Millennial women are cheating more than millennial men, a new study finds

[placer]

It took me two clicks to get to the actual study:

https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-cheats-more-the-demographics-of-cheating-in-america — http://archive.is/rybk6

It's the 18-29 demographic where married girls are slightly more likely to cheat on their husbands (11%) than the other way around (10%); as men get older and their wives hit the wall, they become more likely to cheat on their spouse.

 

[Thomas More]

People's behavior is contingent on what they can get away with. We might hate the office jerk, for example, but we don't punch him in the face because we can't get away with it. We'd get fired and arrested.

When it comes to women and cheating, they do it because they can. There is little downside.

In divorce settlements, women will often get awarded the house and kids even if they're the ones that cheated. They simply claim "abuse" and the chivalrous male judges (or man-hating feminist ones) go along with it.

(Spousal abuse claims, by the way, are the white women's variation on inner city killers pleas of "insanity" so they can get light sentences. Almost all lawyers get their clients to claim this as a matter of course.)

Then there's the social shaming. There is very little of that for women. New agey, Oprah-inspired concepts like "Your Best Self" allow women to justify virtually anything under the concept of "self-improvement." Even religious groups indulge in this sort of thinking, as the Dalrock blog has shown.

Women: "I had to sleep with all your best friends because I had to prove to myself I was attractive to men!"

The Greek Chorus of the American Media: "You go, girl!"

The only downside might be when the guy who gets cheated on complains. But then the women can call on The Costume Crowd.

What is The Costume Crowd? They're the people in society that think they have authority over us because they wear costumes. There is the cop costume (complete with badge!), the judge and priest's robe costume, the doctor's white coat costume, the sexy nurse costume etc. For whatever reason, humans instinctively bow down when they see costumes.

Anyway, The Costume Crowd has morphed from being helpful parts of society to being a support system for the bad behavior of women. All of these people would have called out women cheating back in the 1950s. Now they use their credentials to justify it all in the legal, religious, or psychological realms.

I'll end it there. I don't know if I can be more cynical or bitter than that.

If anything, you're laying it out gently. The situation is badly fucked, and somehow all the institutions, authority figures, moral leaders, and the majority of the general population have gone all in on having it this way.

They say the sins of the parents are visited upon the children to the third generation. We're in for a lot of shit.

 

[Days of Broken Arrows]

People's behavior is contingent on what they can get away with. We might hate the office jerk, for example, but we don't punch him in the face because we can't get away with it. We'd get fired and arrested.

When it comes to women and cheating, they do it because they can. There is little downside.

In divorce settlements, women will often get awarded the house and kids even if they're the ones that cheated. They simply claim "abuse" and the chivalrous male judges (or man-hating feminist ones) go along with it.

(Spousal abuse claims, by the way, are the white women's variation on inner city killers pleas of "insanity" so they can get light sentences. Almost all lawyers get their clients to claim this as a matter of course.)

Then there's the social shaming. There is very little of that for women. New agey, Oprah-inspired concepts like "Your Best Self" allow women to justify virtually anything under the concept of "self-improvement." Even religious groups indulge in this sort of thinking, as the Dalrock blog has shown.

Women: "I had to sleep with all your best friends because I had to prove to myself I was attractive to men!"

The Greek Chorus of the American Media: "You go, girl!"

The only downside might be when the guy who gets cheated on complains. But then the women can call on The Costume Crowd.

What is The Costume Crowd? They're the people in society that think they have authority over us because they wear costumes. There is the cop costume (complete with badge!), the judge and priest's robe costume, the doctor's white coat costume, the sexy nurse costume etc. For whatever reason, humans instinctively bow down when they see costumes.

Anyway, The Costume Crowd has morphed from being helpful parts of society to being a support system for the bad behavior of women. All of these people would have called out women cheating back in the 1950s. Now they use their credentials to justify it all in the legal, religious, or psychological realms.

I'll end it there. I don't know if I can be more cynical or bitter than that.

If anything, you're laying it out gently. The situation is badly fucked, and somehow all the institutions, authority figures, moral leaders, and the majority of the general population have gone all in on having it this way.

They say the sins of the parents are visited upon the children to the third generation. We're in for a lot of shit.

LOL! Thanks.

I actually left a very important point out of my rant. All the people who make up The Costume Crowd (priests, cops, medical workers) enable the bad behavior of women because they PROFIT off of it.

When men crash and burn, they either disappear silently or take their own lives. No one cares. Why? Because there's no money in that.

But when women crash and burn, they look for help in the form of religion, therapy, or legal recourse. Priests want to keep those pews filled, therapists need those clients, lawyers need lawsuits, and cops, nurses, and doctors need to put that "crisis intervention" training to use.

Looking beyond the costumes, self-help authors need to sell books, college profs need to peddle their bullshit, and shelters need grant money.

If women all behaved like nice, quaint little wives out of the 1950s, a lot of people would be out of jobs. This is a major reason for the creation and support of "badass girls." It's a jobs program.

 

[Investment Bro]

So, to answer your post on this thread. Yes, it IS something new. And no, we're not Puritans, just men trying to figure out what happened to cause this change (a lot of which I tried to explain in an earlier post).

You did do a good job of that, and I respect the viewpoint. I 100% agree with you that a lot of the current social climate is caused by no societal downside, and that the system favors women.

