Man avoids jail after having sex with 12-year-old girl he thought was of legal age

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheFinalEpic

Pelican
Catholic
Gold Member
I know someone by extension that had sex with two 14 year old girls he picked up from a club, and the saving grace was that they had been at the club and he reasonably expected them to be of age. Scary situations man.
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
debeguiled said:
Leonard D Neubache said:
Confirmed, as the father of a son entering secondary school.
...

You have yet to take:

The Ultimate Daddy Self Control Challenge.
...
With that number of girls in a house, and least one or two will find your hiding place and start talking to you about how all the other girls seem so immature and how 48 isn't old.
...

That's is indeed the Devil knocking on your door. It's a distant second, but ever since I've taken the spirit of this forum to heart I've had the local 14 to 18 year old girls in the district opening on me. Something about a light mix of country courage and feminism-light coupled with their understanding that I'm a "safe" member of the wider community seems to turn them into playful pups in my presence.

Lord give me strength.
 

Geomann180

Ostrich
Catholic
Gold Member
BrewDog said:
That's why I don't agree with 19 year old guys getting fucked sideways over this shit. Did she say she was older? If so, then what's the point of ruining the guy's life? Was he supposed to card her?

Think of the repercussions for the dude. A lifetime of not being able to rent an apartment or get a job. Fuck that. It's oppressive. A man in the States can beat the hell out of a 15 year old girl and not get the same jail time and lifetime sex registry punishment as a guy that has consensual sex with a girl that lied about her age.

Makes you wonder if this is part of why many rapes end in death.

G
 

puckerman

Ostrich
I remember there being a case in Las Vegas. A girl aged 13 took her sister's work identification card. It was worn out, and she went to the agency which issued the card. She had the pictures shot again and got an ID and used her sister's name. She then made a fortune stripping.

Fortunately, because the ID was actually issue by a government agency, the club where she was stripping was totally off the hook.

Let's also remember the case of Traci Lords. She began a career in porn at the age of 15 or 16. She lied about her age the whole time and even appeared in an issue of Penthouse.

When it was found that she was underage, possession of all that material suddenly became illegal. Lords quit the porn industry a couple days after she became legal. It was probably the biggest scandal in the history of porn and cost the industry millions of dollars.
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
The bottom line is this. God forbid you accidentally end up dicking illegal snatch then deny until you die. You are better off fighting it in court until your last breath than copping a plea, no matter the evidence.

I suspect that most guys roll over and let the system fuck them in the hope of leniency, little realising that the worst of the punishments (sex offender registry etc) are mandatory and lifelong regardless of whether you plea bargained or pled innocent and appealed ten guilty convictions.

All things considered you're better off spending a decade in the courts as a "not yet proven sex offender" than accepting a guilty plea with community service on day one and being listed as a pedo until the end of time.

Needless to say, if in doubt then never talk about the encounter to anyone, ever. Not even close relatives who might baulk at lying in court. I don't doubt that a lot of convictions have been secured on the testimony of drunks who never realised that the bloke they were bragging to at the pub was actually a detective who walked in with the sole purpose of getting a confession before snapping cuffs on them.
 

Mage

 
Banned
I am glad the title of this thread was corrected. it's amazing how many men even if they are members of this forum still have the first instinct to assume the man is guilty by default.
 
Actually the bottom line is that no country is as strict and bigoted at the same time about under-age sex as the US. In most countries of the world a 15yo girl fucking a 25yo or even 45yo man would be no big deal. Actually it never was a big deal in all of human history except for the last 100 years. Only in the US do men go to jail for fucking a 17.9999 year old while the judge bangs her one day later for 200$.

I talked with quite a few girls about their sexual history and literally all of them told me that they were clicking their mouse like crazy when they were 14 to 16. Women reach their hormonal and sexual peak at 15-16 - that is when they are the most horny. That is when nature supplies them with the most desire, urge to fuck and have babies.

Women go through a puberty jump between the ages of 12-14 and that is the only time in developmental history that they have an edge over men. That is why feminists drag out IQ tests and other ability tests comparing girls to boys in those ages. Only at that age are girls slightly smarter than boys - they even run faster and are almost as fast at sprinting as their 13yo counterparts. But that advantage disappears within 2 years completely again.

Still they reach their most horny times and maximum fertility at age 16 - we men probably around age 18-19.

Pre-puberty sex is pedophilia. Look at dogs - they know by smell and not by predetermined age whether a bitch is fertile. Before puberty they treat any dog with leniency and no sexual interest at all. Then suddenly when puberty hits they are instantly interested in them.

I don't know whether it is advisable in an ideal system for girls young as that to get married - maybe it is. It certainly is crap for pre-puberty girls to get married (and no - 8 year olds don't mature faster in the desert).

I think that a sane society fills the minds of girls with sane ideas that form their malleable minds. In the past girls dreamed about marriage, about the future husband, they could not wait to get married and be happy with her husband:

3cb7fdf8a7b3ae901f6b2e4d9c72f291.jpg


Girls were obsessed about it and they concentrated their sexual desire on to that very man. And if it was a 40yo good-looking man that her father approved of, then so be it.

They had babies quickly and were happy.

Now what do we have? 16 year olds want to live the Sex and The City lifestyle, maybe do a porn movie, fuck a rock star, fuck a movie star if possible, fuck around, got to slut-training-central college, get a job, fuck her boss, then finally after all this thinking about settling at age 28 when her first massive wrinkles appear.

I think getting them early is a good idea.
 

Atlanta Man

Ostrich
Gold Member
The one think I like about Atlanta and several other southern States is they lowered the age of consent to 16 which is somewhat reasonable. At least if a girl is driving and lies and says she is 18, she has a drivers licence and insurance so you are not facing prison, just angry parents.
 

The Resilient

Ostrich
Orthodox
Not to thread jack, but i believe with the internet that we're in an age where information is so instant that all the weird shit people did in their communities under hushed spaces never had the opportunity to reach the rest of teh world before we had it.

I mean..I am undecided if the world is getting weirder or if the internet makes the information we gather in this giant world seem a lot smaller


NomadofEU said:
Thread titles and stories have been on-point lately.

Is the forum upping it's game or is the world getting weirder? Maybe both I guess
 

Renton1875

Woodpecker
Gold Member
Quintus Curtius said:
I wish the article gave more details about the law and the case.  They don't tell us what the judge was basing her ruling on.  

According to Wikipedia (for what that's worth), this is Scotland's statutory rape law:

In Scotland, the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009 also fixes an age of consent of 16, and is also two tiered, treating children under 13 differently than children 13–16. Section 18, Rape of a young child, applies to children under 13. Before the enactment of this Act, Scotland had very few statutory sexual offences, with most of its sexual legislation being defined at common law, which was increasingly seen as a problem in particular for the issue of consent.[36] The creation of a two tier age limit was deemed very important during the drafting of the Act.



QC we still have Scots Law (somewhat!) from nearly a thousand years ago. 


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scots_law



As we had to Marry off our infant Heirs to Foreign Nobility to stop our Country from falling into the hands of the Enemy!

It was only in 1929 the law was changed to only allow Marriage between couples of at least 16 years. Beforehand a boy of 14 years or a girl of 12 years could Marry without parental consent!

I gather the States in the US that allowed Marriage at 14 years took it from this. Just checked, New Hampshire with parental consent 13 years for girls 14 years for boys.

In 2009 new legislation passed, including the law on rape. Previously, rape of a minor, as of any rape, was only considered such, if it was a male penis entering a female vagina, under 14 years was considered a minor.


http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2009/9/contents


From Wikipedia:
Sections 18-47 of the Act are on the subject of sexual offences relating to children, and to people under a duty of care such as mentally disordered persons. A person under the age of 16 cannot consent to a sexual activity in Scots law, and two key offences exist: 'Rape of a Young Child' (if the child is aged 0-13), and 'Rape of an Older Child' (aged between 13-15). It is a defence in the latter to argue a reasonable belief that the child had attained age 16, but there is no similar defence regarding the former offence.



Let's not forget, this young lad has pleaded guilty in a court of law to the charge of 'rape of a young child'.His name and picture have gone viral, both have been splashed over the media globally.His life is already fucked.

 There is no defence, as per the law above, to fucking a child who is 12 years old, no matter what they look like, whether they consented or not, also from the age of 13-15 consent is unable to be given by a child.

