Man walked 351 miles to sleep with teenage girl

VNvet

Kingfisher
TheFinalEpic said:
Da da la da!

I think there's been attempts at this on instagram etc. where a questionably young girl will message you and try to get you to meet up.
Immediate solicitation is always a red flag, and having morality is a good way to avoid this.

I once had a young dorky Asian college student (in Asia) approach me in a cafe and ask to have sex "with big white penis." She looked like a college student, but I was very skeptical of her motives. She ran off to her scooter when I denied her, so maybe it wasn't a trap? Girl seemed crazy either way.

Anyway, the only guys that fall for this stuff are very low IQ and probably raised by a single mom.

Geomann180 said:
Or Jewish men?

They had a few Jews on To Catch a Predator. They even got a rabbi.

Never got a Catholic priest.

 

Cobra

Hummingbird
Gold Member
aeroektar said:
"thirsty man attempts to meet female of childbearing age and faces a possible life sentence"

I'm not saying that the guy isn't a rotten scum bag, I didn't even read the whole story, but what are we really doing here? What a waste of resources. More signs of a lost society with its priorities out of whack. How about go after some murderous gangbangers or real life pedophiles and child abusers.

I don't think preventative actions like this are ever too much when it comes to protecting children. God knows how much the degeneracy in the west is limiting procreation. It better protect those children it has!
 

Donfitz007

Kingfisher
This might get me banned but hey.

If you show your friends a picture of a smoking hot "18 year old", they will all agree she's smoking hot. Afterward tell them she's actually 15 and watch as they all struggle but inevitably hide their attraction and say how gross she is and how gross you are for having that picture. This is sorta like aids, If a hot woman who is desperate for sex (because she has aids) seduces a man and the man doesn't know she has aids is the man at fault?

Maybe a week or two ago I went to the gym around 11:30 am, There was this 5'9 brunette who had the Face of Megan fox (unfortunately with brown eyes) and the body of Beyonce (both prime). All my friends were amazed by this woman and she would make a point to be the center of attention. She would come to the gym in biker shorts, leggings pulled up, and volleyball shorts. Get on all the most revealing equipment to make her body be seen and stay at the gym for hours and hours. Finally, I had enough and I approached her, got her name, age(20), number, everything and I thought ok this is great. My friends hyped me up and I felt like the man. Then same day a friend of mines looked her up in the system to see if she lied to me about her name or anything (because i honestly thought she was out of my league at the time). Turns out this girl was born in 2004 and just turned 15. I deleted her number, deleted her snapchat, deleted her existence out my life. I felt so betrayed I wanted to go to the police. My friends who were just bragging about me and saying how lucky I was now laughed at me and called me a pedo. Sure it was all fun and games but being called a pedo is still and scary thing.

I'm not promoting this or even saying its right or wrong, I think pedos should be tortured and killed slowly.
 

SlickyBoy

Hummingbird
The reason you don't see FBI stings against women and underage boys isn't because it never happens. One look at the teacher/student caught having sex thread reveals this phenomenon to be the growing epidemic that it is. The difference is women don't go online to chat rooms or accept random messages from young boys, generally, in order to meet their victims. It always involves some kind of a relationship where the woman can finesse the situation into what she wants while providing - she thinks - the plausible deniability of "it just happened." Usually the courts don't agree with that last bit, although they do soften the punishment blow when compared to male perpetrators similarly situated.

As for the age, teenagers are not the same as children and in many cases it becomes a matter of where the act occurred, not some universally accepted agreement of what a child is. EMJ talked about the legal fiction (his term) with regard to age of the victims in the Catholic priest "child abuse" scandal.

There, the vast majority of the victims were not children but teenagers, mostly over 14 years old. When the secrets came out, the gay church leaders gleefully piled on with "Yeah, that's right - get rid of those god awful child molesters!" when in fact it was not a child molestation problem they faced (and STILL face), it is a homosexual problem.

The recent debacle of the highest ranking American Catholic leader, Cardinal McCarrick, demonstrated exactly this, as his victims were seminarians in mostly (though not exclusively) their late teens.
 

Lechon

Sparrow
Who's a slut (female low rank) and who's a loser (male low rank) and how to get away from them is on the top of every young girl's mind. It's hardwired in them from birth and starts taking over most of their brains by puberty via hormonal surges.

One of the problems with these entrapments is they offer propositions that basically don't exist. Attractive teenage girls don't want to have sex with autistic basement dwelling losers or old peepers from the Internet. So it's not a question of "but he would have done it to someone else", but rather if young girls were having sex with everyone, which they aren't, they would use the opportunity. So if my aunt had a penis etc.

As it stands this is mostly putting autistic losers in jail for being autistic losers, which I guess isn't that bad all things considered. Jail, after all, according to social sciences, is mainly a place where you put (male) losers so others don't need to be around them. The main problem is a lot of these guys go in to jail as relatively benign and naive, and after 10-15 years of being fucked and beaten the shit out of as chomos, they go from lurking on chat forum fantasizing about girls who don't exist to monsters who violate people who do exist.
 
Lechon said:
As it stands this is mostly putting autistic losers in jail for being autistic losers, which I guess isn't that bad all things considered. Jail, after all, according to social sciences, is mainly a place where you put (male) losers so others don't need to be around them.

