whitewashedblackguy said:
TravelingBodybuilder said:
keta doesnt make you burn fat any faster than a high carb diet.
You will also lose strength faster than you would than if you were on a high carb diet=more muscle loss over time.
I am not anti keto nor pro keto just stating the facts for some bs i read in this thread about keto making you burn fat faster.... Because it doesnt and you will also lose strength faster. But the benefits of keto in some people can mean reduced appetite which can help with fat loss.. So people need to find what works for them because everyones body is different. Try high carb cutting, try low carb cutting.. Try medium... Try carbless... Find out what best works for you. If Keto allows you to lose weight without binging then stick with keto... But just know you will lose muscle faster on keto than on a high carb diet. But some people may not able to lose fat on a high carb diet because they get bad cravings... So they may need keto yes...and will be worth the strength/muscle loss in some if they get bad cravings on carb diet. all depends on the person.
high carb is best but the cravings suck so i prefer low carb and dont mind the strength loss/muscle. keto i never tried. I dont think its healthy. Your brain needs some sugars to function at normal levels. But if you cant lose weight without keto, than stick with keto.. do what works best for you.. just my 2 cents
Definitely to each their own. Keto is restrictive, and it kinda dampers social life sometimes, since most don't keto. However, I have to point out that keto does offer faster fat loss, because the body isn't as simple as cals in, cals out. Keto changes the way the body deals with fat. These changes cause faster weight loss, longer life, and other cool shit.
The body has the ability to make it's own glucose for the brain (Gluconeogenesis). If we didn't have this ability, we would have never survived the long, carb-less winters of the north. As for strength loss... I mean, look at Shawn Baker, Thomas DeLauer, or Vince Gironda.
edit: I know that you lose a bit of strength (especially for weight lifters) but it's not like you turn into a twig.
I've never seen a study that supports this. It causes a faster weight loss. But it is just water weight loss, not actual fat loss being loss faster. Since carbs hold water, you eliminate carbs and you lose water weight.
Study by Kevin Hall, two months in metabolic ward. In short, no fat loss advantage to Keto dieting:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiUyjMjuLl0
http://www.thenutritionwonk.com/#!I...of-Obesity-Over/cmbz/5726e6810cf26b6d6848a8f8
Keto diets offer no benefit for fat loss and absolutely can affect performance. While higher fat is more satiating, that doesn't somehow magically circumvent thermodynamics. Still kcals in vs kcals out
Chris Voigt. Voigt ate nothing but potatoes between Oct. 1 and Dec. 1. He had them for breakfast, lunch and dinner — about 20 potatoes per day prepared in a variety of ways. His weight dropped from 197 pounds to 176 pounds and his cholesterol level fell 67 points. Lots of carbs, all the time.
When you eat something, your body doesn't have any idea what it is- it recognizes C, H, O, and N. That's it. That's all. A calorie is a calorie. Why would you think otherwise?
Chris Voigt. Voigt ate nothing but potatoes between Oct. 1 and Dec. 1. He had them for breakfast, lunch and dinner — about 20 potatoes per day prepared in a variety of ways. His weight dropped from 197 pounds to 176 pounds and his cholesterol level fell 67 points. Lots of carbs, all the time.
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/40424...ys-nothing-spuds-leaves-advocate-lbs-lighter/
Mark Haub, a professor of human nutrition at Kansas State University. Haub lost "27 pounds in 10 weeks subsisting almost exclusively on Twinkies, Doritos, Oreos and other treats by ensuring that he consumed fewer calories than he burned."
http://articles.latimes.com/2010/dec/06/health/la-he-fitness-twinkie-diet-20101206
macros don't matter when it comes to cutting. The research is absolute on this.
Here is one of many, many trials demonstrating just this:
"Comparison of Weight-Loss Diets with Different Compositions of Fat, Protein, and Carbohydrates" Frank M. Sacks, M.D., et al. N Engl J Med 2009; 360:859-873February 26, 2009
Set-up:
Group one: 15f/65c/20f
Group two: 25p/55c/20f
Group three: 15p/45c/40f
Group four: 25p/35c/40f
Out of the 811 people, 645 completed the entire two years, and the results showed, "Reduced-calorie diets result in clinically meaningful weight loss regardless of which macronutrients they emphasize."
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0804748
Also the athletes you mentioned are on steroids. So they will still be pretty muscular even with keto diets.