Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
New Study Demonstrates That There Is No Such Thing As Objective Reality
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Valentine" data-source="post: 1248132" data-attributes="member: 4870"><p>Thanks for the kind words Risgby, I'm just a layman in this subject though since I lack the math background to comprehend the deeper intracies of these theories. </p><p></p><p>Your understanding of perceived retrocausality matches mine - it's simply our consciousness collapsing these superpositions to a single subjective reality, so there's no time paradox. This video offers a simple overview of how the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment makes sense:</p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]8ORLN_KwAgs[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>Samseau, I'm not widely read on Kant but it's interesting to hear that he also had the same ideas. It seems we end up verifying a lot of old wisdom later with modern science. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ah I thought it was clear in the idea of the superposition existing at all times without observation. Whether you discover the collapsed reality via direct measurement or indirectly being told by another it's the same thing, the superposition has been collapsed. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is effectively the same as the quantum eraser experiment (see detectors A+B in the video) in that there is this perception of retrocausality, so the experimenter outside the room wouldn't have perceived the superposition at all.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>On a macro level superpositions are also maintained for up to <a href="https://medium.com/the-physics-arxiv-blog/physicists-smash-record-for-wave-particle-duality-462c39db8e7b" target="_blank">810 atom molecules</a>, which are 1000s of times heavier than similar atomic-scale particles to photons such as electrons. To put this in perspective, the width of a human hair is about 100,000 atoms. </p><p></p><p>Yeah, when we look at larger objects the fact that we can't replicate superpositions with them demonstrates that their chemical bonds shift their state to a fixed reality that wouldn't be likely to be modified by your own subjective reality.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Valentine, post: 1248132, member: 4870"] Thanks for the kind words Risgby, I'm just a layman in this subject though since I lack the math background to comprehend the deeper intracies of these theories. Your understanding of perceived retrocausality matches mine - it's simply our consciousness collapsing these superpositions to a single subjective reality, so there's no time paradox. This video offers a simple overview of how the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment makes sense: [MEDIA=youtube]8ORLN_KwAgs[/MEDIA] Samseau, I'm not widely read on Kant but it's interesting to hear that he also had the same ideas. It seems we end up verifying a lot of old wisdom later with modern science. Ah I thought it was clear in the idea of the superposition existing at all times without observation. Whether you discover the collapsed reality via direct measurement or indirectly being told by another it's the same thing, the superposition has been collapsed. This is effectively the same as the quantum eraser experiment (see detectors A+B in the video) in that there is this perception of retrocausality, so the experimenter outside the room wouldn't have perceived the superposition at all. On a macro level superpositions are also maintained for up to [url=https://medium.com/the-physics-arxiv-blog/physicists-smash-record-for-wave-particle-duality-462c39db8e7b]810 atom molecules[/url], which are 1000s of times heavier than similar atomic-scale particles to photons such as electrons. To put this in perspective, the width of a human hair is about 100,000 atoms. Yeah, when we look at larger objects the fact that we can't replicate superpositions with them demonstrates that their chemical bonds shift their state to a fixed reality that wouldn't be likely to be modified by your own subjective reality. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
New Study Demonstrates That There Is No Such Thing As Objective Reality
Top
