Modern Psychiatry Is Demonic

One of the interesting points phased out of history is that when evolution was trying to be introduced into American schools in the 20s, the objection was not necessarily "against" evolution but because eugenics was pushed in with it (think CRT nowadays, but worse). The Scopes Monkey Trial was a big show trial to try to paint all those who disagreed as ignorant religious idiots.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/397478.Better_for_All_the_World this is a really good book about the topic of eugenics and forced sterilization in America (and the source for the above claim).
Thank you for the link, I will have a look!
 
One of the interesting points phased out of history is that when evolution was trying to be introduced into American schools in the 20s, the objection was not necessarily "against" evolution but because eugenics was pushed in with it (think CRT nowadays, but worse). The Scopes Monkey Trial was a big show trial to try to paint all those who disagreed as ignorant religious idiots.

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/397478.Better_for_All_the_World this is a really good book about the topic of eugenics and forced sterilization in America (and the source for the above claim).
That's interesting, and I can well believe it.

Of course, it doesn't change the fact that evolution is the biggest hoax before corona. I wonder how much correlation there is between people who "believe" (the word is appropriate, it's a credo) in evolution, and people who believe in corona apocalypse.

The world was made by a glob of matter which started inexplicably mutating, and will be destroyed by a little virus whose mutations are progressively more deadly.
 
That's interesting, and I can well believe it.

Of course, it doesn't change the fact that evolution is the biggest hoax before corona. I wonder how much correlation there is between people who "believe" (the word is appropriate, it's a credo) in evolution, and people who believe in corona apocalypse.

The world was made by a glob of matter which started inexplicably mutating, and will be destroyed by a little virus whose mutations are progressively more deadly.
A lot of weird American progressivism--including eugenics--has its roots in Calvinism.

What I meant by religious people not necessarily objecting to the *concept* of evolution is that religion follows a long timeline, and one can see how things change over the years. The objection was to saying that since we come from monkeys, certain races and ethnicities are closer to animals, and some are better "evolved."

Sort of like how there's a big difference between genetics and eugenics, even though they're both "based" on the same principle (except one involves God and the other "becoming" a god, or some kind of secular apotheosis).

"Better for All is the World" is a worthwhile read. The one thing that worries me is that it ends on some kind of positive note of that it was a good idea taken in the wrong direction, and science (science!) may be fixing its trajectory. I think this garbage is coming back in a big way. I'm not sure why "everything is heritable" is somehow superior to free will.
 
A lot of weird American progressivism--including eugenics--has its roots in Calvinism.

What I meant by religious people not necessarily objecting to the *concept* of evolution is that religion follows a long timeline, and one can see how things change over the years. The objection was to saying that since we come from monkeys, certain races and ethnicities are closer to animals, and some are better "evolved."

Sort of like how there's a big difference between genetics and eugenics, even though they're both "based" on the same principle (except one involves God and the other "becoming" a god, or some kind of secular apotheosis).

"Better for All is the World" is a worthwhile read. The one thing that worries me is that it ends on some kind of positive note of that it was a good idea taken in the wrong direction, and science (science!) may be fixing its trajectory. I think this garbage is coming back in a big way. I'm not sure why "everything is heritable" is somehow superior to free will.
Sure. Creationists make a distinction between macroevolution (change from one species to another over generations) and microevolution (change in one species over generations, due to interactions with the environment, natural selection, breeding patterns and so on), and the latter definitely happens.

And yeah, if one does accept (macro)evolution, then it becomes pretty easy to argue that some races are less human than others, because what it means to be human has become flexible/mutable. It's pretty funny trying to see modern liberals reconcile their belief in human equality with their dogmatic belief in evolution. 19th century social Darwinists were more coherent.
 
The secular world makes people ill by denying the presence of God, and then the secular world gives the solution of psychiatry and its obsession of prescribing anti-depressant and anti-psychotic drugs which fleece billions of dollars from patients via recurring monthly payments for those who become dependent on them and simply cannot quit.

Propaganda patterns are emerging. An example is the partnership between public schools and the post-COVID medical industry (pharmaceutical companies ). A similar historical partnership happened under USA's public school program titled, Teen Screen, under the Bush Administration. Why was the program terminated in 2012, and will it be revived as a new public school program for child development?

