Men's Forum Posts we Ladies Like Alot

alot-copy.png

jus' sayin'...
 
I think that eventually, "a lot" will turn into "alot". "Can not" is now "cannot", over time I think grammar experts just conceded that one. Read an older book and you won't see "cannot".
 
Vigilant said:
"Now let me tell you WHY women are not allowed on these forums.

There are a LOT of smart men here of various ages, who have a LOT of knowledge to impart. A lot of these men are V E R Y successful in their lives, hell even Mike Cernovich came from here and was/is a core member here for years.

What usually happens, is that when men get together in ANY kind of group, women like to try and butt in, when they do this, the culture changes, as they start encroaching more and more on our territory, first it will be like "maybe you should talk about girls like that" once or "maybe you all should do this" or "maybe you all should do that" etc etc basically nagging to get the men of the group to STOP doing things THEIR way, but to do things the WOMAN's way.

Now of course, when it's one woman, or when ALL, (as in 100%) of the men are not weak-limp-wristed faggots, the woman is usually swiftly told to shut the fuck up or get the fuck out, unfortunately for one, Not all men are at the same place, some are a lot weaker than others. . .which is why they come here, to learn how to become strong men, and get what they want (which is a male biological drive, you know, move, power sex etc. . .) As well as how to deal with women. Because if you were paying attention to what I said in this post so far, in the "current year" dealing with women is a VERY dangerous situation in the west for any man, mostly because the STATE behind them is eager to use women to enslave them(you may not get this now, but you need to do research before it's too late for your son, I'm sure you'd rather not have your son be a slave to the state because of a woman) If you want, you can watch "The red Pill" it's a movie by Cassie Jaye. it should be a must watch for your whole family but Ill leave that up to you.

Anyway, back to my point; when it's ONE woman in the group it CAN be okay but there will be men in that group who will want to placate her in hopes of getting in her pants, these are the weaker men, and this is why there are so many male feminists, they are trying to get into the pants of feminist women as they can't compete with REAL men who have their shit together and are crushing it at life. So basically the group falls apart, and of course MORE women join that group, do the saem thign ad nauseum, until the ideas and thoughts of the group no longer serve the purpose it was supposed to, and the top level members leave.

This is an important tipping point because according to pareto's principles, the top 20% produce 80% of the value in any organization so once you have the top guys leave, 80% of that group's value is GONE FOREVER.

After that it's just a quick snowball until the group no longer exists.
This happens among Many organizations across many cultures across time (you'll need to research this)

Why does this happen? Because biology. Women flock to men in groups to find the top guy to have babies with, a lot of times in our society this doesn't work mostly because if the top guy is the top guy, he's most often than not taken. Which means women coming into an all-male space, is just like a weak, undesirable man coming into a feminist group, he's being a "Sneaker Fucker" [email protected] Saad.

To protect against this and to provide a space where MORE men can reach the TOP in their endeavors in their lives, we have this rule to not allow women in the group.

As far as I know there has only been ONE woman to join the group.

Now let me tell you WHY women are not allowed on these forums.

There are a LOT of smart men here of various ages, who have a LOT of knowledge to impart. A lot of these men are V E R Y successful in their lives, hell even Mike Cernovich came from here and was/is a core member here for years.

What usually happens, is that when men get together in ANY kind of group, women like to try and butt in, when they do this, the culture changes, as they start encroaching more and more on our territory, first it will be like "maybe you should talk about girls like that" once or "maybe you all should do this" or "maybe you all should do that" etc etc basically nagging to get the men of the group to STOP doing things THEIR way, but to do things the WOMAN's way.

Now of course, when it's one woman, or when ALL, (as in 100%) of the men are not weak-limp-wristed faggots, the woman is usually swiftly told to shut the fuck up or get the fuck out, unfortunately for one, Not all men are at the same place, some are a lot weaker than others. . .which is why they come here, to learn how to become strong men, and get what they want (which is a male biological drive, you know, move, power sex etc. . .) As well as how to deal with women. Because if you were paying attention to what I said in this post so far, in the "current year" dealing with women is a VERY dangerous situation in the west for any man, mostly because the STATE behind them is eager to use women to enslave them(you may not get this now, but you need to do research before it's too late for your son, I'm sure you'd rather not have your son be a slave to the state because of a woman) If you want, you can watch "The red Pill" it's a movie by Cassie Jaye. it should be a must watch for your whole family but Ill leave that up to you.

