peoples to be persecuted or enslaved. It doesn't mean the building itself was created by a demon-possessed maniac.

I will lay your cities to waste, and bring your holy things to desolation; and I will not smell the odor of your sacrifices. I will bring your land to desolation, and your enemies will dwell in it and be astonished at it.

- Leviticus 26:31-32

Lastly, Basil the Great was a 4th century bishop.

Are you talking about Basil II? The same Basil who spent years repairing and restoring the Hagia Sophia? But I thought the Hagia Sophia was bad?

After the great earthquake of 25 October 989, which collapsed the Western dome arch, Emperor Basil II asked for the Armenian architect Trdat, creator of the cathedrals of Ani and Argina, to direct the repairs. He erected again and reinforced the fallen dome arch, and rebuilt the west side of the dome with 15 dome ribs. The extent of the damage required six years of repair and reconstruction; the church was re-opened on 13 May 994. At the end of the reconstruction, the church's decorations were renovated, including the addition of four immense paintings of cherubs; a new depiction of Christ on the dome; a burial cloth of Christ shown on Fridays, and on the apse a new depiction of the Virgin Mary holding Jesus, between the apostles Peter and Paul. On the great side arches were painted the prophets and the teachers of the church.


In reality, it was a spiritual center of the empire for a millennia which was honored by successive emperors, and an architectural wonder that had vast influence throughout the Christian and non-Christian world.

It’s disappointing that you’d choose to slander an important saint over such a half-baked and contradictory theory.
 

paternos

Robin
Catholic
This lady really is the gift that keeps on giving.
Great post. Just been watching, it's hilariously horrendous.

The things she says: Putin loves round dates, he becomes 70 and that's why he... Putin thinks .... Putin is ..

It's so incredibly DUMB, it's this childish psychologizing and fantasizing, what I hear many women do.

And then she said this to Marie.
And she was like, what's going on.
And you know her husband just cheated on her so she was in a depression
So her energy wasn't in balance
And he felt that ofcourse, and abused that lower energy

You can pick any random fragment. She is a mind reader.

This is why is detest these fake sciences as psychology. This is terror to any rational serious soul.

And like you said, the reaction in youtube. :laughter:

Julia captivated me as if I was watching a movie. She’s mesmerizingly brilliant and the clarity with which she speaks and explains is refreshing and leaves you wanting more. Thanks Julia, this was just fantastic!!!!!


Wow! She is as sharp as they come! This entire interview & every other one that I’ve seen, all for the first time beginning yesterday & where she was being interviewed, are all immediately interesting. And to see that she is clearly speaking off the cuff & that it’s totally unscripted & all from her obvious vast knowledge of Putin & the Russian political landscape, is a huge compliment unto herself.

I have watched several of the interviews with her now. She is amazingly articulate intelligent and passionate about the subject. It's amazing that interviews like this are not classroom material.

I don't know how these people think. They probably think Kamala Harris is a great VP as well.

Like you said it's Jewish, she is looks good in a superficial way, he acts as if she cares and really understands the core of how Putin is.

Indeed it impresses some people, which is surprising to me, these are the kind of people you run away from when you're at a party, Julia is here again, impressing everyone with all this little Putin stories and how he REALLY is. The moment you out in the garden with the guys, enjoy the silence, hear the birds chirping and drink a beer.
 

Garuda

Pelican
Protestant
A really long thread:


FQChzm3aAAEly86.png
 

infowarrior1

Peacock
Protestant
I think that history is written by the victors, never for truth's sake. It's the Game of Thrones, whoever wins, gets to write history. No doubt there was anti-Justinian party in the Byzantine Empire who sought to write against him after his death.

Everything will be disclosed at the Last Judgment. There is so much lies in history often about defeated political enemies. But God in revealing the heart and real history will turn everyone who shone with glory to be liars.

God-Kings cast down to the ground. With their false Glamour destroyed. Only God and those who share in his Glory in a secondary sense like the Moon reflecting the Glory of the Sun will be True Glory.
 

infowarrior1

Peacock
Protestant
As an American, I can say that such thought process - ethnic loyalty - is bred and trained out of our (white) population. I still have it, and many here do, but I find commonly that (white) Americans have zero ethnic loyalty, nor even racial benevolence. We are more loyal to a dubious "democracy" than we are to our own kind. That is not to mean any harm to others, but it is strange the extent to which ethnic Europeans will demonstrate no consideration for their own kind. Putin is "bucking" this way of thinking, and it is an absolute shock to many westerners.

Ever since the long-time fissioning of western kinship groups courtesy of the ban on First Cousin marriages(And even extending that much further) and Polygamy:



From the Catholic Website itself:


Breaking up clans and tribes and binding them together in Christianity. The Europeans are loyal to each other much more so than historically based on shared Memeplexes. Historically that was Christianity. But now with that undermined and replaced with the memeplex of progressivism and "democracy". You see the results here.

