Migrant invasion of Europe

ilostabet

Kingfisher
911 said:
remarkable vigour said:
Simeon_Strangelight said:
Islam fosters a certain behavior towards women - and the covering up even over-sexualizes the men - let alone the inbreeding that doesn't help either over centuries:



This is endemic in Muslim countries - it only alleviated things in slavery and constant warfare, robbing of women.

Behaviors in all non-Muslim countries are even worse even if they are not better at home.

The covering up does not help at all - plenty of Egyptian expats who then go live in the the "homecountry" report that they could cover up in a Niqab and still get groped in the bus. Islam = creating shitholes. Nuff said.
It certainly does.

Think, that when muslim societies don't let their women out alone, is not just about controlling womens behaviour it is also about keeping them safe from feral packs of other men.
The "feral pack" problem is mostly a western one, there are no ferals in most muslim countries. Muslim countries generally have less of an issue with rape.

You have very large number of young single male migrants going feral in the west and they are allowed to do so, and don't risk getting deported.
I think that is because they don't report them. In fact, many examples in Saudi Barbaria of rape where the women is the one convicted for suffering the rape. I mean, it is a religion that thinks women are lower than cattle. So obviously a country being run seriously on the basis of that religion will not think rape is that big a deal.
 

911

Crow
Not really. In countries like Saudi Arabia, a man who has raped a women would be targeted by the victim's brothers or father, they wouldn't just file a court case. And if they did kill him, I am not sure if they would be arrested for that, or if the authorities would look the other way. As well, the rapist would also bring great shame to his own family. It is just not a common crime there. Think 1950s Sicily.


wannable alpha said:
I keep coming across news stories of rape by refugees and recent immigrants in Sweden and other Euro countries where the rapist only gets a 2-3 year sentence. Is rape taken so lightly by Europeans? I would have thought it would be at least 10 years imprisonment.
I am not sure what you're doing posting here, because India has one of the worst rape cultures in the entire third world, far worse than in any muslim country.

The brutal rape of Jyoti Singh, a 23-year old physiotherapy intern in a bus on her way back home from a movie with a male friend, shocked many across the world.

The six perpetrators, brutally raped her, going as far as inserting an iron rod and left her to die. She eventually succumbed to her wounds in a hospital in Singapore.

In Hyderabad, a young 27-year old vet returned to her scooter parked behind a truck, only to be dragged by the four occupants of the truck into a nearby compound, where she was raped and killed.

Separately, in a non-descript industrial heartland called Unnao, a thousand kilometres north of Hyderabad, a 23-year old rape victim en-route to the court for the hearing of her rape case was accosted by five men, including her accused, and set ablaze. She subsequently died in hospital.

...In 2017, the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) reported 32,559 rape cases, amounting to nearly 90 a day across the whole of India. This was 30.7 per cent more than the cases reported in 2012.

This and other cases have dubiously propelled the capital city New Delhi as the “rape capital” of the world.
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/commentary/gang-rape-murder-india-sex-crimes-women--12190756

India has a real rape culture because there are very large numbers of feral youth who have poured into the big cities from the countryside, with very low social status, no family structures in the cities they live in to keep them in check, and are exposed to pornography through their smart phones.

The problem is further exacerbated by gender imbalance due to the rampant selective abortion of female fetuses, which is a wide cultural practice in India.

India's internal situation is actually somewhat similar to the problems in western Europe with the feral muslim and African migrants.
 
911 said:
remarkable vigour said:
Simeon_Strangelight said:
Islam fosters a certain behavior towards women - and the covering up even over-sexualizes the men - let alone the inbreeding that doesn't help either over centuries:



This is endemic in Muslim countries - it only alleviated things in slavery and constant warfare, robbing of women.

Behaviors in all non-Muslim countries are even worse even if they are not better at home.

The covering up does not help at all - plenty of Egyptian expats who then go live in the the "homecountry" report that they could cover up in a Niqab and still get groped in the bus. Islam = creating shitholes. Nuff said.
It certainly does.

Think, that when muslim societies don't let their women out alone, is not just about controlling womens behaviour it is also about keeping them safe from feral packs of other men.
The "feral pack" problem is mostly a western one, there are no ferals in most muslim countries. Muslim countries generally have less of an issue with rape.