Anyway, back to my point; when it's ONE woman in the group it CAN be okay but there will be men in that group who will want to placate her in hopes of getting in her pants, these are the weaker men, and this is why there are so many male feminists, they are trying to get into the pants of feminist women as they can't compete with REAL men who have their shit together and are crushing it at life. So basically the group falls apart, and of course MORE women join that group, do the saem thign ad nauseum, until the ideas and thoughts of the group no longer serve the purpose it was supposed to, and the top level members leave.

This is an important tipping point because according to pareto's principles, the top 20% produce 80% of the value in any organization so once you have the top guys leave, 80% of that group's value is GONE FOREVER.

After that it's just a quick snowball until the group no longer exists.
This happens among Many organizations across many cultures across time (you'll need to research this)

Why does this happen? Because biology. Women flock to men in groups to find the top guy to have babies with, a lot of times in our society this doesn't work mostly because if the top guy is the top guy, he's most often than not taken. Which means women coming into an all-male space, is just like a weak, undesirable man coming into a feminist group, he's being a "Sneaker Fucker" [email protected] Saad.

To protect against this and to provide a space where MORE men can reach the TOP in their endeavors in their lives, we have this rule to not allow women in the group.

As far as I know there has only been ONE woman to join the group.

One."

@CJ_W

When I joined the forum I preferred not being part of a women's group but that was the only option, and in my intro I was upfront about why I was here because I am not a sneak.

But then you will always get the sneaker insinuating bitch of a woman trying to get the attention of men against a woman she wants to target. Yet another reason I generally don't trust women; vainity, envy, jealousy, meddling, strife, who also tend to hen peck their husbands and other willing males to do their dirty deeds.

I learn far more from men, (and especially their more intelligent humor) than from women,
and I get more fellowship from men than from women, but women like me usually end up falling through the cracks because we don't fit in either group.

I don't follow matriarchy, I follow patriarchy, where men help me mature because of how they think, not women. And women should be looking up to men, not tea party gossip downward into the void.

I tend to agree with the OP I tagged, that the roosh forum should keep women out.
It probably will and I believe it will ultimately end up a small group orthodox men only.
Click to expand...
I agree with the post you quoted which is why I am curious about the motive behind creating a Men’s Forum Fan Club where women (even those who are married) are *encouraged* to pick *favorites* among the men’s posts and tag them for a reaction. Personally, I think this is inappropriate. Slippery Slope is not a fallacy in the real world and there are very thin lines between complements, flattery, and flirtation.

I consider all the ladies here as Sisters in Christ (and even though we don’t “actually” know each other irl, I do consider each of you gals as my sister, even you Vigilant) and we are called to be each other’s keepers, to help each other on the straight and narrow path with a focus on Christ. So, I apologize if my comment came across in a brusque manner; tone is something that can be lost in this medium but I posted it from sincere care for you and the other women here.

If you really follow patriarchy like you say than you should acknowledge that this is a Christian Men’s Forum first and foremost and respect that some men on this forum do not want to interact with women here. Many men have literally written so… (e.g., the post you quoted…) And respect the forum guidelines regarding male/female interactions. Women in the Ladies Forum tagging random men because they like what they wrote is invasive to the Men’s Forum, in my opinion.

Vigilant said:
If so, why should it bother you?
Am I committing a sin?
Is it sinful of me to find women's conversations boring, preferring to learn more from men?
Are you jealous?
Click to expand...
Are you committing a sin? I don’t know… You’re the one that mentioned sin… I don’t know what’s in your heart of hearts. Maybe reflect on that for a bit. I’m certainly concerned about other men and women being led to sin, as we all should be:

Matthew 18:7​

“Woe to the world for temptations to sin! For it is necessary that temptations come, but woe to the one by whom the temptation comes”

That’s just my two cents.
 
stugatz said:
For a period of time after women were let on, I was concerned that a lot of men would suddenly join and turn this into a de facto traditionalist’s dating forum, and it thankfully never happened.
Click to expand...
infowarrior1 said:
What have you done? You didn't have to put that idea into people's heads. :laughter:
Click to expand...

