Nick Fuentes

TooFineAPoint

Pelican
Protestant
I agree and I am disappointed by how many people here don't understand that meme magic is real, and also that Nick is clearly maneuvering under God's guidance. Nick's fandom Ye started roughly around the same time as him becoming a serious Christian, then a serious commentator.

Here's my take on the situation: At this moment in time, we have a situation where the table is being shaken up and people might be able to play a new game. This confuses people, because everybody has learned to play under the rules of the old game. Seeing Ye as a "serious politician" in the sense of the old game, would mean "plays by established rules, doesn't offend the veto players, doesn't mess with conventions too much". The error lies in first of all assuming that the old game really existed as a static entity, which it didn't.
The left/progressives/globohomo understand that you can constantly manipulate the rules if you go about it with enough chutzpah and conviction, which they did. They got comedians into office, they got politicians to do comedy shows, they just recently managed to have a certified retard with aphasia to win an election.
Well, we now have a hyperactive negro superstar promoting open debate about faith, morals and the JQ carry those topics into the realm of media that is normally frequented by completely apolitical people, that is, negroes and young people. He is accompanied by an eccentric loudmouth virgin politics nerd who has a very loyal following of comparably eccentric, yet smart and engaged young people. The US now has a demented and corrupt president who can't help but make inadequate remarks at every turn, before that another hyperactive celebrity who responded to allegations of a sex affair by calling the woman in question "horseface" on twitter.

Long story short, going on about what is and isn't a good move is just an anxious waste of time, since clearly politics is less about convincing people of any measure of objective competence and more about inspiring loyalty, which both Nick and Ye have been very good at in different ways, through many ups and downs.

Do you objectively disagree with them? Then criticize them on that ground. But the never-ending "that's a bad move, now he'll look crazy" is a tired canard that needs to be put to bed. It has no use, since we are already getting shaken up in the inner whirls of the Kali Yuga, metaphorically speaking. From now on, whatever you think "makes sense" strategically will have to take a backseat to the one and only question "whom am I loyal to".
On optics: Optics in the Fuentes sense was about people not getting the wrong idea, not about giving in to people screeching about whether you can say something or not. Nick has never cared about that, that is not what optics means. Ye cannot really be called a Nazi in common perception, so he's got leeway. Also, he's got A LOT of negroes to speak about what's happening, and they ARE a monolithic vote.
Ye saying "I love Hitler" does not make people go "oof, neonazi" it makes them look up the video and find out what he said. He's a big enough fish do accomplish that.

Quoted so I can see it again.

EXCELLENT post, my friend.
 

God's lonely asperger

Woodpecker
Protestant

Blade Runner

Hummingbird
Orthodox
Exactly. People are talking about being unoptical when the president of the country is a doddering octogenarian. Trannies are the most unoptical, unsightly thing I can think of and yet...



We are living in clown world. Time to start worrying about appearances.

When I saw the thumbnail or title picture (I didn't watch the video) of that clown, I had to share what I thought a long time ago: one of the greatest gifts we ever got was that this man didn't have a son.
 

Viktor Zeegelaar

Crow
Orthodox Inquirer
Just checked Norman's early life section.
Every single time.
A wise member on this forum once told me that there'd come a time where one wouldn't have to check the early life section anymore, for one would know it intuitively. You'll get there friend, you'll get there.

Also, am I the only one who noticed the Baphomet horns in the logo? They're showing who they serve lads, every single time.

1670520107033.png
1670522437767.png
1670522475690.png
 
Last edited:

God's lonely asperger

Woodpecker
Protestant
A wise member on this forum once told me that there'd come a time where one wouldn't have to check the early life section anymore, for one would know it intuitively. You'll get there friend, you'll get there.

Also, am I the only one who noticed the Baphomet horns in the logo? They're showing who they serve lads, every single time.

View attachment 51928
View attachment 51934
View attachment 51935
"to challenge the Christian right agenda of the Moral Majority." Gave it away all away.
 

Viktor Zeegelaar

Crow
Orthodox Inquirer
"to challenge the Christian right agenda of the Moral Majority." Gave it away all away.
Yeah if it's anti Christian, anti-men, anti-women, anti-children, anti common sense, anti any morality, than usually there's either a 1. Stein/Berg, 2. Suspicious German name, 3. Suspicious Eastern European name (Polish/Russian usually), or 4. An English name which can be reverted back towards its original roots (like Green = Grün, they quite often went undercover also to become incognito among the masses they infiltrated, so if option 1 to 3 check out, don't call it out already but check for this fourth strike).
 

jordypip23

Pelican
Gold Member
Just checked Norman's early life section.
Every single time.
I shouldn't be commenting on another man's appearance, but this guy (Norman Lear) manages to be wrinkly, ugly & extremely smug at the same time. What is he all dressed up for? The Synagogue of Satan?

220px-Norman_Lear_2017.jpg
 

Max Roscoe

Hummingbird
Orthodox Inquirer
Apparently this latest bank he got banned from was a small local credit union...

This should be illegal.
Absolutely disgusting.
I am a big advocate of credit unions for many reasons. One is that credit unions are collective organizations, owned by the members (account holders). So Nick, an owner of the credit union, was banned from doing business with his own credit union.

I worked in a CU, and the only time we would ever close someone's account is if they defaulted on a loan and owed us money. Otherwise, it would be unfathomable to cut off someone's access to banking. I'm not even sure our rules would allow arbitrarily closing someone's account. Banking is an essential service, and has special rules governing it (banks are never closed for more than 1 working day, for example, because it is understood that money is essential to modern life).

