Migrant invasion of Europe

The English Football Hooligan stereotype is a meme at this point. The true culture has died out since long and is now perpetuated by LARP-ers and high schoolers looking for an adrenaline rush/ opportunity to binge drink

I am not talking about the old school guys bytheway, they are the real deal. But in their 50s and 60s by now. The younger generations are in it for YouTube videos, getting drunk, and the feeling-cool-whilst-wearing-a-balaclava thing.

Not trying to get this discussion off topic, but to look at these guys and think they'll be the ones to stand up against multiculti grooming gangs/ vibrant youths (even when authorities back off) is mistaken

Even when out of police state country (be it England or The Netherlands or anywhere) they are usually fair game in countries with real hooligans like Poland, Russia, Bulgaria, Italy and Turkey.

Even the hooligans are in decline in the West.
 

LeoniusD

Pelican
Very interesting interview with Enoch Powell.


What a giant.
Enoch Powell will be proven right again and again.

Accepting Africans and Muslims into Europe will destroy probably all nations here - maybe some Eastern European ones will shut their borders and kick the enriching migrants out some day, but don't be surprised if only Belarus and Israel remains with predominantly European genetics in place.

That African guy using the broom in a ridiculous way is the architect and engineer we urgently needed. What was it that the US cuts off IQ-acceptance? I think it was 83 - most Africans coming over are below it. The army does not want them, because even their cleaning crew is better to be smarter.

Muslims will unfortunately bring their violence, their inbreeding, their internal tribal strife with them.

As Enoch Powell put it well - the bad far outweighs the bad with those immigrants. We could make the case about moderate immigration of Indians, Asians or Middle Eastern Christians even - those groups would not rock the boat in numbers below 20% of the core population. But anything else just asks for your destruction. The only other option is to do it like Dubai or Bahrain and not give any non-native people much rights. They can kick out any Indian family even after 100 years in the country. But that is not realistic for the West or even countries like Russia, Belarus or even Japan.

The only way would have been to block their entry almost completely just like the US founding fathers did by creating a country for Europeans. Muslims were rejected not even on the basis of race since many look white enough (partly also due to the millions of European slaves they took in the last centuries), but Muslims were rejected after a moderate study of the Quran. The US cited monogamy as the reason, but that was bogus since they accepted non-monogamous Christian sects. They knew that the very Islamic teaching is not compatible. (regardless whether there are some hopeful Muslim reformers and romantics here who believe otherwise - most Muslims here are frankly idealists and not realists when it pertains to their religion - and frankly bless their good hearts ;) - they don't speak for Islam or the reality of Islam seen across the world however).

You know what Yuri Bezmanov said during his talks when faced with the complete demoralization of the West? He said that the first step in saving the West would be to remoralize the country. This can be done via religion best - so strong masculine dominant Christianity or some other positive ideology:


Virtually every report - even a normal newsreport back in the 1950s - they were all upbeat, positive, with positive music underlying it. It was stressing mostly positive news about the country and the world. Positive thinking about the achievements of the West and Christanity was taught everywhere. Too bad that the nihilist decline also began in the 1950s in order to take it all down.

You cannot create a culture by being constantly negative about yourself. Muslims are a good example of that - despite massive internal difficulties and history of brutal conquest, of slavery up until the 1980s they don't talk about it. Part of that is good - you cannot be negative about your culture and country. China, Japan, Korea - they are fiercely nationalistic and positive. They will live on while the destruction of the West will be a reminder to them to be aware of weapons of unfitting mass migration and the superseding ideoloigy of negative nihilism and self-hate that makes all of this even possible .

59Rfh5.gif
59Rfh5.gif
 

Bitter End

Woodpecker
Denmark wants to reduce the number of asylum seekers. Sending a few back to Syria, saying that the country can now be regarded as safe. Perhaps just a stunt to please the electorate short term, but it still sounds good:

 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
Syrian refugees being sent back is fine, but it would have been very useful if Denmark had also came out in favor of lifting the NATO food and oil siege on Syria, which would have allowed their Syrian refugees to return of their own volution.

The other aspect of this thread, propaganda summarized in this cover:

Ez0EKX1XsAYHe7O
 

Dr Mantis Toboggan

Kingfisher
Gold Member
Syrian refugees being sent back is fine, but it would have been very useful if Denmark had also came out in favor of lifting the NATO food and oil siege on Syria, which would have allowed their Syrian refugees to return of their own volution.

The other aspect of this thread, propaganda summarized in this cover:

Ez0EKX1XsAYHe7O

That cover isn't real.
 
