Nick Fuentes

It_is_my_time

Crow
Protestant
Well said. It is surprising to see the denial of historical evidence made by some in defense of Nazism while accusing those of us who have actually read source material from a triangulation of sources, including our own relatives, of being biased. It seems that hating resisting Jews is enough to cover a multitude of sins for some.

For those interested in historical data, like, you know, actual policies in Nazi Germany: http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=1521

This law gave the Reich the power to sterilize anyone, including minors, for having “defects,” including mental defects (can’t imagine that power being abused!). The Nazis were a secular regime who took anti-Christian evolutionary “science” to its logical conclusion. Hitler went on to authorize euthanasia for these people, including children (https://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=1528).

Do not mistake me: The U.S. and others had racial hygiene advocates as well. And it fell out of vogue due to wartime propaganda against the Nazis. But make no mistake of Nazi eugenics either. It was an appalling secularist regime.

This squares with key Nazi views of Christianity, such as Himmler saying “We must settle accounts with this Christianity, this greatest of plagues that could have happened to us in our history, which has weakened us in every conflict” because Christians placed too much stock in the value of mankind (https://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=1573). People can claim that Himmler and Hitler were not on the same page here, but the Reich’s replacement of the traditional churches and ministers with pro-regime stooges tells a different story.

Questioning the (((narrative))) does not mean one has to defend Nazism. If anything, one could argue the latter does a disservice to the former.
No one is defending Nazism, we are just getting the truth out there. The lies about WW2 are the new religion of the west and its satanic leaders. And those who continue to lie in favor of this propaganda are either in on it or really dumb.

If we keep believing the lies about WW2, then you can never close the border (because Nazi's did that) or you can never fight against Pedophiles (because Nazi's did that) or you can never live a decent standard of living again (because Nazi's did that). Just like Nick pointed out, if we continue to accept the lies about WW2 our enemies can continue to destroy us and win because if we push back they just say "the Nazi's did that" and we surrender without a fight.
 

Northumber

Sparrow
Protestant

Who are these people? 95-105 IQ people who will say "I'm not the smartest person..." and then think they have things all figured out because Tucker Carlson or their dad told them something 40 years ago. These people still exist? What?

They are people who are completely comfortable with their frame of reference and want everything to stay as comfortable as possible.
 

Northumber

Sparrow
Protestant
^ I think most in Con inc. still legitimately believe they can keep this whole thing going for their kids. They still buy into keeping up that progress!

Part of that progress means getting that "me time". So they farm out care as much as possible, drug them, and keep them entertained with an iphone and other screens.

I'm assuming they must care about their kids in some capacity. It's just getting warped beyond recognition.
 

DanielH

Hummingbird
Moderator
Orthodox
^ I think most in Con inc. still legitimately believe they can keep this whole thing going for their kids. They still buy into keeping up that progress!

Part of that progress means getting that "me time". So they farm out care as much as possible, drug them, and keep them entertained with an iphone and other screens.

I'm assuming they must care about their kids in some capacity. It's just getting warped beyond recognition.
This got me curious and I did a search for the number of kids US senators have.

Here's a party line breakdown:

1671032142815.png

Interesting. Republicans have far more children, even in Congress. A bit more likely then that Republicans would be motivated by nepotism or stupidity then than pure unadulterated evil when compared to Democrats.
 

It_is_my_time

Crow
Protestant
^ I think most in Con inc. still legitimately believe they can keep this whole thing going for their kids. They still buy into keeping up that progress!

Part of that progress means getting that "me time". So they farm out care as much as possible, drug them, and keep them entertained with an iphone and other screens.

I'm assuming they must care about their kids in some capacity. It's just getting warped beyond recognition.
Yea, the Con Inc. and Lolbertarians who still exist are probably almost all..

Boomers, Gen X, and older Gen Y. They all work comfortable middle class jobs. They are not excited about their life, but they know it is a better life than their parents lived. And they don't want to face the reality that is coming. Just pick yourself up by your bootstraps or "work smarter and not harder" is the mantra they live by, without putting any thought into how empty these slogans are.

