Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="heavy" data-source="post: 532004" data-attributes="member: 5620">Unofficial Joe Rogan representative reporting in again. I found an excellent piece of an interview that represents the nature of fake liar &quot;independents&quot;.Take a couple minutes to watch this short example of a typical liberal.These are people who claim to be any combination of libertarian / apolitical / independent / undecideds. In this case, I think Tom Papa would at least admit he leans liberal, but he would fight tooth and nail with a lot of qualifiers.Queue up 2:46:55 where Rogan rants about the Russians hacking and exposing the DNC corruption. Regardless of all the facts, watch Tom Papa&#039;s initial response at 2:48:00 and listen to the next few minutes of discussion.[MEDIA=youtube]fvUGnN4VF38&amp;t=166m55s[/MEDIA]He bleeds apology to the DNC. Now pretend it was the RNC was exposed and how differently he would have reacted.Tom Papa is a liberal. I don&#039;t hate him or blame him. I suspect he&#039;s mostly a product of his environment like most lib-tards. He&#039;s that guy, Mr Nice Guy doesn&#039;t want to step on toes, relationship guys, guys who don&#039;t want to face hatred blowback from the media, who will claim independence or bi-partisan or undecided who is simply a bleeding heart democrat liberal who will take that side regardless of mathematics or corruption or public policy results or historical facts.As Rush says, a liberal is a liberal first.Edit: In regards to the following discussion, I&#039;m guessing Tom Papa didn&#039;t have much to say when <a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/2012-flashback-obama-whispers-message-putin-after-my-election-ill-have-more" target="_blank">Obama whispered to Medvedev</a> that he would have more flexibility on missle defense after his re-election in 2012.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="heavy, post: 532004, member: 5620"] Unofficial Joe Rogan representative reporting in again. I found an excellent piece of an interview that represents the nature of fake liar "independents". Take a couple minutes to watch this short example of a typical liberal. These are people who claim to be any combination of libertarian / apolitical / independent / undecideds. In this case, I think Tom Papa would at least admit he leans liberal, but he would fight tooth and nail with a lot of qualifiers. Queue up 2:46:55 where Rogan rants about the Russians hacking and exposing the DNC corruption. Regardless of all the facts, watch Tom Papa's initial response at 2:48:00 and listen to the next few minutes of discussion. [MEDIA=youtube]fvUGnN4VF38&t=166m55s[/MEDIA] He bleeds apology to the DNC. Now pretend it was the RNC was exposed and how differently he would have reacted. Tom Papa is a liberal. I don't hate him or blame him. I suspect he's mostly a product of his environment like most lib-tards. He's that guy, Mr Nice Guy doesn't want to step on toes, relationship guys, guys who don't want to face hatred blowback from the media, who will claim independence or bi-partisan or undecided who is simply a bleeding heart democrat liberal who will take that side regardless of mathematics or corruption or public policy results or historical facts. As Rush says, a liberal is a liberal first. Edit: In regards to the following discussion, I'm guessing Tom Papa didn't have much to say when [url=http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/2012-flashback-obama-whispers-message-putin-after-my-election-ill-have-more]Obama whispered to Medvedev[/url] that he would have more flexibility on missle defense after his re-election in 2012. [/QUOTE]

Verification