Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Culture
Culture general
Man marries virgin cutie... she morphs into tattooed slut
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rob Banks" data-source="post: 1232817" data-attributes="member: 12046"><p>What exactly are you referring to when you say "Madonna/Whore complex"?</p><p></p><p>Simply wanting a virgin wife (and seeing non-virgins as "whores" who would not consider marrying) does not constitute a madonna/whore complex. A "<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madonna%E2%80%93whore_complex" target="_blank">madonna/whore complex</a>" is when a man is only attracted to women who he considers "whores" and is not able to get aroused by "good girls" who he respects.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Men have always been down to pump and dump. It was women who did not allow this in the past. It is not a man's fault that a woman allows him to pump and dump her. You (as a man) are not "ruining" this woman for her future husband. If she is allowing herself to be pumped and dumped by you, you probably are not the first nor the last man she will allow to do this.</p><p></p><p>I know a lot of guys here have solid game and what not, but if a truly good girl (not that there are many of those left in the West) is determined to save herself for marriage, or to not cheat on her husband, she simply won't give up the ass no matter how good your game is.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is actually a very misleading statistic. When you were taught in history class that people in the past did not live as long, and that the average human lifespan in the middle ages was under under 50 years, these numbers averaged in all infant deaths, which was close to half of all people. If you have two kids and one dies when he is a baby and the other dies at 90, then the average lifespan of your children would be 45 yerars. However, that statistic is obviously misleading.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, there is a big difference. The important thing is a girl's actions (moreso than her intentions or thoughts). If a girl is physically a virgin, then there is a big difference between her and a woman who is not.</p><p></p><p>Also, if you manage to wife up a woman while she is still a virgin, then there is less of a chance she will fall into society's corruption when she gets exposed to it. If she is not a virgin and has already had premarital sex, then she <em>already has</em> fallen into society's corruption.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What do you mean men want it "both ways"? I assume you mean that men want to fuck around and have casual sex when they're young, and then marry a virgin when they get older.</p><p></p><p>I get what you're saying, but unfortunately, if one man by himself decides not to pump and dump chicks, he will not be able to fix society by himself. Those chicks will simply get pumped and dumped by other guys. If you can't change the way modern women are, why not get in on the action and at least get what you can out of a bad situation?</p><p></p><p>If you do this as a young man, and then later decide that you want a family and want a virgin, that is fine. There is no obligation that you accept promiscuous women just because you were a promiscuous man yourself. This is not a double standard. It's two different standards. Men can have tons of casual sex and still be marriage-worthy partners (as long as they have money, status, etc.), but for women, it is not the same. If you were a ladies man in your youth, you should not be punished for this by being forced into accepting a slut as a wife.</p><p></p><p>This is basically red-pill theory 101.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Huh? So you would rather take a known whore than take a "chance" on a virgin (out of fear that she might become a whore)?</p><p></p><p>This makes no sense whatsoever.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Men are simply reacting and adjusting to what's out there. If all that is out there is "sloots", then men will bang them. A few centuries ago, when there were hardly any "sloots" and most women wanted to get married and beome mothers, men got married relatively young, didn't bang "sloots" or "THOTs," and focused their lives on building society and protecting their families.</p><p></p><p>However, you're simply not going to change human nature. As long as the </p><p>West is full of sluts and feminism is running rampant, men are not simply going to change and become near-celibate in hopes that this will change society for the better. This is most certainly utopian thinking.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rob Banks, post: 1232817, member: 12046"] What exactly are you referring to when you say "Madonna/Whore complex"? Simply wanting a virgin wife (and seeing non-virgins as "whores" who would not consider marrying) does not constitute a madonna/whore complex. A "[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madonna%E2%80%93whore_complex]madonna/whore complex[/url]" is when a man is only attracted to women who he considers "whores" and is not able to get aroused by "good girls" who he respects. Men have always been down to pump and dump. It was women who did not allow this in the past. It is not a man's fault that a woman allows him to pump and dump her. You (as a man) are not "ruining" this woman for her future husband. If she is allowing herself to be pumped and dumped by you, you probably are not the first nor the last man she will allow to do this. I know a lot of guys here have solid game and what not, but if a truly good girl (not that there are many of those left in the West) is determined to save herself for marriage, or to not cheat on her husband, she simply won't give up the ass no matter how good your game is. This is actually a very misleading statistic. When you were taught in history class that people in the past did not live as long, and that the average human lifespan in the middle ages was under under 50 years, these numbers averaged in all infant deaths, which was close to half of all people. If you have two kids and one dies when he is a baby and the other dies at 90, then the average lifespan of your children would be 45 yerars. However, that statistic is obviously misleading. Actually, there is a big difference. The important thing is a girl's actions (moreso than her intentions or thoughts). If a girl is physically a virgin, then there is a big difference between her and a woman who is not. Also, if you manage to wife up a woman while she is still a virgin, then there is less of a chance she will fall into society's corruption when she gets exposed to it. If she is not a virgin and has already had premarital sex, then she [i]already has[/i] fallen into society's corruption. What do you mean men want it "both ways"? I assume you mean that men want to fuck around and have casual sex when they're young, and then marry a virgin when they get older. I get what you're saying, but unfortunately, if one man by himself decides not to pump and dump chicks, he will not be able to fix society by himself. Those chicks will simply get pumped and dumped by other guys. If you can't change the way modern women are, why not get in on the action and at least get what you can out of a bad situation? If you do this as a young man, and then later decide that you want a family and want a virgin, that is fine. There is no obligation that you accept promiscuous women just because you were a promiscuous man yourself. This is not a double standard. It's two different standards. Men can have tons of casual sex and still be marriage-worthy partners (as long as they have money, status, etc.), but for women, it is not the same. If you were a ladies man in your youth, you should not be punished for this by being forced into accepting a slut as a wife. This is basically red-pill theory 101. Huh? So you would rather take a known whore than take a "chance" on a virgin (out of fear that she might become a whore)? This makes no sense whatsoever. Men are simply reacting and adjusting to what's out there. If all that is out there is "sloots", then men will bang them. A few centuries ago, when there were hardly any "sloots" and most women wanted to get married and beome mothers, men got married relatively young, didn't bang "sloots" or "THOTs," and focused their lives on building society and protecting their families. However, you're simply not going to change human nature. As long as the West is full of sluts and feminism is running rampant, men are not simply going to change and become near-celibate in hopes that this will change society for the better. This is most certainly utopian thinking. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Culture
Culture general
Man marries virgin cutie... she morphs into tattooed slut
Top