They don't have time to think it through, between work, their kids, their house maintenance, their friends and family, they have no time to really think or even learn about how bad things are. They see drag time story hour at their school and it is "those darn socialist democrats". They see higher crime and they just move another exit down the freeway and say "darn socialist democrats".

They are pretty much the opposite side of the same coin as the suburban liberal soccer mom's. They don't know any better, they don't have any time to know any better, and when presented with the information they put up a wall of ignorance. That caller who tried to lecture Nick during Alex's interview yesterday was a prime example of that. A man who thinks he is great, but in reality is just a slave and has a lot of strength to gain just to understand what Nick is saying and will never be a great enough man to criticize the points Nick made.

Being my age, had I made the mistake and gotten married and had kids, when I wasn't ready for it, I too would be the exact same person I suspect.
 

RedLagoon

Kingfisher
Orthodox Inquirer
No one is defending Nazism, we are just getting the truth out there. The lies about WW2 are the new religion of the west and its satanic leaders. And those who continue to lie in favor of this propaganda are either in on it or really dumb.

If we keep believing the lies about WW2, then you can never close the border (because Nazi's did that) or you can never fight against Pedophiles (because Nazi's did that) or you can never live a decent standard of living again (because Nazi's did that). Just like Nick pointed out, if we continue to accept the lies about WW2 our enemies can continue to destroy us and win because if we push back they just say "the Nazi's did that" and we surrender without a fight.

The you know who's actually framed the term "Nazi" as an insult and to try and defuse the subject of National Socialism in it's entirety. It worked a treat as even the ones seeing the truth are using the phrase. So let's stop using it.
 

berserker2001

Robin
Protestant
Boomers, Gen X, and older Gen Y. They all work comfortable middle class jobs. They are not excited about their life, but they know it is a better life than their parents lived.

For the record, I have never heard a Millenial say that they have a better life than their parents lived. Most would say the nation crested in many regards in the 60's and began slowly crashing back to sea as the Boomers came of age. By the time Millenials are born, obviously the morality and educational system of the country were compromised and in steep decline, but also the financial and career prospects of young people as well.


The big difference between Millenials and Gen Z though, is Millenials didn't realize the future was grim until we got into our 20's. We had a decade of blissful ignorance. The Obama presidency really killed all enthusiasm there was left for a return to children having a brighter future than our parents. So at least Millenials had the 90's and early 2000's for great years to look back on, when there was at least some hope. To my eyes, as a Millenial, I'd say the defining characteristic of Nick Fuente's generation, is they never had a collective period of hopeful years. They started coming of age during the 2008 recession, then came Obama's years of racial divisions, and now we are in the post-modern decay we find ourselves in today, capped off with Covid which further robbed them of childhood. Hence, they are a pretty bitter generation, and they don't want any advice from any elders (be it Millenials, Gen-X, or Boomers). And for the Christian American conservative side, this is all pretty well summed up with Fuentes and the Groypers. They sincerely do not care whatsoever about what any grown adults think of them or wants to explain to them.
 

It_is_my_time

Crow
Protestant
For the record, I have never heard a Millenial say that they have a better life than their parents lived. Most would say the nation crested in many regards in the 60's and began slowly crashing back to sea as the Boomers came of age. By the time Millenials are born, obviously the morality and educational system of the country were compromised and in steep decline, but also the financial and career prospects of young people as well.


The big difference between Millenials and Gen Z though, is Millenials didn't realize the future was grim until we got into our 20's. We had a decade of blissful ignorance. The Obama presidency really killed all enthusiasm there was left for a return to children having a brighter future than our parents. So at least Millenials had the 90's and early 2000's for great years to look back on, when there was at least some hope. To my eyes, as a Millenial, I'd say the defining characteristic of Nick Fuente's generation, is they never had a collective period of hopeful years. They started coming of age during the 2008 recession, then came Obama's years of racial divisions, and now we are in the post-modern decay we find ourselves in today, capped off with Covid which further robbed them of childhood. Hence, they are a pretty bitter generation, and they don't want any advice from any elders (be it Millenials, Gen-X, or Boomers). And for the Christian American conservative side, this is all pretty well summed up with Fuentes and the Groypers. They sincerely do not care whatsoever about what any grown adults think of them or wants to explain to them.
I completely agree, but there are some Gen Y people who fall into this category...

