A thread to discuss and critique the viral theory that "Mass Formation Psychosis"
I am in agreement generally with the theory that people are a herd and move together in a herd like fashion. Christianity supports this in speaking of times or people who have 'gone bad'. At the same time individual free will is a Christian concept which Western society has taken to an extreme and placed out of context.
Myself, I couldn't help but feel a sense of relief when Robert Malone explained what is happening as 'insanity' or a 'form of sickness' Still, I can't help but feel left wanting by the theory, as it almost explains away what is happening and the moral culpability involved. For instance did the Crowd of Jews screaming "crucify him" simply suffer from mass psychosis!?
Background
The concept went viral with Dr. Robert Malone's interview with Joe Rogan.
I had watched this months ago, which better explains the root of the theory, created by Psychiatrist Carl Yung.
The below video presents an alternative secular viewpoint, explaining how mass psychosis is a liberal 'cope' to mass obedience, which is a huge part of human nature. This runs contrary to the modern liberal mindset where individuality is raised above it's actual importance in human behaviour.
What I'm currently considering is that Liberals and libertarians hold the individual action as primary in all cases. The idea that inquiry and truth somehow naturally rises like cream to the top is a foundation of liberalism. The mass psychosis theory attempts to provide a pseudo scientific explanation for human beings all acting in unison which bucks up against the liberal / libertarian belief. The libertarian must diagnose this using psychological science as an aberration or illness, when in reality it is simply basic human nature.
I am in agreement generally with the theory that people are a herd and move together in a herd like fashion. Christianity supports this in speaking of times or people who have 'gone bad'. At the same time individual free will is a Christian concept which Western society has taken to an extreme and placed out of context.
Myself, I couldn't help but feel a sense of relief when Robert Malone explained what is happening as 'insanity' or a 'form of sickness' Still, I can't help but feel left wanting by the theory, as it almost explains away what is happening and the moral culpability involved. For instance did the Crowd of Jews screaming "crucify him" simply suffer from mass psychosis!?
Background
The concept went viral with Dr. Robert Malone's interview with Joe Rogan.
I had watched this months ago, which better explains the root of the theory, created by Psychiatrist Carl Yung.
The below video presents an alternative secular viewpoint, explaining how mass psychosis is a liberal 'cope' to mass obedience, which is a huge part of human nature. This runs contrary to the modern liberal mindset where individuality is raised above it's actual importance in human behaviour.
What I'm currently considering is that Liberals and libertarians hold the individual action as primary in all cases. The idea that inquiry and truth somehow naturally rises like cream to the top is a foundation of liberalism. The mass psychosis theory attempts to provide a pseudo scientific explanation for human beings all acting in unison which bucks up against the liberal / libertarian belief. The libertarian must diagnose this using psychological science as an aberration or illness, when in reality it is simply basic human nature.