Lady Scott has taken the view of "exceptional circumstances" in sentencing.

The "exceptional circumstances" were:

Her physical appearance...the Police had no concern of her age when they came upon her at 3am, the taxi driver who picked them up thought she looked around 20 years old, she had told the lad and his friend that she was 16 and her friend was 17.

She was also an "active participant" in sexual activity....which I don't know if that means during this encounter, or if she admitted in the previous hearing, to prior sexual activity before this incident.

The Judge I feel will face a shitstorm over this, by setting a precedent that was argued during the legislation debates, that now anyone can have sex with a 13 year old, get a couple of mates and a taxi driver to say they looked 16 and 'hey presto' it doesn't even get to court. The Gary Glitter brigade will be on their way in droves.

Firstly she allowed, because the girl was a couple of months from her 13th Birthday, the evidence usually associated with the 'older child' defence of 'reasonable belief that the child had attained age 16'. Then used the defence of this with the mitigating circumstances to say "justice is best served" with an absolute discharge. As Zelcorpian said the Globalists want the age of consent taken down, they have been in control of my Country for nearly 40 years now and I see this as their move to start the normalisation of the paedos.

The Absolute Discharge means no jail time, no criminal record and no sexual offender register. The conviction will only appear if the defendant appears in court again, where it can be used as a previous conviction.


a Scottish tabloid said:
A student who admitting raping a 12 year-old girl today walked free from court.

A judge showed leniency to Daniel Cieslak by handing him an absolute discharge meaning he escaped further punishment.

The shock move happened as the 21 year-old returned to the High Court in Glasgow having earlier pled guilty to a rape charge.

The student had sex with the child in July 2015 after meeting her at a taxi queue in Edinburgh city centre.

Cieslak had believed she was 16. He later burst into tears when police revealed her true age.

Lady Scott today said she had decided “justice is best served” by taking the “wholly exceptional decision” to give Cieslak an absolute discharge.

She told the court the statutory rape offence had a “very wide scope” with, as a result, a “variation” in sentencing.

The judge went on: “The fact the Lord Advocate decided it was in the public interest in bringing this prosecution does not limit my discretion in deciding the appropriate disposal.”

She said the purpose of the offence was to “protect young girls” - but added there were “exceptional circumstances” in this case.

The number of factors included Cieslak – and other witnesses – believing the victim was 16 or older.

Lady Scott said the 12 year-old was also an “active participant” in sexual activity and that there was no suggestion of “predatory conduct” or grooming.

The judge concluded: “I am satisfied you have been subject to considerable pressure and distress from the burden of this prosecution.

“I do not consider there is any need – or public interest – in punishment.

“To do so would, in my view, be disproportionate given the nature of the criminal culpability here.”

Cieslak, of the capital's Leith, will also avoid being on the sex offenders list.

He appeared to be on the verge of tears as he left the dock. Cieslak was then hugged by a number of weeping women who had joined him at court.

A hearing was last month told how the victim and a teenage friend had been in Edinburgh city centre on July 31 2015.

In the early hours of the next morning, police were in Princes Street following a report of a missing girl.

The 12 year-old happened to direct officers to the child they were looking for.

Despite the time, prosecutor Kath Harper explained: “Police spoke to (the girl who was raped), but did not note her details as they were not concerned by her age.”

The girl and her friend were later in taxi queue when they got talking to Cieslak and his pal.

They all got in a cab together and headed to a flat in the city's Gorgie.

It was there Cieslak and the 12 year-old began kissing before the Polish-born student had sex with her.

Days later, the youngster told her sister she was “extremely worried” she could be pregnant

Miss Harper told the court: “She was distressed at this time.”

The 12 year-old's GP “encouraged” her to go to the police. It was the girl's sister who reported the incident.

Cieslak later admitted he had sex with the girl, but denied it was rape.

He said he was told the girl was 16.

Prosecutor Miss Harper said: “When it became clear police were suggesting she was younger, he asked them what age she was.

“When told she was 12 years-old, he started to cry and held his head in his hands.”

Cieslak had been due to start an Architectural Technology course at Napier University at the time. He had been studying engineering.