Me coming into to the ladies forum for the first time:

image0-15-1.jpg
 
I'm married so this is nothing to do with me, but what would be so wrong if women and men found each other on here? Where else would you find someone Christian anyway? Bars and nightclubs? lol (Although I met my husband at a bar, and we're both Orthodox, total fluke).
 
DelMarMisty said:
I'm married so this is nothing to do with me, but what would be so wrong if women and men found each other on here? Where else would you find someone Christian anyway? Bars and nightclubs? lol (Although I met my husband at a bar, and we're both Orthodox, total fluke).
Click to expand...
Very good idea! Maybe a subform for this?
It could be public fellowship and the men and and women who want to take part could chaperone it? Many will learn and be blessed by this!
 
Vigilant said:
Here's my first one, lol.

"You wanna back that up with something? Not trying to sound like a hardass but I am curious to why you think that. I know/knew a lot of folks that drank coffee and lived to be old, healthy, and productive for their ages. (including my grandparents)"
@Cr33pin
Click to expand...
Hello, an Orthodox member made a thread on Monday, July 19, 2021, in the Orthodox General forum, with the title tag 'Prayer and Worship' and thread title "Prayer Books and Devotional/Liturgical Texts" that is excellent and appreciated.
 
I came in here just to read posts from the ladies, but now I realize that someone's gotta save this thread and it might as well be me. I found this post the other day from MrLemon that I had saved on my computer back in '18. Food for thought as you struggle just to put food on the table when you go to work tomorrow:

MrLemon said:
Hate to pull the old age card again on you guys, but I want to give you some historical perspective. I hope you think about this because it's quite important and religiously ignored by the press. When it comes to this topic, you guys are so utterly bamboozled. We have tricked you and like fucking chumps, you keep falling for it.

Let me give you the reality so you can stop being chumps:

30 years ago, when I was 30, I could:

-Rent a nice 2 br apartment for $400, rent a room in a 4 br house with 2 other guys for $200. Now the same apt is $1500.

-Buy a corolla for $4,500 brand new. Now it's $16K.

-Buy a house in LA for $80k. Now $800k.

-Get health insurance for $100/mo any time. For a family, $300mo. Now it's quadruple that.

Every single major expense in this nation has quadrupled in the last 30 years

But you think I made 1/3 the money? Nope. With no college degree, I could make 10 bucks an hour with health insurance. Starting wage out of college was $40k. Today, you guys are STILL making only maybe $12-15 with no degree and starting $ 50k with degree.

You are making 25% more, at best, than we did in 1990, but you pay 400% more.

Let's not quibble the numbers guys. Women like to quibble about this bullshit, so they can shoot down the argument. Don't tell me "oh, my brother in law's uncle is making $70/hour in the oil field". The point is, the vast majority of american citizens, male or female, are making 1/3 what we did 30 years ago. You guys banter and quibble about "people lacking financial responsibiilty". That is such utter horseshit. Do you have any idea how financially irresponsible my generation was? Jesus H. Christ. You guys are frugal little churchmice compared to me and mine. We worked half as many hours as you did, we sat on our asses smoking dope and playing Pong all afternoon, we went to colleges that let us fuck around. Anybody could get into a top college with a 3.0 grade point average.

We could get married, have a decent girl who maybe worked part time, make $60k a year and raise a family just fine.

Your generation works twice as hard as we ever did and you are barely making it because you're getting paid ONE THIRD what we did, per hour, adjusted for real costs.

ONE THIRD.

How can anybody in America live on ONE THIRD what their parents made?

THEY CAN'T.

How are they going to save for retirement, buy houses, or have kids?

THEY WON'T.

Where is all that money going?
What do we do?
How do we fix this?

Heres' why all this happened:

My generation has INFLATED THE FUCK out of every single thing in this country and the Chinese, Indian, and globalist billionaires have bought out all the major assets and are draining off TRILLIONS of dollars into their swiss bank accounts. The USA is one big fat dairy cow for the world, and every other nation, especially the crafty Chinese, are draining the fuck out of us, and we are standing here like a stupid fucking bovine idiots, letting our nation be drained. The UK and Germany aren't far behind because they have been stupid enough to follow our lead. Why do you think the Chinese economy has grown from $300B to $12T in that past 30 years? It's not because they are geniuses. They have been draining the life's blood of the biggest economy in the world and WE HAVE LET THEM.

