Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Current Events
United States
Kyle Rittenhouse case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SlickyBoy" data-source="post: 1398949" data-attributes="member: 8508"><p>In their slight defense, they got blindsided into a response when RIttenhouse wore a branded T shirt in the photo. If his lawyer knew anything at all about optics, he would have told him not to wear anything distracting that would take away from the message - he made bail, period. There's no reason to throw chum in the water and distract from that message. </p><p></p><p>I actually thought for a second that Rittenhouse was sponsored in some way by Black Rifle, so it's a reasonable question to ask. Their reply may come across as Judas-like, but taken to the essentials it is pretty neutral. </p><p></p><p>What disturbs me more is that Rittenhouse has a lawyer who didn't notice this and be more proactive. Also in case you're wondering that's his lawyer on the left, the one in the sweatshirt LARPing as his uncle or something. Lawyers should look like lawyers in any public appearances, period - wear a goddamned suit. He did this on Fox shortly after the event too - open collared shirt and no jacket. Yes, this matters - he wouldn't be allowed to wear that casual crap in court, and he should know enough not to wear it in the court of public opinion if he wants to be taken seriously.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SlickyBoy, post: 1398949, member: 8508"] In their slight defense, they got blindsided into a response when RIttenhouse wore a branded T shirt in the photo. If his lawyer knew anything at all about optics, he would have told him not to wear anything distracting that would take away from the message - he made bail, period. There's no reason to throw chum in the water and distract from that message. I actually thought for a second that Rittenhouse was sponsored in some way by Black Rifle, so it's a reasonable question to ask. Their reply may come across as Judas-like, but taken to the essentials it is pretty neutral. What disturbs me more is that Rittenhouse has a lawyer who didn't notice this and be more proactive. Also in case you're wondering that's his lawyer on the left, the one in the sweatshirt LARPing as his uncle or something. Lawyers should look like lawyers in any public appearances, period - wear a goddamned suit. He did this on Fox shortly after the event too - open collared shirt and no jacket. Yes, this matters - he wouldn't be allowed to wear that casual crap in court, and he should know enough not to wear it in the court of public opinion if he wants to be taken seriously. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Current Events
United States
Kyle Rittenhouse case
Top