You have very large number of young single male migrants going feral in the west and they are allowed to do so, and don't risk getting deported.
Muslim countries only have less of an issue with rape unless there is something like giant protests going on where women can be safely pulled into the underground and then be raped while other men are standing around. It gives you the cover of anonimity.

Normally the feral packs are just grabbing, harrassing women physically - their brothers and husbands are not going to go apeshit over that since the infraction is not severe enough to go and murder the transgressor. So you still are a shithole, because you only have a semblance of non-rape by draconian laws and other families who are willing to mass-murder the rapist' family over this. Also all of this is not valid if the girl is Christian - countrless Christian girls get kidnapped, raped and then forcibly married to Muslim men in the eldorado of Egypt.

As Akif Pirincci put it correctly - most Muslim countries with the exception Persia possibly - they are just led by dictators who work as tamers controlling the feral population. And that will come to Europe now - over time as the society becomes more low-IQ, low-trust, more Islamic, then rape will become more dangerous to the rapist again, but laws won't work so well either then. Maybe they will have far better tracking then, so rape won't be such an issue in a few decades as 100% will be caught and lobotomized by the health-dictatorship.
 

911

Crow
Oberrheiner said:
911 said:
there are no ferals in most muslim countries
Oh sure, of course not :tard:

Just go to algeria or egypt ..
I have been to Egypt, it's a relatively safe country by third world standards, especially considering how poor the masses are there. Egypt's homicide rate is similar to Hungary's.

I haven't been to Algeria, but I have been to Morocco, pretty safe country. Algeria's homicide rate is lower than Canada's. It is a lot safer there than in your average large American city, and much, much safer than in many other third world countries like Mexico, Brazil or the Dominican. It's not the same situation there as in say, Seine-St-Denis, which I assume is the kind of place you are basing your views on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...ate#By_country,_region_or_dependant_territory
 
911 said:
Oberrheiner said:
911 said:
there are no ferals in most muslim countries
Oh sure, of course not :tard:

Just go to algeria or egypt ..
I have been to Egypt, it's a relatively safe country by third world standards, especially considering how poor the masses are there. Egypt's homicide rate is similar to Hungary's.

I haven't been to Algeria, but I have been to Morocco, pretty safe country. Algeria's homicide rate is lower than Canada's. It is a lot safer there than in your average large American city, and much, much safer than in many other third world countries like Mexico, Brazil or the Dominican. It's not the same situation there as in say, Seine-St-Denis, which I assume is the kind of place you are basing your views on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...ate#By_country,_region_or_dependant_territory
Actually I don't deny that except for acts against Christians - that is legion and not reported:

https://www.hudson.org/research/14725-egypt-s-silent-epidemic-of-kidnapped-christian-girls

Aside from that girls can get decapitated for Allah in certain rural areas.

Sexual harrassment however is legion - I heard it from multiple Egyptian expats who tried to live in Egypt for a while (as they grew up in the West). Virtually all reported being groped and touched countless times.

So they do as much as they can get away with - kill the odd remote bugger, rape and kidnap Christians because it's under-reported, grope and harrass women because it's a thing that women won't report and cousins won't kill for.

There is a reason Egypt has those PSA campaigns out constantly.

However - all of this works to some degree because of a very very strict state and the fear of the brothers of the girl dishing out biblical justice. Yes - I get that you can control a country well-enough like that and it is certainly safer than Black-dominated US cities - no doubt about it. But that also means that the West would have to become similar in shitlord-law - Draconian laws, deportations of entire families, public executions of gang-rapists and then deportation of all his friends and family and life-long ban from entering the West later on. Plus Eruopean families would have to do brutal justice if a few slip through the justice cracks and the police then would have to close both eyes to that as they do in Muslim countries. Then yes - then you could control it all, but that wouldn't exactly be the West anymore which is a high-trust country.

So yeah - I agree that Muslim countries are often safer than enriched Western cities, but there is a good reason for it - they are being tamed by family-structure and government.
 
