Male Student Accuses Female Student of Sexual Assault. She Says He Wanted Revenge.

[jeffreyjerpp]

How do the 18-22 set have sex then? Its as if there is really an INGSOC equivalent political party trying to eliminate the orgasm.

We now have incentivized "revenge tattling". No one in the story is anywhere near being an adult.

The ONLY insurance policy men can count on is audio recording. It is easy to do (download a $1 app from the app store) and might save your life/career. Also perfectly legal in the vast majority of the US.

The second best insurance policy is to file a claim before the girl, which has the added benefit of exposing how ridiculous the existing system is.

I wonder if guys might start preemptively accusing women they work with of sexual harassment?

 

[david.garrett84]

Regarding the comments I've quoted below, the university system would respond to a rush of male complaints by highlighting how all men have institutional power and privilege - the Reginald Denny argument. The majority of the male complaints would be filtered out.

Denny was the white truck driver who had his skull fractured in around 100 places by a group of black men in retaliation for the Rodney King incident before the LA Riots. Many have argued that Denny was not the victim of racism (despite incontrovertible evidence he was selected for death or near-death as revenge for King, someone he had never met). King was a black man living in a "racist" country, so apparently only he was targeted based on race. The exact same thing shall occur with a rise in male-on-female accusations at colleges. America and the West are "intrinsically sexist", so women are the ones perceived as sexual assault victims en masse.

Tribunals at universities, governed as they are by radical feminist theories, are never going to see the light and treat a body of male accusers with so-called cis-privilege even half as positively as the bottom 10% (i.e. least credible) female accusers.

Can you really imagine, for example, a Emma Sulkowicz-style situation where a man who texted a woman saying "I want to fuck you in the butt" would find his rape accusation taken seriously by a feminist-dominated tribunal? By contrast, Sulkowicz's "fuck me in the butt" comments AFTER the "rape" did nothing to cast aspersions on her victim status in the minds of the mass media, Columbia, or a plethora of others interested in portraying her as a poor receptacle of "sexual assault".

I think a number of you are way too optimistic. Even if we got rid of college kangaroo courts:
- 90% of women sleeping with minors get a pussy pass from proper courts, 5% receive a partially acceptable sentence, whereas only 5% are thrown on the altar (usually because of something else that is unpleasant about them) as a sacrifice to the idea/ruse that men and women supposedly face equal consequences across the board.
- Swathes of proven false rape accusations reaching courts and culminating in the innocence of the accused still don't strip lying hoes/c*nts of their "right" to anonymity. The GOT whore who accused Mark Pearson in the UK is a case in point.
- Orwellian events (incl. one from a UMass campus from memory) have resulted in drunk/passed out men being found "guilty" of rape by college tribunals, despite the tribunals knowing the guy was passed out and the girl was performing oral sex on him while awake.

Young lads should be flooding the system with fake complaints, vexatious claims and trying to get as much publicity as possible.

But this is better....if dudes start accusing girls every time they engage in sexual activity after drinking that would be interesting to see how the aca-femi-nazis resolve that development

If you are a man, and suspect a woman might try and pull some bullshit like this, your best hope (as this absurd situation shows) is to file a complaint *before* she does. It will protect you, and discredit the system as a whole.

It may be revenge, but the system is incentivizing smart moves like this. You can't be a rapist if you're the victim.

It'll be a race to the Title IX office to make the complaint first.

We now have incentivized "revenge tattling". No one in the story is anywhere near being an adult.

Under their ridiculous rules, these are't "fake" accusations, it's just holding everyone to the same standard. This is actually a classic tactic from Alinn's rules for radicals (they can work for good and evil both) saying to make sure you hold your opponents to their own ridiculous rules.

The second best insurance policy is to file a claim before the girl, which has the added benefit of exposing how ridiculous the existing system is.

I wonder if guys might start preemptively accusing women they work with of sexual harassment?

 

[AceP]

Doesn't it seems so convenient that their names are John and Jane and their family names are Doe and Roe? Lmfao.