:lolwtf:
 

Lechon

Sparrow
The Catalyst said:
Lechon said:
As it stands this is mostly putting autistic losers in jail for being autistic losers, which I guess isn't that bad all things considered. Jail, after all, according to social sciences, is mainly a place where you put (male) losers so others don't need to be around them.

:lolwtf:

Criminology 101 teaches you that what people go to jail for varies immensely accross time and space, there is almost no connection at times. Now around half of all inmates are in for drug offences. Before the hippies it was practically zero. Now jails are filling up with sex offences that weren't offences just a decade or two ago.

However, what practically all societies agree on is who belongs in jail: Male, young, unresourceful, and from the working class/underclass. It's almost as if jails are made to put them there, and the justification just changes from place to place.
 

kinjutsu

Pelican
Unfortunately or fortunately (depending on your own personal tastes) AoC laws exist.

In Canada, they raised the age from 14 to 16 on May 1st 2008.

So if this guy and this situation took place in Canada in 2007 it wouldn't be a news story and it wouldn't be illegal.

Just some food for thought.



PS: Not excusing his behaviour....if i had a 14yr old daughter back in 2007 and found out she was talking to some 30yr old dude for sex I'd be in jail for attempted murder.
 

...

Crow
Gold Member
Oh boy, you guys are giving all the Mainstream Media and feminists ammo for the next witch hunt.

Even some of the senior guys are being just straight up autistic (lack self awareness).
 

SlickyBoy

Hummingbird
Lechon said:
Criminology 101 teaches you that what people go to jail for varies immensely accross time and space, there is almost no connection at times. Now around half of all inmates are in for drug offences. Before the hippies it was practically zero. Now jails are filling up with sex offences that weren't offences just a decade or two ago.

Statistics 101 shows those are not "drug" crimes any more than speeding away from the cops after you rob a bank is a traffic offense.

At least in America, whenever you hear the media moan about putting people in jail for "nonviolent drug crimes," they are lying.
 

Lechon

Sparrow
SlickyBoy said:
At least in America, whenever you hear the media moan about putting people in jail for "nonviolent drug crimes," they are lying.

Yes, the truth is not black and white, leftist media says a lot of stupid things and a lot of these people commit violent crimes too. But the point is non-violent drug crimes add a lot of prison time even if most prisoners aren't non-violent angels just in for recreational drug use.

Something that really adds a lot of prison years in the US is breaking parole violations with testing positive for weed, where metabolites stay in your system for a month, or even violations such as possesion of rolling papers. I'm not a fan of lying around smoking weed all day, but the fact is it's pacifying for real criminals with real issues, and there's no good reason to fill up jails with them for others. I'm sure there are good stats on exactly how many people are behind bars in the US for non-violent drug offences and how many prison years are added to violent prisoner's sentences, but since this isn't a WOD-thread I think I'll pass on that (after taking a puff :D).
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
"The age of consent in (wherever) is (whatever) and the sky didn't fall over there."
"It's not pedophilia, it's technically ephebophilia."
"Historically girls were married off at age (x)."
"If she's post pubescent then nature says..."

Makes me realise that the line in the sand will eventually be drawn between family men and people who only see the world as a collection of things to use as sex toys.
 

BlackFriar

 
Banned
You can take this comment for what it is worth. But at least listen to what I say:

100+/- years ago...men in their 20s and 30s were marrying 14-17 year old girls. 40 years ago, 30 year old men still dated, married and impregnated 16/17 year old girls. (My parents did this.) Now...post 2010. Parents can give hormones to their kids and try to change their gender or tell them it is completely normal for kids to do this.

I was at work a few years ago and we were talking in the lunch room. I was mid 30s then. I said it would be my dream to date and have a kid with a 25 or 26 year old. My shift supervisor tried to act all high and mighty and say that was still a "kid" according to him. I told him to stick it where the sun does not shine.

I am not saying it is ok to try to sleep with a 14 year old. All I am saying is at one time in the recent past. People did it and it was considered normal. What is considered acceptable in society is always changing. And normally for the worst.

Some man thinking he is going to get it on with a 14 year old girl is wrong. But in 3-5 years...just watch. You will see it almost normal for older men to lure younger boys into a relationship. It is coming....and so are they. Literally....just watch, wait and see.
 

Aurini

Ostrich
Hegelian dialectic. Force a choice between two idiotic extremes.

Extreme No 1: Kids should be taught anal sex in sex ed at age 8.

Extreme No 2: Sexually activity before 18 is pedophilia, afterwards it's liberating.

I think we all know the result they're trying to manufacture as the Hegelian Synthesis. Unfortunately, thanks to the modern taboos, it's impossible to make a sane statement about situations such as this.
 

worldwidetraveler

Hummingbird
Gold Member
Guys, you know that you're not suppose to be attracted to a fully developed girl under the age of 18. After she is 18 then it is ok. In order to make sure you comply, we will misuse the term pedophilia in order to shame you into submission. Sure, it is a vile accusation, but this is for your own good. We all know that you have no self control and when attracted you will automatically do something you shouldn't be doing. You have no control over the benis. How dare you even think someone under 18 is pretty!

I think it was Tucker Carlson who said those who control our words control our mind.

Throwing out the term pedophilia casually is a great example. While we are at it you are racist, misogynist, and homophobic if you are not attracted to trannies.
 

Roosh

Cardinal
Orthodox
Multiple members have been suspended in this thread for giving support to sexual relations of women under 18. This is not the forum to show support for that sort of thing. If you have problems with the law, feel free to contact your local congressman to change it.
 
Top