His lawyer David Nicolson said Cielsak “genuinely believed” the girl was years older.


3am she directed Police to the reported missing child.  :smile:

Where were all the fuckin Parent(s)? They all deserve a trip in front of a judge too.

Well I suppose at least one Parent noticed their kid was missing. Fuck!






scotian said:
I've never been to Scotland but I've read enough Irvine Welsh's novels (author or Trainspotting) to know that this is the type of shit that goes down in Leith, Edinburgh.

23m4txj.jpg
[/img]

Hey scotian, the invite still stands.

Irvine got all his stories first hand from people that grew up in the housing scheme's (project's) he only elaborated on them.

The scheme's are full of hood rats like this and I would guarantee she had been pumped at least 20 times by the local bro's before she decided to pop on the high heels and head up town. Fuck no doubt she's probably up around the 50 mark now with her 'celebrity status', she may even make Roosh's 100 before she's even legal!

'Skagboys' was set around the time at the end of the fight against Globalism in Scotland. All our heavy industries had been stripped away finishing with the coal miners strikes. The inner cities, scheme's, most of the male population infact found themselves unemployed with no signs of any jobs to replace the lost ones (sound familiar?). Glue bags gave way to 'teenth's of hash and £1 bags of skag (heroin, for the unaware). Social housing had become scarce because of 'The Right To Buy'. Preference were given to single mothers who then shacked up with numerous partners, on the sly obviously, and then popped out kid after kid. Fast forward 35 odd years and no doubt the girl from this case is a product of that environment.

And fuck Frankie's RELAX. We ended up, during those dark days with the unenviable tag of 'the AIDS Capital of Europe'. Faggots.
 

debeguiled

Peacock
Gold Member
RE: Man avoids jail after having sex with 12-year-old girl

There might be too much truth in this thread.

Basic idea: Girls mature faster than men, and stop maturing sooner.

Only problem is, we have societal rules to the contrary.

Hence this forum rule:

11. No jailbait/illegal/p4p threads. Do not talk about where to find girls under 18 or how to have sex with them, even if it's legal in the location being discussed. Do not post sexy pictures of girls that are confirmed to be under 18. Do not talk about illegal drug use, breaking the law, or prostitution.

A good rule, not for the sake of truth, but of practicality.

No one can handle the red pill truth of women. We pretend it ain't so.

Aw shucks, they're just kids.

They aren't hitting on you, they are just testing limits or seeing what power they have.

Yeah.

Women think that they are the glue that holds society together.

Nopes.

Society is held together by men controlling their urges for the sake of the common good.

The first time you are a fifty year old and a 17 year old gives you her phone number out of the blue you become painfully aware of this fact.

Accent on the painfully.

Or, to paraphrase Norm MacDonald:

Some things you don't do not because they are wrong, but because they are against the law.




We are piloting this baby, and making sacrifices to keep it sailing smoothly, and don't let any feminists tell you different.

And thank god for that.
 

polar

Pelican
Gold Member
Atlanta Man said:
The one think I like about Atlanta and several other southern States is they lowered the age of consent to 16 which is somewhat reasonable. At least if a girl is driving and lies and says she is 18, she has a drivers licence and insurance so you are not facing prison, just angry parents.

I am not a lawyer, but aren't there still ten ways to get fucked til Sunday if she's under 18, in most states? Not being close in age is one exception, another being from out of state (crossing state lines)...etc. This isn't something to fuck around with.
 

Atlanta Man

Ostrich
Gold Member
polar said:
Atlanta Man said:
The one think I like about Atlanta and several other southern States is they lowered the age of consent to 16 which is somewhat reasonable. At least if a girl is driving and lies and says she is 18, she has a drivers licence and insurance so you are not facing prison, just angry parents.

