L'Oréal goes Full Retard - Uses a Hijab Wearer as a Hair Model

[The Beast1]

Why do you even need shampoo if you're hiding your hair under a lamp shade?

Why do you even need soap and deodorant if you wear clothes most of the day?

Apples and oranges my goldin boy.

You can't smell greasy hair the same way you smell BO. I know this because I only shampoo my hair once a week

 

[Laner]

I think we are underestimating what wearing a hijab does to a young woman.

If she is raised in the west, and is still somewhat traditional - marries young, children, in the home - yet is exposed to the same media as her non Muslim peers, her brain will still be doing hamster wheels.

She has all of the needs for validation that any woman has, yet none of the release. She puts on sexy clothes, hair fresh with jasmine and make up from the top producers. Yet she gets no attention from passing men. For this reason the hijab is genius in allowing a husband to make sure her desire for validation comes directed only at him.

Talk to Persian girls who travel back to Tehran often, and ask them about this. It drives them - if they are honest - a but crazy.

 

[jordypip23]

L'Oréal Model Amena Khan Is the First to Wear a Hijab in a Mainstream Hair Ad

From banning Photoshop to casting diverse faces and launching inclusive shade ranges, beauty brands are shifting the way they speak to shoppers. They're finally trying to speak to all of us. While some folks have questioned the motivation behind the diversification of beauty campaigns—especially after brands tried capitalizing on the success of what's being called "The Fenty Effect"—this latest ad gets it right. For its new Elvive campaign, L'Oréal Paris UK brought on British beauty blogger Amena Khan as one of its new faces.

Even in a time when exciting, unique women are scoring beauty contracts left and right—shoutout to Maye Musk and Ayesha Curry—the decision to cast Khan, who wears a headscarf, isn't only history making (she's the first hijab-wearing woman to be featured in a major mainstream hair ad), it's also a step toward correcting a common misconception.

“How many brands are doing things like this? Not many. They’re literally putting a girl in a headscarf—whose hair you can’t see—in a hair campaign. Because what they’re really valuing through the campaign is the voices that we have,” Khan told Vogue UK this week. “You have to wonder—why is it presumed that women who don’t show their hair don’t look after it? The opposite of that would be that everyone that does show their hair only looks after it for the sake of showing it to others. And that mindset strips us of our autonomy and our sense of independence. Hair is a big part of self-care.”

In an industry where the definition of what it means to be beautiful has been markedly thin, this is a huge deal. Not only is L'Oréal saying to women and girls who wear hijab that they're seen—the theme of the campaign is self-worth over self-doubt—but that how they are seen doesn't define who they are. As Khan pointed out to Vogue UK, whether or not her hair is visible in public, how it looks and feels still matters to her: “For me, my hair is an extension of my femininity. I love styling my hair, I love putting products in it, and I love it to smell nice. It’s an expression of who I am."

[img=600x400]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DPe9VvMW0AA1SVJ.jpg[/img]

[img=640x350]https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yUdLz_hdU2s/maxresdefault.jpg[/img]

What do you think of this guys? WB the British-Pakistani, but I think this is crazy SJW crap...

At least she is good looking. Without the hijab, she would've been an appropriate choice across the board.

 

[The Beast1]

^^^ I'm sorry, but these women are still exposing too much. Their faces need to be covered as well to make Muhammid happy.

 

[Gradient]

^^^ I'm sorry, but these women are still exposing too much. Their faces need to be covered as well to make Muhammid happy.

And they would need to be about 10 years old to REALLY make him happy.

 

[kaotic]

I thought everyone uses baking soda in their hair now ?

 

[Dragan]

Globocuck goal: destroy all notions of Western beauty.

 

[AnonymousBosch]

Bad business. Bad marketing.
SJW pandering to a minor (if not minuscule) demographic is just prioritizing virtue signaling over legit business.

It's not women virtue signaling.

It's not narcissism.

It's not SJW pandering.

As I discussed way back re: Gamergate. You're simply-watching the increasingly-successful subversion of Capitalism by Reform Judaism, as seeded by the Canadian Mental Environmentalism movement in the late 90's / early 00's. This was an offshoot of the Canadian Environmentalist movement, Environmentalism itself being an already successfully-seeded Reform Jew Religious Belief based upon their Scripture, with the added bonus of wounding Capitalist industry.

