pelicanto8888
Pigeon
Hoser said:Nothing in it that you didn't already know? That's impressive. How did you obtain this knowledge? I ask sincerely.
Agreed that it's as uncritical of Hitler as virtually every other (((approved))) documentary is critical of him. As such, it serves its purpose of informing both sides of the debate.
These two books:
Anthony Beevor - Berlin: The Downfall 1945
Keith Lowe - Savage Continent: Europe in the Aftermath of World War II (highly recommended)
Plus a few TV documentaries I don't remember the names of.
I can see where you are coming from with regards to the documentary balancing the debate however my experience has been that none of the information in the documentary is a withheld secret.
The strange reality is that it would be socially acceptable for someone to make the case that Stalin did some good and some bad. Or that his aims were noble but his methods cruel etc.
However it is not socially acceptable to make a similar case for Hitler.
When the reality is that Stalin was probably worse for the people of eastern Europe than Hitler would have been.
Same goes for Mao, Castro etc.