@911 - India's rape problem is exaggerated by the western media. Do you trust the BBC and Guardian over its coverage of other issues? or any other mainstream publication? South Africa is the rape capital of the world and Honduras has the highest per capita female homicide rate.

India has a very low rape rate compared to other countries in spite of the poverty. Are figures under reported? Yes, but that is true everywhere. In the west, men's rights activists underplay the problem and keep talking about fake claims. This forum is big on that. While feminists keep talking about how one in four women are raped on American college campuses. Indian cops and judges usually side with the victim while in the west, rapists get away with saying that the sex was consensual. Look up the gang rapes of French teenagers in 1999-2000. Google "french gang rape 1999" and read about Nina and Stephanie.

The eve-teasing thing is blown up as well. It is no different than the catcalling that women in NYC and other places have to bear. But because India is a conservative place with a non-existent dating culture, women get offended. They are not used to being approached and pursued by men. Westernized Indian feminists hype up the issue to score brownie points.

The reason the rape-murder cases in India get so much coverage is because they are so rare. About the Jyoti Singh case. The most brutal rapist was a Muslim guy who inserted an iron rod in her vagina and damaged her internal organs. Her uterus and intestines were all messed up. He shouted "die bitch die" while doing that. But he got away with a slap on the wrist cause he was 17 years and 10 months old. He served three years in juvenile jail (the max punishment for juveniles for any crime) and is now roaming free doing who knows what.

Even in the Hyderabad rape-murder case the ring leader was a Muslim guy.

In the city of Surat, almost two decades ago, there was a Muslim gang that would go around raping Hindu girls and making video clips of it for sale. They were finally caught when they kidnapped a 17 year old girl going home from her coaching center and raped her and made a video of it. They were posing as cops in order to intimidate and pick up young Hindu girls.

We have our own version of Muslim grooming gangs called "love jihad". This happens in rural areas where there is a big stigma attached to having a boyfriend let alone pre-marital sex. The Muslim guys introduce themselves as Hindus to Hindu girls and then they rape or seduce the girl when they can get her alone. They will make a video of the whole thing and blackmail her into converting and marrying them. So now Hindu orgs are working with the girls and spreading the message that they should not feel hopeless and convert for marriage just cause there is a sex tape of them or because everyone knows about their affair with a Muslim guy.

In 1990, when the entire Kashmiri Hindu community was a victim of ethnic cleansing, rape and threat of gang rape was a big part of that. Muslims used the loudspeakers of their mosques to announce that Hindu men could leave while Hindu women could stay behind. i.e. become sex slaves.

@SS - It's good that you brought up the plight of Christian women in Egypt. Remember what happened to Yazidi and Christian women in Iraq and Syria. Kidnapping, rape,including gang rape, and forcible conversion and marriage to her Muslim rapist are things that are happening to Hindu, Sikh and Christian women in Afghanistan and Pakistan and also to Hindu women in "moderate" Bangladesh. And the entire law and order establishment sides with the Muslims. In Pakistan there was a case of a young underage Hindu girl who was kidnapped, raped, converted and married off to her Muslim rapist. The Hindu community protested but the judge said that forget the girl otherwise your entire community will be wiped out and the cops wouldn't be able to stop it.

Does anyone believe that women from religious minorities in these countries are "slutting it up" in order to deserve this? If you dropped the Amish community in some Muslim country their women would suffer the same fate as all these other ones.

Finally, if Indian i.e. Hindu men are so rapey then why aren't there Hindu grooming gangs in the west? Plenty of Hindus in Australia, NZ, USA, Canada, UK and now even Germany and Netherlands. And not all of them are well-paid, well-educated professionals. Ever heard of Hindu gas station and motel owners running grooming gangs targeting underage white girls from broken families? Do you think they cannot do it if they wanted to?

Only thing Hindu guys are guilty of is doing awkward approaches to white women. The guys are young and single so why shouldn't they? But they are labelled as IRTs for doing that and the target of memes.
 
I think in India it's multi-faceted.

The numbers may be inflated, but they are not high in the West - in reality they would be 70% lower according to many cops - even going back to the 1980s. Western men don't rape often.