This 2021 Scientific American article presented a concerning trend in the public school system now:

Ask any teenager if they would like to talk about mindfulness and mood thermometers with their peers a dozen times in one school year, and most would decline the opportunity. But ask them instead if they would like a vaccine to ward off the worst mental health impacts of the past year and a half, and most would raise their hands without thinking.

There is also a partnership between medical practitioners and pharmaceutical companies involving incentives.
The Washington Post presented an article titled, The pandemic could drive another national health crisis, GAO warns: Anxiety

“The pandemic is potentially driving another national crisis related to its effects on behavioral health, with people experiencing new or exacerbated behavioral health symptoms or conditions.”
As of November, Washington has spent more than $8.5 billion in covid-19 relief for behavioral health, which includes mental health issues like anxiety and depression, in addition to substance abuse. Almost all of that was funneled through five programs of the Department of Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. The rest went to the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

The UN agency /United Nations Children Fund provides the examples of mental health / childhood development disruptions developed because of the COVID Pandemic.

How can parents prepare to avoid the next pandemic: mental health crisis?

This thread by @DanielH asks individuals to "discuss personal experiences with children in these times, as well as any theories you may have, how to deal with this phenomenon, and why this isn't triggering policy changes or how the oligarchs benefit from an essentially disabled population."

 
Propaganda patterns are emerging. An example is the partnership between public schools and the post-COVID medical industry (pharmaceutical companies ). A similar historical partnership happened under USA's public school program titled, Teen Screen, under the Bush Administration. Why was the program terminated in 2012, and will it be revived as a new public school program for child development?

This 2021 Scientific American article presented a concerning trend in the public school system now:



There is also a partnership between medical practitioners and pharmaceutical companies involving incentives.
The Washington Post presented an article titled, The pandemic could drive another national health crisis, GAO warns: Anxiety



The UN agency /United Nations Children Fund provides the examples of mental health / childhood development disruptions developed because of the COVID Pandemic.

How can parents prepare to avoid the next pandemic: mental health crisis?

This thread by @DanielH asks individuals to "discuss personal experiences with children in these times, as well as any theories you may have, how to deal with this phenomenon, and why this isn't triggering policy changes or how the oligarchs benefit from an essentially disabled population."


The public school system wants to parent and to decide what is right for your child to learn:

Of course, this is no longer surprising:

"The purpose of public education in public schools is not to teach kids only what parents want them to be taught," the post continued. "It is to teach them what society needs them to know. The client of the public school is not the parent, but the entire community, the public."


Thank you for sharing @MartyMcFly !
 
Psychiatry is a Jewish scam:

Dr. Isaac “Ike” Herschkopf, who was stripped of his medical license in April by a state disciplinary board, lost his appeal to get it back.Herschkopf, 71, who also reportedly treated Gwyneth Paltrow and Courtney Love, was accused of exploiting former patient Marty Markowitz, taking over his Hamptons house and even persuading him to rewrite his will for the doctor’s gain.
The pair’s twisted relationship was the basis of a podcast, “The Shrink Next Door” which became the Apple TV series. Will Ferrell plays Markowitz.
The state Board for Professional Medical Conduct had found him guilty of 16 charges of misconduct, including negligence and moral unfitness.

Source: https://nypost.com/2021/12/18/shrink-next-door-doctor-loses-appeal-for-medical-license/


Fico;2365681 said:
From: https://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=559646

According to woman who went in psychiatry for treatment against depression.

In ex-communist Yugoslavia,opposed politicans were also unhealthy for them and in modern Croatia one pro-white political opponent was also in mental institution with diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia and later independent expertise made conclusion that is he healty. In NS Germany Freud teachenings were expelled and his book were burned. Today is whole psychoanalysis in mental hospitals and NATO created by Freud. Remember that was homosexuality also removed from list of mental illnesses because NS mental institutions had it. Of course,they will not remove Sigmund Freud books than doctor who just follow his medical methods. What is judea gashlighting? It is mindfuck who want to convince us goys that our brain do not have health views because it is opposed to Christianity,Communsim,Sigmund Freud and whole this system. It is not first time of using such methods who are realized for jewish enemyes,Christianity also had brutal methods for all who did not belive in jewish god with inquisition.

