But Gio, none of this solves the primary issue. Now we've concluded that girls aren't attracted to fucked up guys per se, but that instead they just ignore obvious "fucked up" signals over game, fame or wealth. Which is worse? One variant is evil, the other is stupid and reckless, and both mean awful consequences for normal guys left out in the cold.
That said, by "fucked up" I mean propensity to violence, aggressiveness, instability, absence/lack of empathy. Some of those things are good game by themselves - qualifying the guy as a "strong dominant guy who knows what he wants", while others are obviously not. Seeing this overlap, perhaps it would be better to use the terms "bad person" and "good person".
I.e., with a few exceptions, girls are not attracted to bad people because they are bad, but most of them are willing to ignore the bad for the sake of getting their Alpha fix. But as I already mentioned, that just makes the average girl stupid and reckless instead of plain evil.
For example, I've recently personally met a just plain psycho, violent guy who has had 6 notches by the age of 18. He has a mental illness of some kind and was charged with several crimes in his life, including assault, stalking, robbery and cruelty to animals. We're talking "the guy who filmed himself taking a pet kitten out of a cage and slitting its throat with a knife" caliber here. Yet this guy is at a whole lot above the average for his age as far as sexual partners go. Every single girl would describe him as despicable, but they sure did fuck him, and multiple times at that. The point is, I just don't see how him being fucked up has made him unappealing to girls, even by a bit. Am I supposed to be comforted with the fact that he can't keep months for longer than 6 months? Many good-hearted Betas can't either.