Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
New Study Demonstrates That There Is No Such Thing As Objective Reality
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kaligula" data-source="post: 1248145" data-attributes="member: 9585"><p>Anomalies are sure signs that our theory is not correct.</p><p></p><p>I think that maybe too much enchanted by so called '<em>beauty</em>' of mathematics we missed some important part of physics, probably in the direction of electromagnetic theory, which is not so elegant in terms of mathematic description. Mathematics can be treacherous, too - sometimes mathematical truths are located on the level of sets, being the outcome of many operations, as in probability theory. So in the way a 'truth' can depend on its own reality, how large this reality is. <strong>And how large is the reality of Earth?</strong> The point being that we developed our physics believing it is universal, but we forgot that we developed it on a very unique planet - Earth (unique as unique life is). Maybe the Earth physics is just a special case of an Universe physics (probably something based on plasma and electromagnetism much more than on gravity), in the way Newtonian descirption is a special case of relativity theory.</p><p></p><p>Whatever, I do not believe in time reversal, maybe some kind of oscillation, but not time reversal. I do not take seriously 'time reversal' claims when talking about minute particles with few possible states as those changes can be very well seen as forms of oscillation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kaligula, post: 1248145, member: 9585"] Anomalies are sure signs that our theory is not correct. I think that maybe too much enchanted by so called '[i]beauty[/i]' of mathematics we missed some important part of physics, probably in the direction of electromagnetic theory, which is not so elegant in terms of mathematic description. Mathematics can be treacherous, too - sometimes mathematical truths are located on the level of sets, being the outcome of many operations, as in probability theory. So in the way a 'truth' can depend on its own reality, how large this reality is. [b]And how large is the reality of Earth?[/b] The point being that we developed our physics believing it is universal, but we forgot that we developed it on a very unique planet - Earth (unique as unique life is). Maybe the Earth physics is just a special case of an Universe physics (probably something based on plasma and electromagnetism much more than on gravity), in the way Newtonian descirption is a special case of relativity theory. Whatever, I do not believe in time reversal, maybe some kind of oscillation, but not time reversal. I do not take seriously 'time reversal' claims when talking about minute particles with few possible states as those changes can be very well seen as forms of oscillation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
New Study Demonstrates That There Is No Such Thing As Objective Reality
Top