Loud bitch gets hell of an uppercut
- Thread starter Roosh
- Start date
- Status
SpiderKing said:
It IS important to know in this case because some one who lives in Monaco (rich white people) thinks differently about things than some one from Albania ( dirt poor, predominantly moslim)
I'm not asking for posters address but just a bit more info to be less vague.
This goes for skin color and visited countries also. The profile is there. Use it. This gives a better perspective to know if a poster is full of shit or not.
Are you so paranoid about what you write on an online forum? Who is gonna check this and is gonna find out your posting here?.
BoiBoi said:
Who are you addressing here?
Godwin's law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies or Godwin's Law of Nazi Analogies. It states: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."[2][3] In other words, Godwin observed that, given enough time, in any online discussion—regardless of topic or scope—someone inevitably makes a comparison to Hitler and the Nazis.
Not sure what you are talking about.
Neil Skywalker said:
He's talking about my reference to the Nazi's to make a point.
Walderschmidt said:
I didn't specifically say the word Nazi in my post because I didn't want the discussion get off track and to turn into a discussion about Nazis, because you focused on "Nazi" and not the point I was making.
Neil Skywalker said:
I try to keep personal information, any personal information to a minimum at all times. Once your personal information is out there, it's hard to get it off.
I have no problem PMing you the countries (and skin color) I've lived in if you want to know - I just rather it not be on a public forum. Also - you can see my profile to see (roughly) how many countries I've been to, to get an idea on my perspective.
I understand you may distrust people who dislike sharing personal details over the internet - to the point of being vague - in my case, I am wary of people who demand personal information all the time - I've already paid for exposing my personal information too soon before - so there's how I see it.
Wald
Ah, ok I understand the part about the Germans now but i didn't recognize it as a Godwin because usually stronger language is used in this case.
No worries, about the personal information. I just took you as an example for something I'm a little annoyed by on this forum. Nothing personal. I've had a few times that I had a certain image of a person in my mind for a long time just to find out later that it was totally different.
No worries, about the personal information. I just took you as an example for something I'm a little annoyed by on this forum. Nothing personal. I've had a few times that I had a certain image of a person in my mind for a long time just to find out later that it was totally different.
Timoteo
Crow
The NY Daily News has picked up on this story now:
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...ger-article-1.1182600?localLinksEnabled=false
Notice in the story where they write that it is unclear who started the fight. My guess is they've only seen the severely edited version of the cellphone video, that basically picked up when the driver got up and tried to lift this hoodrat's head off with an uppercut.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...ger-article-1.1182600?localLinksEnabled=false
Notice in the story where they write that it is unclear who started the fight. My guess is they've only seen the severely edited version of the cellphone video, that basically picked up when the driver got up and tried to lift this hoodrat's head off with an uppercut.
Timoteo
Crow
Neil Skywalker said:
I don't understand why you're bothered by how some protect their personal information. You've made the decision to be an author and sell books, so in doing so you've had to put yourself out there a bit more. That doesn't mean everyone else should follow suit. You're asking everyone to qualify their opinion of this thread to you, based on where they live, so you can make a judgment as to whether or not their opinion is legitimate?
Athlone McGinnis said:
For some reason you are not willing to see that I based my whole first post statement on the video in the opening post and the fact people were cheering on it. Just that video. ( the one with the very unclear shot of her doing something to the driver for half a second.
I don't care how many videos and how many witness reports were made afterwards. That was not the point of my first post on this subject.
Timoteo said:
Did you not read the text you quoted from me?
It has nothing to do with me being partly out there. It has everything to do with sharing minor info that makes understanding a poster a bit better.
Would you rather take traveling advice from some one like me (50 something countries on a shoestring) or from someone who once went to Cancun for the weekend?
The same goes for race. How hard is to share your skin color? If someone is giving game advice and I think its a black dude for ages then this makes a difference.
I mean how many guys thought G was a black dude? He turned out to be white. This changes the whole image I have of a person.
And no, i'm not being racist. I'm just talking about the certain image you have in your mind of a person.
Would you not be a bit offended if for example El Mech turned out to be a Japanese midget? or if a famous poster turned out to be a woman?