However there are simply a few things that can explain the numbers in India:

1) Muslims and the mindset - people forget that many Muslims still live in Hindu-dominated regions
2) The anti-woman devaluating perception that is connected to the dowry adding multiple problems to it - thus many men expect a woman to submit.

Sexual harrassment - not only odd approaches (I can forgive every odd approach) - is being reported by countless women who visit India. It's a fact.

Now - rape is less frequent than the aggressive approaching which ends up warping the minds of many men. The shortage of women mostly created by the dowry system is not making things better - far far worse. If there were 10% more women than men in India, then all of this would not be happening.




I would yet like to see the accounts of tourists who get harrassed (really harrassed - not approached) or raped in the West by Western men.

And there are a few odd cases of attempted rape by fresh-off-the-boat Hindu guys in Europe now - UBER EATS has hired them and a few attempted to rape a girl. (one guy funnily demanded to be released because he did not manage to rape her) It resulted in people asking for non-foreign delivery drivers or shifting to the competition.

Though obviously all of that goes away instantly as soon as the Indian diaspora stays in the West longer, so it's more of a self-inflicted sexual market problem in India and nothing that is prevalent in the mindset longer. With Muslims it's more due to the religious mindset.

And none of it is obviously genetics - even strong sexual appetite can be channelled well in a sane society and sane balanced sexual market. And the dowry system has to go, though I am certain that India will solve those issues one day. Their best days are still ahead. I am less optimistic about the West which will be ultimately wiped out by mass migration - the corona dictatorship is just the new commie-autocratic system on top of it.
 
Sexual harassment would mean a different thing in a different region, readers of RoK will know that all too well. Even before the MeToo hysteria. I bet that if a white woman landed in a place like Havana the guys will not give her a moment of peace. If you don't shout after her 5 times and don't push until you get slapped you will probably be seen as impotent. :) Latin countries and the German speaking world for example are already worlds apart in that regard.

Now I feel for the Pakistani as many of them were denied contact with women for the majority of their lives. They were incels decades before internet culture came up with the term. I could not imagine how I would act if I grew up in a place like Karachi and then all of a sudden I am walking Stureplan in Stockholm surrounded by women with shorts that reveal their genitals. It is the equivalent of going from universal basic income (arranged marriage for decades) to an american level of market competition. It must be daunting and confusing, but it would also send a celibate brain into an overdrive. The result is awkward and embarrassing at best and vile and repugnant at worst.

The Indians in general are more friendly and appear less threatening, I gather they spend their lives alongside women,even if in a very traditional and conservative context. I think the Indian man meme came to be because of the accent, the illiteracy of some of them and the lack of female supply. These guys actually appear quite romantic in an innocent way, so it is only natural that Western modernism would rip them to shreds.
 
Bitter End said:
Sexual harassment would mean a different thing in a different region, readers of RoK will know that all too well. Even before the MeToo hysteria. I bet that if a white woman landed in a place like Havana the guys will not give her a moment of peace. If you don't shout after her 5 times and don't push until you get slapped you will probably be seen as impotent. :) Latin countries and the German speaking world for example are already worlds apart in that regard.

Now I feel for the Pakistani as many of them were denied contact with women for the majority of their lives. They were incels decades before internet culture came up with the term. I could not imagine how I would act if I grew up in a place like Karachi and then all of a sudden I am walking Stureplan in Stockholm surrounded by women with shorts that reveal their genitals. It is the equivalent of going from universal basic income (arranged marriage for decades) to an american level of market competition. It must be daunting and confusing, but it would also send a celibate brain into an overdrive. The result is awkward and embarrassing at best and vile and repugnant at worst.

The Indians in general are more friendly and appear less threatening, I gather they spend their lives alongside women,even if in a very traditional and conservative context. I think the Indian man meme came to be because of the accent, the illiteracy of some of them and the lack of female supply. These guys actually appear quite romantic in an innocent way, so it is only natural that Western modernism would rip them to shreds.
Harrassment is relative, however where I would pull the line is when it manifests itself in relentless pursuit, touching, grabbing of buttocks - once I will even let pass, when the lady protests, then you pull away. But most often those men know exactly that they are crossing a line, it's not a badly calibrated move during a date or approach. Everyone undrestands that grabbing a woman's ass or tit is not even remotely the same as to a 1950's boss slapping his secretary's ass lightly. Back then she slapped him and that was it. If he continued then this was frowned upon by everyone. The sexual behavior is subtle, but clear - a bunch of men surrounding a woman is known to not work out well.

