Considering the length of the deliberations now, I think it’s safe to safe to say there is at least one woke hero on the jury. Maybe they were just being thorough, but if that were the case, I can’t imagine they would drag this out another day. I’m predicting a hung jury, and I think the judge is gonna grant a mistrial.
Kyle Rittenhouse case
- Thread starter ABeast
- Start date
Yup. All you need is one of these clowns who ignore the facts. I bet they even go public later:
"I did this for the memory of George." (Fake crying, news media fawning)
What's more alarming is that reality doesn't seem to matter anymore.
I haven't been following this at all, but now looking for the verdict and the reaction to it.
I'm sure he acted in self defense around those aggressive Antifa fools, but he has to go down for something given that he shouldn't have been there with a weapon in the first place which was arguably the impetus (like DUI, there is culpability without intent)?
Unfortunately if there are African Americans/other folks of color/Jews or libs that are biased on the jury, they aren't going to be persuaded not to move against a "white supremacist". There have been many conservatives/nationalists who have been tried for nothing more than their beliefs.
I'm sure he acted in self defense around those aggressive Antifa fools, but he has to go down for something given that he shouldn't have been there with a weapon in the first place which was arguably the impetus (like DUI, there is culpability without intent)?
Unfortunately if there are African Americans/other folks of color/Jews or libs that are biased on the jury, they aren't going to be persuaded not to move against a "white supremacist". There have been many conservatives/nationalists who have been tried for nothing more than their beliefs.
Is a unanimous verdict required?
The scope of the trial has nothing to do with his presence there with a gun, it was legal. It was poor judgement for him to be there, but its ultimately not his responsibility for how rioters choose to react to his mere presence. Sort of like a drunk girl passing out a party. Even open carry is generally legal in the US .
Yes.
I agree he shouldn't have been there, but he also had the right to be there (versus the legality of Driving while Under the Influence).
I get what you mean, but him being there wasn't against the law or illegal.
It was legal for him to be there with the gun? I thought he was underage and/or breaking other ordinances being armed there in the first place?
- I hadn't been following this
Given the prosecutor's alleged misconduct, perhaps someone living in Wisconsin wouldn't mind filing a complaint against the prosecutor(s) with the Wisconsin Bar?
Last edited:
Then I agree
I file a complaint against Jared Kushner couple years ago and am still waiting to hear back. Im starting to have doubts about the system
Amusing headline.
Our headline was unclear | Wisconsin Jewish Chronicle
We wrote a headline that caused some concern and confusion on Twitter today, and we apologize. We published a story about how Joseph Rosenbaum, killed senselessly in Kenosha, has been targeted by anti-Semites online. His last name was how they decided to target their hate, and that’s not right...
"Our Headline was.. (((Unclear)))
We wrote a headline that caused some concern and confusion on Twitter today, and we apologize. We published a story about how Joseph Rosenbaum, killed senselessly in Kenosha, has been targeted by anti-Semites online. His last name was how they decided to target their hate, and that’s not right.
An image of our headline was shared on Twitter, without the context of a link to the story.
Some people read our headline to mean that we don’t hold all life to be equal.
We hold dear the Jewish value of B’tselem Elohim, the notion that we are all created in the image of God.
We regret that our poorly written headline appeared not to uphold this value.
We pray for the families of Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum, and for the healing of Jacob Blake.
We apologize for any pain we’ve caused.
Rob Golub
Editor"
Love to see that Headline.
"Jewish pedophile killed. Questions asked after involvement of Goyim corpse and exploding Goyim bicep are allowed to take focus away from (((Real Tragedy))) ."
Some people >> have read the Talmud / (((misinterpreted))) our attitude. <<
When I hear that someone is still shilling Q, a switch gets flipped in my brain and I just immediately dismiss that person’s opinion on these topics. It’s not even a conscious decision, I just have such a deep disdain for the Q psyop that I instantly categorize anyone still shilling it as profoundly naive, grifting for material benefit, a fed, or some combination of the above.Anonymous Cuckservative (who still believes Q will rescue us all) says this:
Gradient
Kingfisher
Yes. Jury verdicts must be unanimous. That is why Defense lawyers will frequently "poll the jury" after a verdict is read. The clerk of court makes each member of the jury attest the guilty verdict that was reached is still the verdict they believe.
I just read the description of the incident on Wikipedia and it sounds like Rittenhouse was basically just defending himself. pretty f*cked to just lock up a kid who did what he could to stay alive regardless of the right and wrong of how he ended up in the situation.