Graduated college after 2009/2010. So, they have never been both working adults AND lived through a real economic downturn. This is why they are out there buying houses that are 3 times their annual combined income. The whole "my house is my biggest investment" investment mistake couples. They don't know the realities of layoffs and longtime sitting on the bench not getting paid.

Their parents were not unsuccessful, but not as successful as the Gen Y kids. So, the kids are still doing better than their parents, at least financially.

Work some fluff job, like sales or marketing, a job where "knowing people" is all that matters.

And these people simply do not want to rock the boat. They mistakenly believe if the GOP just behaves then everything will be fine, because so far everything has been fine for them. And if you are struggling, well you need to "work smarter and not harder" and "pull yourself up by your bootstraps".

And they simply don't know and don't want to know, what a giant storm is headed their way. Once that storm gets there, then they will be easier to red pill.
 

Easy_C

Peacock
Gun restrictions were loosened for Germans after the Nazi's replaced the failed Weimar state, but they were tightened on Jews and Communist party members, due to their attempt to overthrow the govt. in a communist revolution in 1919 that left thousands of Germans dead.

The family in question were Austrians and neither Jews nor Communists.
 

It_is_my_time

Crow
Protestant
The family in question were Austrians and neither Jews nor Communists.
Then it doesn't fit with the historical references I have seen. Maybe this was during the war time, when everything went sideways and they were accused of being spies and/or communists.

What I do know is that while my family struggled greatly in the USA in the 1930's, despite having nearly unlimited resources, that the Germans were living sky high by simply kicking out the satanic globalist bankers and instituting an economy that was focused on family creation and women having as many children as possible to write off debt.

They were putting Olympics on TV, while our men were waiting in long lines for bread and soup. They were building rockets, we were trying to pretend that the satanic elite didn't exist and gave no solutions for it. They were burning books on pedophilia and we were slowly starting to embrace it.
 

Easy_C

Peacock
Then it doesn't fit with the historical references I have seen. Maybe this was during the war time, when everything went sideways and they were accused of being spies and/or communists.

What I do know is that while my family struggled greatly in the USA in the 1930's, despite having nearly unlimited resources, that the Germans were living sky high by simply kicking out the satanic globalist bankers and instituting an economy that was focused on family creation and women having as many children as possible to write off debt.

They were putting Olympics on TV, while our men were waiting in long lines for bread and soup. They were building rockets, we were trying to pretend that the satanic elite didn't exist and gave no solutions for it. They were burning books on pedophilia and we were slowly starting to embrace it.


No. One member of the family was even a Nazi counterintelligence agent.

That said, the rest of what I was told paints a vastly more positive picture of life under the Nazis than do any Western media.
 

Newtown

 
Banned
Other Christian
Nick Fuentes is very naive if he thinks he can flagrantly insult the southern American people while establishing himself as a representative of conservatism.

He's not ready for the position he's attempting to place himself in.

 

EuropeanCanon

Woodpecker
Trad Catholic
Dunno if anybody has talked about this yet, but I found it weird that when Fuentes starting hanging around Kanye he ditched his suits and general dapper appearance and started wearing a hoodie and looking like a homeless person. What is that about?
 

mountainaire

Woodpecker
Orthodox Inquirer
Nick Fuentes is very naive if he thinks he can flagrantly insult the southern American people while establishing himself as a representative of conservatism.

He's not ready for the position he's attempting to place himself in.


I've seen this exact same post before, word for word. With this video. Brand new member and this is his first post.