Coming to Europe soon enough - guess the implantable health ID chips will make solving those crimes easy....
 

911

Crow
wannable alpha said:
@911 - India's rape problem is exaggerated by the western media. Do you trust the BBC and Guardian over its coverage of other issues? or any other mainstream publication? South Africa is the rape capital of the world and Honduras has the highest per capita female homicide rate.

India has a very low rape rate compared to other countries in spite of the poverty. Are figures under reported? Yes, but that is true everywhere. In the west, men's rights activists underplay the problem and keep talking about fake claims. This forum is big on that. While feminists keep talking about how one in four women are raped on American college campuses. Indian cops and judges usually side with the victim while in the west, rapists get away with saying that the sex was consensual. Look up the gang rapes of French teenagers in 1999-2000. Google "french gang rape 1999" and read about Nina and Stephanie.

The eve-teasing thing is blown up as well. It is no different than the catcalling that women in NYC and other places have to bear. But because India is a conservative place with a non-existent dating culture, women get offended. They are not used to being approached and pursued by men. Westernized Indian feminists hype up the issue to score brownie points.

The reason the rape-murder cases in India get so much coverage is because they are so rare. About the Jyoti Singh case. The most brutal rapist was a Muslim guy who inserted an iron rod in her vagina and damaged her internal organs. Her uterus and intestines were all messed up. He shouted "die bitch die" while doing that. But he got away with a slap on the wrist cause he was 17 years and 10 months old. He served three years in juvenile jail (the max punishment for juveniles for any crime) and is now roaming free doing who knows what.

Even in the Hyderabad rape-murder case the ring leader was a Muslim guy.

In the city of Surat, almost two decades ago, there was a Muslim gang that would go around raping Hindu girls and making video clips of it for sale. They were finally caught when they kidnapped a 17 year old girl going home from her coaching center and raped her and made a video of it. They were posing as cops in order to intimidate and pick up young Hindu girls.

We have our own version of Muslim grooming gangs called "love jihad". This happens in rural areas where there is a big stigma attached to having a boyfriend let alone pre-marital sex. The Muslim guys introduce themselves as Hindus to Hindu girls and then they rape or seduce the girl when they can get her alone. They will make a video of the whole thing and blackmail her into converting and marrying them. So now Hindu orgs are working with the girls and spreading the message that they should not feel hopeless and convert for marriage just cause there is a sex tape of them or because everyone knows about their affair with a Muslim guy.

In 1990, when the entire Kashmiri Hindu community was a victim of ethnic cleansing, rape and threat of gang rape was a big part of that. Muslims used the loudspeakers of their mosques to announce that Hindu men could leave while Hindu women could stay behind. i.e. become sex slaves.

@SS - It's good that you brought up the plight of Christian women in Egypt. Remember what happened to Yazidi and Christian women in Iraq and Syria. Kidnapping, rape,including gang rape, and forcible conversion and marriage to her Muslim rapist are things that are happening to Hindu, Sikh and Christian women in Afghanistan and Pakistan and also to Hindu women in "moderate" Bangladesh. And the entire law and order establishment sides with the Muslims. In Pakistan there was a case of a young underage Hindu girl who was kidnapped, raped, converted and married off to her Muslim rapist. The Hindu community protested but the judge said that forget the girl otherwise your entire community will be wiped out and the cops wouldn't be able to stop it.

Does anyone believe that women from religious minorities in these countries are "slutting it up" in order to deserve this? If you dropped the Amish community in some Muslim country their women would suffer the same fate as all these other ones.

Finally, if Indian i.e. Hindu men are so rapey then why aren't there Hindu grooming gangs in the west? Plenty of Hindus in Australia, NZ, USA, Canada, UK and now even Germany and Netherlands. And not all of them are well-paid, well-educated professionals. Ever heard of Hindu gas station and motel owners running grooming gangs targeting underage white girls from broken families? Do you think they cannot do it if they wanted to?