On a serious note, well played. When women like to use legal moves against men, let's see if men can beat them at their own game.

 

[kaotic]

On a serious note, well played. When women like to use legal moves against men, let's see if men can beat them at their own game.

You don't.

Men say fuck you, and don't play the game to begin with.

They learn game and learn how to handle women.

 

[Papaya]

Regarding the comments I've quoted below, the university system would respond to a rush of male complaints by highlighting how all men have institutional power and privilege - the Reginald Denny argument. The majority of the male complaints would be filtered out.

Denny was the white truck driver who had his skull fractured in around 100 places by a group of black men in retaliation for the Rodney King incident before the LA Riots. Many have argued that Denny was not the victim of racism (despite incontrovertible evidence he was selected for death or near-death as revenge for King, someone he had never met). King was a black man living in a "racist" country, so apparently only he was targeted based on race. The exact same thing shall occur with a rise in male-on-female accusations at colleges. America and the West are "intrinsically sexist", so women are the ones perceived as sexual assault victims en masse.

Tribunals at universities, governed as they are by radical feminist theories, are never going to see the light and treat a body of male accusers with so-called cis-privilege even half as positively as the bottom 10% (i.e. least credible) female accusers.

Can you really imagine, for example, a Emma Sulkowicz-style situation where a man who texted a woman saying "I want to fuck you in the butt" would find his rape accusation taken seriously by a feminist-dominated tribunal? By contrast, Sulkowicz's "fuck me in the butt" comments AFTER the "rape" did nothing to cast aspersions on her victim status in the minds of the mass media, Columbia, or a plethora of others interested in portraying her as a poor receptacle of "sexual assault".

I think a number of you are way too optimistic. Even if we got rid of college kangaroo courts:
- 90% of women sleeping with minors get a pussy pass from proper courts, 5% receive a partially acceptable sentence, whereas only 5% are thrown on the altar (usually because of something else that is unpleasant about them) as a sacrifice to the idea/ruse that men and women supposedly face equal consequences across the board.
- Swathes of proven false rape accusations reaching courts and culminating in the innocence of the accused still don't strip lying hoes/c*nts of their "right" to anonymity. The GOT whore who accused Mark Pearson in the UK is a case in point.
- Orwellian events (incl. one from a UMass campus from memory) have resulted in drunk/passed out men being found "guilty" of rape by college tribunals, despite the tribunals knowing the guy was passed out and the girl was performing oral sex on him while awake.

Young lads should be flooding the system with fake complaints, vexatious claims and trying to get as much publicity as possible.

But this is better....if dudes start accusing girls every time they engage in sexual activity after drinking that would be interesting to see how the aca-femi-nazis resolve that development

If you are a man, and suspect a woman might try and pull some bullshit like this, your best hope (as this absurd situation shows) is to file a complaint *before* she does. It will protect you, and discredit the system as a whole.

It may be revenge, but the system is incentivizing smart moves like this. You can't be a rapist if you're the victim.

It'll be a race to the Title IX office to make the complaint first.

We now have incentivized "revenge tattling". No one in the story is anywhere near being an adult.

Under their ridiculous rules, these are't "fake" accusations, it's just holding everyone to the same standard. This is actually a classic tactic from Alinn's rules for radicals (they can work for good and evil both) saying to make sure you hold your opponents to their own ridiculous rules.

The second best insurance policy is to file a claim before the girl, which has the added benefit of exposing how ridiculous the existing system is.

I wonder if guys might start preemptively accusing women they work with of sexual harassment?

You raise some valid points and I agree that men trying a "tit for tat" (pun intended) strategy likely wont solve the systemic issues in the short term. But if men were to go on the offensive in enough numbers then it would likely force the conversation more towards the middle (sanity).

Granted its not likely to happen as guys just want pussy, not attention, and so wont have the natural propensity to seek victim status.

Its a fun mental masturbatory exercise though