I think you are totally right, they are shaped as 'agents of chaos'.
In Europe back in the 80s there were little problems with migrants. They were coming here as workers, which they did, in summers they would go back to Morocco with a lot of stuff in big old buses.
In the 90s it seems Jewish policy changed and migrants had to be turned into criminals. The rise of rap music, the adoration of "scarface", the promotion of gang culture, the pushing of brotherhood (under blacks in the US and mostly North-African migrants in Europe), the rise of migration for jewish "humanitarian" purposes for men between 16 and 25 instead of temporary industry workers, as Singapore and all the gulf states are doing.
For a young Moroccan popular jewish culture tells him what to do. This is the same all across Europe. They make aggressive songs which promote dealing drugs, using drugs, fornication, stabbing people with knives and killing people with guns.
The difference is that Singapore and Dubai do not build comfortable dwellings and deliberately import the worst elements of countries on the other side of the world to live in them, and (if said criminals stir up trouble) gaslight the populace against driving them out.
And even if the immigrants on those places are mostly blue-collar laborers, that is not a simple reason alone for them to turn into criminal gangs because the threat of losing their jobs and documentation (and thereby starving) is enough to keep them in line. There are plenty of skilled and unskilled foreign laborers in South Korea and Japan, but the street gangs and criminal syndicates in those two countries are ethnic Koreans or Japanese (add some Chinese Triads to the mix).
And I want to say here that this ghetto rap culture that you're describing isn't only affecting blacks and North Africans but is pretty much widespread in other parts of the world thanks to Americanization. And it does affect law and order even if the delinquent gangstas are of the same ethnicity as everyone else.
The entire notion of closed vs open borders is misleading for the ff. reasons:
There are different kinds of people who want to move from one country to another: blue-collar economic migrants, white-collar professionals, business executives who want to target new markets and invest/outsource in new factories or offices, actual refugees who have good reason to flee (i.e. war or famine), foreigners who are attracted to another country's culture for its own sake (basically weeaboos), or simply people who want to start over for plenty of personal reasons. The "migrants" wrecking havoc in Britain, Ireland, Sweden, Germany and other parts of Europe fall into none of these categories, and even the "refugees" don't count because otherwise it should only be just the women, children and elderly.
The other factor is that a country allowing immigration does not
automatically mean that it would have to provide for the food, lodging, transport, and documentation for everyone. Simply put, it costs a lot for an emigrant to pay for visa, passport, plane ticket, training and other needed documents, and in most cases he or she has to raise the money on their own or get support from a government agency. And then once one gets to the destination country, you'll have to worry about stuff like setting up a bank account, phone number, living arrangements, etc.,
And what's happening in Europe of handing out pretty much everything
to demographic migrants is unprecedented and has been occuring right under the noses of everyone. And if all European countries declare closed borders tomorrow, the instigators of the ethnic displacement will still have their way because they're above the law, and it's the legitimate migrants that only will be barred. Similar to how gun control and anti-2A policies will not stop criminals from possessing firearms, only punish the law-abiding citizens.
Logistics alone is enough deterrent to control the flow of immigration, unless we're talking about the US-Mexico border which I concede as an exception, but there are other factors at play there such as the white population growth keeping the Hispanic migration in check there.
Things surely must come to a head soon. 1m migrants came in to UK in 2021. From January til June, 500k this year. People know what's going on, they can see it with their own eyes.
Question is, is what any anger results in. Streams and angry audio essays on Odyssey aren't really doing much to stem the flow.
This destabilization of Europe is another sign of the end times, just like all the wars and the moral decline of the West in general.
What is definitely not
the solution here is to point the finger at Christianity as many Europeans are now doing (aka the "neo-pagan larpers"), and being part of the psyop weaponizing far-right nativism as an anti-Christian movement, gaslighting Christians into giving up their faith and becoming pagans in order to supposedly save the West. I wanted to dedicate an entire section to secular nationalism
and how it's another tool of the Antichrist on the same vein as atheist scientism and Marxism.