Can you imagine not having access to money, beyond the cash in your pocket? When they closed his account, they mailed him a check for the balance. Until he finds a new bank to accept that check and open an account, he cannot pay any bills, even rent or a mortgage, unless he has enough cash to do so. And this happened 5 times? I'm not sure I would have a 6th option if I were in his shoes. This is horrible behavior.

A credit union which is member owned is not going to be controlled by Jews. Also, a small locally owned credit union is going to be off the radar of "ban lists" and things like that. There was likely an organized local opposition to Nick which was put in place a while ago, planned to shut him out of all local commerce. You can't just pick up the phone and call a credit union and tell them to cancel someone, unless you have laid the ground work already for "Nick Fuentes is evil and a nazi."

His best bet is probably opening a credit union account in a different town, if he's able to do so. But often the rules won't allow that.
 

Viktor Zeegelaar

Crow
Orthodox Inquirer
This is the guy behind modern television. He is a massive % for why many people these days think the way they do. An enemy of humanity.
Someone said the other day here ''if you have a TV in your home, you have a Jew talking to you 24/7''. Man what I'm starting to realize vehemently is that everything in life can be quantified: there is a general rule that applies 9/10 times, regarding everything. 9/10 times X is true, 9/10 times Y is true. What the regime (Jews/Freemasons) have done is convinced you that the 1/10 is true, and that you should act on that. So when you see a snake 9/10 times he'll try to kill you, yet 1/10 times he may say hi. The regime wants you to greet the snake enthusiastically and ignore the 9/10 times. If you see a guy with a gun in the street, 9/10 times the guy is trying to put you in danger, yet the regime wants you to walk towards him friendly and with open arms, as there's a 1/10 chance that he's a police man wanting to show his glock and drink a coffee with you. Be aware of this and you'll be able to navigate yourself way better in this jungle that they've created the modern world to be.
 

Max Roscoe

Hummingbird
Orthodox Inquirer
Someone said the other day here ''if you have a TV in your home, you have a Jew talking to you 24/7''. Man what I'm starting to realize vehemently is that everything in life can be quantified: there is a general rule that applies 9/10 times, regarding everything. 9/10 times X is true, 9/10 times Y is true. What the regime (Jews/Freemasons) have done is convinced you that the 1/10 is true, and that you should act on that. So when you see a snake 9/10 times he'll try to kill you, yet 1/10 times he may say hi. The regime wants you to greet the snake enthusiastically and ignore the 9/10 times. If you see a guy with a gun in the street, 9/10 times the guy is trying to put you in danger, yet the regime wants you to walk towards him friendly and with open arms, as there's a 1/10 chance that he's a police man wanting to show his glock and drink a coffee with you. Be aware of this and you'll be able to navigate yourself way better in this jungle that they've created the modern world to be.
Yeah, having a television in your home is like having a Rabbi in your living room.

I'm a fan of JF Gariepy and he was explaining this phenomenon the other day in regards to Tim Pool and the Kanye interview. It's the annoying and low IQ way Tim Pool views the world--everything is just individuals, why is it any different whether an immigrant slices off someone's head, or a white guy kills someone. Why is more attention given to the former? They are both just crimes. Nothing to see here. Move along. Killing is killing and they didn't report on the white killing so why report on the immigrant one. Why does it matter if Jew censored you? Censorship is wrong.

The way JF explains it is comparing race and a coin flip. I can flip a coin and have it land on heads 3 times in a row, or I can show you a successful and prosperous Thomas Sowell. But to pretend like those are probable events is misleading. The coin will land on heads only 50% of every single toss. And a black man is more likely to be a criminal than a successful author. Showing a rare event and pretending it is the norm is misleading.


It's the annoying way Tim Pool views the world. It's strongly related to what Morgoth refers to as "The Hatchling." He summarizes it here in this 7 min clip, but basically the hatchling is like a newly hatched chick who just arrived yesterday and doesn't know any of our social mores or ethics or norms, but just sees an event on its own, without relationship to anything else.



The communist and sexual pervert Vaush plays the Hatchling in his debate with E Michael Jones where he pretends not to know anything which is just common sense "How is watching pornography worse than playing a video game" or "who is getting censored on the internet"? You can find someone with an extreme view who has a youtube channel, like some child tranny and say "look, this is an extreme view, and it is not banned." That is the technique used by midwit online debaters like Vaush and Destiny. So to him porn is just a way of obtaining pleasure, like eating a delicious meal or getting a massage or lying on the beach. Pleasure is pleasure, and it's never viewed within the greater context of marriage, or human relations, or morality, or anything. It's merely "a good feeling, end of story."
 

GigaBITE

Woodpecker
Oriental Orthodox
I shouldn't be commenting on another man's appearance, but this guy (Norman Lear) manages to be wrinkly, ugly & extremely smug at the same time. What is he all dressed up for? The Synagogue of Satan?

220px-Norman_Lear_2017.jpg
That's for the Kennedy Center Honors, it's kind of like a lifetime achievement award for contributions to American culture. It's a stupid prize given out by the (((Hollywood types))) but somehow since its inception in the 70s, they've gotten the American president to hand it out. Trump refused to do so since the whole thing is ridiculous and every year the honorees are mostly comprised of people who hate Trump and Christians.

As for the rainbow ribbon, this is from Wiki: The wide rainbow-colored ribbon then hung around the necks of the recipients and prominently noticeable when the events are televised, symbolizes "a spectrum of many skills within the performing arts" according to creator Ivan Chermayeff.[14]

Right...
 
Top