This is all true, how they held back scientific progress.

Just read about what happened to Ignaz Semmelweis:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignaz_Semmelweis
 
I see psychiatry and psychology as a scam.

It is a false religious system and it created very dangerous precedents in law.

Both fields deal fundamentally with 2 problems:
- Person feels bad (e.g. stress, fear, anger, addiction)
- Behaviors not desired by the world (coming from those feelings, anger resulting in murder, fear resulting in panick, meaninglessness resulting in depression and not working)

Both fields reduce feelings to alleged substances in the brain.
- E.g. you feel meaningless, then you have to little serotonine
- E.g. you have addiction, then you chase dopamine
- E.g. you feel no desire, they you have to little testosterone

If psychologists and psychiatrists balance out several substances and have a few talk and you learn some tricks, you will feel fine.

This false model of thinking has been so widely used it's almost impossible to let it go.

Anthonie van Leeuwenhoek, a Dutch scientist who invented the microscope, often referred with reverence to the wonders God designed in making creatures great and small. He believed that his amazing discoveries were further proof of the great wonder of God's creation.

The current Jewish "scientists" took God out of the equation. They see the human as a robot with testosterone, dopamine and serotonine levels that should be optimized. With secular mental trickery, tell yourself you are great, to satanic rituals as hypnosis and with poisoning sold as medication.

It basically says that Gods creation has been suboptimal. God did a bad job this time. And we will fix you, put you on a life long dose of pain killers, stress relievers, testosterone medication.

These Jews wrote the DSM, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which describes statistical models to define who has a disorder and who has not. Like law, the DSM has become thicker and thicker, resulting in the fact that many people "have a disorder". The DSM is the Law of mental disorders. Based on this people can get free benefits, as God created them in this wrong way.

CHRISTIANS KNOW THE SOURCE OF UNHAPPINESS IS SIN.

Sin has been taken out. As has been God.

Thereby it becomes satanic trickery, giving people false hope and trusting "the science". All this science is unproven to be effective.

Even in the court of law, in more and more cases psychologists and psychiatrists have to write reports on the accused. Criminals claim a psychological/psychiatric disorder to be seen as non accountable. E.g. because of blind anger, the person was unable to control himself and killed that person. This person needs psychological treatment. Instead of seen as sinners, these criminals are seen as victims, victims of god, who created them in this wrong manner.

What does satan do? He tells us sin in good, and good is bad.

In current society, the sinners become the victims of god who shaped them with defect brain chemicals. And the good are taxed, to give the sinners false treatment.

I generalize, but in my personal life I have seen all this very nearby and also seeing the destruction and toil it has on souls.

Pray to God. Ask for forgiveness for your sins. Follow Gods will. And try to better yourself in the image of Christ.

And you can throw all the pills and witchery away. Anyhow none can be saved in our worldly existence.

In some way I am flabbergasted, how is it possible to make this the world religion? Cutting out God and sin? How can you make so many people depended on the mental health industry, which doesn't fix you, but leads you more astray while feeding you drugs?
 
Last edited:
These Jews wrote the DSM, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which describes statistical models to define who has a disorder and who has not. Like law, the DSM has become thicker and thicker, resulting in the fact that many people "have a disorder". The DSM is the Law of mental disorders. Based on this people can get free benefits, as God created them in this wrong way.
The DSM serves neither for the good of humanity nor the good of the individual. Maybe it did many decades ago but they removed homosexuality and added ADHD and so it is now clearly serving demonic forces, suppressing masculinity, promoting dysfunction and making money for psychologists and psychiatrists and drug companies.
 
Anthonie van Leeuwenhoek, a Dutch scientist who invented the microscope, often referred with reverence to the wonders God designed in making creatures great and small. He believed that his amazing discoveries were further proof of the great wonder of God's creation.

The current Jewish "scientists" took God out of the equation. They see the human as a robot with testosterone, dopamine and serotonine levels that should be optimized. With secular mental trickery, tell yourself you are great, to satanic rituals as hypnosis and with poisoning sold as medication.