A lot of Western Psychology is based on this. The East with its Polygamy and more frequent close relative marriages are more clannish and far less ideological in their loyalties comparatively speaking. This highly outbred society with Christianity can have the benefits of the most meritocracy and innovativeness not being constrained but also being bound together under Christ.
 
Last edited:

Max Roscoe

Ostrich
Orthodox Inquirer
This Julia Ioffe character is really something. She was recently on Real Time with Bill Maher and after seeing her smug face I IMMEDIATELY had to check early life and then found several posts about her here.

To start off the interview, she made a gross joke out of nowhere about putting stuff in her butt.

So much projection and psychobabble in the Frontline interview. How does she know the feelings of KGB agents or Putin? Some brilliant revelation she had at age 7 before she immigrated to the US?

She is a Russian Jew who moved to the US at age 7. Remember the James Bond film Goldeneye? The whole plot was that a secret agent in Britain actually had ties to Russia and for that reason he betrayed Britain after making his way to the top of their spy agency. A very believable plot. Background mattered to him a lot. Contrast that with Julia, who one *could* worry would carry the same baggage and be a Russian spy. But no, because she is also Jewish, she has NO allegiance to her country of Russia, and in fact her entire existence is about attacking it from abroad. Her life is a refutation of the plot to Goldeneye.

She claims "Nobody in the Kremlin imagined Putin could do this."
*American* John Mearsheimer said precisely this would happen back in 2014. If you're shocked by this then you have no business talking about it.

At the end she says Putin invaded Ukraine because of Covid-19 lockdowns :laughter:
We all got cabin fever during these covid lockdowns, and most people... bought too much stuff on Amazon and he's like "I'll invade Ukraine"

Here's a brief summary of her Wikipedia (I'm sure there are much more disturbing bits that didn't make it to wiki):

Wrote her anti-Soviet thesis under a Polish Jewish immigrant whose work is all anti-semetism Holocaust stuff.
(Funny, this guy also betrayed Poland and wrote a bunch of Anti-Polish stuff, and was charged with libel in Poland over claiming that "Polish killed more Jews than Germans did")

(((Fulbright Scholar)))
Moscow correspondent for the New Yorker *and* Foreign Policy at age 27
Shill for Alexey Navalny
Attacked anti-vaxxers (prior to covid)
Shilled the "Assad gassed his people" narrative
Shilled for Pussy Riot
Showed up in Ukraine right around the 2014 coup
Worked for New Republic, the NYTimes, The Atlantic, Politico
Shilled "Russian collusion" story
Wrote a nasty article about Melania Trump and said "Either Trump is fucking his daughter or he's shirking nepotism laws. Which is worse?"

She has a string of nasty stuff, several RVF posts on her from years past:

And yeah those youtube comments really show you how brainwashed Americans are.

This woman really has a way with words. Further the interview goes more thrilling it gets. Her answers are like a movie script.

Probably the best talk on any historical event I have ever heard!

Julia is super advanced in her knowledge and experience 9n foreign affairs and more importantly Eastern Europe. She is a master communicator. I highly respect her. A very very smart woman. Wow....

This is by far the best interview I've seen on the Russian situation and in particular Putin. Julia Ioffe is the master of both the literacy and fluency of such a dynamic historical event and I've now watch this interview multiple times because of how compelling it (and she) is.

I was in a trance watching and listing to her, it doesn't happen often with me. Awesome interview. She is easy to read in a way you know she is not faking it or just wanting to say words. She is well versed in the goings on in the world. Putin on the other hand thinks he is but isn't.

The best interview I have seen ever. Interviewer did not interrupt. Ms. Ioffe insight is amazing and fully on display. She has command of her subject matter.
Have these people ever read a book or watched a program that's not a Jewish sitcom?
 
Last edited:

Stoyan

 
Banned
Orthodox
A really long thread:
I looked it up. Apparently it's a real project and they're actually wanting to go through with it. The mere existence of this project, and the lack of words on the part of the Russian Federation is telling something. This is like the idea of creating an state for ethnic Japanese in Guandong.

Think about what would happen if someone would want to create a state for ethnic Russkies somewhere on the territory of Russia or Ukraine. They would be put into jail. Russkies are not allowed to have their own state anywhere in the world.
 

Stoyan

 
Banned
Orthodox
A really long thread:
I found propoganda videos by this man, in the Russian language. He is some kind of TV show host or someone. Apparently he wants to create a Jewish state in Novorussia, as a homeland for the people of Israel who would escape from the Islamic militants. According to him, Israel will not last, and it will be attacked by Islamists, Palestinians, extremists, etc. So he said that he wants to move the Israelis refugees to the new lands, where it would be safer for them.

He uses the hot woman with tatoos on her body as a kind of sex appeal in order to attract the male audience. This makes me question his intentions, if he is sincere or not. I mean, I like looking at the women, but if you have to use women in your videos for agitating your cause, that seems insincere. Because it is a well known method of using sex appeal in advertisements to subconsciously trick men into accepting your message via association. It somewhat disables the logical thinking mechanism in weak willed men. I'm wondering how many Ukrainian simps would be falling for this.





 
Last edited:
Top