My tweet about the Jews went viral

Roosh V: These anti-semitic posts don't serve you well. Martin Luther published similar diatribes and his reputation has never recovered. Recall that Martin Luther wrote a book entitled The Jews and Their Lies. It was a serious mistake on his part, even though the contention was largely theological. As a superintendent of a Christian forum, I would concentrate on edifying material and apologetics. It's one thing to push back against abortion, homosexuality and fornication; it's quite another to attack a group because of it's ethnicity.
I would say Luther did quite all right considering his brand of Christianity is the most widely followed in the 1st world.

Luther was a great man who spent an entire lifetime being a defender of the jews and trying to save them. Only after having gone to such lengths and got nothing but hate and vitriol in return from the jews, did he turn against them.

What does it say about a people, that they actively resist salvation for 2000 years?

Why would you resist God's grace for 2000 years, when you actively choose to live among christians?
 

andy dufresne

Woodpecker
You gonna get so deplatformed.

Call them the 'media', 'corporations', 'socialists' or what have you, but attacking them directly isn't a good idea.

But I will say for a group that actually has a specific word for members of the outgroup (gentiles) they can come off as pretty damn racist themselves. Oops....
 

CynicalContrarian

Owl
Gold Member
Roosh V: These anti-semitic posts don't serve you well. Martin Luther published similar diatribes and his reputation has never recovered. Recall that Martin Luther wrote a book entitled The Jews and Their Lies. It was a serious mistake on his part, even though the contention was largely theological. As a superintendent of a Christian forum, I would concentrate on edifying material and apologetics. It's one thing to push back against abortion, homosexuality and fornication; it's quite another to attack a group because of it's ethnicity.
Reputation?
You are aware, the mere suggestion by Roosh about three years ago that he would visit Australia, led to the Soycialists, fake news Aus. media & then the Aus. government all having a conniption fit...?

China Virus travel restrictions aside for all foreigners to Australia at this time.
I would not be surprised if the Republican equivalent government in Aus. (Liberal Party) still has Roosh on a black list for a VISA...
 

Drakken

Sparrow
These anti-semitic posts don't serve you well. Martin Luther published similar diatribes and his reputation has never recovered.
Martin Luther's reputation with whom? Ah...

It's one thing to push back against abortion, homosexuality and fornication; it's quite another to attack a group because of it's ethnicity.
They do it all the time.
 

Mr Gibbs

Robin



This is one of the replies to Rooshs Jew behavior tweet. A mild criticism of Jews has people thinking the US is descending to, in their minds, the gates of Auschwitz. And yet we have videos like this !!!!!




Mild criticism of Jews = genocide and persecution
Whites being brutalized incessantly = meh, slavery or whatever
 

Hermetic Seal

Kingfisher
Gold Member
What's so anti-semitic about telling someone that behaving in bad faith makes people like you less?
Exactly. There's nothing hateful in Roosh's tweet. It's a simple observation that just maybe, the reaction is at least due in part to behavior.

Maybe people disagree with that. But the utter nastiness and vitriol he got in response to a pretty restrained statement says a lot.
 

Elipe

Woodpecker
Exactly. There's nothing hateful in Roosh's tweet. It's a simple observation that just maybe, the reaction is at least due in part to behavior.

Maybe people disagree with that. But the utter nastiness and vitriol he got in response to a pretty restrained statement says a lot.
It's funny, because they say this to whites all the time. "People hate whites because of the KKK! People hate whites because of slavery! People hate whites because of Hitler! People hate whites because of..."
 

bucky

Pelican
Silverman's entire tired schtick is "I'm a cute Jewish princess talking over-the-top dirty". It worked ok when she was, ahem, young and cute, but now that she's old, it fails, because she's just a used-up old bag talking dirty. She's a one trick pony and the pony got too old to ride.

And, I'll note, even when she was young she never got over big (Jesus is Magic and The Sarah Silverman Show were not huge hits, but only critically lauded mild hits), and was only pushed because she was, again, a cute Jewish princess that the (((studio heads))) and other (((powerful entertainment folk)))) liked because she was (((like them))) and they wanted to screw her and she was also pushing their kind of comedy---Anti-Christian/Anti-Western.

(((Amy Schumer)))) tried to ride a similar pony (less over-the-top Anti-Christian, but more Anti-Western morality), but she got fat too soon to push it as long as Silverman did. And Schumer is literally Senator Chuck Schumer's niece! Talk about privilege.
Does anyone else remember a few years ago with they were trying to make Amy Schumer the new standard of female beauty? I thought it would work, but it was a tiny white pill for me in a sea of black pills that it failed and she's been more or less forgotten.
 

MajorStyles

Kingfisher
On a related note, I am planning a trip to Buffalo to see Niagara Falls. So I checked out Trip Advisor’s “Things to Do in Buffalo” list, and they recommended the site of President McKinley’s assassination (he was killed at the Temple of Music in Buffalo). Like most people, I knew little to nothing about this incident.

Short review of my findings:

1.) Jews start a revolutionary group called the Anarchist movement: Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman being the prominent figures

2.) Some dumb goy (Leon Czolgosz) gets brainwashed by their nonsense. After listening to a speech by Goldman, he decides to assassinate the President.

3.) The Jewish involvement in the anarchist movement is downplayed: Theodore Roosevelt, McKinley’s predecessor, takes a general stand against anarchy; however, because he never condemns the Judeo origins of the movement, the Jewish revolutionary spirit just morphs into a new arena: i.e. socialism and communism.

4.) (((History)) applauds Emma Goldman as a hero. i.e. if you review her Wikipedia page, they champion her as a forerunner to the women’s rights movement.

The event, which occurred in 1901, was an omen for the 20th century. Jewish anarchy, cloaked in the veil of social reform, leads to the murder of an innocent person. We can even see correlations between this event and the current political mayhem: i.e. the Antifa group, being funded by Jews like George Soros.

This Jewish fragility that we see in people like Sarah Silverman is masking a deeper fear—the reality of her guilt. Perhaps we should thank the internet since, without its power, we would not be able to link these pieces together.
 

bucky

Pelican
Amy Schumer's figure as a new standard of female beauty? It sure beats what we have today.
Well yeah, obviously AS > TH any day, but I don't think the powers that be ever thought they could really get normal straight men to be into morbidly obese women. With TH I think it was more an attempt to humiliate weak men into agreeing to something they know isn't true, that is, that morbid obesity is anything but horrifying (hence the "morbid" right there in the term itself). That, and the general tendency of evil to promote that which is inherently ugly and obscene as beautiful and good.

On the other hand, it's common to see normal guys with women whose looks are comparable to AS, although given the opportunity pretty much all of them would prefer a more attractive and feminine woman. With AS I think the push was to get men to internalize that's it's unreasonable to expect more from your woman. Thankfully, it failed.
 
Last edited:

kel

Pelican
Call them the 'media', 'corporations', 'socialists' or what have you, but attacking them directly isn't a good idea.
"Globalists" is the safest, I've found. It has a bit of an Alex Jones ring to it, but still, it's relatively safe and it's accurate - all demographics who are into this have that in common, they want to run the world by committee and turn all humanity into faceless consoomers.
 

bucky

Pelican
"Globalists" is the safest, I've found. It has a bit of an Alex Jones ring to it, but still, it's relatively safe and it's accurate - all demographics who are into this have that in common, they want to run the world by committee and turn all humanity into faceless consoomers.
To be fair, Gates and Bezos are not of the tribe but are very much globalists in the sense you're using it here.
 
Top