^^^ Honestly at this point I'm emotionally too exhausted to put any further credence into any 'democratic elections' in the West. Back in 2017 France was already in really bad shape and yet STILL the prevailing attitude among French people was 'anyone but Le Pen'. Plus the 2-stage election process greatly favors the incumbent or the one supported by the establishment. The failure of the yellow vest uprising strongly suggests that Macron isn't going anywhere, so don't get your hopes up. The establishment wants Macron and Macron is who they are going to get.
 

Goni

Woodpecker
Truest words never said.

It is crazy how actual how words are , how effectual national Socialist ideology was and that is the reason why they demonize him so much after so many decades

 

LeoniusD

Pelican
Syrian refugees being sent back is fine, but it would have been very useful if Denmark had also came out in favor of lifting the NATO food and oil siege on Syria, which would have allowed their Syrian refugees to return of their own volution.

The other aspect of this thread, propaganda summarized in this cover:

Ez0EKX1XsAYHe7O
Even if they are as of yet not that blatant - commercials are - the wise black man, the smart black man, the dorky weak white man, the black man - white woman couple - there are a legion of those out there. It is essentially relentless and has obviously little do with reality as the few smart successful black men living with a white woman in a married happy relationship - they are a tiny tiny part on the level of transgenders.

They will keep on beating that horse until it is dead.
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
View attachment 30541

Any French members that can shed some light on this?

Le Pen is a perennial loser who is comfortable with her role as a second place finisher. She is a weak politician that lacks gravitas, got slaughtered in the last presidential debate due to her lack of professionalism. She tried to move to the center with a socially liberal platform (pro-artificial insemination, gay marriage etc), similar to the center right, with no Frexit or Euro exit plan, her anti-EU platform amounts to a bit of bitching against Brussels. which will split that vote. If Macron ends up in the top two with her, he is certain to beat her in the runoff. The French MSM is going to pump her up going into the next elections, they will also amplify or stage islamic terror events.

Le Pen is a huge liability, she should have long stepped down. Her party should be dissolved and a new right wing socially conservative populist party should replace it. There is a number of politicians who would make good presidents, like Asselineau or de Villiers, but they are marginalized by the MSM and they will not break the 5%-10% barrier in the 1st round. Barring some kind of unity agreement among the "soverignist" anti-EU candidates, Macron will crush Marine Le Pen in the second round and win again.

The letter from the generals was published by Valeurs Actuelles, a weekly edited by this fellow below, a board member of the CRIF, the local ADL/AIPAC. They have been agitating for a civil war for a long time now, completely conflating mass immigration/open border policies with Islam, never talking about the actors and motives behind the Great Replacement.

1619632290842.png

Nevertheless the letter is a good start, a shot across the bow, the focus should now be on a national referendum on immigration, with a large majority of the French public being against open borders. This is a winning platform for a candidate going into the presidential elections, especially if held by someone other than Marine Le Pen. Recently French and EU "human rights" courts have struck down immigration laws, stating that pushing back illigal migrants was against the "Fraternity" mandate of the French Republic. The system is broken and so are the floodgates...
 

Sitting Bull

Woodpecker
Good overall assessment of the French situation, 911 !
The only part I would criticize is the following :


There is a number of politicians who would make good presidents, like Asselineau or de Villiers

Assileneau's anti-EU political stance is indeed extremely important, and his party is doing a lot to unearth a whole set of taboo historical facts regarding recent history especially WW2.

Whether he would make a good president is more doubtful. He is currently under investigation for accusations of homosexual harassment (a frequent phenomenon under Marine Le Pen's leadership also, by the way) coming from what seems to be distinterested, genuine victims.

I am surprised to see you put de Villiers on a similar footing with Assileneau. De Villiers is such a joke. He is the proverbial barking dog that lets all the caravans pass. Yes, sure, he is never in a good mood and is always denouncing something, but he is always careful not to name names, has never gotten into trouble for anything he said or did, has never been censored from mainstream media as far as I know. He has a completely undeserved reputation for being a traditional Catholic, probably because of his background. But a man and his background are two different things ...

And yes, De Villiers rants a lot about the EU too, but you can't compare his comedian performances to Asselineau's in-depth analysis, supported by professional historians like Annie Lacroix-Riz or international-politics analysts like Valérie Bugault.

Last I saw of De Villiers was on TV, he was sitting not far from Macron having fun with brown-skinned gay dancers. He had that awkward smile, like "I'm supposed not to like that, but you know how it is ..."
 
Top