It basically says that Gods creation has been suboptimal. God did a bad job this time. And we will fix you, put you on a life long dose of pain killers, stress relievers, testosterone medication.

These Jews wrote the DSM, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, which describes statistical models to define who has a disorder and who has not. Like law, the DSM has become thicker and thicker, resulting in the fact that many people "have a disorder". The DSM is the Law of mental disorders. Based on this people can get free benefits, as God created them in this wrong way.

CHRISTIANS KNOW THE SOURCE OF UNHAPPINESS IS SIN.

The Jews were the ones who caused the epidemic of mental illness in the first place when they put anti-androgens in our water supply and commercial products to primarily decrease our fertility rates, but it also caused side effects such as mood swings, anger, depression, anxiety, and cerebral atrophy which involves reductions in brain volume and thus intelligence and creativity.

Source: https://www.rooshvforum.com/threads...crease-testosterone.31592/page-6#post-1569284
 
"Many psychiatrists and psychologists are actually going crazy. They're worse than their patients. Because they are getting in full contact with the demonic powers." - Monk Aserniye Jovanović

Source - https://yewtu.be/watch?v=iCR9jSy2ZwE

It seems to me there is a trend of women being classified as mentally ill, spending years in therapy, before becoming a therapist themselves. Mental health is mental.
 
bgf23FZ7WmVG.png
 
Article doesn't go far enough. Nobody needs a Therapist (The Rapist). All Mental Health Torture needs to be abolished. It is an absolute rubbish Pseudoscience.

I had a situation arise where I got the chance to run a Roshenhan Experiment 2.0. Cops took me in for a psych eval because of my books. Two being The Federalist Papers and The Anti Federalist Papers. The second one was named in the police report. Both of them have copies of The Constitution in them. Apprantly, thats a symptom of a mental illness. I was then yelled and screamed at and called a Nazi by a Nurse. Didn't even see a Doctor for 24 hours. She had no idea what an Anthropologist was. Violated HIPPA (Reasonable Professional Belief). Tried to take my gun rights away. Oh and my Catholic Bible was sitting right next to all those other books too.

It's a completely rubbish Pseudoscience. Anyone that thinks it's legit needs to be kicked out of your life.

Went to go join The Marines and they believed it. Apprantly The Constitution is an Anti-Government Document. Their words not mine. So screw Psychiatry. I could go on and on, but please see any of the books by Thomas Szasz.

I'm surprised it took this long for people to come around to the notion that Psychiatry is Quackery. Psychiatrists need to be given a dose of their own medicine.

Psychiatry is just a tool used by the SJW libtards to censor dissenting opinions against their ideology.

The fact that you got sent to a psych eval just for possessing "politically incorrect" books is proof that mental illness is not real and is just a label used by SJW fanatics for censoring unbelievers.

This is proof that we live in a 1984 Orwellian Nightmare because your freedom of speech and freedom of information are being violated by these SJW psychiatrists.

The worst part is that you got arrested just for possessing books about the US Constitution which is proof that the SJWs are usurping the constitution and turning the USA into a totalitarian police state since they consider possessing such books a thought crime.

The nurse in the psych ward called you a Nazi for possessing books about the US Constitution? What an SJW retard!

These books do not even contain hate speech and are actually promoting equal rights for all people.

But the SJWs do not want anyone to have rights because it makes us harder to control when laws cannot be passed that violate our God-given unalienable rights.

The ultimate goal of the SJWs is to abolish the constitution and take away all of our rights, making us slaves to the Social Justice Warrior States of America.

Here’s an interesting character from recent history I came across, one Charles Binet-Sanglé.
He was a “psychologist” who wrote a book in the 19th century called ‘la folie de Jesus’
(the folly of Jesus). He used his materialistic worldview to label our Lord as merely a human who was mentally ill.
Here’s something else about this man that is not at all shocking; his other notable work was titled ‘Le Haras Humain’ (the human stud-farm).
This illustrious and philanthropic work is about (you guessed it)…eugenics!
There seems to be an obvious pattern the more one investigates these types of people and their work.


