Mandatory vaccination policies

DanielH

Hummingbird
Moderator
Orthodox

Some people opted to take an early retirement or just not reenlist instead of fighting it - I have one friend who is retiring after 14 years on October 1st instead of getting the jab. 20 years would have been a nice pension. That's probably far more people than who have been outright kicked out. The goal isn't actually to get people vaccinated, the goal is to purge the military and get it more ideologically in tune with the federal government
 

budoslavic

Eagle
Orthodox
Gold Member


As COVID-19 becomes endemic, Tufts transitions into new phase of public health response​

As the Tufts community returns to campus and adjusts to the fall semester, the new school year brings new guidance surrounding COVID-19 protocols. All eligible Tufts community members are required to receive a bivalent COVID-19 booster shot by Dec. 2, as announced in a Sept. 16 email from University Infection Control Director Michael Jordan and Medical Director of Health Service Marie Caggiano.

The university will be offering vaccine clinics for the bivalent booster and the influenza vaccine. The new booster aims to address currently circulating strains of COVID-19.

“The updated (bivalent) booster is designed to protect against two strains of a virus in a single shot versus one strain with the original monovalent vaccine,” Jordan wrote in an email to the Daily. “The bivalent booster provides protection against the two omicron sub-variants which are currently the predominant circulating viral strains.”

All on-campus booster clinics are fully booked, as announced in a Sept. 19 email from Jordan. More clinics will be added in the future.

“We will be adding more booster clinics and expanding hours to the extent possible. New clinic dates will be posted on go.tufts.edu/COVIDvaccine as soon as we schedule them,” Caggiano wrote in an email to the Daily. “If students are unable to visit one of the Tufts clinics, they can schedule a booster appointment at a local clinic or pharmacy.”

Regular COVID-19 testing is no longer required, although Caggiano reminded students that they can still test on campus under certain circumstances.

“Testing is available for people who have symptoms or those who have had close contact with someone who was diagnosed with COVID-19. Asymptomatic, surveillance testing is not being offered,” Caggiano wrote.

The university’s COVID-19 dashboard, which displayed the number of active cases in the Tufts community, was retired when surveillance testing ended in May. Jordan noted the reasoning behind the change.

The Sept. 16 announcement reminded community members that although requirements have changed, the pandemic is not over.

“SARS-CoV-2, the cause of COVID-19, is becoming an endemic infectious disease, and we continue to see new cases on our campuses,” Jordan and Caggiano wrote. “Please do not delay getting your COVID-19 bivalent booster and influenza vaccinations.”
 

Papaya

Peacock
Gold Member


As COVID-19 becomes endemic, Tufts transitions into new phase of public health response​






Deleted. Black pill overdose
 
Last edited:

fortyfive

Kingfisher
Other Christian
View attachment 49006

View attachment 49007
View attachment 49008

Unconfirmed if true.
Seems true. That's brutal.

Best comment from that blog
killing 2 birds with 1 stone. destroy the army, the only institution that could stand in the way of the QR smart city 4th industrial revolution, and poison another 300,000 thousand healthy men. and if the jab doesn't kill them the war will. the betrayal is so monumental it makes one feel physically sick
 

Biscuits_Gravy

Woodpecker
Catholic
What about homeschooling? Can they extend this law to homeschooled children in that state too?
And what about other states?
You seem to be approaching this from a frame where you have to obey an unconstitutional and completely immoral law. Yes, if you want to participate in a corrupt systems educational institution, you may have to play ball, but if you don’t want that, then you have a choice for yourself and your kids.
 

Mrredsquare

Hummingbird
Other Christian
Wonder how they define full FDA approval. If these are being mandated under true FDA approval, this means that Pfizer no longer has legal immunity from lawsuits, correct? If so, maybe Pfizer themselves will push back on this mandate.. wishful thinking I suppose.
They don't care about legalities. Corporations are above the law.
 

Grigori

 
Banned
Other Christian
You seem to be approaching this from a frame where you have to obey an unconstitutional and completely immoral law. Yes, if you want to participate in a corrupt systems educational institution, you may have to play ball, but if you don’t want that, then you have a choice for yourself and your kids.
My question is a simple one: if for example you want to have your children be homeschooled, would such a law apply to homeschoolers also, or only to students of public/private schools in California? Do homeschool students have to submit to the mandates or not? Would they be able to enforce that?

Well, on some level you do have to obey an unconstitutional law, because if you don't, they'll throw you into jail, and you'll just die there, leaving the kids without a father. If for example, you don't want to participate in a corrupt systems educational institution, what kind of choice do you have for yourself and your kids? I do not know how homeschooling works in California. But can the Californian government regulate homeschooling? Can they enforce such a law for homeschools? Can children and/or parents of homeschool face legal penalties for refusing to vaccinate?
 

Wavethewheat

Chicken
Orthodox Inquirer
Wonder how they define full FDA approval. If these are being mandated under true FDA approval, this means that Pfizer no longer has legal immunity from lawsuits, correct? If so, maybe Pfizer themselves will push back on this mandate.. wishful thinking I suppose.
Actually, once the shots are listed on the CDC recommended childhood vaccine schedule (and they will soon be, despite the clear evidence of harm and the lack of any real benefit in children), the vaccine manufacturers are immune from any liability for injuries. That's why the drug companies push so aggressively to get their newly developed vaccines onto the recommended childhood schedule. It gives them guaranteed annual sales and no risk of lawsuits. Anyone who is harmed must pursue a claim in the adversarial federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, where the Justice Department with their unlimited resources argues on behalf of the drug companies in front of a special master that is paid by the government that your injuries from a government-recommended product were not due to the product (and they will also try to paint you as crazy or seeking a payday). This court has no jury, and no standard rules of discovery. It's a rigged game. Only after going through this kangaroo court do you have the option to then sue in regular civil court. But in reality, what lawyer is going to pursue that option after losing in the vaccine court? So for all intents and purposes, there is no viable way to sue in civil court for injuries caused by vaccines that are on the CDC recommended childhood schedule. Keep that in mind when anyone starts to question "Why are they pushing so hard to get approval for these Covid shots for kids?"
 
Top