I am not a lawyer, but aren't there still ten ways to get fucked til Sunday if she's under 18, in most states? Not being close in age is one exception, another being from out of state (crossing state lines)...etc. This isn't something to fuck around with.
This is true. If I have a 16 year old girlfriend, which is legal, she cannot send me nudes- she would be producing child porn, I would be receiving and possessing it (even if I deleted it immediately and told her never to do it again). Also because she is a minor if I take her on vacation to Florida the law says I am taking a minor over state lines for sex-Technically I can take her to Florida, we just cannot have sex there.Furthermore I cannot drink with her or do any illicit substances, that is contributing to the delinquency of a minor. So the law is reasonable in some respects, but an asshole cop or prosecutor can make life difficult if they so choose.
 

scotian

Peacock
Gold Member
RE: Man avoids jail having sex with 12-year-old girl he thought was of legal age

Atlanta Man said:
polar said:
Atlanta Man said:
The one think I like about Atlanta and several other southern States is they lowered the age of consent to 16 which is somewhat reasonable. At least if a girl is driving and lies and says she is 18, she has a drivers licence and insurance so you are not facing prison, just angry parents.

I am not a lawyer, but aren't there still ten ways to get fucked til Sunday if she's under 18, in most states? Not being close in age is one exception, another being from out of state (crossing state lines)...etc. This isn't something to fuck around with.
This is true. If I have a 16 year old girlfriend, which is legal, she cannot send me nudes- she would be producing child porn, I would be receiving and possessing it (even if I deleted it immediately and told her never to do it again). Also because she is a minor if I take her on vacation to Florida the law says I am taking a minor over state lines for sex-Technically I can take her to Florida, we just cannot have sex there.Furthermore I cannot drink with her or do any illicit substances, that is contributing to the delinquency of a minor. So the law is reasonable in some respects, but an asshole cop or prosecutor can make life difficult if they so choose.

There's a big consent sex scandal happening now in Canada involving a senator and a woman he banged when she was 18 but apparently he "groomed" her according to police, the senator is black so he's pulling the race card: Don Meredith 'groomed' teen for sex, former police chief says
Meredith maintains he didn't have intercourse with the woman until she turned 18. Ottawa Police investigated the allegations but didn't lay charges against Meredith. The age of consent in Canada is 16 years old, except for the exploitative situations described in section 153. White said the Criminal Code provision describes what Meredith is alleged to have done. "It talks about people in a position of trust or power who literally groom someone between the age of 16 and 18 years for sexual favour. That's exactly what is described by the [Senate] investigator," he said.
http://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/don-meredith-groomed-teen-for-sex-former-police-chief-says-1.3329776

Fuck this grooming bullshit, so what he chatted with a teenager? He did the right thing by waiting until she was 18 to go for the bang, maybe it was a bit greasy to do this if he was married but fuck it, sex between two consenting adults shouldn't be shamed. As Pierre Trudeau once quipped "there's no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation."
 

Hoser

Kingfisher
"Old enough to bleed, old enough to breed", they used to say.

Although I reflexively recoil at the thought of sexing up an adolescent, there is something to be said for marrying them off in their mid teens (hello Quinceaneras, Bat Mitzvahs, and Sweet Sixteens---all ceremonies releasing the debutante into the world of courtship).

As irritating as teen girls are, they are wonderfully malleable. Imagine how sweet a person your wife could become if you became the male authority in her life when she was only a handful of years past girlhood---rather than after she had experienced a decade plus of using her pussy pass to get what she wanted, becoming a hardened bitch in the process.

There's a reason Roosh named his site "Return of KINGS", not "The Incel Strikes Back"
 

Thrill Jackson

Kingfisher
Gold Member
Atlanta Man said:
Roosh said:
Girls are going through puberty at earlier ages. If you saw the "Cash Me outside" girl outside on the street, would you guess she's 13?

Danielle-Bregoli-Kodak-Black.jpg
`
I honestly did not know about this girl until just now but she is a perfect example of why Statutory Rape Laws do not need to be strict liability. She is exactly the fatherless, poorly supervised, manipulative girl who could easily fuck up a man's life. All it takes is her getting into a bar, a nightclub, or college party and it is game over for whichever man picks her up. She is one fake id away from becoming a weapon of ass destruction. Imagine some college sophomore at a pregame keg party the night before homecoming drunk and horny running into her at a frathouse-48 hours and a smartphone video later-Child pornography frathouse rape party at State University article on every news channel.

Hold on Hold on Hold on..........

If a man ONS a girl he met at a bar and she turn out to be underaged, HE would face charges? Wouldn't the bar be liable for letting her in the bar in the first place?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top