We’re the providers, emotional, financial - everything. It’s the woman that moves up, she stands to gain so much more on paper. This is the historical view. Judging that today’s equality culture is strong enough to erase these facts would be the only possibility of them not applying.
So the question: is today’s equality culture strong enough to make a woman not gain much by marrying a man?
While their financial situation has improved, their emotional vulnerability remains. A healthy, emotionally undamaged woman needs a man in her life to protect her. This need is essential, like shelter and water. You can argue that there are more damaged women out there today, but you would still not want to marry them.
The fact remains that a woman stands to gain much more out of marriage than a man given her need to be protected. Her very survival as a woman depends on it. Then, if she stands to gain something that valuable, that her emotional well being depends on completely, she has a great motive and incentive to lie - to even create new beliefs.
This is a worry a man doesn’t have and therefore no comparison between the two can be made. All this to caution men against seeing women as equals as today's culture requires - they are still not emotionally emancipated, and in this way depend on men completely. If they are to break this dependency, they become feral: manipulative to survive. An example can be seen readily in the politicians of the Democratic party; AOC, Ihan Omar, etc. But also in gold diggers (OnlyFans included) and deceivers in general; any woman that stands to gain something out of you.
This calls for great caution, I would not underestimate a woman's ability to act and adopt new beliefs, such as those that could lure a good Christian man in.
So the question: is today’s equality culture strong enough to make a woman not gain much by marrying a man?
While their financial situation has improved, their emotional vulnerability remains. A healthy, emotionally undamaged woman needs a man in her life to protect her. This need is essential, like shelter and water. You can argue that there are more damaged women out there today, but you would still not want to marry them.
The fact remains that a woman stands to gain much more out of marriage than a man given her need to be protected. Her very survival as a woman depends on it. Then, if she stands to gain something that valuable, that her emotional well being depends on completely, she has a great motive and incentive to lie - to even create new beliefs.
This is a worry a man doesn’t have and therefore no comparison between the two can be made. All this to caution men against seeing women as equals as today's culture requires - they are still not emotionally emancipated, and in this way depend on men completely. If they are to break this dependency, they become feral: manipulative to survive. An example can be seen readily in the politicians of the Democratic party; AOC, Ihan Omar, etc. But also in gold diggers (OnlyFans included) and deceivers in general; any woman that stands to gain something out of you.
This calls for great caution, I would not underestimate a woman's ability to act and adopt new beliefs, such as those that could lure a good Christian man in.
Last edited: