Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Comte De St. Germain" data-source="post: 1197810" data-attributes="member: 6151">A good argument stands on its own merits. All you had to do was state the facts as to why rather than something being definitive. You wouldn't have to justify your opinion, which is obviously not the clear consensus in the field, if you could flat out say the complete and utter rational proven FACTS(genes, environmental issues, et al), but of course you're gonna back peddle off soft science like sociology and use the alleged numbers as your justification. So keep linking your studies and deflect the possibility of being wrong on to someone else.PS science is reductive. If you had a STEM degree you would know that all you're doing is proving something doesn't work with science until something you can't prove wrong sticks as a rational reason. And sadly you haven't proven that mixing races DIRECTLY leads to mental disorder by isolating what genes cause it and linking them to race mixing. Then you could link the exhaustive research/experimentation used to prove that to corroborate and citing your sources properly(usually there are more than one explaining one facet). This would be the proper way to argue your point. TL;DR learn your shit. Signed someone well versed in a STEM field.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Comte De St. Germain, post: 1197810, member: 6151"] A good argument stands on its own merits. All you had to do was state the facts as to why rather than something being definitive. You wouldn't have to justify your opinion, which is obviously not the clear consensus in the field, if you could flat out say the complete and utter rational proven FACTS(genes, environmental issues, et al), but of course you're gonna back peddle off soft science like sociology and use the alleged numbers as your justification. So keep linking your studies and deflect the possibility of being wrong on to someone else. PS science is reductive. If you had a STEM degree you would know that all you're doing is proving something doesn't work with science until something you can't prove wrong sticks as a rational reason. And sadly you haven't proven that mixing races DIRECTLY leads to mental disorder by isolating what genes cause it and linking them to race mixing. Then you could link the exhaustive research/experimentation used to prove that to corroborate and citing your sources properly(usually there are more than one explaining one facet). This would be the proper way to argue your point. TL;DR learn your shit. Signed someone well versed in a STEM field. [/QUOTE]

Verification