Do these people really think they're influencing anyone with these low effort, low quality concern trolling campaigns?
 

Tom Slick

Kingfisher
Orthodox
Dunno if anybody has talked about this yet, but I found it weird that when Fuentes starting hanging around Kanye he ditched his suits and general dapper appearance and started wearing a hoodie and looking like a homeless person. What is that about?
I think it's about fitting in with Kanye and his primary audience. Nick seems pretty good at riding shotgun with Kanye and letting the even bigger ego and wallet do most of the talking even though it would be more effective if Kanye gave Nick more than 10 seconds to explain things that he can not.
 

Tom Slick

Kingfisher
Orthodox
Here's a 13 minute clip of a Twitter space from a few days ago involving Nick Fuentes and Gabe Hoffman, the man who produced the documentary "An Open Secret" about pedophilia in Hollywood. I have always thought this docu was a major attack on Pedowood/Hollywitz, so I was surprised to hear about this conflict, which is based on a conversation Gabe apparently had with Milo, and this is ironic because Gabe mortally wounded the career of X-Men director Brian Singer and at least one other Hollyweird pedo who had already been convicted, while Milo is on record as someone who witnessed Hollywood pedophilia, but refuses to name names, not to mention his comments that teenage boys being seduced by older men can be an overall good thing for the boys.

Somehow though Nick claims Milo reported a conversation to him that reverses the roles of who is for or against pedophilia. Considering what Gabe did in his production of An Open Secret, I don't think it's fair for Nick to attack him for being a Jew. Nick says something like yeah, your film was good, but the real problem is that you're Jewish and you don't worship Jesus. What is the point of saying something like this? I don't get it.

It's like Nick was using his own alleged "anti-semitism" to bait Gabe, but why? That's what I do not understand from this exchange, so I'm just going with any interaction with Milo should be avoided because it will probably distort the truth.

Nick's initial summary of the conversation Gabe had with Milo was very misleading. When Nick got around to reading the screen shots, the actual quotes from Gabe were totally different and carefully worded without any accusation, however Nick kept hitting Gabe with the liar accusation (unproven in this convo, IMO) until Gabe unwisely hit back with personal attacks, which seemed to have been Nick's strategy in this pointless contest about whether or not Latino Zoomer was or was not a "key lieutenant" of Nick's among the Groypers.



Around the 10:20 mark in this video, there is some brief talk about a headline saying Latino Zoomer was a "key lieutenant", if that really matters.



There are some circular references to this "headline" that Gabe is referring to. This all happened back in July and August. Why is Milo stirring this up now?




 
Last edited:

raveking

Sparrow
I saw the argument with Nick and Gabe Hoffman and chalk up to Nick having just distrust and cautiousness against the Jew. I mean can you really blame him after everything he's been through just talking about the JQ? This guy could've had a promising career where he coulde've been a neocon shill for the establishment and got offered a job from Daily Wire straight out of graduation (lookup Kassy Dillon connection with Nick).

Also the SPLC released an article this morning literally doxxing Nick's parents' full names, area and neighborhood his parent's houses in the Chicago suburbs, and property belonging to his dead grandmother.


1671510911646.png
1671510949616.png1671510977500.png

1671511015718.png

Between this and Ben Shapiro insinuating that Ye will be assassinated from "suicide by mental illness" if he keeps up on this trajectory, the cognitive dissonance of the Jew never ceases to amaze and they wonder why there's so much disdain towards them, as someone once said "The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you"

1671511391910.png
 

Tom Slick

Kingfisher
Orthodox
I didn't know about the latest attacks from the SPLC. I'm glad that Nick has some money in the bank so he can deal with these additional doxes. Imagine someone going after your family like that, painting targets on them. When that happened to Roosh, he held a press conference in order to let the "journalists" know they would be responsible for any harm that came to his family. He said he was so stressed out his sense of taste had stopped working. I pray Nick and his family will not be harmed.
 