To clarify what I meant, of course women are driven to mate with only the most dominant men that they possibly can. However, with all the access they have to cock it's a lot easier to allow that biological desire to happen. Where it relates to long term relationships, it's my belief that the perception of dominance tends to fade over time in the eyes of the woman. The 1950s were different because there was significantly more social pressure (which you explained has reversed significantly with the costumes, which I also agree with).

What I'm trying to get at is that both men and women are naturally driven to be promiscuous, if you look at the lavish sex lives and the boundless hedonism of western Rome, this kind of thing has happened before. What I'm underlying is that the desire to cheat is nothing new.

 

[kosko]

Girls want to try and think the # doesn't matter....



In reality, the number means everything. The higher the # the more strange and unable she will be to have a normal grounded relationship. If she wants to live the life of a spinster all the power to her but then doesn't expect any reasonable man to want to share anything with you aside from an orgasm.

The reality... I have yet, in my day, to see a girl indulge in random ONS sex sober. Yes, this is correct, I have never seen a girl partake in a ONS 100% clean and sober (weed, drugs, molly, coke, booze... take your pick). My sample size extends beyond my own experiences, I was previously an active hedonist and would mull around swingers clubs and have seen 100s upon 100s of women who all fit the description. Only sober girls would be the lowest of the low who were there out of their own desperation as they had slim picking and options to get laid (think of the fatties and the weirdos of the world, the female dregs).... or she is just hoe, to begin with.

Caveat.... I do remember one friend of mine always got horny after the gym and if you were to even complement a freckle on her after the gym she would let you hit it. I remember one story of her fucking some random dude in her building as he walking his dog. Not even sure what small talk was made before she had him back in her apartment and bent over. Alsobut she was not normal once bit and was off the charts crazy.

No reasonable woman will partake in random ONS bangs sober. Will she call up some D she has on her phone? Yeah sure but the connection or some sort of relationship has been established. Even via Tinder her hamster is establishing some sort of (loose) connection via communication. In the real world though, nope, not at all.

 

[CynicalContrarian]

It took me two clicks to get to the actual study:

https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-cheats-more-the-demographics-of-cheating-in-america — http://archive.is/rybk6

It's the 18-29 demographic where married girls are slightly more likely to cheat on their husbands (11%) than the other way around (10%); as men get older and their wives hit the wall, they become more likely to cheat on their spouse.

An indirect acknowledgment of the Rollo Tomassi type 'SMV' then?

 

[rpg]

Women cannot bang a bunch of guys and be normal and move on. Women damage themselves in ways that dont happen to guys. A guy can bang a dozen bitches, call it quits and carry on like nothing if no babies or diseases happened in the meantime. Women pair bond early, if that doesnt pan out it is over she is broken. Buyer beware. It takes the right touch to keep them in line and Im not wasting my time.
In my town, everybody cheats. The smart one know how to keep it quiet, the dumb ones fuck everything up coming and going. For the young guys here, dont ever use your real name or give out your phone number to a women. If you do, you are going to get screwed.

 

[911]

People's behavior is contingent on what they can get away with. We might hate the office jerk, for example, but we don't punch him in the face because we can't get away with it. We'd get fired and arrested.

When it comes to women and cheating, they do it because they can. There is little downside.

In divorce settlements, women will often get awarded the house and kids even if they're the ones that cheated. They simply claim "abuse" and the chivalrous male judges (or man-hating feminist ones) go along with it.

(Spousal abuse claims, by the way, are the white women's variation on inner city killers pleas of "insanity" so they can get light sentences. Almost all lawyers get their clients to claim this as a matter of course.)

Then there's the social shaming. There is very little of that for women. New agey, Oprah-inspired concepts like "Your Best Self" allow women to justify virtually anything under the concept of "self-improvement." Even religious groups indulge in this sort of thinking, as the Dalrock blog has shown.

Women: "I had to sleep with all your best friends because I had to prove to myself I was attractive to men!"

The Greek Chorus of the American Media: "You go, girl!"

The only downside might be when the guy who gets cheated on complains. But then the women can call on The Costume Crowd.

What is The Costume Crowd? They're the people in society that think they have authority over us because they wear costumes. There is the cop costume (complete with badge!), the judge and priest's robe costume, the doctor's white coat costume, the sexy nurse costume etc. For whatever reason, humans instinctively bow down when they see costumes.

Anyway, The Costume Crowd has morphed from being helpful parts of society to being a support system for the bad behavior of women. All of these people would have called out women cheating back in the 1950s. Now they use their credentials to justify it all in the legal, religious, or psychological realms.

I'll end it there. I don't know if I can be more cynical or bitter than that.

DOBA you're always railing about our Catholic heritage, but you have to recognize that it kept our societies and particularly women in check for nearly two millennia before the floodgates opened post-V2.

 

[N°6]

The average age when women want to marry is approaching 30. This pushes the men’s first time marriage age higher. In the early 30s the average husband’s SMV surpasses the average wife’s and this has been the mechanism for most marital infidelity in history. The husband is often the same man who was rejected from the SMP when he was in his teens and 20s when his wife was a participant.

So when younger women finally show sexual interest in the married man when his wife begins refusing sex (but still demands financial support), it’s a temptation that is hard to deal with.