Only thing Hindu guys are guilty of is doing awkward approaches to white women. The guys are young and single so why shouldn't they? But they are labelled as IRTs for doing that and the target of memes.



This kind of rhetoric might have worked on here a few years ago, or it might still work on other sites populated with pozzed neocon boomers. A bit less so here, the lowbrow (((muslim-misdirection))) is not ageing well.


The reason the rape-murder cases in India get so much coverage is because they are so rare. About the Jyoti Singh case. The most brutal rapist was a Muslim guy

The 4 other guys don't sound very muslim to me:
Mukesh Singh
Vinay Sharma (juvenile)
Pawan Gupta
Akshay Thakur

I picked up on this because the first guy, Mukesh, is featured in the video posted above as an example of Indian rape culture, seems like a piece of work, completely unrepentant.

One muslim and four hindus, but you portray it as a muslim operation. A bit disingenuous...

Another common rhetorical approach you have here is to frame your message in very emotional terms, going heavy on the gore and violence, which appeals to the reptilian brain of your audience, shock and awe, bypassing reason:

The most brutal rapist was a Muslim guy who inserted an iron rod in her vagina and damaged her internal organs. Her uterus and intestines were all messed up. He shouted "die bitch die" while doing that.


Finally, if Indian i.e. Hindu men are so rapey then why aren't there Hindu grooming gangs in the west? Plenty of Hindus in Australia, NZ, USA, Canada, UK and now even Germany and Netherlands
This Indian guy was my landlord, turns out he was a big sex trafficker, what are the odds...

https://sfpublicpress.org/news/2012-02/how-an-infamous-berkeley-human-trafficking-case-fueled-reform

Also, the Paki grooming gang problem is almost exclusively a British one, there are almost a million Pakis in N. America, like this guy. and nowhere near the issues of the British grooming gangs:


India's caste system predisposes them to a mindset of human trafficking. When you consider a whole class of people as "untouchable", it justifies their exploitation as slaves. The worst aspect of this is a culture of child prostitution. 40% of Indian prostitutes are children, with 1.2 million child prostitutes, though to be fair here this problem extends to Bengladesh, which is a muslim indian country, so it seems to be more of a cultural problem than a religious one.
 
@911

This kind of rhetoric might have worked on here a few years ago, or it might still work on other sites populated with pozzed neocon boomers. A bit less so here, the lowbrow (((muslim-misdirection))) is not ageing well.

You believe in consipracy theories but not in facts and figures.

Another common rhetorical approach you have here is to frame your message in very emotional terms, going heavy on the gore and violence, which appeals to the reptilian brain of your audience, shock and awe, bypassing reason:

Inconvenient details are emotional appeals according to you.

This Indian guy was my landlord, turns out he was a big sex trafficker, what are the odds...

https://sfpublicpress.org/news/2012-02/h...led-reform

Also, the Paki grooming gang problem is almost exclusively a British one, there are almost a million Pakis in N. America, like this guy. and nowhere near the issues of the British grooming gangs:

So you dug up the story of one guy which equates to the entire grooming gang and rapefugee problem caused by Muslims. Also, in the 1950s and 60s the Indian Hindus and Sikhs who migrated to Britian where from a similar socio-economic group as Paki Muslims. But the former two have left the latter far behind in all parameters of social and economic achivement. Once again, where are the large scale Hindu grooming and pedo gangs in the UK?

India's caste system predisposes them to a mindset of human trafficking. When you consider a whole class of people as "untouchable", it justifies their exploitation as slaves. The worst aspect of this is a culture of child prostitution. 40% of Indian prostitutes are children, with 1.2 million child prostitutes, though to be fair here this problem extends to Bengladesh, which is a muslim indian country, so it seems to be more of a cultural problem than a religious one.

You don't know anything about the caste situation. You have only read what is written by the biased western media. The same media which will label you an anti-semite for your beliefs. But when it comes to India and Hindu society they are considered unbiased news sources.

What about the child prostitutes in Philippines, Cambodia and Thailand? Most of whom are used by white Christian men. Is all this a reflection of Christian values?
 