Remember, their goal is to make the entire world 'Spiritually Israel' and make everyone live by their law - note this is done without informing the public that they are now following Reform Jewish Law.

'Mental Environmentalism' itself was sold via two forms of attack by two different Reform Jew thought Leaders, 'one of whom was praising Hugo Chavez and Venezuela as 'perfect models of society' only two years ago. It's the rot of our times, and this is why Trump's waffling about strengthening business is playing into the enemies hands.

This shit is everywhere. I've noticed this with the NRL (National Rugby League) board here in Australia, since it's started making its players dress up in pink, do domestic violence ads, signal against homophobia, etc. Reform Jew CEO. I've looked into the board, and the thing to pay attention to is how they're all spread across multiple businesses and committees. So, say someone will be working for the NRL's board, who is also on various Aboriginal Committees trying to radicalise them against White Australia, whilst also being a Lawyer undermining existing Australian Law, whilst also being on a UN Committee. Meanwhile, another Board Member will turn up in propaganda videos for Refugee Immigration, because everyone knows playing Rugby League makes you a model citizen. :tard:

This is how committed they are to working towards making Australia Spiritual Israel, and this is where I get annoyed, as in the ((())) thread when people dismiss this kind of thing as Anti-Semitism.

Like Disney, or like Woolworth Australia (another increasingly-crazy Social Justice company), if you look at the Board of Directors of Loreal you will see the same Globalist Fingers in multiple pies and companies.

http://www.loreal.com/group/governance/the-board-of-directors.aspx

Note that 'Diversity' excludes Dark Skin.

For example, look at the Lesbian with Subversive Hair at the bottom of the page. Note that she's worked for Google and Time.

If you look at both the board and the Executive Committee, you will note the absence in their eyes common with the True Believers of Globalism.

This is what Trump is empowering.

Look at Jean-Paul Agon's own words:

In addition to his vision for L’Oreal, Jean-Paul Agon also has strong viewpoints on corporate social responsibility; often being quoted as stating “the leader in beauty must be exemplary in terms of the environment.” To this end, L’Oreal has made the commitment to halve their CO2 emissions, water consumption and waste production within the next 10 years.

Jean-Paul Agon has stated that corporate social responsibility issues are as important as business profitability.

Who would you expect to be happy about putting Social Justice before Profit?

L’Oreal CEO Jean-Paul Agon has been honoured by the American Jewish Committee (AJC) with an International Human Relations Award in recognition of his ‘leadership, vision and corporate citizenship’.

The only way to damage these people is to unplug and be careful where you spend your money. If you watch or attend an NRL Game, you are supporting Globalism. If you buy L'Oreal or Nestle, you are supporting Globalism. If you shop at Woolworths, you are supporting Globalism. If you buy a game by Ubisoft, you are supporting Globalism. Hell, if you watch fucking Star Wars, even just to bitch about it, you are supporting Globalism. When something's converged: move the fuck on.

These connections really need to be mapped out, these faces and where they're infiltrated. I even suspect you could do the same for the Catholic Church.

We are warned it will be difficult for us to not serve the Beast, and the Globalists will think that they're winning by doing this, and that their control will be complete, but I'm noticing something: the more I unplug from their propaganda and the less I spend, the richer and happier life seems to be becoming.

 

[debeguiled]

We are warned it will be difficult for us to not serve the Beast, and the Globalists will think that they're winning by doing this, and that their control will be complete, but I'm noticing something: the more I unplug from their propaganda and the less I spend, the richer and happier life seems to be becoming.

U r a Anti j3w whoo wantzus all like cavemens.

Ths is u on a satrday havin fun.

 

[Days of Broken Arrows]

Here's a question. Why not an Amish woman for the ad?

Here's an answer: Because if they did that, people on the left would scream about "subjugation of woman" and boycott them. The left hates "fundies" (fundamentalists) unless they're from a far-off country.

This is the kind of two-faced thinking that makes it impossible for me to support the left. They have no philosophy or principles. They just side with whoever the media says it's cool to like.
[attachment=38373]

 

[CynicalContrarian]

Here's a question. Why not an Amish woman for the ad?
Here's an answer: Because if they did that, people on the left would scream about "subjugation of woman" and boycott them. The left hates "fundies" (fundamentalists) unless they're from a far-off country.
This is the kind of two-faced thinking that makes it impossible for me to support the left. They have no philosophy or principles. They just side with whoever the media says it's cool to like.