So, it is mentally ill to follow Christian values such as abstaining from vice?

But indulging vices such as caffeine, alcohol, tobacco, nicotine, drugs, endocrine disruptors, gambling, romance, sex, and sexual perversions is what makes you retarded in the 1st place.

Such stupid and self-contradictory logic.

Leftists really are idiotic.
 
Last edited:
These posts discuss how psychiatry is a Leftist scam:

"Racism" - White Biocentrism
"Racism" - White Biocentrism

So does this:

Mike Sullivan said:
The Authoritarian Personality attempts to show that the group affiliations of non-Jews, and particularly membership in Christian religious sects, nationalism, and close family ties, are an indication of psychiatric disorder. At a deep level the work of the Frankfurt School is addressed to altering Western societies in an attempt to make them resistant to anti-Semitism by pathologizing group affiliations of non-Jews.

The ideology of intergroup animosity developed by the intergroup relations movement derived from the Studies in Prejudice series sponsored by the AJCommittee, particularly the Frankfurt School’s The Authoritarian Personality. This work explicitly viewed manifestations of ethnocentrism or discrimination against outgroups as a mental disease and thus literally a public health problem. The assault on intergroup animosity was likened to the medical assault on deadly infectious diseases, and people with the disease were described by activists as “infected.”

Source: Jews, Blacks, and Race - White Biocentrism

This text reveals the Leftist plot to destroy us and take over our lives by turning anti-Leftism into a mental illness to censor any dissent against Leftist ideology:

R. Bryant said:
Indeed, the goal of producing political propaganda by using the methods of social science was self-consciously articulated by Horkheimer. Thus Hork- heimer reacted with enthusiasm to the idea of including criminals in the study: “Research would be able here to transform itself directly into propaganda, i.e., if it could be reliably established that a particularly high percentage of crimi- nals were extreme anti-Semites, the result would as such already be propagan- da. I would also like to try to examine psychopaths in mental hospitals” (in Wiggershaus 1994, 375; italics in text). Both groups were eventually included in the study.

This tendency to interpret anti-Semitism as fundamentally deriving from suppressing nature is central to Studies in Prejudice, and particularly The Authoritarian Personality. Suppression of nature results in projection of qualities of self onto the environment and particularly onto the Jews. “Impuls- es which the subject will not admit as his own even though they are most assuredly so, are attributed to the object—the prospective victim” (p. 187). Particularly important for this projection process are sexual impulses: “The same sexual impulses which the human species suppressed have survived and prevailed—in individuals and in nations—by way of the mental conversion of the ambient world into a diabolical system” (p. 187). Christian self-denial and, in particular, the suppression of sex result in evil and anti-Semitism via projection.

A good example of such a reader is Christopher Lasch (1991, 445ff), who noted “The purpose and design of Studies in Prejudice dictated the conclusion that prejudice, a psychological disorder rooted in ‘authoritarian’ personality structure, could be eradicated only by subjecting the American people to what amounted to collective psychotherapy—by treating them as inmates of an insane asylum.” From the beginning, this was social science with a political agenda: “By identifying the ‘liberal personality’ as the antithesis of the author- itarian personality, they equated mental health with an approved political position. They defended liberalism . . . on the grounds that other positions had their roots in personal pathology” (Lasch 1991, 453).

Further, Levinson notes “The ethnocentric ‘need for an outgroup’ prevents that identification with humanity as a whole which is found in anti- ethnocentrism” (p. 148). Levinson clearly believes that ethnocentrism is a sign of psychiatric disorder and that identification with humanity is the epitome of mental health, but he never draws the obvious inference that Jews themselves are unlikely to identify with humanity, given the importance of ingroup- outgroup distinctions so central to Judaism. Moreover, Levinson describes the anti-Semite Mack’s demand that Jews assimilate as a demand that Jews “liquidate themselves, that they lose entirely their cultural identity and adhere instead to the prevailing cultural ways” (p. 97). Levinson sees the demand that Jews assimilate, and thus abandon rigid ingroup-outgroup social categoriza- tion processes, as an aspect Mack’s anti-Semitic psychopathology; at the same time Levinson is perfectly willing to advocate that the anti-Semite identify with humanity and abandon ingroup-outgroup social categorization processes. Clearly ethnocentrism and its concomitant salience of ingroup-outgroup social categorization is to be reserved for Jews and pathologized as an aspect of gentile behavior.