The economists who advocate so relentlessly are not only paid off by the big globalist companies, they are also using ancient theories that are WRONG. Free trade works great when you have two nations like England and France who are trading by sailing ships in the 1800s. But in today's world, with giant container ships, the internet, and giant robotic-factory-equipped nations like China and the US, the US has an average of $60/hour employees and China (or Vietnam, or whatever) has $5/hour employees, "free trade" is an unmitigated destruction, a tidal wave of destruction. Within 20 years the combination of "free trade" and "the internet" will be recognized as the greatest economic calamity every to befall a major nation, a perfect storm of economic transfer from rich US citizens to poor Chinese and Indian citizens.

This is why, if Donald Trump was revealed as the antichrist tomorrow, I'd still vote for him. Because he is the only powerful person who is admitting to this and fighting to stop the bloodletting. It may be far too late. We have so many blood draining catheters inserted into our vital organs as a nation, we literally may no be able to tear them out without dying in the process. We have so many of our citizens who are on the Chinese payroll (including the entire Democratic party and all Democrat congressional members).

You watch that show "Man in the High Castle" about the Nazis taking over the US? We are living that already, except it's not the Nazis. We are already slaves to a foreign master. It's all happening in plain sight and nobody is bothering to talk about it.

All of you are the slaves.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
 
Maddox said:
I came in here just to read posts from the ladies, but now I realize that someone's gotta save this thread and it might as well be me. I found this post the other day from MrLemon that I had saved on my computer back in '18. Food for thought as you struggle just to put food on the table when you go to work tomorrow:
Click to expand...

Mr Lemon of Old Rooshv had this strange theory that women are the supreme powers of the world. Probably a different guy from this person that is the current MrLemon.
 
I've been quiet on this so far. There are a lot of thoughts and feelings here, and I didn't want to say anything in haste.

But now that a bit of the smoke has cleared, I gotta say, the title "Men's Forum Posts We Ladies Like A Lot" is a title I find a tad irritating. I am reminded of what I say often to my kids,

"WE??? You got a mouse in your pocket??"
 
Maddox said:
I came in here just to read posts from the ladies, but now I realize that someone's gotta save this thread and it might as well be me. I found this post the other day from MrLemon that I had saved on my computer back in '18. Food for thought as you struggle just to put food on the table when you go to work tomorrow:
Click to expand...
I miss MrLemon, Traveler Kai, The Black Knight, and Samseau.

I am grateful we still have gems from Easy C and scorpion.
 
midwest_struttin said:
I miss MrLemon, Traveler Kai, The Black Knight, and Samseau.

I am grateful we still have gems from Easy C and scorpion.
Click to expand...
I miss the insight and personality of Ghost of Jefferson. He reminded me of my husband. To the point I nearly asked him “Baby, are you familiar with the Roosh V forum?” But Mr. Leeloo doesn’t spend that much time on the internet.
 
Vigilant said:
Here's my first one, lol.

"You wanna back that up with something? Not trying to sound like a hardass but I am curious to why you think that. I know/knew a lot of folks that drank coffee and lived to be old, healthy, and productive for their ages. (including my grandparents)"
@Cr33pin
Click to expand...
I'm finding that simply by 'Follow'ing RooshV by clicking on his profile name and then clicking on 'Follow' in his profile you get a newsfeed.

By clicking 'Your Newsfeed' every time you log on, in the ribbon choice where you see 'what's new', 'new posts' and 'latest activity' you see what he sees is valuable.
Obviously there's going to be high value/high quality posts by him in his newsfeed and even his 'likes' path is high value direction to good learning. Thanks to Roosh.
 
stugatz said:
I think that eventually, "a lot" will turn into "alot". "Can not" is now "cannot", over time I think grammar experts just conceded that one. Read an older book and you won't see "cannot".
Click to expand...
Similar to “alright,” which I always thought of as an acceptable word, but in proper language (amd many spell checks), it’s still “all right.” But it’s widely accepted enough that people use it without a second thought.
 
Leeloo said:
Similar to “alright,” which I always thought of as an acceptable word, but in proper language (amd many spell checks), it’s still “all right.” But it’s widely accepted enough that people use it without a second thought.
Click to expand...
I lost a spelling bee in the third grade due to that, I was supposed to spell "all right", but I spelled it "alright" due to thinking that only single words qualified, so "alright" must be an acceptable spelling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top