Regressive types don't want the best.
They're envious of the best.
They want to tear everything down to their spiteful, miserable level.

 

[Paracelsus]

Here's a question. Why not an Amish woman for the ad?

Mainly because the Amish are forbidden to use beauty products. They can use any shampoo they like, but face creams, moisturizers, makeup, and coloring hair are all considered to be unnecessary and worldly.

You likely couldn't get an Amish woman to agree to participate in this ad because they actually have some congruence with their beliefs. Unlike Islam, whose hypocrisy is perfect for the Western narcissist: paint your face up and inflate your lips like a fourth-grade sex doll, but wear a hijab because you want to be "modest".

 

[Suits]

Why do you even need shampoo if you're hiding your hair under a lamp shade?

 

[Sombro]

Bad business. Bad marketing.
SJW pandering to a minor (if not minuscule) demographic is just prioritizing virtue signaling over legit business.

I'm not so sure it's a minuscule demographic, UK has a large muslim population and it's probably the fastest growing one in the country. Also they are probably going to use this ad all of over the middle east and elsewhere with muslim population.
It's most likely a business decision, but with the Islam propaganda these days you can never know for sure.

Maybe so. But markets like these are global nowadays.
But really it boils down to: muslim women + makeup.

Not saying there is a Mega-Conspiracy to either liberalize Islam on one hand or virtue signal about it on the other.

But the end results indeed go one way or the other.

 

[Leonard D Neubache]

Bosch covered it, but another shorter way of putting it is this.

Moves like the one Loreal made don't make sense if you work on the assumption that these corporations only care about making money (isn't that one of the most ingrained tropes of our society?).

The reality is that if a small handful of elites virtually own all corporations lock, stock and barrel then why would they care about competing financially with each other? Money is only relevant insomuch as what you can achieve with it.

All of these events make far more sense when you look at corporations as non-competitive entities pushing a political agenda. Cut "markets and profit" out of your thinking. Why does (((this guy))) care if you take your money down the road and spend it with (((that guy))) instead?

Do you think he's suddenly going to struggle to find change to catch the bus home?

 

[Suits]

Here's a question. Why not an Amish woman for the ad?

Here's an answer: Because if they did that, people on the left would scream about "subjugation of woman" and boycott them. The left hates "fundies" (fundamentalists) unless they're from a far-off country.

This is the kind of two-faced thinking that makes it impossible for me to support the left. They have no philosophy or principles. They just side with whoever the media says it's cool to like.

The Amish don't watch TV.

Therefore there is no point in marketing to them with TV ads. However, there is a sizably garbage bag wearing demographic in Western countries that does watch TV and it would serve these shampoo companies well to convince them that just because no one ever sees their hair isn't a good reason to not spend all of their disposable cashflow on beauty products just like the heathens.

 

[Simeon_Strangelight]

^^^ I'm sorry, but these women are still exposing too much. Their faces need to be covered as well to make Muhammid happy.

And they would need to be about 10 years old to REALLY make him happy.

8 will suffice, 6 is fine too when the ancient practice of "thighing" is added.

And no - neither makeup nor form-fitting clothes are allowed. The Westernized Hijabi women are just stretching the limits of credible "holiness" that is bestowed upon them by the Hijab:

And as Paracelsus put it - the mark in the Hijab ad con is not the Muslim demographic - it is the LEFT SJW DEMOGRAPHIC.

Proud SJWs carrying a Hijab in solidarity while Muslim women are fighting against the Hijab in countries like Iran at threat of their own lives:

And as a sidenote - if men created hair commercials, then they would pick 18yo blossoms like that and not Instagram attention whores.

 

[Atlanta Man]

If 20 percent of women who wear hijab buy there product it is a win.

 

[Matsufubu]

And they would need to be about 10 years old to REALLY make him happy.

[/url]via Imgflip Meme Generator[/img]

 

[Duke Castile]

At first it makes zero sense to me. As I think about it, it makes more sense since underneath the hijab they're clearly not going to let their hair's appearance go to crap. What better way to influence a block of people that never considered your product to give it a shot?

What makes you think hijab wearing Muslim women don't care about hair care? Many of them do, they just don't display it in public.

? That's basically what I said man.

Actually I have seen what happens in these total burka/hijab whatever countries and these women do go to absolute shit especially the ones covered from head to toe.

In fact, they are often the only fat ones in Indonesia.