One wonders if these social scientists would similarly advocate that Jewish children should reject their families as the prototypical ingroup. The transmis- sion of Judaism over the generations has required that children accept parental values. In Chapter 3 it was noted that during the 1960s radical Jewish stu- dents, but not radical gentile students, identified strongly with their parents and with Judaism. I have also discussed extensive socialization practices whereby Jewish children were socialized to accept community interests over individual interests. These practices function to produce strong ingroup loyalty among Jews (see PTSDA, Chs. 7, 8). Again, there is an implicit double stand- ard: Rebellion against parents and the complete abandonment of all ingroup designations is the epitome of mental health for gentiles, whereas Jews are implicitly allowed to continue with a strong sense of ingroup identity and follow in their parents’ footsteps.

Whereas the negative feelings high scorers had toward their parents tend to derive from parental efforts to discipline the child or get the child to do household chores, the negative feelings of the low scorers are the result of feelings of desertion and loss of affection (p. 349). However, in the case of the low scorers, Frenkel-Brunswik emphasizes that the desertions and loss of love are frankly accepted, and this acceptance, in her view, precludes psycho- pathology. I have already discussed F63, whose father abandoned her; another low scoring subject, M55, states, “For example, he would take a delicacy like candy, pretend to offer us some and then eat it himself and laugh uproariously. . . . Makes him seem sort of a monster, though he’s not really” (p. 350). It is not surprising that such egregious examples of parental insensitivity are vividly recalled by the subject. However, in the upside-down world of The Authoritarian Personality, their being recalled is viewed as a sign of mental health in the subjects, whereas the overtly positive relationships of the high scorers are a sign of deep, unconscious layers of psychopathology.

This style of high-investment parenting in which high levels of solicitude are combined with powerful controls over children’s behavior is effective in getting children to identify with parental values in traditional Jewish societies. Supreme among these values is accepting parents’ religion and the necessity of choosing a marriage partner suitable to the parents and especially to avoid marrying a gentile. To have a child marry a gentile is a horrifying, catastrophic event that indicates that “something must be wrong with the parents” (Zbor- owski & Herzog 1952, 231). For Frenkel-Brunswik, however, parental solici- tude, accepting parental values, and parental influence on marriage decisions are a sign of pathology—a forerunner of fascism. For gentiles, but apparently not for Jews, rebellion against parental values is the epitome of mental health.

This picture of conflict in the families of low scorers receives the following interpretation by Frenkel-Brunswik: “The foregoing records illustrate the frankness and the greater insight into the marital conflicts of the parents” (p. 369). The assumption seems to be that all families are characterized by alco- holism, desertion, physical abuse, quarreling, and narcissistic preoccupation with one’s own pleasures rather than family needs. Mental health in the low scorers is indicated by their being aware of familial psychopathology, whereas the pathological high scorers simply fail to recognize these phenomena in their families and persist in their delusions that their parents are self-sacrificing, loving disciplinarians.

This inversion of reality continues in the chapter entitled “Sex, People, and Self as Seen through Interviews.” High-scoring males appear as more sexually successful and as having high self-conceptions of masculinity; high-scoring females are described as popular with boys. Low-scoring males appear as sexually inadequate and low-scoring females as uninterested in men or unable to attract men. The low-scoring pattern is then interpreted as “open admission” of sexual inadequacy and therefore a sign of psychological health, and the high-scoring pattern is labeled as “concerned with social status” and therefore pathological. The assumption is that psychopathology is indicated by overt social adjustment and feelings of self-esteem; while mental health is indicated by feelings of inadequacy and admissions of “insufficiency” (p. 389).

