This is what is necessary to stop this:
Even if I did not know the details about Tony Blair's policies, etc, I would never blame the Western Europeans. While there is some apathy among the millenials, these processes started ages ago and went very slowly for long periods. You can easily be living in the center and stay oblivious to the ghettos forming around until it is very late to react. It was never voted in to bring this people in first place, so good luck using democracy to send them away.I'm rambling here, but the point being i dont think the people have EVER been responsible for this. Even in the late stage 'hey guys, we really ARE a nation of immigrants' retardation, it just feels like blaming a battered housewife for sticking up for her man.
That's a good point - and it would be a lot more based, because there's no need to pretend to defend the frontier when these migrants are just planning to use Poland as a transit route anyway. Tell the EU: fine, since you love migrants so much, have a few more. It would also diminish unnecessary tensions between Poland and Belarus.The Polish know very well that the migrants will not settle in Poland, the whole situation is a joke. The politicians are appealing to the braindead "patriots" by claiming that they are defending the border when instead they should put them on a direct bus to the German border, far cheaper for the tax payers and less headache.
Bad idea and short-term thinking. If enough go to Germany and breed, Poland will fall in 15-20 years. If Germany becomes a third-world Islamic republic, you really think they will respect their neighbors and not try to sneak into their borders later? Poland needs to either build a wall and shoot people trying to cross OR catch people crossing and use them as cheap labor on prison farms and prison factories and then deport the prisoners after 1-2 years. Maybe Poland can become the world's factory instead of China if they are willing to do my 2nd idea (I know they lack the cahones to do this but one can dream).That's a good point - and it would be a lot more based, because there's no need to pretend to defend the frontier when these migrants are just planning to use Poland as a transit route anyway. Tell the EU: fine, since you love migrants so much, have a few more. It would also diminish unnecessary tensions between Poland and Belarus.
to love your neighbour as yourself
Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not from the world.”
And I see that if I look well, the kingdom of God is in the midst of us. The kingdom we have at our kitchen tables.Luke 17:20-21
Being asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, he answered them, “The kingdom of God is not coming with signs to be observed, nor will they say, ‘Look, here it is!’ or ‘There!’ for behold, the kingdom of God is in the midst of you.”
“If the world hates you, know that it has hated me before it hated you. If you were of the world, the world would love you as its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hates you. Remember the word that I said to you: ‘A servant is not greater than his master.’ If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you. If they kept my word, they will also keep yours.
More than that, we rejoice in our sufferings, knowing that suffering produces endurance, and endurance produces character, and character produces hope,
Exactly, I think it is ridiculous that nations feel they have no choice in this matter. However, I suppose the problem is we must assume that at least 51% of western Europeans, Canadians, and Americans want more African immigration (assuming the fact they are democracies and we know that in democracies, the leaders make decisions based on whether the majority of the population supports it). If 51% of people want their nation to be overrun with Africans, the other 49% will have to accept it or migrate to a less 'tolerant' nation. You may not believe 51% + is accurate but look at the people that Germans, French, Americans, and Canadians choose as their leaders.African demography can affect a country only if the country wants to be affected.
The "rapid growth" has nothing to do with monogamous folks who just won't take birth control. Its has to do with runaway promiscuity- with no birth control. Its no secret. And Africa is like this. Christian missionaries (in living memory) have always turned a blind eye to this fact and instead do the shtick of helping poor people. Pointing out poor behavior, however is too scary.I have read several articles that discuss Africa's overpopulation (Rwanda's genocide in Jared Diamond's book 'Collapse' mentions overpopulation as a major cause for this). One serious question though. Many forum users here are against birth control. However, Africa's rapid population growth is likely its #2 most serious problem (#1 is probably greed). Assuming everybody should marry at a young age and have big families (as long as they stay married and plan to raise the children to the best of their ability), this means an average of 6-9 kids per couple. How can Africa prevent mass starvation and war while still maintaining such a rapid population growth?
I would have guessed that Africa had fewer out of wedlock babies than the USA. I assumed their cultures were more family oriented (until they migrate to western nations and get westernized in the worst ways). Polygamy is common in many of the nations, but this shouldn't increase birth rates (unless the wives have affairs or the men pimp out their wives); it will just result in more incels which will lead to more violent hopeless angry men (another issue in Africa and the Middle East).The "rapid growth" has nothing to do with monogamous folks who just won't take birth control. Its has to do with runaway promiscuity- with no birth control. Its no secret. And Africa is like this. Christian missionaries (in living memory) have always turned a blind eye to this fact and instead do the shtick of helping poor people. Pointing out poor behavior, however is too scary.
Its mathematical really. You do the hyper-modern sterile society like Japan you fade into a geriatric gray-hair Atlantis type of country. If you do the South Sudan style permanent orgy you have the perpetual famine-o-clock civilization.
If you have five ladies on rotation with no birth control, you forfeit any cooling off period (nine-or-so month pregnancy), and no guaranteed horizon for menopause, as you won't grow old with one wife, and will most likely discard her for a newer younger one.
It doesn't matter how hard you work at the point (which is another issue in Africa) you will never, ever earn enough to feed that many kids in your allotted lifetime.
African demography can affect a country only if the country wants to be affected.
The whole migrant thing is just a weapon to erode from the inside and to put false flags on:
Former French official says there has been too much immigration.
Muslims rioted in Sweden after Quran was burned.