I'm just annoyed by the fact that not even the most basic things are shared.
This is what I wanted to point out when i talked about walterschmidt living in Europe. You can't even share the country you lived in in Europe?
(out of 25 or so countries)
I hope I made myself clear because I won't be in this thread much longer.
Neil Skywalker said:
I think that would be the coolest thing to ever hit this forum. Man, you got my hopes up. I got to get down to Tampa now.
Neil Skywalker said:
No, no, no. Don't get it twisted.
I am willing and able to see everything here (including the fact that you were referring only to the first video).
You are simply unable to understand.
You are referring to the video in which the hoodrat very clearly lunged at and struck the bus driver? The video in which nearly every one of the millions of folks who saw was able to determine that she had struck the driver?
Here is the first video, for the record:
Go to 27 seconds. Watch carefully from there (pause intermittently if necessary) so you can see for yourself what nearly everyone else able to observe. The attack occurs between 27-29 seconds-pause intermittently there and you will eventually reveal a fairly clear still frame with her arm fully extended, and her body lunged fully forward in his direction. An obvious strike, plain as day.
Even at normal speed, this wasn't hard to miss-her lunge and the latter portions of the strike were quite visible, with her demeanor, the driver's reaction and the crowd's reaction filling in what little uncertainty remains.
There are two possibilities here with your interpretation of this, the first video:
1. You really and truly could not tell that there was a strike made in that video. Her posture, the exchanged language and crowd reactions give it away entirely, along with the fact that the tape clearly shows her lunge in and lunge back with her arm fully extended.
If you missed this, you're either pathetically oblivious or blind. Nearly anyone with eyes could see that she struck him.
Since you have eyes (in all likelihood), I must leave open the second possibility...
2. You saw what everyone else did, and can see that she struck the driver. Your continued attempts to draw at straws and claim plausible deniability for the hoodrat are therefore likely the manifestation of your inner white knight, which seeks to defend the female at all costs with no acknowledgement of (or respect for) her own personal responsibility.
This leads you to give the hoodrat the benefit of the (nearly nonexistant) doubt, while showing no such respect for the elderly driver, ignoring the passengers she endangered, and also subsequently attacking/shaming those who rightfully criticize your unworthy damsel in distress.
Both of these options reflect quite poorly on you.
I've only ever been referring to the very first video, bro. That you've been doing the same tells me you're either blind or a rabid white knight.
Right now, I'd bet on some combination of the two.
Timoteo
Crow
Neil Skywalker said:
I see you're quick to assume that disagreement somehow means a lack of understanding. I get why you want certain information from posters, but I still don't necessarily agree. Some may want to keep race out of it because, if you pay any attention to some of the threads on this forum, many make negative assumptions about a poster because of their race, and filter their posts based on that. I'm more interested in the places someone has been, and what info they have to drop about those places. We know who the big travelers are here. We can all read a post and decide how we feel about it. We can all decide individually if we think something a guy wrote makes sense. You can question the poster further about what he wrote if you so choose. And since you DID mention that you withhold certain information because you're an author, it's obviously a factor for you. It's as if you're saying that YOU have a reason to withhold, but others don't have a legit reason for withholding their own info. I'm not the least bit disturbed to find out that a guy I may have thought was one race is actually another (I never got the impression that G was black), because I find no value in it. I don't try to form mental pictures of guys here - I merely read what they have to share, and either agree or disagree and try to foster debate. If I want to understand why a guy feels a certain way about a particular issue, I'll just ask. If a particular poster says he went to a particular city/country, he'll post about it. If someone else was there and disagrees with his findings, or had a different experience, they'll challenge it. You can only require so much proof from people on the internet - we all deal with that every day in this medium. Basically, you got annoyed because of a disagreement, and you're using that to air an unrelated gripe. And frankly, guys that post often give me the info I need about them - roughly were they live, their ethnicity, and other little details. I'm fine getting the info that way.
_GQ_
Kingfisher
teh_skeeze
Pelican
worldwidetraveler said:
Agreed. It would be proof that game is the most important thing when trying to bang chicks.
- Status