Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Culture
Deep forum
Monarchy vs Democracy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MusicForThePiano" data-source="post: 1393921" data-attributes="member: 16601"><p>The aristocracy usually were not sellouts in times of old, they may be greedy and pompous and arrogant, but by the Lord if their shores were threatened they were standing with their countrymen. The divine right of kings was meant for good shepherds. The masses, as is, are not capable of self-governing themselves, as we can see this experiment in democracy, which is coming to a close one way or another. Nations need Kings, though they may be corruptible crowns, they must all be kings before the only incorruptible crown. The system of checks and balances has an expiration date which a long line of kings does not. There is no one system totally superior than the other, but men lived and died for thousands of years under kings without the kind of coercive satanic influences which are imposing themselves on the world now. Perhaps not a single monarchy, but a round table manifested in an Arthurian spirit would see good governance and obeisance to God's natural law, thus ensuring some order in human nations. From now until the day He comes back though, there will be strife in this world, but that is not to say that real leaders and real shepherds cannot rise up and lead the flock away from the bad herders which currently control the ebb and flow of societies.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MusicForThePiano, post: 1393921, member: 16601"] The aristocracy usually were not sellouts in times of old, they may be greedy and pompous and arrogant, but by the Lord if their shores were threatened they were standing with their countrymen. The divine right of kings was meant for good shepherds. The masses, as is, are not capable of self-governing themselves, as we can see this experiment in democracy, which is coming to a close one way or another. Nations need Kings, though they may be corruptible crowns, they must all be kings before the only incorruptible crown. The system of checks and balances has an expiration date which a long line of kings does not. There is no one system totally superior than the other, but men lived and died for thousands of years under kings without the kind of coercive satanic influences which are imposing themselves on the world now. Perhaps not a single monarchy, but a round table manifested in an Arthurian spirit would see good governance and obeisance to God's natural law, thus ensuring some order in human nations. From now until the day He comes back though, there will be strife in this world, but that is not to say that real leaders and real shepherds cannot rise up and lead the flock away from the bad herders which currently control the ebb and flow of societies. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Culture
Deep forum
Monarchy vs Democracy
Top