Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Samseau" data-source="post: 1248138" data-attributes="member: 550">I don't think time travel would look like that.One of the major discussions of Kant is on the nature of time. What is time? Everyone knows what time is until you ask what time is.And the answer Kant arrived at: Time does not exist outside of our minds, and yet, time is a fundamental component of our cognition that intuits the sense-data collected by our perception.Therefore, time is subjectively objective, a process rooted in the subject's mind to create objective reality (most likely for the purpose of humans to communicate - without time order nothing is possible). So, time travel in the noumena is most likely something no one even conceives, not like some silly movie, but more like being able to reverse entropy at will. It would not be like undoing &quot;events&quot; and going back into the &quot;past,&quot; because stuff like events and the past aren't real and only exist in our minds as concepts of cognition necessary to generate experience.I think real time travel would be the ability to recreate a person, or animal, that once existed in the &quot;past,&quot; immediately in the &quot;present.&quot; In other words, reverse entropy.In theory, it could be possible to rearrange matter such that an entire civilization is immediately recreated, a whole Roman empire born instantly for our evaluation. That's what perfect knowledge would look like to us from the perspective of our minds - I think...We are discussing the absolute limits of human epistemology and metaphysics right now - your guess is as good as mine <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/lol.gif"&nbsp; class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":laugh:" title="Old Laugh&nbsp; &nbsp; :laugh:" data-shortname=":laugh:" />But I think Kant is by far and away the most correct on these issues. Time is indeed a function of our imagination the mind uses to process sense-data into an ordered understanding.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Samseau, post: 1248138, member: 550"] I don't think time travel would look like that. One of the major discussions of Kant is on the nature of time. What is time? Everyone knows what time is until you ask what time is. And the answer Kant arrived at: Time does not exist outside of our minds, and yet, time is a fundamental component of our cognition that intuits the sense-data collected by our perception. Therefore, time is subjectively objective, a process rooted in the subject's mind to create objective reality (most likely for the purpose of humans to communicate - without time order nothing is possible). So, time travel in the noumena is most likely something no one even conceives, not like some silly movie, but more like being able to reverse entropy at will. It would not be like undoing "events" and going back into the "past," because stuff like events and the past aren't real and only exist in our minds as concepts of cognition necessary to generate experience. I think real time travel would be the ability to recreate a person, or animal, that once existed in the "past," immediately in the "present." In other words, reverse entropy. In theory, it could be possible to rearrange matter such that an entire civilization is immediately recreated, a whole Roman empire born instantly for our evaluation. That's what perfect knowledge would look like to us from the perspective of our minds - I think... We are discussing the absolute limits of human epistemology and metaphysics right now - your guess is as good as mine :laugh: But I think Kant is by far and away the most correct on these issues. Time is indeed a function of our imagination the mind uses to process sense-data into an ordered understanding. [/QUOTE]

Verification