This was actually the second apology he made for this. He was on Howard Stern a couple days ago too.
Quintus Curtius said:Just think of the mentality of the society we live in, where we can witness this kind of spectacle.
A person basically grovels like a beaten dog for using an "offensive" word.
The problem I have with this analysis is that it is presenting this transformation as something new, of recent decades. This seems to be a common theme; conservatives trot it out constantly. Everything was some way until some point in time, then everything went awry. (The inverse of the Progressive view, in which everything was awful until they arrived and made things better, although... there is always a long way to go, etc etc).
It does not take much historical research to realise that this maternalist view has a long history, and that this is basically a resurgence of it, a "second wave". The first wave? The Victorian Era, Victorian values. It is oft ignored that the driving force of that cultural revolution was a religious fervour, and the driving force of that was upper class women. By the end of the revolution, the men who "ran" society has internalised the maternal values of those women; women from Hannah More to Josephine Butler to the Pankhursts, Susan B Anthony and Jane Addams.
The maternalist values we see in this second wave are identical to those of the first and, once more, being imposed at the political level by a mixture of female dominated campaigners and compliant males, whether in activism or politics. Temperance, the white slave panic, obscenity hysteria, the infantilisation of everyone, the promotion of a lifestyle interventionist state... all of this is identical to that of 100 years ago, even down to a new masturbation panic (nowadays the cod-science is "rewiring brains" and "addicted to brain chemicals" and so on). There is nothing new about this at all. And, just as last time, it is the "moral domination" of women- the basic idea that women represent a preferable moral ideal, and are the guardians of it- at its source.
In between, we had a period where the bourgeois matrons stopped "minding the store" and everyone got distracted by Marxism, etc; and thus a reactionary anti-puritan liberalism appeared in the 1960s- a period which is now suffereing a ruthless damnatio memoriae as the Second Wave bites.
But the idea that this is some New Thing is just plain wrong. This is the Victorian/Progressive Era Mark II. And there is no "zombie" feminism. Feminism, as a movement, is always and only those upper class matrons, and their puritans ideals. whatever "wave" you want to call it. The so-called "gender" or "radical" feminists were simply a revival of the likes of Addams, Anthony, Butler and Pankhurst and the Social Purity Movement, with a new gloss on it. As Spinal Tap said, "The more it stays the same, the less it changes".
Ensam said:Roosh said:Good news for Jonah: the mob approves of his groveling...
It's such a well constructed apology, it's almost diabolical.
"Use me as an example of what not to do," is practically poetry. I feel like we're on a date and Hill is saying all the right things. Please, Jonah, keep murmuring these words of compassion and social awareness into my ears. You're totally going to to score tonight (no homo).
http://gawker.com/jonah-hill-issues-perfect-apology-for-saying-faggot-1585900792
How is saying 'no homo' acceptable to the PC crowd?
cooledcannon said:More seriously, i thought "no homo" is standard for liberals to say. Not really for the enemies of liberals to say.
Roosh said:If I was in the spotlight like Jonah Hill is, I would've definitely apologised.
He already made millions... if anyone is any position to tell the PC police to fuck off, it's him.
RenewalMan said:I have a friend who met Jonah Hill and went out on a date with him-- ONE date. Shes a 6, 7 on a good day. She denied him sex and he went crazy. Sent her dick pics on snapchat and was whining and begging her to meet up with him and give him a chance. After a while she stopped replying and he sent 10 text messages and left a couple of voice mails in a 2 day period (all the while without her responding).
I wouldn't have believed this, but she showed me the text messages, voice mails and pictures she took with him.
This guy is a classic beta with absolutely 0 game, just fame game. This video only confirms it.
Roosh said:"How to lose respect for a heterosexual man in one video."
Roosh said:If I was in the spotlight like Jonah Hill is, I would've definitely apologised.
He already made millions... if anyone is any position to tell the PC police to fuck off, it's him.
Roosh said:If I was in the spotlight like Jonah Hill is, I would've definitely apologised.
He already made millions... if anyone is any position to tell the PC police to fuck off, it's him.
Skye said:Truth Teller said:Does anyone really care about what this fat fuck does?
America, we care more about someone famous' opinions and verbal blunders than local and state politics, education, healthcare, the earth, etc., combined.
MattC said:You can't judge celebrities and famous people in the same way you'd judge one of us for reacting this way. Kdog has nailed it.
If you're in the media, you absolutely have to subscribe to their agendas in order to thrive in that business. His repercussions could be massive for trying to let it slide and coming on TV and sticking by his stance that calling someone a faggot for pissing him off is fine.
If I had to apologise at the investment bank I used to work at for calling someone a faggot for the sake of my career, I most likely would've done it. If I was in the spotlight like Jonah Hill is, I would've definitely apologised. There's a massive backlash millions of people over for someone in his position.
I suppose that's the price you pay by being in the spotlight. You must tow the line.