TooFineAPoint

Pelican
Protestant
Here's a 13 minute clip of a Twitter space from a few days ago involving Nick Fuentes and Gabe Hoffman, the man who produced the documentary "An Open Secret" about pedophilia in Hollywood. I have always thought this docu was a major attack on Pedowood/Hollywitz, so I was surprised to hear about this conflict, which is based on a conversation Gabe apparently had with Milo, and this is ironic because Gabe mortally wounded the career of X-Men director Brian Singer and at least one other Hollyweird pedo who had already been convicted, while Milo is on record as someone who witnessed Hollywood pedophilia, but refuses to name names, not to mention his comments that teenage boys being seduced by older men can be an overall good thing for the boys.

Somehow though Nick claims Milo reported a conversation to him that reverses the roles of who is for or against pedophilia. Considering what Gabe did in his production of An Open Secret, I don't think it's fair for Nick to attack him for being a Jew. Nick says something like yeah, your film was good, but the real problem is that you're Jewish and you don't worship Jesus. What is the point of saying something like this? I don't get it.

It's like Nick was using his own alleged "anti-semitism" to bait Gabe, but why? That's what I do not understand from this exchange, so I'm just going with any interaction with Milo should be avoided because it will probably distort the truth.

Nick's initial summary of the conversation Gabe had with Milo was very misleading. When Nick got around to reading the screen shots, the actual quotes from Gabe were totally different and carefully worded without any accusation, however Nick kept hitting Gabe with the liar accusation (unproven in this convo, IMO) until Gabe unwisely hit back with personal attacks, which seemed to have been Nick's strategy in this pointless contest about whether or not Latino Zoomer was or was not a "key lieutenant" of Nick's among the Groypers.



Around the 10:20 mark in this video, there is some brief talk about a headline saying Latino Zoomer was a "key lieutenant", if that really matters.



There are some circular references to this "headline" that Gabe is referring to. This all happened back in July and August. Why is Milo stirring this up now?





I too listened to this live, and then re-listened again, later.

I came away with a completely different view of the exchange.

Gabe clearly wanted to infer that Nick has something to do with child abuse because this other dude Latino Zoomer was charged with something. So he invented a hilariously stretched reasoning to use a term "key lieutenant", which Nick correctly identified as "that's saying I am giving him marching orders and he is carrying them out."

The issue wasn't a throwaway line in a tweet, it was that Gabe very obviously wanted to make that connection to the CHILD ABUSE. Cos he is this crusader or something (which is another really funny claim he made, that he did more than anyone on earth to take on Hollywood pedos).

Then Nick allowed Gabe on the stream that Gabe was clearly following with bated breath, and then he even let Gabe say his whole piece without interruption.

The texts that he read from Milo had Milo calling out exactly what Gabe was doing, and Gabe replying that he gave his reasons and it was a minor disagreement. To Milo it was not minor, and he said so, repeatedly and clearly. One of the exchanges Milo essentially said, "to play loose with the facts just because you think he is an antisemite", and Gabe responded with "I KNOW he is."

So all Nick was saying (correctly) was that this guy will make nasty inferences and use wording to make it seem like he has hard evidence of some serious misconducts, and that is obviously motivated in large part by the fact that the guy is a Jew and sees Nick as his enemy.

This is the whole thrust of the Ye campaign and why Nick has been brought on, as far as I can tell. They are saying over and over that their primary goal is for a Christian country with Christian laws led by Christians. We don't care if you're Jewish. We don't care what you think about the Holocaust. If you wanna play, it will be by these rules. No one cares that you "vote Republican" or "are conservative".

And of course, what did Gabe immediately do? Say Nick is gay. Then run to Twitter to do a ton of posts about it. Like a jilted 13 year old girl.

The only thing Nick flubbed up on was remembering a part of the convo as being said explicitly by Gabe, rather than the fact that it was said by Milo and essentially glossed over by Gabe.

Soon the insane Jewish paranoia that is shared by the majority of power-hungry Jews on both the left and the right will finally be justified. They just can't help themselves.
 
Top