The Indian diaspora is living across the world - some 45-60 mio. - there may be occasionally some areas that have some less performing people in it, but it's clear that Hindu Indians don't destroy or impact a society negatively.

Muslims however - we have a lot of data about that - not only are prisons in Europe filled with Muslims at record rates of 40%, but they are over-represented in crimes in almost all countries they settle into. Occasionally you get a few places like Chile where the intelligentsia of Lebanon and the Middle East travelled to, but that is an exception to the rule. And the worst part is - this is the same generations later - Netherlands, Belgium, UK, Germany (still low tier underperformers after 3 generaations). By that time the Ash Aggrawals are long since doctors, entrerpreneurs - sure it would be a bit different if the poorest Indians came over, but that is unlikely to happen.

While the caste system is negative, the treatment of women is not carried over from India to any of the diaspora countries. And picking the odd Hindu criminal out is bullshit - every nation has criminals - Japanese have serial killers, rapists too, just 99% less than other tribes. And the overall stats are what counts. Indians are not over-represented in any crime stats, but Muslims are. You are literally using SJW arguments who say: "But local Swedes rape too....." Yeah right - cupcake.
 
In addition I would like to differentiate between Muslims and Islam. Islam is the mental cancer created by a warlord. If Rumi had been the founder, then Islam would be similar to Christianity.

Muslims when viewed separately from Islam - aka the base genetic and cultural stock - they are fine people and I repeated this a few times: If you turned them Christian, Buddhist via magic, then they would settle quickly into being a mix of Italians/Armenians/Greek in mentality - hearty, welcoming, family-oriented, warm and good people and they would stop cloggig up European prisons.

But it's thoroughly thoroughly misunderstood how negative an ideology can be - people who loathe to criticize Muslims do so readily with Jews, when in reality it's the same problem. The Talmudic dogma or the liberal Holocoust self-trauma psychosis of Jews is causing those behavioral patterns among so many of the elite and the broad support of progressivism. It's just as negative as the original Islamic mental imprinting - I have said it repeatedly - Muslims are better people than their religion would actually dictate for them to be. Even most Jews are better people than what hardcore Talmudism preaches.

That said - the globalists have rapid secularization for the Muslim world in store - https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east...esty-police-are-nowhere-to-be-found-1.8136389 It's possible that they let go of hard wars for now - they already control most countries except for Syria and partly Iran.

So Muslims will join Christians in the honk world in a few decades. The terror-and-radicalization-agenda seems to have changed just recently - they have Corona now for the next world order and likely will let go of the false flags - you only have to avoid the normal rapists until they have joined the liberal Honk World in 2-3 decades.
 

911

Crow
wannable alpha said:
@911

This kind of rhetoric might have worked on here a few years ago, or it might still work on other sites populated with pozzed neocon boomers. A bit less so here, the lowbrow (((muslim-misdirection))) is not ageing well.

You believe in consipracy theories but not in facts and figures.

Another common rhetorical approach you have here is to frame your message in very emotional terms, going heavy on the gore and violence, which appeals to the reptilian brain of your audience, shock and awe, bypassing reason:

Inconvenient details are emotional appeals according to you.

This Indian guy was my landlord, turns out he was a big sex trafficker, what are the odds...

https://sfpublicpress.org/news/2012-02/h...led-reform

Also, the Paki grooming gang problem is almost exclusively a British one, there are almost a million Pakis in N. America, like this guy. and nowhere near the issues of the British grooming gangs:

So you dug up the story of one guy which equates to the entire grooming gang and rapefugee problem caused by Muslims. Also, in the 1950s and 60s the Indian Hindus and Sikhs who migrated to Britian where from a similar socio-economic group as Paki Muslims. But the former two have left the latter far behind in all parameters of social and economic achivement. Once again, where are the large scale Hindu grooming and pedo gangs in the UK?

India's caste system predisposes them to a mindset of human trafficking. When you consider a whole class of people as "untouchable", it justifies their exploitation as slaves. The worst aspect of this is a culture of child prostitution. 40% of Indian prostitutes are children, with 1.2 million child prostitutes, though to be fair here this problem extends to Bengladesh, which is a muslim indian country, so it seems to be more of a cultural problem than a religious one.