Again, psychodynamic theory allows the author to ascribe surface admira- tion and affection to underlying hostility, whereas the surface problems of the low scorers are a sign of mental health: “Some of the records of low-scoring subjects refer rather frankly to their inadequacies, inhibitions, and failures in sex adjustment. There also is evidence of ambivalence toward one’s own sex role and toward the opposite sex although this ambivalence is of a different, more internalized kind from the combination of overt admiration and underly- ing disrespect characteristic of high scorers” (p. 405). We may not see this underlying disrespect and thus have no evidence for its existence. But psycho- dynamic theory allows Frenkel-Brunswik to infer its existence nonetheless.
The tendency to pathologize behaviors related to adaptive functioning can also be seen in the discussion of self-concept. High scorers are found to have a very positive self-image, whereas low scorers are filled with insecurity, self-condemnation, and even “morbid” self-accusations (p. 423ff)—results inter- preted as due to the repressions of the high-scorers and the objectivity of the low scorers.

As with political radicalism, only a rarified cultural elite could attain the extremely high level of mental health epitomized by the true liberal:
The replacement of moral and political argument by reckless psychologizing not only enabled Adorno and his collaborators to dismiss unacceptable political opinions on medical grounds; it led them to set up an impossible standard of political health—one that only members of a self-constituted cultural vanguard could consistently meet. In order to establish their emotional “autonomy,” the subjects of their research had to hold the right opinions and also to hold them deeply and spontaneously. (Lasch 1991, 453– 455)
In the post–World War II era The Authoritarian Personality became an ideological weapon against historical American populist movements, especial- ly McCarthyism (Gottfried 1998; Lasch 1991, 455ff). “[T]he people as a whole had little understanding of liberal democracy and . . . important questions of public policy would be decided by educated elites, not submitted to popular vote” (Lasch 1991, 455).

5. The theme that all modern ills, including National Socialism, collectivism, ado- lescent rebellion, mental illness, and criminality are due to the suppression of nature, including human nature, is also prominent in Horkheimer’s (1947, 92ff) Eclipse of Reason. In a passage that directly conforms to the psychoanalytic perspectives dis- cussed in Chapter 4, the suppression of nature characteristic of civilization is said to begin at birth:
Each human being experiences the domineering aspect of civilization from his birth. To the child, the father’s power seems overwhelming, supernatural in the literal sense of the word. The father’s command is reason exempt from nature, an inexorable spiritual force. The child suffers in submitting to this force. It is almost impossible for an adult to remember all the pangs he experi- enced as a child in heeding innumerable parental admonitions not to stick his tongue out, not to mimic others, not to be untidy or forget to wash behind his ears. In these demands, the child is confronted by the fundamental postulates of civilization. He is forced to resist the immediate pressure of his urges, to differentiate between himself and the environment, to be efficient—in short, to borrow Freud’s terminology, to adopt a superego embodying all the so-called principles that his father and other father-like figures hold up to him. (pp. 109–110)

16. This idea that rebellion against parental values and authority is a sign of mental health can also be seen in the theory of the psychoanalyst Erik Homberg Erikson (1968). Erikson proposed that the most important developmental issue of adolescence was the identity crisis and that going through an identity crisis was a necessary prereq- uisite for healthy adult psychological functioning. The evidence indicates, however, that adolescence is not normatively a time of rebellion against parents, but rebellion against parents is associated with hostile, rejecting family relationships.

Source: The Frankfurt School - Professor Kevin MacDonald - White Biocentrism
 
I was diagnosed with multiple mental illnesses after a head injury. These kept changing because I wasn't responding to the drugs as well as my doctors hoped. So the drugs kept changing, I was just depressed, and if you had chronic painful illnesses that impaired your life you would be too.

Unfortunately my priest kept telling me to take the harmful medication I was prescribed. Even my parents still believe in it somewhat. I've survived everything, brain zaps, panic attacks, insomnia for a month, migraines, vertigo, endless "pseudo" seizures, tremors, restless legs, and I couldn't even walk for a little while (drug induced Parkinsons) I honestly don't know how I survived. It's traumatizing to remember this honestly. Sadism is the word I like to use to describe this kind of medical fascism.

I believe medication has its place, there are generic meds like lithium that are mild in comparison but make no money. The harmful ones make the most money. The worst med I was given was already recalled several times. They repackaged it, and it's now prescribed for everything from autism to bipolar.
 
Back
Top