Man avoids jail after having sex with 12-year-old girl he thought was of legal age

Status
Not open for further replies.

Skank_Hunt

Kingfisher
Gold Member
RBerkley said:
@ Skankhunt, though I think Roosh will probably want to avoid such discussions (while feminists teacher want to pose nude in front of schoolchildren for "Sexual Education"), the Law regarding Age of Sexual Consent was as low as 12 in Latin America-Caribbean and even 14 in Canada up to 2004-2006, before the feminist movement started to increase in power.

Plus, those laws weren't even enforced strictly unless it was considered serious such as impregnating a 12-year-old or rape, etc.

It's only the feminist movement in the 21st century which started the Witch-hunt to change the Age of Consent to 18 and beyond, which punishes the teens they claim to protect (no Romeo & Juliet provision or excusing an Aspie 21-year-old from losing his virginity to a 13-year-old to 16-year-old Cash Me Ousside Instagram chick).

It was considered in Hitlery Clinton's policy to force other countries to set their Age of Consent to at least 18, even up to 21 in cases of "exploitation".

Then you have these fucking Westernized educated feminazi cunts travelling abroad to bully foreign governments to raise the age of consent to 18 and beyond infinity and beyond like Buzz Lightyear, yet those feminazis would likely "teach" a starving 4-year-old Black or Middle Eastern refugee how to suck her pussy.

Current Age of Consent legislation is a feminist weapon used against masculinity and hot chicks. Yes, hot chicks are affected by the Age of consent feminist hysteria.

There were 16 & 17-year-old Swiss chicks who were pissed off when the country increased the legal prostitution age to 18. Even in the city of Amsterdam, old fucking feminist cunts were forcing the EU to increase that city's prostitution age to 21.

Totally agree. Both bitter women and bitter men have successfully criminalized much of normal sexual behavior because they don't want the hot girls and attractive men to have fun. The women who push for further criminalization of normal sexual behavior (in the direction against men, of course) are bitter because they are ugly, old, masculine. The bitter men who are unfortunately even more numerous are bitter because they are unattractive losers with fat old wives as their only option, if that. They will be damned if the hot young girls are getting banged by attractive men who naturally or through learning have game. In most countries of the world the age of consent is 14-16, in the vast majority 16 is legal, and 18 pretty much the world over, and these are the kind of girls most judges, politicians and other legislators desperately want to fuck but cannot, so the only other option is to try to raise the age of consent to 18 or 21 for places with 16 or 18 respectively so that any guy who successfully and fairly games one of these hot girls gets 5-10 years. At least that will calm some of the internal rage.

You would of course expect such malicious attack against men and normal sexual behavior from bitter old feminist hags, but one cannot help but be a bit disappointed in the men, who despite having considerable intellectual strength choose to persecute their fellow man rather than go for what they truly want, deep down in the gut, all for that fleeting feeling of satisfaction, that if they cannot get hot girls, then no one can. With girls in the Anglosphere and western Europe being spoiled at increasingly lower ages, 14 is comfortably the new 16, 16 comfortably the new 18, so pushing draconian legislation to increase ages of consent to 21 or locking up men for up to a decade for a genuine mistake with a 15 year old going on 20, fake IDs in tow, that effectively cuts out the best, least ruined girls from the supply. Most girls I know in the US who are 21 have banged at least 3-5 guys already and are pretty well indoctrinated. They're either single mothers or soon to be college graduates. Sex appeal aside, they were just far more pleasant in high school. Even at 21, I see the masculine, militant feminist, man hating, smartphone addicted qualities pretty deeply ingrained in them.

If the law means that we cannot talk to any girl under 21, then the bitter women and bitter men have their wish, they further restrict us to the worst of women. And we will have no choice in the matter. Given recent witch hunt like trends in rape and pedo hysteria over the past few years, I can't say I'm surprised though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top