You don't know anything about the caste situation. You have only read what is written by the biased western media. The same media which will label you an anti-semite for your beliefs. But when it comes to India and Hindu society they are considered unbiased news sources.

What about the child prostitutes in Philippines, Cambodia and Thailand? Most of whom are used by white Christian men. Is all this a reflection of Christian values?

Here's the deal though, most of the customers for the 1.2 million child prostitutes in India are Indian. That is not the case in SE Asia. These trafficked Indian children are from lower castes, that is why this practice is tolerated in India.

Bottom line - India has a rape culture problem that is unlike that of most other third world countries, including muslim ones.

The issues with immigration in W. Europe are related to mass immigration, not religion. Non-muslim migrants from sub-Saharan Africa, Caribbbean or Central America have the highest crime rates.

The problem with fixating on muslims is that this is used as a triangulation for the Kalergist planners to hide behind, and to drive the neocon agenda of setting up security state at home and forever war abroad.
 
You are truly covering up for anything Muslim by default.

Child prostitution becomes an issue in poor countries that have large unctonrolled underclasses. This used to be a thing as well in Europe in the last centuries up until the early 19th century:

In 1848, it was claimed that almost 2,700 girls in London between the ages of 11 and 16 were hospitalised because of venereal disease, many as a result of prosti tution. In 1875, the age of consent, which had remained at 12 since 1285, was raised to 13, partly as a result of concerns about child prostitution.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2000/may/24/childrensservices.guardiansocietysupplement

So if you have a large country that for example still has issues with toilets, then you cannot expect it to enact those laws towards the most vulnerable. Once you have a better standard of living, then you can easily see those cases disappear.

------------------

But one other enrichment aspect that is connected to Muslims and to some degree Africans is the ever popular car-burning and attacks on firemen and cops. During the times of quarantines those boys are getting bored - this costs tens of millions each year usually for people who are poor anyway and have some shitty car to get to their shitty job.

This has become a tradition in France and also in Sweden.

Ah well - nevermind - the mass migration will continue and continues even during complete lockdown, so that should tell you something - neither is covid about health and the replacement population agenda must continue.

Though at least the globalists seem to have shifted from promotion of more strict radical Islam to liberalization. I considered this as an option they would do sooner or later.

Saudi Arabia is a massive sign and you might see an ever greater amount of liberal preachers come to the front being financed by the Saudis and globalists. The future for the Muslims are ever greater liberalization. They will still require control, but that is what the chipping and drone-control will be for on top of the "for-your-health" surveillance.

The entire mass migration suddenly becomes a lesser issue - obviously apart from the tens of thousands of girls that will continue to be raped and killed each year by the enrichers, but hey.... you will be living in a 1984 sanitary dictatorship and a Judge-Dred-economy, so I guess that most will have more severe problems.



Whether the other UBI recipients in 2050 will be more diverse won't matter that much anymore.
 

911

Crow
Simeon_Strangelight said:
You are truly covering up for anything Muslim by default.

Child prostitution becomes an issue in poor countries that have large unctonrolled underclasses. This used to be a thing as well in Europe in the last centuries up until the early 19th century:

In 1848, it was claimed that almost 2,700 girls in London between the ages of 11 and 16 were hospitalised because of venereal disease, many as a result of prosti tution. In 1875, the age of consent, which had remained at 12 since 1285, was raised to 13, partly as a result of concerns about child prostitution.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2000/may/24/childrensservices.guardiansocietysupplement

So if you have a large country that for example still has issues with toilets, then you cannot expect it to enact those laws towards the most vulnerable. Once you have a better standard of living, then you can easily see those cases disappear.
...
Egypt is just as poor as India, but you don't have child brothels there, it just wouldn't be culturally tolerated like in India.

There are networks for child prostitution in Morocco geared towards French and European pedo tourists, but those are much smaller operations compared to the older practice of child brothels in India, which mostly cater to locals.

Also note that in countries like France, Belgium or Holland, the local child traffic is mostly muslim kids who are used by pedos and homos, including many high officials.


If you want to understand why paki grooming gangs are tolerated in the UK, you need to watch the video above, and understand who runs that country.
 
Top